Development of a Controlled-Release Mosquito RNAi Yeast Larvicide Suitable for the Sustained Control of Large Water Storage Containers

Development of a Controlled-Release Mosquito RNAi Yeast Larvicide Suitable for the Sustained Control of Large Water Storage Containers | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article Development of a Controlled-Release Mosquito RNAi Yeast Larvicide Suitable for the Sustained Control of Large Water Storage Containers Keshava Mysore, James D. Oxley, Craig Duckham, Clarissa Castilla-Gutierrez, and 8 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566173/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted 12 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Large household water storage containers are among the most productive habitats for Aedes aegypti , the primary mosquito vector for dengue and other arboviral pathogens. Increasing concerns for insecticide resistance and larvicide safety are limiting the successful treatment of large household water storage containers, which are among the most productive habitats for Aedes juveniles. The recent development of species-specific RNAi-based yeast larvicides could help overcome these problems, particularly if shelf stable ready-to-use formulations with significant residual activity in water can be developed. Here we examine the hypothesis that development of a shelf-stable controlled-release RNAi yeast formulation can facilitate lasting control of A. aegypti juveniles in large water storage containers. In this study, a dried inactivated yeast was incorporated into a biodegradable matrix containing a mixture of polylactic acid, a preservative, and UV protectants. The formulation was prepared using food-grade level components to prevent toxicity to humans or other organisms. Both floating and sinking versions of the tablets were prepared for treatment of various sized water containers, including household water storage tank-sized containers. The tablets passed accelerated storage tests of shelf life stability and demonstrated up to six months residual activity in water. The yeast performed well in both small and large containers, including water barrels containing 20-1000 larvae each, and in outdoor barrel trials. Future studies will include the evaluation of the yeast larvicide in larger operational field trials that will further assess the potential for incorporating this new technology into integrated mosquito control programs worldwide. Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Genetic techniques Biological sciences/Genetics Health sciences/Diseases/Infectious diseases Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Introduction Aedes aegypti is the principal mosquito vector of viruses that cause dengue, Zika, yellow fever, and chikungunya. Dengue, the most widespread and significant arboviral disease in the world, is a threat to roughly four billion people worldwide and has an annual incidence of approximately 400 million cases resulting in ~ 40,000 deaths from severe dengue annually across the globe 1 . The Pan-American Health Organization warned that 2024 may be the worst year for dengue ever recorded, with > 3.5 million cases confirmed by Latin American governments in the first quarter of 2024 2 . Although a dengue vaccine is now available in some parts of the world 1 , the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommends that it be used only in children ages 9–16 living in dengue endemic countries who have had a confirmed case of dengue, and mosquito control is therefore vital for disease control. Yellow fever is endemic in 33 African countries and 11 South American countries, and several recent outbreaks have occurred despite the availability of a highly effective vaccine 1 . Furthermore, in 2015–2016, large outbreaks of Zika, which has been linked to severe birth defects and neurological disorders, occurred in many countries in the Americas, and chikungunya outbreaks have occurred in more than 100 countries in the Americas, Africa, Asia, and Europe 1 . No human vaccines for Zika or chikungunya are yet available, underscoring the importance of Aedes mosquito control. Unfortunately, the emergence of insecticide resistance, concerns for the negative impacts of pesticides on the environment, and a lack of support for mosquito control programs compromise mosquito management strategies and efforts to control arboviral illnesses 1 . Aedes mosquitoes lay eggs in water-holding containers, including a variety of both natural and artificial containers that collect rainwater or that are filled with water by humans. Larvae hatch from the eggs and remain in the water-filled containers through the end of the pupal stage. During this aquatic phase, the immature mosquitoes are concentrated within defined water boundaries and therefore susceptible to control efforts. Larviciding is the application of microbial or chemical agents to kill mosquito larvae, before they are reproducing adults that vector human disease pathogens, and is a key component of integrated Aedes control strategies 1 . Temephos attached to silica (sand) granules, the active ingredient in Abate®, had historically been used to treat water containers that are too large to empty 3 and which are the most productive Aedes larval habitats 4 . After decades of heavy temephos usage, temephos resistant A. aegypti strains were identified in many countries 5,6 . Moreover, in a recent re-registration eligibility decision, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) called for labeling changes to address risks that temephos poses to human and environmental health and prohibited drinking water source treatment 7 . This compromised larval control in large water storage containers in the U.S. and many other countries, which stopped using the insecticide. Due to the loss of this pesticide option, as well as the frequent development of pesticide resistance and growing concerns regarding the non-target effects of pesticides in the environment, the development of new environmentally-friendly larvicides that have minimal impact on the environment is therefore essential and urgent 8 . RNA interference (RNAi) has been used extensively for functional genetic studies in a wide variety of organisms, including insects 9,10 . The RNAi pathway is initiated by Dicer, an enzyme that cleaves long double stranded RNA (dsRNA) into short 20–25 nucleotide-long small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that function as sequence-specific interfering RNA, which may offer a species-specific means of targeting insect pests. siRNAs silence genes that are complementary in sequence by promoting transcript turnover, cleavage, and disruption of translation 10,11 , and numerous studies have demonstrated that target gene silencing through RNAi can promote insect death 9,10 . For example, Baum et al. 12 engineered transgenic corn plants expressing dsRNA targeting the western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte. dsRNA insecticidal corn targeting this species was registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7 . An RNAi insecticide targeting the Colorado potato beetle was also registered by the EPA in December 2023 7 . These and other findings suggest that RNAi can be exploited to control insect agricultural pests. This study aimed to apply RNAi technology for the control of insect vectors of human disease pathogens. Here, we evaluate the impact of deploying yeast RNAi larvicides, a new species-specific eco-friendly class of insecticides, for the treatment of large water storage containers. Our recent studies have demonstrated that short hairpin RNA (shRNA) designed to specifically target mosquito larval genes can be expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker’s yeast), a model organism that is genetically tractable, inexpensive to culture, and which can facilitate shRNA production during yeast propagation 13,14 . The yeast, which can be heat killed prior to deployment, is highly attractive to mosquito larvae 15 and readily consumed, even when placed in containers bearing other food sources. Yeast RNAi systems promote high levels of gene silencing during the larval stages and, when used to target larval genes that are required for survival, can generate high levels of larval mortality upon consumption 14 . The yeast has demonstrated high levels of efficacy in semi-field trials 14,16 . Here, we describe the formulation of dried heat-killed yeast tablets and briquettes that were developed as long-lasting controlled-release larvicides for the treatment of large water storage containers. Results and Discussion Evaluation of yeast prepared through spray drying and lyophilization: Previous studies described development of the syt.427 17 and sema.460 18 yeast strains, which express short hairpin RNA (shRNAs) targeting conserved sites in the mosquito synaptotagmin (syt) and semaphorin (sema) genes, respectively. These RNAi yeast insecticides effectively kill Aedes, Anopheles , and Culex mosquito larvae, yet were not found to impact the survival of several non-target arthropods that consumed the yeast. In initial experiments with RNAi yeast, the yeast was heat killed and then dried in a food dehydrator 14 . This drying procedure 19 was suitable for initial proof of concept experiments but is not sufficient for scaled yeast production and could permit the growth of other microbes during the extended drying procedure. To address these concerns, cultures of syt.427 and sema.460 yeast were heat-killed and subjected to spray drying. Initial attempts to spray dry the yeast resulted in inclusion of dried media in the samples, an issue that could make it difficult to determine how much yeast is present in the resulting product, and which may not be desired in treated water containers. This was resolved through the addition of a water washing step prior to drying. The larvicidal activity of syt.427 and sema.460 yeast was retained following spray drying, as demonstrated in laboratory larvicide trials conducted on 20 A. aegypti larvae placed in 3.5 L of water in 7.5 L containers (Fig. 1 A, P < 0.001 vs. control spray dried yeast) which corresponded roughly to the size of ovitrap containers used in recent field studies in Trinidad 20 . Significant syt.427 and syt.460 larvicidal activity was observed after two, three, and four weeks of storage of the dried yeast in the dark at room temperature (P < 0.001 vs. control; Fig. 1 B). Although the shelf life of the dried insecticidal yeast was retained over a four-week period, microbial growth was noted in the yeast-treated larvicide trial containers. Furthermore, a higher than normal incidence of control larval death, which is typically close to 0% 14 , was observed in these experiments (Fig. 1 B). The high rate of control larval death complicated interpretation of these data and would likely hamper longer term storage of the yeast. In addition to spray drying, preparations of syt.427 and sema.460 yeast were also heat-inactivated and dried through lyophilization. The lyophilized samples were evaluated after one, two, three, and four weeks of storage in the dark at room temperature. In laboratory trials conducted on A. aegypti larvae, both the syt.427 and sema.460 larvicides induced significant larval death with respect to the control samples throughout this time period (P < 0.001; Fig. 1 D). No larval death was observed in control yeast-treated containers (Fig. 1 D). However, similar to trials conducted with spray dried yeast, the growth of microbes was again noted in containers treated with lyophilized yeast. Although the microbes did not kill control larvae in this trial (Fig. 1 D), this observation indicated that the addition of preservatives to the yeast larvicide samples could prove useful. Analysis of larvicides prepared with added preservatives: It was hypothesized that the use of commercial drying procedures, in combination with the addition of antimicrobials, would improve the shelf life of the yeast larvicides and prevent microbial growth on the yeast during larvicide trials. To evaluate this, ascorbic acid, benzoic acid, citric acid, and potassium sorbate, all of which are food-grade level preservatives 21 were added to the yeast prior to spray drying, and the activities of these larvicides were assessed. The levels of larval mortality observed following treatments with syt.427 yeast prepared with any of the preservatives were comparable to those of non-dried wet formulations of yeast and to that of spray dried yeast lacking preservatives (Fig. 1 C). No significant differences (P > 0.05) were detected in the activities of syt.427 yeast prepared with the different preservatives (Fig. 1 C). Moreover, none of the preservatives impacted control yeast-treated larval survival levels (Fig. 1 C). The additives themselves do not, therefore, appear to be toxic to larvae or to impact activity of the larvicides. Moreover, microbial growth was not detected in any of the containers treated with larvicides containing preservatives during the trials. These data suggest that any of the four preservatives are suitable for prevention of microbial growth in the yeast larvicides and treated containers. Moreover, given that all the preservatives are food grade additives, it is anticipated that they would be considered safe to use in potable water and would not pose substantial risks to non-target organisms. While all four anti-microbials preserved the activity of the dried yeast larvicides (Fig. 1 C), benzoic acid has low solubility in water 22 . Given that the larvicides will be used in aquatic habitats, this preservative was selected for all future studies. Moreover, due to the availability of a lyophilizer on site and the relative technical ease of lyophilizing yeast preparations, lyophilized samples were used throughout the remainder of this investigation. It should be noted, however, that industrial scale production operations might opt to use spray drying, which is more cost-efficient at a commercial scale 23–26 . syt.427 strain yeast, which was used for the remainder of these studies, was lyophilized with benzoic acid and induced significant larval death (Fig. 1 E). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses accelerated storage tests 27 to assess chemical shelf lives 27 . In these tests, the insecticides are subjected to accelerated storage at 54 o C for two weeks. A portion of the freshly prepared syt.427 + benzoic acid lyophilized yeast was subjected to these storage conditions, while the other portion was stored at -20 o C. Lyophilized syt.427 yeast powder stored at -20 o C or subjected to accelerated storage conditions induced significant larval mortality with respect to control yeast (Fig. 1 E). These results suggest that lyophilized yeast prepared with benzoic acid has an excellent shelf life, and it was anticipated that tableting and encapsulation of this yeast, would further improve its shelf life. Identification of bulking agents and UV protectant additives that maintain the positive impacts of yeast on A. aegypti oviposition : Bulking agents are used in the preparation of large tablet and briquette formulations. In initial experiments, two starches, maltodextrin and HI-CAP 100, were evaluated as potential bulking agents. Each starch was mixed 1:1 with control and syt.427 dried yeast. However, water in the treated containers was cloudy, and it was anticipated that use of these tablets in the tropics would likely present problems resulting from overgrowth of unwanted microbes in the water containers. Work with these starches was therefore discontinued. b-D-lactose and microcrystalline cellulose were then assessed as potential bulking agents. 400 mg tablets containing 10% control interfering RNA yeast with 90% b-D-lactose or microcrystalline cellulose filler were prepared and evaluated. In both cases, significant control larval death was observed (not shown), and the b-D-lactose also resulted in clouding of the water. The amount of yeast included in each tablet was therefore increased, as there was concern that insufficient nutrition was a potential cause of larval death in these assays. These formulations were further modified through the addition of chitosan, a polysaccharide used in several mosquito larval RNAi studies 15,28 . These modifications did not improve the outcome for yeast containing b-D-lactose, which still generated cloudy water and control larval death (not shown) and was therefore eliminated from further consideration. The addition of microcrystalline cellulose resulted in negligible (1%) control larval death, with 91±2.5% (P < 0.001 vs. control) larval death resulting from treatments with tablets containing microcrystalline cellulose and chitosan (Fig. 2 A), which were subsequently selected as bulking agents. Table 1 Composition of PLA and PCL tablets evaluated. The name of the tablet, the composition of the tablet, and the state of the tablet following submersion in water are noted. Results from the larvicide trials performed with each tablet are shown in Fig. 2 . Treatments Description Tablet Condition PLA-1 (Control)-T 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet) Almost Intact PLA-1 (Control)-P 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder) Floating components observed PCL-1 (Control)-T 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet) Almost Intact PCL-1 (Control)-P 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder) Floating components observed PLA-2 (Control)-T 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet) Slightly broken and dispersed PLA-2 (Control)-P 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder) Floating components observed PCL-2 (Control)-T 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet) Broken into small mounds PCL-2 (Control)-P 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder) Floating components observed PLA-1 (427b)-T 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet) Almost Intact PLA-1 (427b)-P 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder) Some component is floating (more than in other containers) PCL-1 (427b)-T 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet) Almost Intact PCL-1 (427b)-P 20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder) Some component is floating (more than in other buckets) PLA-2 (427b)-T 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet) Has formed a mound PLA-2 (427b)-P 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder) Floating components observed PCL-2 (427b)-T 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet) Formed a mound PCL-2 (427b)-P 20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder) Floating components observed WP-Control Wet pellet control for above yeast preparations. Yeast has dispersed and settled on the bottom. WP-427b The microcrystalline cellulose tablets were then evaluated in combination with polylactic acid (PLA) or polycaprolactone (PCL), which were provided in a variety of proportions as noted in Table 1 . The conditions of the tablets after five days in water was noted for each formulation (Table 1 ), and the larvicidal activity of each tablet is shown in Fig. 2 B. While all the syt.427 tablets induced significant larval mortality with respect to their relevant control counterparts, some of the tablets resulted in > 5% control mortality (Fig. 2 B). This was presumably due to poor growth resulting from insufficient yeast release and occasional films forming at the surface of the water upon release of particulate matter. The potential for these formulations to impact the ability of yeast to promote oviposition in treated containers was also assessed. Although yeast typically promotes oviposition in containers bearing water and yeast (vs. water alone) 20 , the addition of PCL to the tablets reversed this behavior, with mosquitoes choosing to lay eggs in containers bearing water alone during insectary trials (Fig. 3 A). Based on the combined analysis of tablet stability in water (Table 1 ), the performance of each formulation in larvicide trials (Fig. 2 B), and the ability of tablets with PLA, but not PCL, to attract mosquitoes (Fig. 3 A), tablet formulations with microcrystalline cellulose, chitosan, and PLA, were selected for subsequent work. The addition of titanium dioxide or zinc oxide as UV protectants was also assessed. Both UV protectants are approved as food grade materials in the United States 21 , and neither had a significant impact on larvicide activity or control survival (Fig. 2 C). Although the addition of UV protectants did not impact the performance of the yeast larvicide, these tablets, particularly those containing zinc oxide, disintegrated quickly in water. It was noted that baking the tablets during accelerated storage experiments improved tablet stability, and so this step was included during subsequent tablet preparations. 400 mg tablets composed of 20% syt.427 yeast, 20% chitosan, 5% microcrystalline cellulose, 45% PLA and 10% titanium dioxide (percentages by weight) were prepared and will now be referred to as controlled-release sinking syt.427 tablets. These tablets performed well in accelerated storage assays (Fig. 2 D) and maintained larvicidal activity through two releases of first instar larvae into 7.5 L containers in the insectary (Fig. 2 D). Moreover, larval attraction to this formulation of yeast tablets was maintained in two-point oviposition assays conducted in the insectary, in which gravid females preferred to lay eggs in yeast-larvicide treated water vs. water alone (Fig. 3 B, p < 0.001). Controlled-release RNA larvicides display significant residual activity in water: Given the results obtained with the controlled-release tablets, the next goal was to prepare and test a larger sized 5 g briquette (20 yeast: 20 chitosan: 5 microcrystalline cellulose: 45 PLA: 10 titanium dioxide formulation). These briquettes were designed for use in longer assays conducted over several months, during which time the residual activity of the controlled-release formulations could be better assessed. The mean results from two such trials performed in 7.5 L containers in the insectary, the first conducted from July through December 2020, and the second conducted from November 2020 through May 2021, are shown in Fig. 4 A. These results demonstrate that the activity of the larvicides was retained over the 5–6 month duration of the experiments, in which significant mortality was observed during each of five releases of 100 larvae in treated containers (P < 0.001 with respect to control containers, Fig. 4 B). Assessment of controlled-release yeast larvicides in large water storage containers with varying densities of larvae and under semi-field conditions : The next goal was to assess the activity of the larvicide in larger 37.9 L (10 gallon) barrel-sized containers. These assays were conducted outdoors under semi-field conditions in Notre Dame, IN. In preparation for these experiments, we first attempted to rear larvae on a control yeast sinking 400 mg tablet placed in these barrel-sized containers. However, when control larvae were released in the containers, all the larvae died within several days, presumably because they could not swim to the bottom and eat the yeast that had been placed in these large-sized containers with a greater depth than the smaller 7.5 L containers. To address this, a 400 mg floating tablet formulation consisting of tablets prepared with a 9 yeast: 9 PLA: 2 titanium dioxide: 20 beeswax ratio was prepared and used in trials that were completed in the large 37.9 L containers maintained outdoors under semi-field conditions. When floating tablets were used, although the control yeast-treated larvae survived, significant larval mortality was observed in the syt.427-treated barrel (Fig. 4 C; P < 0.001). To account for water containers with higher larval densities, the number of larvae added to the barrels was increased to 1000. This required development of larger 5 g floating briquettes, which were prepared in ratios of 1 yeast: 1PLA: 0.22 titanium dioxide: 0.444 milled beeswax, layered with 1 g milled beeswax then again layered with 5 ml 3:1 melted milled beeswax: hollow glass microspheres to add buoyancy after annealing. The tablets were assessed in barrel assays conducted within the insectary. This floating syt.427 tablet formulation induced significant (P < 0.001) larval death in replicate trials conducted on 1000 A. aegypti larvae (Fig. 4 D), indicating that the yeast formulation was suitable for treatment of large water storage containers with high densities of larvae. Sustained A. aegypti larval control in large water storage containers in Trinidad: To better simulate natural containers, 220 L barrels were set outdoors for nine months prior to the initiation of larvicide trials in St. Augustine, Trinidad. This permitted deposition and growth of algae and other organic matter, which could be accessed by first instar larvae, permitting the use of sinking yeast briquettes. The barrels were treated with either 5 g control or syt.427 sinking briquettes (80 yeast: 80 chitosan: 20 microcrystalline cellulose: 180 PLA: 40 titanium dioxide). During the four-month trials, three separate batches of 150 A. aegypti larvae were added to each container after the previous batch of larvae in the control-treated barrel matured. Although survival rates were lower in the control barrels (Fig. 4 D,E) than what had been observed in trials conducted in Indiana, survival rates in the syt.427 barrels were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than the control barrels (Fig. 4 D,E). These results confirmed the ability of sinking controlled release syt.427 briquettes to provide sustained A. aegypti control in large outdoor barrels in the tropics. Conclusions and future directions: In summary, a heat-inactivated dried yeast was incorporated into a biodegradable matrix containing a mixture of polylactic acid, benzoic acid, and titanium dioxide. The formulation was prepared using food-grade level components to prevent toxicity to humans or other organisms. Both floating (with beeswax and glass microsphere) and sinking (with chitosan) versions of the tablets were prepared for treatment of various sized water containers, including 200 L household water storage tank-sized containers. The tablets passed accelerated storage tests of shelf-life stability and demonstrated up to six months residual activity in water. The yeast performed well in a variety of containers, including water barrels containing 20-1000 larvae each, and in outdoor barrel trials in the tropics. Future studies should include evaluation of the yeast larvicide in larger operational field trials in which the potential for incorporating this new class of larvicides into integrated mosquito control programs can be further assessed. As discussed above, the loss of temephos left a gap in the existing larvicide repertoire. It is therefore timely that controlled-release formulations of RNAi yeast were successfully developed and performed well in semi-field trials conducted at two study sites. Although the toxin Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) can be used as a larvicide 29 for treatment of large water storage containers and potable water, it is not specific to mosquitoes, and Bt resistance has begun to emerge in a number of crop pests 30 , highlighting the importance of developing new classes of mosquito-specific larvicides such as RNAi yeast. Likewise, Spinosad 31 , which is derived from a soil bacterium, is approved for treatment of drinking water, but resistance has begun to emerge to this broad-spectrum insecticide 32 . The insect growth regulators pyriproxyfen and methoprene are approved for drinking water treatment. Pyriproxyfen, which can be dispersed by mosquitoes during skip oviposition, is relatively safe for vertebrate organisms, but is not specific to mosquitoes and can kill other insects 33 . Although methoprene does not pose unreasonable risks to human health, it is extremely toxic to other invertebrate species 34 , and reduced susceptibility has begun to emerge 35,36 . The potential for introducing RNAi yeast to Aedes mosquito control programs, which could be rotated with the use of these other larvicides, may prove beneficial for reducing the incidence of larvicide resistance, while also offering an alternative that is designed to be specific to mosquitoes, allowing non-targets to survive. Large-scaled larvicide trials should be conducted in support of potential future registry applications to the U.S. EPA and the WHO. In addition to Aedes mosquitoes, the syt.427 larvicide, as well as a number of other existing RNAi yeast larvicide strains that have been developed, including a robust commercial-ready strain that silences the Shaker gene 37 , target conserved sites in Anopheles and Culex spp. mosquitoes 17 . In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a vector alert noting that the spread of A. stephensi is a major threat to malaria control and elimination in Africa and southern Asia and urging for immediate action to control the spread of this insect 38 . A. stephensi , which has adapted to developing in a wide variety of human-made containers, is susceptible to larvicides 39,40 . The WHO recommends that larviciding be considered for malaria control in areas where breeding sites are few, fixed, and findable 39 , suggesting that RNAi yeast larvicides may prove invaluable in the fight to control this invasive malaria mosquito. Moreover, larvicides are also used for control of Culex spp. mosquitoes. For example, the North Shore Mosquito Abatement District has applied a variety of larvicides to catch basins in Chicago since the mid-1990s, and it will be interesting to ascertain whether these controlled-release tablets, or perhaps other yeast formulations, will be useful for treatment of catch basins 41,42 . Past studies suggest that selection of the proper formulation will be critical for catch basin treatments, where loss of larvicides over time can be an issue 43 . Evaluation of yeast larvicides in catch basins will inform the best strategies for RNAi yeast larvicide formulation and deployment for control of Culex spp. mosquitoes. RNAi yeast larvicides, which can readily be incorporated into useful controlled-release formulations, may prove invaluable for the control of Aedes, Anopheles , and Culex mosquitoes. Materials and Methods Materials: Materials used for tablet preparation : The following materials were acquired and used for tablet preparation: beeswax (yellow, Strahl & Pitsch SP66G, 0911/15), chitosan (Sigma-Aldrich C3646), hollow glass microspheres (System Three, 646697002783), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC, Alfa Aesar A17730.36), polylactide acid resin (PLA; Natureworks Ingeo Biopolymer 6362D, CK0528B131), and titanium dioxide (TiO 2 , Spectrum Chemical T1083). Additional materials evaluated during the formulation studies included: b-D-lactose (Acros Organics), maltodextrin (Maltrin M180, Grain Processing Corporation, modified food starch (HI-CAP 100, Ingredion), zinc oxide, poly(caprolactone) (PCL Resomer C209, Evonik). Milling of beeswax Beeswax was milled using a laboratory scale hammer mill (Fitzpatrick Hammer Mill, model L1A). The mill was operated with liquid nitrogen and a 3.96 mm screen. The beeswax was submerged in liquid nitrogen prior to milling, which was required to reduce the particle size and to prepare a uniform blend of powder for tableting. Particle size analysis (Malvern Mastersizer 3000) was used to quantify the particle size of the cryomilled beeswax, which was 60.4 Dx ( 10 ) (µm), 241 Dx (50) (µm), 490 Dx (90) (µm) with a 1.785 span. Preparation of PLA : Spray drying was used to micronize the PLA, which was required to reduce the particle size and to prepare a uniform blend of powder for tableting. 40 g of PLA was dissolved into 1560 g of acetone. The solution was spray dried with a Pro-C-epT 4M8 laboratory scale spray dryer under the following configuration and conditions: 0.4 mm nozzle bifluid nozzle, 3.0 bar atomizing air pressure, 80°C inlet air temperature, 6 g/min feed rate, and 0.3 m w /min air speed. Particle size analysis (Malvern Mastersizer 3000) was used to verify the particle size of the spray dried PLA, which was 1.30 Dx ( 10 ) (µm), 12.1 Dx (50) (µm), 155 Dx (90) (µm) with a 12.669 span. Yeast preparation, drying, transport, and storage: Yeast strains Stable transformants expressing syt.427 17 , sema.460 18 , or control 14 shRNA were used in this investigation. Yeast cultivation Culturing and galactose induction was performed as described 14 . Yeast was then heat-killed and pelleted as described 19 . Transport and storage of yeast Spray dried or lyophilized yeast was shipped to the Scheel laboratory on ice packs via overnight courier service. Prior to shipment and upon arrival at the final destination, yeast was stored at − 20° C unless specified otherwise. Pelleted yeast that had not been dried was stored in glass vials, packaged on ice, and shipped overnight. Such samples served as wet formulation (WF) controls. Spray drying Spray drying was performed with a Pro-C-epT 4M8 laboratory scale spray dryer. Yeast media was pumped into the spray dryer at 5–6 g/min. The fluid was atomized with a 0.6 mm diameter air atomized nozzle with an atomizing pressure of 3.0 bar. The spray dryer inlet temperature was set to 180° C, resulting in an outlet temperature of 45–55° C, depending upon the formulation. Air flow through the spray dryer was set to 0.3 m 3 /min. For initial spray dry preparations, media was used as the carrier during the spray drying process. However roughly half of the spray dried material, which had a powder-like consistency, was composed of dried media. Therefore, in all subsequent preparations, and for the experiments described herein, the yeast was pelleted through centrifugation, and excess media was removed. The yeast was then resuspended in e-pure water and spray dried. The resulting preparations contained only dried yeast and lacked dried media. Lyophilization Following pelleting, the yeast was rinsed by resuspending it in 10 ml of e-pure water prior to heat killing at 70 o C for 25 min. Following the addition of preservative, the centrifuge tube was submerged in liquid nitrogen until frozen then placed on a Labconco FreeZone 6 L Console Freeze Dryer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) for 48–72 hrs until dry. To assess preservatives, the following food-grade preservatives were added to yeast cultures after pelleting and resuspension in water prior to drying of the yeast: 0.1% ascorbic acid, 0.1% benzoic acid, 0.1% citric acid, or 0.1% potassium sorbate. After evaluation of these preservatives, 0.1% benzoic acid was selected as the preservative of choice and used in the remainder of the experiments. Assessment of shelf life For evaluation of shelf life, yeast was stored in the dark at room temperature (~ 22 o C on average). Samples were stored for 0–4 weeks after shipment and then evaluated in larvicide trials. Accelerated storage tests were also pursued through storage of yeast at 54 o C for two weeks per the protocol described by the EPA 27 . Preparation of controlled release sinking briquettes: The following procedure produced fourteen 5.0 g briquettes of control or syt.427 yeast per production: 17g of control or syt.427 yeast, 17g of chitosan, 4.25g of MCC, 38.25g of spray dried PLA, and 8.5 g of TiO2 were combined and blended using a FlackTek DAC 150.1 FV Speed Mixer for 1 minute at 2000 rpms. Each tablet was then produced using a 5.0 g portion from the master mix that was transferred to a 25 mm diameter die set (Pellet Press Die Sets, Traverse City, MI). The die plunger was inserted, and the tablet was formed using a Model C Carver Laboratory Press at 12 tons for 15 seconds. Tablets were then removed from the die, covered with aluminum foil, then heat treated at 57°C for 72 hours. No additional materials were needed to promote sinking of the tablets. b-D-lactose, maltodextrin, and HI-CAP 100 were also assessed as bulking agents in place of the MCC, though not selected for use in the final tablet formulation. PCL and PLA were initially assessed at a variety of concentrations (see Table 1 ) prior to development of the above sinking tablet formulation. Zinc oxide was also evaluated but not selected as a U.V. protectant. Preparation of controlled release floating tablets and briquettes: The following materials, which yielded eight 5 g briquettes of control or syt.427 yeast, were blended at 200 rpms for 1 minute with a FlackTek DAC 150.1 FV Speedmixer: 10 g yeast, 10 g spray dried PLA, 2.2 g TiO2, and 4.44 g beeswax. For each briquette, 1 g of milled beeswax followed by 2.66 g of the above mixture were layered into a 25 mm diameter die set (Pellet Press Die Sets, Traverse City, MI) then pressed using a Model C Carver Press at 12 tons for 15 seconds. The tablets were then placed into a weight boat wax side up, covered with aluminum foil, and heat treated at 57°C for 72 hours. Separately, > 10 g of a 3:1 ratio of beeswax to hollow glass microspheres were prepared and heated using a hot plate while stirring manually with a metal spatula until the wax was melted and the mixture was evenly dispersed. Immediately upon removing the tablet from the oven, it was placed back into the die, beeswax side up. Using a serological pipette, ~5ml of molten wax/beads mixture was placed into the die and gently pressed, letting the plunger fall naturally. Six 400 mg tablets of control and syt. 427 were also prepared by combing these materials in the following ratio: 90 control or syt.427,90 spray dried PLA, and 20 TiO2. The materials were speed mixed at 2000 rpms for 1 minute. Each tablet was prepared with 200mg of the master mix that was transferred to a 12 mm diameter die set (Pellet Press Die Sets, Traverse City, MI). 200 mg of hand cut beeswax was then layered on top of the master mix layer and pressed 3.5 tons for 15 seconds. The tablets were then placed in a weigh boat, wax side up, covered with aluminum foil, and heat treated at 57°C for 72 hours. Mosquito rearing Indiana insectary: A. aegypti Liverpool-IB12 (LVP-IB12) mosquitoes were reared as described according to established protocols 44 within an insectary maintained at a temperature of 26.5° C, an approximate relative humidity of 80%, and with a 12-hour light and dark cycle featuring 1-hour crepuscular periods at the beginning and end of each cycle. Larvae were fed with liver powder (900396, MP Biologicals, Solon, OH, USA); male and female adult mosquitoes were supplied a 10% sucrose solution, while adult females were provided with defibrinated sheep blood meals (HemoStat Laboratories located in Dixon, CA, USA) using an artificial membrane feeding system (Hemotek Limited, Blackburn, UK). Trinidad insectary: A. aegypti that had been collected in Trinidad (Diego Martin, Maraval and St. Augustine) were used to establish laboratory colonies; the larvae used in the larvicide trial were approximately fifth generation. The insectary in Trinidad was maintained at ambient temperature and humidity conditions, and adult female mosquitoes were blood fed as described above but using fresh sheep’s blood provided by the School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mt. Hope, UWI. Larvicide assays: Small container assays With the exception of the residual studies, large container assays, and semi-field trials (see below), larvicide assays were performed in the insectary as described (Mysore et al., 2018) and conducted in 7.5 L containers bearing 3.5 L of water (which was approximately the container size/water volume of containers used in recent ovitrap trials conducted in Trinidad 20 ). These assays conformed to the guidelines of the World Health Organization 45 . Each replicate assay was performed using 20 first instar A. aegypti Liverpool-IB12 (LVP-IB12) strain mosquitoes per treatment. Depending on the amount of materials available at each step in the tablet design process, one or more replicate container trials were performed. Residual activity assays in 7.5 L containers 100 first instar A. aegypti larvae were added to each of two 7.5 L containers bearing 3.5 L of water. One container was treated with a 5 g syt.427 larvicide tablet and the other with a 5 g control interfering RNA tablet. Control- and syt.427-treated larval mortality was recorded. Upon emergence of any surviving animals as adult mosquitoes, a new set of 100 first instar larvae was added to each container (termed release 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 herein). This occurred approximately once per month. Large container trials in Indiana Large water container trials were conducted in a similar manner, except that 200 L of water was placed in Rubbermaid Commercial 37.2 L (10 gallon) Round Plastic Brute Containers (Rubbermaid, Atlanta, GA). These trials were initially performed in the insectary. Semi-field trials in large containers The large container trials were also performed under semi-field conditions in Indiana and Trinidad and were conducted in accordance with the World Health Organization larvicide testing guidelines 45 . The trials performed in Notre Dame, Indiana were conducted in June and August 2021 on 20 first instar larvae placed in 200 L of water contained in a Rubbermaid Commercial 37.2 L (10 gallon) Round Plastic Brute Containers (Rubbermaid, Atlanta, GA). Each container was treated with one sinking and one floating 0.4 g tablet and covered with mesh to prevent the entry or exit of any organisms. The trials performed in Trinidad were conducted from October 2023 through January 2024 and performed in 220 L barrels that had been filled with tap water. The barrels were placed outdoors (uncovered) for nine months prior to the start of the trials, then covered with 1 mm mesh for one month prior to the start of the experiment to ensure that no natural mosquito activity remained, then topped off with water to bring the volume to 140 L. 5 g sinking yeast briquettes (control or syt.427) were added to the barrels. 150 first instar larvae were then added to the barrels, which were then covered with 1 mm mesh, preventing the entry or exit of any other organisms during the trial. A new set of 150 first larvae was added to each container after the prior set had died or emerged (referred to as releases 1, 2, and 3 herein). Analysis of larvicide data The percentages of larval mortality for replicates of each treatment were transformed using the arcsine transformation prior to analyzing the data using ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparison post-hoc test), Student’s t-test, or Mann Whitney U test as indicated in the figure legends. Ethics Statement No vertebrate animals were used directly in these studies, as mosquitoes were blood fed with a membrane feeding system as described above. The semi-field trials were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of the West Indies (Study CEC403/12/17), the chair of the UWI St. Augustine Department of Life Sciences, and the Southwest Regional Health Authority, a division of the Trinidad and Tobago Ministry of Health. Declarations Acknowledgements: We thank the members of our labs for their advice, as well as Longhua Sun, Britton Sofhauser, Joi Misenti, Joe Roethele, and Diana Cervera for technical support. Author Contributions: K.M., J.D.O, C.D., D.W.S. and M.D.S. designed and conceived the study; J.D.O., C.D., and C.C-G designed and prepared the yeast tablets with input from K.M., D.W.S., and M.D.S; K.M. performed the Indiana larvicide trials, and A.T.M.S., N.W., R.S.F, and L.D.J., and S.S. carried out the trials in Trinidad; K.M., D.W.S., and M.D.S. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, which was edited by all the authors; D.W.S. and M.D.S. obtained funding; J.D.O., C.D., A.M., D.W.S. and M.D.S. supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: The Innovative Vector Control Consortium funded the formulation and barrel studies. The ovitrap container studies were supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program under Award No. W81XWH-17-1-0294 and W81XWH-17-1-0295 (to M.D.S. and D.W.S., respectively). Data Availability Statement: All data are available within the text of this article. Additional Information: The funders of this work did not play a role in the design of this study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to publish the results of this investigation. The opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the manuscript’s authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity. In the conduction of research utilizing recombinant DNA, the investigator adhered to NIH Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.Although MDS and DWS are inventors on U.S. patent No: 62/361,704, European Application No. 17828458.4, which was filed by Indiana University, this did not affect their interpretations of the data presented in this manuscript and does not impact their adherence to journal policies on sharing data and materials. The research findings presented herein are not related to any products or services currently provided by any third parties. Although MDS is serving as a guest editor for the Vector Control for Neglected Diseases Collection, she had no involvement with the review of this manuscript at Scientific Reports. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. References CDC. Mosquitoes. https://www.cdc.gov . (2024). PAHO. PAHO calls for collective action in response to record increase in dengue cases in the Americas. https://www.paho.org/en/news/28-3-2024-paho-calls-collective-action-response-record-increase-dengue-cases-americas . (2024). BASF. Abate ® Larvicides – Stop disease-causing insects before they hatch https://agriculture.basf.com/global/en/business-areas/public-health/products/abate.html . (2014). Chadee, D. D., Doon, R. & Severson, D. W. Surveillance of dengue fever cases using a novel Aedes aegypti population sampling method in Trinidad, West Indies: the cardinal points approach. Acta Trop 104, 1–7 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.06.006 . Mazzarri, M. B. and Georghiou, G. P. Characterization of resistance to organophoshate, carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides in field population of Aedes aegypti from Venezuela. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 11(3), 315–322 (1995). Saavedra-Rodriguez, K. et al. Differential transcription profiles in Aedes aegypti detoxification genes after temephos selection. Insect Mol Biol 23, 199–215 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12073 . EPA. Signed temephos registration review. https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ- OPP-2008-0444-0019. (2011). Airs, P. M. & Bartholomay, L. C. RNA Interference for mosquito and mosquito-borne disease control. Insects 8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8010004 . Yu, N. et al. Delivery of dsRNA for RNAi in insects: an overview and future directions. Insect Sci 20, 4–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01534.x . Zhang, H., Li, H. C. & Miao, X. X. Feasibility, limitation and possible solutions of RNAi-based technology for insect pest control. Insect Sci 20, 15–30 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01513.x . Li, J., Wang, X. P., Wang, M. Q., Ma, W. H. & Hua, H. X. Advances in the use of the RNA interference technique in Hemiptera. Insect Sci 20, 31–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01550.x Baum, J. A. et al. Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol 25, 1322–1326 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1359 . Duman-Scheel, M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) as an interfering RNA expression and delivery system. Curr Drug Targets 20, 942–952 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450120666181126123538 . Hapairai, L. K. et al. Lure-and-kill yeast interfering RNA larvicides targeting neural genes in the human disease vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. Sci Rep 7, 13223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13566-y . Mysore, K., Flannery, E. M., Tomchaney, M., Severson, D. W. & Duman-Scheel, M. Disruption of Aedes aegypti olfactory system development through chitosan/siRNA nanoparticle targeting of semaphorin-1a . PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7, e2215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002215 . Mysore, K. et al. Characterization of a dual-action adulticidal and larvicidal interfering RNA pesticide targeting the Shaker gene of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14, e0008479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008479 . Mysore, K. et al. Characterization of a yeast interfering RNA larvicide with a target site conserved in the synaptotagmin gene of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13, e0007422 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007422 . Mysore, K. et al. Characterization of a broad-based mosquito yeast interfering RNA larvicide with a conserved target site in mosquito semaphorin-1a genes. Parasit Vectors 12, 256 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3504-x . Mysore, K. et al. Preparation and use of a yeast shRNA delivery system for gene silencing in mosquitol larvae. Methods Mol Biol 1858, 213–231 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8775-7_15 . Hapairai, L. K. et al. Evaluation of large volume yeast interfering RNA lure-and-kill ovitraps for attraction and control of Aedes mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol 35, 361–370 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12504 . FDA. Food additive status list. https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/food-additive-status-list . (2024). National Library of Medicine. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary Benzoic Acid. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Benzoic-Acid . (2024). Acar, C., Dincer, I. & Mujumdar, A. A comprehensive review of recent advances in renewable-based drying technologies for a sustainable future. Dry Technol 40, 1029–1050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1848858 . Fathi, F., Ebrahimi, S. N., Matos, L. C., Oliveira, M. B. P. P. & Alves, R. C. Emerging drying techniques for food safety and quality: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci F 21, 1125–1160 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12898 . Peighambardoust, S. H., Tafti, A. G. & Hesari, J. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech 22, 215–224 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009 . Khuenpet, K. C., N.; Jaijit, S., Arayapoonpong, S., Jittanit, W. Investigation of suitable spray drying conditions for sugarcane juice powder production with an energy consumption study. Agriculture and Natural Resources 50(2), 149–145 (2016). EPA. Accelerated storage stability and corrosion characteristics study protocol. https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/accelerated-storage-stability-and-corrosion-characteristics-study-protocol . (2024). Zhang, X. et al. Chitosan/interfering RNA nanoparticle mediated gene silencing in disease vector mosquito larvae. J Vis Exp (2015). https://doi.org/10.3791/52523 . EPA. Bti for Mosquito Control. (2023). Alam, I. et al. Role of lectin in the response of Aedes aegypti against Bt Toxin. Front Immunol 13, 898198 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.898198 . Bunch, T. R., Bond, C.; Buhl, K.; Stone, D. Spinosad General Fact Sheet , http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/spinosadgen.html . (2014). Lan, J. et al. Identification of the Aedes aegypti nAChR gene family and molecular target of spinosad. Pest Manag Sci 77, 1633–1641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6183 . McGregor, B. L. & Connelly, C. R. A review of the control of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in the continental United States. J Med Entomol 58, 10–25 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa157 . EPA. Methoprene. https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/pdf/0030fact.pdf . (1991). Marcombe, S., Farajollahi, A., Healy, S. P., Clark, G. G. & Fonseca, D. M. Insecticide resistance status of United States populations of Aedes albopictus and mechanisms involved. PLoS One 9, e101992 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101992 . Lau, K. W., Chen, C. D., Lee, H. L., Norma-Rashid, Y. & Sofian-Azirun, M. Evaluation of insect growth regulators against field-collected Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) from Malaysia. J Med Entomol 52, 199–206 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tju019 . Brizzee, C. et al. Targeting mosquitoes through generation of an insecticidal RNAi yeast strain using Cas-CLOVER and super piggyBac engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Fungi (Basel) 9 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111056 . WHO. Vector alert: Anopheles stephensi invasion and spread. (2019). WHO. Larval source management: A supplementary meausre for malaria vector control. An operational manual. , https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/85379/9789241505604_eng.pdf . (2012). Mnzava, A., Monroe, A. C. & Okumu, F. Anopheles stephensi in Africa requires a more integrated response. Malar J 21, 156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04197-4 Harbison, J. E., Henry, M., Xamplas, C. & Dugas, L. R. Evaluation of Culex pipiens populations in a residential area with a high density of catch basins in a suburb of Chicago, Illinois. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 30, 228–230 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2987/14-6414R.1 . Harbison, J. E. et al. Variable Efficacy of extended-release mosquito larvicides observed in catch basins in the northeast Chicago metropolitan area. Environ Health Insights 10, 65–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S38096 . Harbison, J. E. et al. Observed loss and ineffectiveness of mosquito larvicides applied to catch basins in the northern suburbs of Chicago IL, 2014. Environ Health Insights 9, 1–5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S24311 . Clemons, A., Mori, A., Haugen, M., Severson, D. W. & Duman-Scheel, M. Culturing and egg collection of Aedes aegypti. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010, pdb prot5507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5507 . WHO. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-WHOPES-GCDPP-2005.13 . (2005). Additional Declarations Competing interest reported. The funders of this work did not play a role in the design of this study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to publish the results of this investigation. Although MDS and DWS are inventors on U.S. patent No: 62/361,704, European Application No. 17828458.4, which was filed by Indiana University, this did not affect their interpretations of the data presented in this manuscript and does not impact their adherence to journal policies on sharing data and materials. The research findings presented herein are not related to any products or services currently provided by any third parties. Although MDS is serving as a guest editor for the Vector Control for Neglected Diseases Collection, she had no involvement with the review of this manuscript at Scientific Reports. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Dec, 2024 Read the published version in Scientific Reports → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 17 Sep, 2024 Reviews received at journal 13 Sep, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 03 Sep, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 16 Aug, 2024 Reviews received at journal 08 Jul, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Jun, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 28 Jun, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 28 Jun, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 28 Jun, 2024 Editor invited by journal 21 Jun, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 19 Jun, 2024 First submitted to journal 11 Jun, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4566173","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":321119754,"identity":"80282c90-c22a-4860-9f98-b4b018d021ef","order_by":0,"name":"Keshava Mysore","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Keshava","middleName":"","lastName":"Mysore","suffix":""},{"id":321119755,"identity":"e7637110-84e9-40f3-ba25-379336dbd5c5","order_by":1,"name":"James D. Oxley","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Southwest Research Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"James","middleName":"D.","lastName":"Oxley","suffix":""},{"id":321119756,"identity":"ebfb2592-dc12-49f6-b56c-571e09728a46","order_by":2,"name":"Craig Duckham","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"CD R\u0026D Consultancy Services","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Craig","middleName":"","lastName":"Duckham","suffix":""},{"id":321119757,"identity":"4469ed77-9532-4860-9e88-9d9c74b090a1","order_by":3,"name":"Clarissa Castilla-Gutierrez","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Southwest Research Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Clarissa","middleName":"","lastName":"Castilla-Gutierrez","suffix":""},{"id":321119758,"identity":"c55707ab-2b71-406d-8db7-9884d74d0536","order_by":4,"name":"Akilah T. M. Stewart","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Akilah","middleName":"T. M.","lastName":"Stewart","suffix":""},{"id":321119760,"identity":"a7f98f39-4f5b-4d20-9d9a-d2db08123c2e","order_by":5,"name":"Nikhella Winter","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of the West Indies","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Nikhella","middleName":"","lastName":"Winter","suffix":""},{"id":321119762,"identity":"c3ecd795-4b62-4876-807e-19d303e2b0aa","order_by":6,"name":"Rachel Shui Feng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of the West Indies","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rachel","middleName":"Shui","lastName":"Feng","suffix":""},{"id":321119763,"identity":"148ec465-5a36-4fee-80ab-b034efc1cff0","order_by":7,"name":"Satish Singh","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of the West Indies","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Satish","middleName":"","lastName":"Singh","suffix":""},{"id":321119764,"identity":"8022c323-1112-4d1e-9351-b26e9abcba97","order_by":8,"name":"Lester D. James","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of the West Indies","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lester","middleName":"D.","lastName":"James","suffix":""},{"id":321119765,"identity":"330b51a8-cd66-40a1-9094-f7690ec86823","order_by":9,"name":"Azad Mohammed","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of the West Indies","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Azad","middleName":"","lastName":"Mohammed","suffix":""},{"id":321119768,"identity":"400bbd51-61f8-4b74-bbe3-9fb243c2db87","order_by":10,"name":"David W. Severson","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Notre Dame","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"David","middleName":"W.","lastName":"Severson","suffix":""},{"id":321119770,"identity":"22b0c457-ac5c-4986-9efc-ef5652824601","order_by":11,"name":"Molly Duman-Scheel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indiana University School of Medicine","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Molly","middleName":"","lastName":"Duman-Scheel","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-06-11 20:08:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566173/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566173/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81800-5","type":"published","date":"2024-12-04T15:57:49+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":60171016,"identity":"cf6a4cc3-718b-40e7-a4fa-5269e69e082e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-12 15:08:18","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1225333,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLarvicidal activity is retained in spray-dried and lyophilized RNAi yeast formulations.\u0026nbsp; \u003c/strong\u003eYeast preparations were produced by spray drying a yeast-water mixture (A-C).\u0026nbsp; A wet formulation (WF) consisting of heat-inactivated yeast that was pelleted but not dried served as a control (A,C), as did a control yeast strain (Control) that produces shRNA with no known target in mosquitoes (all panels).\u0026nbsp; WF and spray-dried (SD) formulations of the syt.427 and sema.460 larvicides induced comparable levels of significant larval death (A).\u0026nbsp; The mean results from three replicate trials per treatment conducted on \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae are shown, and errors denote SEM (A-C, *** P\u0026lt;0.001 vs. controls).\u0026nbsp; Significant syt.427 and sema.460 larvicide activity was also observed (B) after storage of the yeast at room temperature for two (2W), three (3W), and four weeks (4W).\u0026nbsp; Results were combined from three replicate containers per treatment (B; ***= P\u0026lt;0.001 vs. control).\u0026nbsp; The RNAi larvicides were prepared through spray drying of a yeast-water mixture containing ascorbic acid (AA), benzoic acid (BA), citric acid (CA), potassium sorbate (PS), or no additive (N).\u0026nbsp; Significant syt.427 activity was observed in comparison to any of these spray dried preparations, as well as to wet formulation (WF) control yeast (C) from the same preparations (*** = P\u0026lt;0.001 vs. any of the WF or spray dried controls).\u0026nbsp; Formulated spray dried larvicide activity was comparable to that of WF syt.427. \u0026nbsp;Larvicides were also prepared through lyophilization of yeast that had been rinsed with water to remove residual culture media (D,E).\u0026nbsp; Significant syt.427 and sema.460 larvicide activity was observed in comparison to control yeast following one (1W), two (2W), three (3W), and four weeks (4W) of storage in the dark at room temperature (D; mean results from three replicate trials per treatment conducted on \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae are shown; ***= P\u0026lt;0.001 vs. treatments with the control yeast).\u0026nbsp; With respect to control interfering RNA yeast, lyophilized powder syt.427 yeast prepared with benzoic acid preservative induced significant \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larval mortality following 20\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C frozen or 54\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C accelerated storage (E, *** = P\u0026lt;0.001; mean results from eight replicate containers per treatment are shown).\u0026nbsp; Data were analyzed with ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison test.\u0026nbsp; Error bars throughout the figure represent SEMs.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4566173/v1/e143054c4e9cb38aa094d18e.png"},{"id":60171012,"identity":"a6111cba-bd38-43f0-90cd-3528d8f9228c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-12 15:08:17","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":25387,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFormulating a controlled-release tablet.\u0026nbsp; \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eA. aegypti \u003c/em\u003elarval mortality was observed following larval treatments with tablets containing 20% syt.427 yeast, 20% chitosan, and 60% microcrystalline cellulose (A, *** = P\u0026lt;0.001 vs. tablets prepared with control yeast, paired two-tailed t-test).\u0026nbsp; The syt.427 tablets containing PLA or PCL induced significant larval mortality (B, *** = P\u0026lt;0.001 with respect to the control counterpart, ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison test; refer to Table 1 for the compositions of each tablet).\u0026nbsp; The mean results from two replicate trials per treatment are shown in B, and error bars represent SEMs.\u0026nbsp; The syt.427 tablets containing the UV protectants zinc oxide (ZO) or titanium dioxide (TiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e) induced significant larval mortality (C, *** = P\u0026lt;0.001 with respect to the control counterpart, ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison test).\u0026nbsp; No significant larvicidal activity was observed in control tablets containing the UV protectants.\u0026nbsp; Tablets contained UV protectants in either 20:20:5:45:10 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:PLA:UV protectant (ZO1 and TiO2-1) or 20:20:5:45:20 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:PLA:UV protectant (ZO2 and TiO2-2).\u0026nbsp; The mean results from three replicate trials per treatment are shown in C, and error bars represent SEMs.\u0026nbsp; Tablets stored at 54\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C for two weeks in accelerated storage (2W-AS, D) did not have significantly different activity compared to fresh tablets (OW, D).\u0026nbsp; Both the OW and 2W-AS tablets killed significantly more larvae than their control counterparts (D, P\u0026lt;0.001 is denoted by ***, ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparison test; mean results from two replicate trials per treatment are shown, and error bars correspond to SDs).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4566173/v1/75d35bbdc029400d76622bc0.png"},{"id":60172267,"identity":"e7d0edf8-82c9-474f-acc2-c798c80e8f5b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-12 15:16:18","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":12692,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEvaluating the impacts of the tablet formulation on \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA. aegypti \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eoviposition choice.\u003c/strong\u003e A. Gravid adult female \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e are not attracted to water treated with tablets containing PCL. The mean number of eggs laid by a gravid female mosquito in three replicate trials per treatment are shown. Although gravid \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e females were attracted to lay eggs in containers treated with tablets containing PLA, the mosquitoes preferred to lay eggs in untreated water vs. water containing tablets with PCL (A, Error bars correspond to SEM; *** = P\u0026lt;0.001 with respect to the alternative container in each two-point assay, ANOVA/Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). Gravid adult female \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e laid significantly more eggs in containers treated with tablets composed of 20:20:5:45:10 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:PLA:titanium dioxide (B; assays were pursued after the tablets had been subjected to accelerated storage conditions; results were compiled from 12 replicate trials/treatment, and error bars correspond to SEM; *** = P\u0026lt;0.001 with respect to the untreated water container in each two point assay, Mann Whitney U Test).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4566173/v1/11871ca5b24bf051b85011fc.png"},{"id":60171014,"identity":"f3d8c9e2-bf7f-4681-94f6-b709a7aec11b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-12 15:08:18","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1051283,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eControlled release syt.427 tablets or briquettes retain larvicidal activity conducted for several months in indoor and outdoor trials. \u003c/strong\u003eControlled-release 5 g sinking briquettes killed \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae in simulated field trials conducted in the insectary over the course of 5-6 months (A). The mean larvicidal results from two separate (five and six month) trials, each in which five releases of 100 larvae into 7.5 L containers with 3.5 L of water are shown in A (error bars correspond to SD). The mean mortality of all 10 replicate releases per treatment is shown in B, and error bars correspond to SEM). A floating version of the syt.427 tablets performed well in semi-field trials conducted in Indiana during the summer of 2021, resulting in significant mortality of \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae in 200 L barrels (C; the mean results from replicate trials for each treatment conducted on 20 larvae are shown, and error bars correspond to SD). Significant mortality was observed when a 5 g controlled-release floating briquette was used to treat a 200 L container with 1000 larvae in simulated field trials conducted in the insectary (D; the mean results of two replicate trials per treatment are shown, and error bars correspond to standard deviation). Sustained four-month larvicidal activity of sinking syt.427 tablets was observed in semi-field outdoor roof trials conducted in a 220 L barrel in St. Augustine, Trinidad (D,E). Larvicidal activity was maintained through three releases of 150 field strain larvae into the barrels (E); the mean mortality of larvae from the three releases is shown (D); error bars represent SEM. Throughout the figure, *** corresponds to P\u0026lt;0.001 with respect to control, t-test, two-sample equal variance).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4566173/v1/711e0846eda7cdaaae4e31b4.png"},{"id":70964813,"identity":"d3625ac4-8e07-4c57-a0f8-1c748da0b653","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-12-09 16:16:10","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3881223,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4566173/v1/1842cec9-b8cd-4f5f-8861-a147fdbec018.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"Competing interest reported. The funders of this work did not play a role in the design of this study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to publish the results of this investigation. Although MDS and DWS are inventors on U.S. patent No: 62/361,704, European Application No. 17828458.4, which was filed by Indiana University, this did not affect their interpretations of the data presented in this manuscript and does not impact their adherence to journal policies on sharing data and materials. The research findings presented herein are not related to any products or services currently provided by any third parties. Although MDS is serving as a guest editor for the Vector Control for Neglected Diseases Collection, she had no involvement with the review of this manuscript at Scientific Reports. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"Development of a Controlled-Release Mosquito RNAi Yeast Larvicide Suitable for the Sustained Control of Large Water Storage Containers","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e is the principal mosquito vector of viruses that cause dengue, Zika, yellow fever, and chikungunya. Dengue, the most widespread and significant arboviral disease in the world, is a threat to roughly four billion people worldwide and has an annual incidence of approximately 400\u0026nbsp;million cases resulting in ~\u0026thinsp;40,000 deaths from severe dengue annually across the globe\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. The Pan-American Health Organization warned that 2024 may be the worst year for dengue ever recorded, with \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;3.5\u0026nbsp;million cases confirmed by Latin American governments in the first quarter of 2024\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e. Although a dengue vaccine is now available in some parts of the world\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e, the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommends that it be used only in children ages 9\u0026ndash;16 living in dengue endemic countries who have had a confirmed case of dengue, and mosquito control is therefore vital for disease control. Yellow fever is endemic in 33 African countries and 11 South American countries, and several recent outbreaks have occurred despite the availability of a highly effective vaccine\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. Furthermore, in 2015\u0026ndash;2016, large outbreaks of Zika, which has been linked to severe birth defects and neurological disorders, occurred in many countries in the Americas, and chikungunya outbreaks have occurred in more than 100 countries in the Americas, Africa, Asia, and Europe\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. No human vaccines for Zika or chikungunya are yet available, underscoring the importance of \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e mosquito control. Unfortunately, the emergence of insecticide resistance, concerns for the negative impacts of pesticides on the environment, and a lack of support for mosquito control programs compromise mosquito management strategies and efforts to control arboviral illnesses\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes lay eggs in water-holding containers, including a variety of both natural and artificial containers that collect rainwater or that are filled with water by humans. Larvae hatch from the eggs and remain in the water-filled containers through the end of the pupal stage. During this aquatic phase, the immature mosquitoes are concentrated within defined water boundaries and therefore susceptible to control efforts. Larviciding is the application of microbial or chemical agents to kill mosquito larvae, before they are reproducing adults that vector human disease pathogens, and is a key component of integrated \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e control strategies\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e. Temephos attached to silica (sand) granules, the active ingredient in Abate\u0026reg;, had historically been used to treat water containers that are too large to empty\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e and which are the most productive \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e larval habitats\u003csup\u003e4\u003c/sup\u003e. After decades of heavy temephos usage, temephos resistant \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e strains were identified in many countries\u003csup\u003e5,6\u003c/sup\u003e. Moreover, in a recent re-registration eligibility decision, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) called for labeling changes to address risks that temephos poses to human and environmental health and prohibited drinking water source treatment\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e. This compromised larval control in large water storage containers in the U.S. and many other countries, which stopped using the insecticide. Due to the loss of this pesticide option, as well as the frequent development of pesticide resistance and growing concerns regarding the non-target effects of pesticides in the environment, the development of new environmentally-friendly larvicides that have minimal impact on the environment is therefore essential and urgent\u003csup\u003e8\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRNA interference (RNAi) has been used extensively for functional genetic studies in a wide variety of organisms, including insects\u003csup\u003e9,10\u003c/sup\u003e. The RNAi pathway is initiated by Dicer, an enzyme that cleaves long double stranded RNA (dsRNA) into short 20\u0026ndash;25 nucleotide-long small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that function as sequence-specific interfering RNA, which may offer a species-specific means of targeting insect pests. siRNAs silence genes that are complementary in sequence by promoting transcript turnover, cleavage, and disruption of translation\u003csup\u003e10,11\u003c/sup\u003e, and numerous studies have demonstrated that target gene silencing through RNAi can promote insect death\u003csup\u003e9,10\u003c/sup\u003e. For example, Baum et al.\u003csup\u003e12\u003c/sup\u003e engineered transgenic corn plants expressing dsRNA targeting the western corn rootworm \u003cem\u003eDiabrotica virgifera virgifera\u003c/em\u003e LeConte. dsRNA insecticidal corn targeting this species was registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e. An RNAi insecticide targeting the Colorado potato beetle was also registered by the EPA in December 2023\u003csup\u003e7\u003c/sup\u003e. These and other findings suggest that RNAi can be exploited to control insect agricultural pests. This study aimed to apply RNAi technology for the control of insect vectors of human disease pathogens. Here, we evaluate the impact of deploying yeast RNAi larvicides, a new species-specific eco-friendly class of insecticides, for the treatment of large water storage containers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur recent studies have demonstrated that short hairpin RNA (shRNA) designed to specifically target mosquito larval genes can be expressed in \u003cem\u003eSaccharomyces cerevisiae\u003c/em\u003e (baker\u0026rsquo;s yeast), a model organism that is genetically tractable, inexpensive to culture, and which can facilitate shRNA production during yeast propagation\u003csup\u003e13,14\u003c/sup\u003e. The yeast, which can be heat killed prior to deployment, is highly attractive to mosquito larvae\u003csup\u003e15\u003c/sup\u003e and readily consumed, even when placed in containers bearing other food sources. Yeast RNAi systems promote high levels of gene silencing during the larval stages and, when used to target larval genes that are required for survival, can generate high levels of larval mortality upon consumption\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e. The yeast has demonstrated high levels of efficacy in semi-field trials\u003csup\u003e14,16\u003c/sup\u003e. Here, we describe the formulation of dried heat-killed yeast tablets and briquettes that were developed as long-lasting controlled-release larvicides for the treatment of large water storage containers.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results and Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eEvaluation of yeast prepared through spray drying and lyophilization:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevious studies described development of the syt.427\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e and sema.460\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003e yeast strains, which express short hairpin RNA (shRNAs) targeting conserved sites in the mosquito \u003cem\u003esynaptotagmin (syt)\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003esemaphorin (sema)\u003c/em\u003e genes, respectively. These RNAi yeast insecticides effectively kill \u003cem\u003eAedes, Anopheles\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eCulex\u003c/em\u003e mosquito larvae, yet were not found to impact the survival of several non-target arthropods that consumed the yeast. In initial experiments with RNAi yeast, the yeast was heat killed and then dried in a food dehydrator\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e. This drying procedure\u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003e was suitable for initial proof of concept experiments but is not sufficient for scaled yeast production and could permit the growth of other microbes during the extended drying procedure. To address these concerns, cultures of syt.427 and sema.460 yeast were heat-killed and subjected to spray drying. Initial attempts to spray dry the yeast resulted in inclusion of dried media in the samples, an issue that could make it difficult to determine how much yeast is present in the resulting product, and which may not be desired in treated water containers. This was resolved through the addition of a water washing step prior to drying. The larvicidal activity of syt.427 and sema.460 yeast was retained following spray drying, as demonstrated in laboratory larvicide trials conducted on 20 \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae placed in 3.5 L of water in 7.5 L containers (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eA, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001 vs. control spray dried yeast) which corresponded roughly to the size of ovitrap containers used in recent field studies in Trinidad\u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e. Significant syt.427 and syt.460 larvicidal activity was observed after two, three, and four weeks of storage of the dried yeast in the dark at room temperature (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001 vs. control; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB). Although the shelf life of the dried insecticidal yeast was retained over a four-week period, microbial growth was noted in the yeast-treated larvicide trial containers. Furthermore, a higher than normal incidence of control larval death, which is typically close to 0%\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e, was observed in these experiments (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eB). The high rate of control larval death complicated interpretation of these data and would likely hamper longer term storage of the yeast.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to spray drying, preparations of syt.427 and sema.460 yeast were also heat-inactivated and dried through lyophilization. The lyophilized samples were evaluated after one, two, three, and four weeks of storage in the dark at room temperature. In laboratory trials conducted on \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae, both the syt.427 and sema.460 larvicides induced significant larval death with respect to the control samples throughout this time period (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001; Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD). No larval death was observed in control yeast-treated containers (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD). However, similar to trials conducted with spray dried yeast, the growth of microbes was again noted in containers treated with lyophilized yeast. Although the microbes did not kill control larvae in this trial (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eD), this observation indicated that the addition of preservatives to the yeast larvicide samples could prove useful.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAnalysis of larvicides prepared with added preservatives:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt was hypothesized that the use of commercial drying procedures, in combination with the addition of antimicrobials, would improve the shelf life of the yeast larvicides and prevent microbial growth on the yeast during larvicide trials. To evaluate this, ascorbic acid, benzoic acid, citric acid, and potassium sorbate, all of which are food-grade level preservatives\u003csup\u003e21\u003c/sup\u003e were added to the yeast prior to spray drying, and the activities of these larvicides were assessed. The levels of larval mortality observed following treatments with syt.427 yeast prepared with any of the preservatives were comparable to those of non-dried wet formulations of yeast and to that of spray dried yeast lacking preservatives (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC). No significant differences (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) were detected in the activities of syt.427 yeast prepared with the different preservatives (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC). Moreover, none of the preservatives impacted control yeast-treated larval survival levels (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC). The additives themselves do not, therefore, appear to be toxic to larvae or to impact activity of the larvicides. Moreover, microbial growth was not detected in any of the containers treated with larvicides containing preservatives during the trials. These data suggest that any of the four preservatives are suitable for prevention of microbial growth in the yeast larvicides and treated containers. Moreover, given that all the preservatives are food grade additives, it is anticipated that they would be considered safe to use in potable water and would not pose substantial risks to non-target organisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile all four anti-microbials preserved the activity of the dried yeast larvicides (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eC), benzoic acid has low solubility in water\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e. Given that the larvicides will be used in aquatic habitats, this preservative was selected for all future studies. Moreover, due to the availability of a lyophilizer on site and the relative technical ease of lyophilizing yeast preparations, lyophilized samples were used throughout the remainder of this investigation. It should be noted, however, that industrial scale production operations might opt to use spray drying, which is more cost-efficient at a commercial scale\u003csup\u003e23\u0026ndash;26\u003c/sup\u003e. syt.427 strain yeast, which was used for the remainder of these studies, was lyophilized with benzoic acid and induced significant larval death (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eE). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses accelerated storage tests\u003csup\u003e27\u003c/sup\u003e to assess chemical shelf lives\u003csup\u003e27\u003c/sup\u003e. In these tests, the insecticides are subjected to accelerated storage at 54\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C for two weeks. A portion of the freshly prepared syt.427\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;benzoic acid lyophilized yeast was subjected to these storage conditions, while the other portion was stored at -20\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C. Lyophilized syt.427 yeast powder stored at -20\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C or subjected to accelerated storage conditions induced significant larval mortality with respect to control yeast (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eE). These results suggest that lyophilized yeast prepared with benzoic acid has an excellent shelf life, and it was anticipated that tableting and encapsulation of this yeast, would further improve its shelf life.\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eIdentification of bulking agents and UV protectant additives that maintain the positive impacts of yeast on A. aegypti oviposition\u003c/b\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBulking agents are used in the preparation of large tablet and briquette formulations. In initial experiments, two starches, maltodextrin and HI-CAP 100, were evaluated as potential bulking agents. Each starch was mixed 1:1 with control and syt.427 dried yeast. However, water in the treated containers was cloudy, and it was anticipated that use of these tablets in the tropics would likely present problems resulting from overgrowth of unwanted microbes in the water containers. Work with these starches was therefore discontinued. b-D-lactose and microcrystalline cellulose were then assessed as potential bulking agents. 400 mg tablets containing 10% control interfering RNA yeast with 90% b-D-lactose or microcrystalline cellulose filler were prepared and evaluated. In both cases, significant control larval death was observed (not shown), and the b-D-lactose also resulted in clouding of the water. The amount of yeast included in each tablet was therefore increased, as there was concern that insufficient nutrition was a potential cause of larval death in these assays. These formulations were further modified through the addition of chitosan, a polysaccharide used in several mosquito larval RNAi studies\u003csup\u003e15,28\u003c/sup\u003e. These modifications did not improve the outcome for yeast containing b-D-lactose, which still generated cloudy water and control larval death (not shown) and was therefore eliminated from further consideration. The addition of microcrystalline cellulose resulted in negligible (1%) control larval death, with 91\u0026plusmn;2.5% (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001 vs. control) larval death resulting from treatments with tablets containing microcrystalline cellulose and chitosan (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eA), which were subsequently selected as bulking agents.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eComposition of PLA and PCL tablets evaluated.\u003c/b\u003e The name of the tablet, the composition of the tablet, and the state of the tablet following submersion in water are noted. Results from the larvicide trials performed with each tablet are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTreatments\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescription\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTablet Condition\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-1 (Control)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlmost Intact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-1 (Control)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloating components observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-1 (Control)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlmost Intact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-1 (Control)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloating components observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-2 (Control)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSlightly broken and dispersed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-2 (Control)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloating components observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-2 (Control)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBroken into small mounds\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-2 (Control)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloating components observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-1 (427b)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlmost Intact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-1 (427b)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome component is floating (more than in other containers)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-1 (427b)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlmost Intact\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-1 (427b)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:5:55 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome component is floating (more than in other buckets)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-2 (427b)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHas formed a mound\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePLA-2 (427b)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Lactic Acid (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloating components observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-2 (427b)-T\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Tablet)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFormed a mound\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePCL-2 (427b)-P\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e20:20:30:30 yeast:chitosan:microcrystalline cellulose:Poly Caprolactone (Powder)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFloating components observed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWP-Control\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWet pellet control for above yeast preparations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYeast has dispersed and settled on the bottom.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWP-427b\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe microcrystalline cellulose tablets were then evaluated in combination with polylactic acid (PLA) or polycaprolactone (PCL), which were provided in a variety of proportions as noted in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. The conditions of the tablets after five days in water was noted for each formulation (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), and the larvicidal activity of each tablet is shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB. While all the syt.427 tablets induced significant larval mortality with respect to their relevant control counterparts, some of the tablets resulted in \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;5% control mortality (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB). This was presumably due to poor growth resulting from insufficient yeast release and occasional films forming at the surface of the water upon release of particulate matter. The potential for these formulations to impact the ability of yeast to promote oviposition in treated containers was also assessed. Although yeast typically promotes oviposition in containers bearing water and yeast (vs. water alone)\u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e, the addition of PCL to the tablets reversed this behavior, with mosquitoes choosing to lay eggs in containers bearing water alone during insectary trials (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA). Based on the combined analysis of tablet stability in water (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), the performance of each formulation in larvicide trials (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eB), and the ability of tablets with PLA, but not PCL, to attract mosquitoes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eA), tablet formulations with microcrystalline cellulose, chitosan, and PLA, were selected for subsequent work.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe addition of titanium dioxide or zinc oxide as UV protectants was also assessed. Both UV protectants are approved as food grade materials in the United States\u003csup\u003e21\u003c/sup\u003e, and neither had a significant impact on larvicide activity or control survival (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eC). Although the addition of UV protectants did not impact the performance of the yeast larvicide, these tablets, particularly those containing zinc oxide, disintegrated quickly in water. It was noted that baking the tablets during accelerated storage experiments improved tablet stability, and so this step was included during subsequent tablet preparations. 400 mg tablets composed of 20% syt.427 yeast, 20% chitosan, 5% microcrystalline cellulose, 45% PLA and 10% titanium dioxide (percentages by weight) were prepared and will now be referred to as controlled-release sinking syt.427 tablets. These tablets performed well in accelerated storage assays (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD) and maintained larvicidal activity through two releases of first instar larvae into 7.5 L containers in the insectary (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eD). Moreover, larval attraction to this formulation of yeast tablets was maintained in two-point oviposition assays conducted in the insectary, in which gravid females preferred to lay eggs in yeast-larvicide treated water vs. water alone (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eB, p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eControlled-release RNA larvicides display significant residual activity in water:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGiven the results obtained with the controlled-release tablets, the next goal was to prepare and test a larger sized 5 g briquette (20 yeast: 20 chitosan: 5 microcrystalline cellulose: 45 PLA: 10 titanium dioxide formulation). These briquettes were designed for use in longer assays conducted over several months, during which time the residual activity of the controlled-release formulations could be better assessed. The mean results from two such trials performed in 7.5 L containers in the insectary, the first conducted from July through December 2020, and the second conducted from November 2020 through May 2021, are shown in Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eA. These results demonstrate that the activity of the larvicides was retained over the 5\u0026ndash;6 month duration of the experiments, in which significant mortality was observed during each of five releases of 100 larvae in treated containers (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001 with respect to control containers, Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eB).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eAssessment of controlled-release yeast larvicides in large water storage containers with varying densities of larvae and under semi-field conditions\u003c/b\u003e:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe next goal was to assess the activity of the larvicide in larger 37.9 L (10 gallon) barrel-sized containers. These assays were conducted outdoors under semi-field conditions in Notre Dame, IN. In preparation for these experiments, we first attempted to rear larvae on a control yeast sinking 400 mg tablet placed in these barrel-sized containers. However, when control larvae were released in the containers, all the larvae died within several days, presumably because they could not swim to the bottom and eat the yeast that had been placed in these large-sized containers with a greater depth than the smaller 7.5 L containers. To address this, a 400 mg floating tablet formulation consisting of tablets prepared with a 9 yeast: 9 PLA: 2 titanium dioxide: 20 beeswax ratio was prepared and used in trials that were completed in the large 37.9 L containers maintained outdoors under semi-field conditions. When floating tablets were used, although the control yeast-treated larvae survived, significant larval mortality was observed in the syt.427-treated barrel (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eC; P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo account for water containers with higher larval densities, the number of larvae added to the barrels was increased to 1000. This required development of larger 5 g floating briquettes, which were prepared in ratios of 1 yeast: 1PLA: 0.22 titanium dioxide: 0.444 milled beeswax, layered with 1 g milled beeswax then again layered with 5 ml 3:1 melted milled beeswax: hollow glass microspheres to add buoyancy after annealing. The tablets were assessed in barrel assays conducted within the insectary. This floating syt.427 tablet formulation induced significant (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) larval death in replicate trials conducted on 1000 \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD), indicating that the yeast formulation was suitable for treatment of large water storage containers with high densities of larvae.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSustained A. aegypti larval control in large water storage containers in Trinidad:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo better simulate natural containers, 220 L barrels were set outdoors for nine months prior to the initiation of larvicide trials in St. Augustine, Trinidad. This permitted deposition and growth of algae and other organic matter, which could be accessed by first instar larvae, permitting the use of sinking yeast briquettes. The barrels were treated with either 5 g control or syt.427 sinking briquettes (80 yeast: 80 chitosan: 20 microcrystalline cellulose: 180 PLA: 40 titanium dioxide). During the four-month trials, three separate batches of 150 \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae were added to each container after the previous batch of larvae in the control-treated barrel matured. Although survival rates were lower in the control barrels (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD,E) than what had been observed in trials conducted in Indiana, survival rates in the syt.427 barrels were significantly lower (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) than the control barrels (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eD,E). These results confirmed the ability of sinking controlled release syt.427 briquettes to provide sustained \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e control in large outdoor barrels in the tropics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions and future directions:","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn summary, a heat-inactivated dried yeast was incorporated into a biodegradable matrix containing a mixture of polylactic acid, benzoic acid, and titanium dioxide. The formulation was prepared using food-grade level components to prevent toxicity to humans or other organisms. Both floating (with beeswax and glass microsphere) and sinking (with chitosan) versions of the tablets were prepared for treatment of various sized water containers, including 200 L household water storage tank-sized containers. The tablets passed accelerated storage tests of shelf-life stability and demonstrated up to six months residual activity in water. The yeast performed well in a variety of containers, including water barrels containing 20-1000 larvae each, and in outdoor barrel trials in the tropics. Future studies should include evaluation of the yeast larvicide in larger operational field trials in which the potential for incorporating this new class of larvicides into integrated mosquito control programs can be further assessed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs discussed above, the loss of temephos left a gap in the existing larvicide repertoire. It is therefore timely that controlled-release formulations of RNAi yeast were successfully developed and performed well in semi-field trials conducted at two study sites. Although the toxin \u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis israelensis\u003c/em\u003e (Bti) can be used as a larvicide\u003csup\u003e29\u003c/sup\u003e for treatment of large water storage containers and potable water, it is not specific to mosquitoes, and Bt resistance has begun to emerge in a number of crop pests\u003csup\u003e30\u003c/sup\u003e, highlighting the importance of developing new classes of mosquito-specific larvicides such as RNAi yeast. Likewise, Spinosad\u003csup\u003e31\u003c/sup\u003e, which is derived from a soil bacterium, is approved for treatment of drinking water, but resistance has begun to emerge to this broad-spectrum insecticide\u003csup\u003e32\u003c/sup\u003e. The insect growth regulators pyriproxyfen and methoprene are approved for drinking water treatment. Pyriproxyfen, which can be dispersed by mosquitoes during skip oviposition, is relatively safe for vertebrate organisms, but is not specific to mosquitoes and can kill other insects\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e. Although methoprene does not pose unreasonable risks to human health, it is extremely toxic to other invertebrate species\u003csup\u003e34\u003c/sup\u003e, and reduced susceptibility has begun to emerge\u003csup\u003e35,36\u003c/sup\u003e. The potential for introducing RNAi yeast to \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e mosquito control programs, which could be rotated with the use of these other larvicides, may prove beneficial for reducing the incidence of larvicide resistance, while also offering an alternative that is designed to be specific to mosquitoes, allowing non-targets to survive. Large-scaled larvicide trials should be conducted in support of potential future registry applications to the U.S. EPA and the WHO.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes, the syt.427 larvicide, as well as a number of other existing RNAi yeast larvicide strains that have been developed, including a robust commercial-ready strain that silences the \u003cem\u003eShaker\u003c/em\u003e gene\u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003e, target conserved sites in \u003cem\u003eAnopheles\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eCulex spp.\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e. In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a vector alert noting that the spread of \u003cem\u003eA. stephensi\u003c/em\u003e is a major threat to malaria control and elimination in Africa and southern Asia and urging for immediate action to control the spread of this insect\u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e. \u003cem\u003eA. stephensi\u003c/em\u003e, which has adapted to developing in a wide variety of human-made containers, is susceptible to larvicides\u003csup\u003e39,40\u003c/sup\u003e. The WHO recommends that larviciding be considered for malaria control in areas where breeding sites are few, fixed, and findable\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e, suggesting that RNAi yeast larvicides may prove invaluable in the fight to control this invasive malaria mosquito. Moreover, larvicides are also used for control of \u003cem\u003eCulex\u003c/em\u003e spp. mosquitoes. For example, the North Shore Mosquito Abatement District has applied a variety of larvicides to catch basins in Chicago since the mid-1990s, and it will be interesting to ascertain whether these controlled-release tablets, or perhaps other yeast formulations, will be useful for treatment of catch basins\u003csup\u003e41,42\u003c/sup\u003e. Past studies suggest that selection of the proper formulation will be critical for catch basin treatments, where loss of larvicides over time can be an issue\u003csup\u003e43\u003c/sup\u003e. Evaluation of yeast larvicides in catch basins will inform the best strategies for RNAi yeast larvicide formulation and deployment for control of \u003cem\u003eCulex\u003c/em\u003e spp. mosquitoes. RNAi yeast larvicides, which can readily be incorporated into useful controlled-release formulations, may prove invaluable for the control of \u003cem\u003eAedes, Anopheles\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eCulex\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMaterials:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eMaterials used for tablet preparation\u003c/em\u003e: The following materials were acquired and used for tablet preparation: beeswax (yellow, Strahl \u0026amp; Pitsch SP66G, 0911/15), chitosan (Sigma-Aldrich C3646), hollow glass microspheres (System Three, 646697002783), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC, Alfa Aesar A17730.36), polylactide acid resin (PLA; Natureworks Ingeo Biopolymer 6362D, CK0528B131), and titanium dioxide (TiO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, Spectrum Chemical T1083). Additional materials evaluated during the formulation studies included: b-D-lactose (Acros Organics), maltodextrin (Maltrin M180, Grain Processing Corporation, modified food starch (HI-CAP 100, Ingredion), zinc oxide, poly(caprolactone) (PCL Resomer C209, Evonik).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eMilling of beeswax\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeeswax was milled using a laboratory scale hammer mill (Fitzpatrick Hammer Mill, model L1A). The mill was operated with liquid nitrogen and a 3.96 mm screen. The beeswax was submerged in liquid nitrogen prior to milling, which was required to reduce the particle size and to prepare a uniform blend of powder for tableting. Particle size analysis (Malvern Mastersizer 3000) was used to quantify the particle size of the cryomilled beeswax, which was 60.4 Dx (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e) (\u0026micro;m), 241 Dx (50) (\u0026micro;m), 490 Dx (90) (\u0026micro;m) with a 1.785 span.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003ePreparation of PLA\u003c/em\u003e: Spray drying was used to micronize the PLA, which was required to reduce the particle size and to prepare a uniform blend of powder for tableting. 40 g of PLA was dissolved into 1560 g of acetone. The solution was spray dried with a Pro-C-epT 4M8 laboratory scale spray dryer under the following configuration and conditions: 0.4 mm nozzle bifluid nozzle, 3.0 bar atomizing air pressure, 80\u0026deg;C inlet air temperature, 6 g/min feed rate, and 0.3 m\u003csup\u003ew\u003c/sup\u003e/min air speed. Particle size analysis (Malvern Mastersizer 3000) was used to verify the particle size of the spray dried PLA, which was 1.30 Dx (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e) (\u0026micro;m), 12.1 Dx (50) (\u0026micro;m), 155 Dx (90) (\u0026micro;m) with a 12.669 span.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eYeast preparation, drying, transport, and storage:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eYeast strains\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eStable transformants expressing syt.427\u003csup\u003e17\u003c/sup\u003e, sema.460\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003e, or control\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e shRNA were used in this investigation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eYeast cultivation\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eCulturing and galactose induction was performed as described\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003e. Yeast was then heat-killed and pelleted as described\u003csup\u003e19\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eTransport and storage of yeast\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpray dried or lyophilized yeast was shipped to the Scheel laboratory on ice packs via overnight courier service. Prior to shipment and upon arrival at the final destination, yeast was stored at \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;20\u0026deg; C unless specified otherwise. Pelleted yeast that had not been dried was stored in glass vials, packaged on ice, and shipped overnight. Such samples served as wet formulation (WF) controls.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eSpray drying\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpray drying was performed with a Pro-C-epT 4M8 laboratory scale spray dryer. Yeast media was pumped into the spray dryer at 5\u0026ndash;6 g/min. The fluid was atomized with a 0.6 mm diameter air atomized nozzle with an atomizing pressure of 3.0 bar. The spray dryer inlet temperature was set to 180\u0026deg; C, resulting in an outlet temperature of 45\u0026ndash;55\u0026deg; C, depending upon the formulation. Air flow through the spray dryer was set to 0.3 m\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e/min. For initial spray dry preparations, media was used as the carrier during the spray drying process. However roughly half of the spray dried material, which had a powder-like consistency, was composed of dried media. Therefore, in all subsequent preparations, and for the experiments described herein, the yeast was pelleted through centrifugation, and excess media was removed. The yeast was then resuspended in e-pure water and spray dried. The resulting preparations contained only dried yeast and lacked dried media.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eLyophilization\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollowing pelleting, the yeast was rinsed by resuspending it in 10 ml of e-pure water prior to heat killing at 70\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C for 25 min. Following the addition of preservative, the centrifuge tube was submerged in liquid nitrogen until frozen then placed on a Labconco FreeZone 6 L Console Freeze Dryer (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) for 48\u0026ndash;72 hrs until dry.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo assess preservatives, the following food-grade preservatives were added to yeast cultures after pelleting and resuspension in water prior to drying of the yeast: 0.1% ascorbic acid, 0.1% benzoic acid, 0.1% citric acid, or 0.1% potassium sorbate. After evaluation of these preservatives, 0.1% benzoic acid was selected as the preservative of choice and used in the remainder of the experiments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eAssessment of shelf life\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor evaluation of shelf life, yeast was stored in the dark at room temperature (~\u0026thinsp;22\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C on average). Samples were stored for 0\u0026ndash;4 weeks after shipment and then evaluated in larvicide trials. Accelerated storage tests were also pursued through storage of yeast at 54\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003e C for two weeks per the protocol described by the EPA\u003csup\u003e27\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePreparation of controlled release sinking briquettes:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe following procedure produced fourteen 5.0 g briquettes of control or syt.427 yeast per production: 17g of control or syt.427 yeast, 17g of chitosan, 4.25g of MCC, 38.25g of spray dried PLA, and 8.5 g of TiO2 were combined and blended using a FlackTek DAC 150.1 FV Speed Mixer for 1 minute at 2000 rpms. Each tablet was then produced using a 5.0 g portion from the master mix that was transferred to a 25 mm diameter die set (Pellet Press Die Sets, Traverse City, MI). The die plunger was inserted, and the tablet was formed using a Model C Carver Laboratory Press at 12 tons for 15 seconds. Tablets were then removed from the die, covered with aluminum foil, then heat treated at 57\u0026deg;C for 72 hours. No additional materials were needed to promote sinking of the tablets.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eb-D-lactose, maltodextrin, and HI-CAP 100 were also assessed as bulking agents in place of the MCC, though not selected for use in the final tablet formulation. PCL and PLA were initially assessed at a variety of concentrations (see Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) prior to development of the above sinking tablet formulation. Zinc oxide was also evaluated but not selected as a U.V. protectant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePreparation of controlled release floating tablets and briquettes:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe following materials, which yielded eight 5 g briquettes of control or syt.427 yeast, were blended at 200 rpms for 1 minute with a FlackTek DAC 150.1 FV Speedmixer: 10 g yeast, 10 g spray dried PLA, 2.2 g TiO2, and 4.44 g beeswax. For each briquette, 1 g of milled beeswax followed by 2.66 g of the above mixture were layered into a 25 mm diameter die set (Pellet Press Die Sets, Traverse City, MI) then pressed using a Model C Carver Press at 12 tons for 15 seconds. The tablets were then placed into a weight boat wax side up, covered with aluminum foil, and heat treated at 57\u0026deg;C for 72 hours. Separately, \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;10 g of a 3:1 ratio of beeswax to hollow glass microspheres were prepared and heated using a hot plate while stirring manually with a metal spatula until the wax was melted and the mixture was evenly dispersed. Immediately upon removing the tablet from the oven, it was placed back into the die, beeswax side up. Using a serological pipette, ~5ml of molten wax/beads mixture was placed into the die and gently pressed, letting the plunger fall naturally. Six 400 mg tablets of control and syt. 427 were also prepared by combing these materials in the following ratio: 90 control or syt.427,90 spray dried PLA, and 20 TiO2. The materials were speed mixed at 2000 rpms for 1 minute. Each tablet was prepared with 200mg of the master mix that was transferred to a 12 mm diameter die set (Pellet Press Die Sets, Traverse City, MI). 200 mg of hand cut beeswax was then layered on top of the master mix layer and pressed 3.5 tons for 15 seconds. The tablets were then placed in a weigh boat, wax side up, covered with aluminum foil, and heat treated at 57\u0026deg;C for 72 hours.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMosquito rearing\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eIndiana insectary: A. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e Liverpool-IB12 (LVP-IB12) mosquitoes were reared as described according to established protocols\u003csup\u003e44\u003c/sup\u003e within an insectary maintained at a temperature of 26.5\u0026deg; C, an approximate relative humidity of 80%, and with a 12-hour light and dark cycle featuring 1-hour crepuscular periods at the beginning and end of each cycle. Larvae were fed with liver powder (900396, MP Biologicals, Solon, OH, USA); male and female adult mosquitoes were supplied a 10% sucrose solution, while adult females were provided with defibrinated sheep blood meals (HemoStat Laboratories located in Dixon, CA, USA) using an artificial membrane feeding system (Hemotek Limited, Blackburn, UK).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eTrinidad insectary: A. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e that had been collected in Trinidad (Diego Martin, Maraval and St. Augustine) were used to establish laboratory colonies; the larvae used in the larvicide trial were approximately fifth generation. The insectary in Trinidad was maintained at ambient temperature and humidity conditions, and adult female mosquitoes were blood fed as described above but using fresh sheep\u0026rsquo;s blood provided by the School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mt. Hope, UWI.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLarvicide assays:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eSmall container assays\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith the exception of the residual studies, large container assays, and semi-field trials (see below), larvicide assays were performed in the insectary as described (Mysore et al., 2018) and conducted in 7.5 L containers bearing 3.5 L of water (which was approximately the container size/water volume of containers used in recent ovitrap trials conducted in Trinidad\u003csup\u003e20\u003c/sup\u003e). These assays conformed to the guidelines of the World Health Organization\u003csup\u003e45\u003c/sup\u003e. Each replicate assay was performed using 20 first instar \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e Liverpool-IB12 (LVP-IB12) strain mosquitoes per treatment. Depending on the amount of materials available at each step in the tablet design process, one or more replicate container trials were performed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eResidual activity assays in 7.5 L containers\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003e100 first instar \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e larvae were added to each of two 7.5 L containers bearing 3.5 L of water. One container was treated with a 5 g syt.427 larvicide tablet and the other with a 5 g control interfering RNA tablet. Control- and syt.427-treated larval mortality was recorded. Upon emergence of any surviving animals as adult mosquitoes, a new set of 100 first instar larvae was added to each container (termed release 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 herein). This occurred approximately once per month.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eLarge container trials in Indiana\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge water container trials were conducted in a similar manner, except that 200 L of water was placed in Rubbermaid Commercial 37.2 L (10 gallon) Round Plastic Brute Containers (Rubbermaid, Atlanta, GA). These trials were initially performed in the insectary.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eSemi-field trials in large containers\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe large container trials were also performed under semi-field conditions in Indiana and Trinidad and were conducted in accordance with the World Health Organization larvicide testing guidelines\u003csup\u003e45\u003c/sup\u003e. The trials performed in Notre Dame, Indiana were conducted in June and August 2021 on 20 first instar larvae placed in 200 L of water contained in a Rubbermaid Commercial 37.2 L (10 gallon) Round Plastic Brute Containers (Rubbermaid, Atlanta, GA). Each container was treated with one sinking and one floating 0.4 g tablet and covered with mesh to prevent the entry or exit of any organisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe trials performed in Trinidad were conducted from October 2023 through January 2024 and performed in 220 L barrels that had been filled with tap water. The barrels were placed outdoors (uncovered) for nine months prior to the start of the trials, then covered with 1 mm mesh for one month prior to the start of the experiment to ensure that no natural mosquito activity remained, then topped off with water to bring the volume to 140 L. 5 g sinking yeast briquettes (control or syt.427) were added to the barrels. 150 first instar larvae were then added to the barrels, which were then covered with 1 mm mesh, preventing the entry or exit of any other organisms during the trial. A new set of 150 first larvae was added to each container after the prior set had died or emerged (referred to as releases 1, 2, and 3 herein).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eAnalysis of larvicide data\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe percentages of larval mortality for replicates of each treatment were transformed using the arcsine transformation prior to analyzing the data using ANOVA (Tukey\u0026rsquo;s multiple comparison post-hoc test), Student\u0026rsquo;s t-test, or Mann Whitney U test as indicated in the figure legends.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEthics Statement\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eNo vertebrate animals were used directly in these studies, as mosquitoes were blood fed with a membrane feeding system as described above. The semi-field trials were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of the West Indies (Study CEC403/12/17), the chair of the UWI St. Augustine Department of Life Sciences, and the Southwest Regional Health Authority, a division of the Trinidad and Tobago Ministry of Health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements: \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eWe thank the members of our labs for their advice, as well as Longhua Sun, Britton Sofhauser, Joi Misenti, Joe Roethele, and Diana Cervera for technical support.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contributions: \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eK.M., J.D.O, C.D., D.W.S. and M.D.S. designed and conceived the study; J.D.O., C.D., and C.C-G designed and prepared the yeast tablets with input from K.M., D.W.S., and M.D.S; K.M. performed the Indiana larvicide trials, and A.T.M.S., N.W., R.S.F, and L.D.J., and S.S. carried out the trials in Trinidad; K.M., D.W.S., and M.D.S. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, which was edited by all the authors; D.W.S. and M.D.S. obtained funding; J.D.O., C.D., A.M., D.W.S. and M.D.S. supervised the project. \u0026nbsp;All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding: \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe Innovative Vector Control Consortium funded the formulation and barrel studies. \u0026nbsp;The ovitrap container studies were supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, through the Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program under Award No. W81XWH-17-1-0294 and W81XWH-17-1-0295 (to M.D.S. and D.W.S., respectively). \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability Statement: \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAll data are available within the text of this article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdditional Information: \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe funders of this work did not play a role in the design of this study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to publish the results of this investigation. \u0026nbsp;The opinions, interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the manuscript\u0026rsquo;s authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity. \u0026nbsp;In the conduction of research utilizing recombinant DNA, the investigator adhered to NIH Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.Although MDS and DWS are inventors on U.S. patent No: 62/361,704, European Application No. 17828458.4, which was filed by Indiana University, this did not affect their interpretations of the data presented in this manuscript and does not impact their adherence to journal policies on sharing data and materials. \u0026nbsp;The research findings presented herein are not related to any products or services currently provided by any third parties. \u0026nbsp; Although MDS is serving as a guest editor for the Vector Control for Neglected Diseases Collection, she had no involvement with the review of this manuscript at \u003cem\u003eScientific Reports. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eThe other authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCDC. Mosquitoes. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.cdc.gov\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.cdc.gov\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePAHO. PAHO calls for collective action in response to record increase in dengue cases in the Americas. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.paho.org/en/news/28-3-2024-paho-calls-collective-action-response-record-increase-dengue-cases-americas\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.paho.org/en/news/28-3-2024-paho-calls-collective-action-response-record-increase-dengue-cases-americas\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBASF. Abate\u003csup\u003e\u0026reg;\u003c/sup\u003e Larvicides \u0026ndash; Stop disease-causing insects before they hatch \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://agriculture.basf.com/global/en/business-areas/public-health/products/abate.html\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://agriculture.basf.com/global/en/business-areas/public-health/products/abate.html\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChadee, D. D., Doon, R. \u0026amp; Severson, D. W. Surveillance of dengue fever cases using a novel \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e population sampling method in Trinidad, West Indies: the cardinal points approach. Acta Trop 104, 1\u0026ndash;7 (2007). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.06.006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.actatropica.2007.06.006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMazzarri, M. B. and Georghiou, G. P. Characterization of resistance to organophoshate, carbamate, and pyrethroid insecticides in field population of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e from Venezuela. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 11(3), 315\u0026ndash;322 (1995).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaavedra-Rodriguez, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Differential transcription profiles in \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e detoxification genes after temephos selection. Insect Mol Biol 23, 199\u0026ndash;215 (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/imb.12073\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/imb.12073\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEPA. Signed temephos registration review. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.regulations.gov/document/EPA-HQ-\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003eOPP-2008-0444-0019. (2011).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAirs, P. M. \u0026amp; Bartholomay, L. C. RNA Interference for mosquito and mosquito-borne disease control. Insects 8 (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/insects8010004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/insects8010004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYu, N. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Delivery of dsRNA for RNAi in insects: an overview and future directions. Insect Sci 20, 4\u0026ndash;14 (2013). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01534.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01534.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang, H., Li, H. C. \u0026amp; Miao, X. X. Feasibility, limitation and possible solutions of RNAi-based technology for insect pest control. Insect Sci 20, 15\u0026ndash;30 (2013). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01513.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01513.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi, J., Wang, X. P., Wang, M. Q., Ma, W. H. \u0026amp; Hua, H. X. Advances in the use of the RNA interference technique in Hemiptera. Insect Sci 20, 31\u0026ndash;39 (2013). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01550.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01550.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBaum, J. A. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Control of coleopteran insect pests through RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol 25, 1322\u0026ndash;1326 (2007). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1359\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/nbt1359\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDuman-Scheel, M. \u003cem\u003eSaccharomyces cerevisiae\u003c/em\u003e (baker's yeast) as an interfering RNA expression and delivery system. Curr Drug Targets 20, 942\u0026ndash;952 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2174/1389450120666181126123538\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2174/1389450120666181126123538\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHapairai, L. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Lure-and-kill yeast interfering RNA larvicides targeting neural genes in the human disease vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. Sci Rep 7, 13223 (2017). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13566-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1038/s41598-017-13566-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMysore, K., Flannery, E. M., Tomchaney, M., Severson, D. W. \u0026amp; Duman-Scheel, M. Disruption of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e olfactory system development through chitosan/siRNA nanoparticle targeting of \u003cem\u003esemaphorin-1a\u003c/em\u003e. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7, e2215 (2013). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002215\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pntd.0002215\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMysore, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Characterization of a dual-action adulticidal and larvicidal interfering RNA pesticide targeting the \u003cem\u003eShaker\u003c/em\u003e gene of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14, e0008479 (2020). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008479\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pntd.0008479\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMysore, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Characterization of a yeast interfering RNA larvicide with a target site conserved in the \u003cem\u003esynaptotagmin\u003c/em\u003e gene of multiple disease vector mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 13, e0007422 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007422\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pntd.0007422\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMysore, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Characterization of a broad-based mosquito yeast interfering RNA larvicide with a conserved target site in mosquito \u003cem\u003esemaphorin-1a\u003c/em\u003e genes. Parasit Vectors 12, 256 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3504-x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13071-019-3504-x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMysore, K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Preparation and use of a yeast shRNA delivery system for gene silencing in mosquitol larvae. Methods Mol Biol 1858, 213\u0026ndash;231 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8775-7_15\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/978-1-4939-8775-7_15\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHapairai, L. K. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Evaluation of large volume yeast interfering RNA lure-and-kill ovitraps for attraction and control of \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol 35, 361\u0026ndash;370 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12504\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/mve.12504\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFDA. Food additive status list. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/food-additive-status-list\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/food-additive-status-list\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNational Library of Medicine. National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary Benzoic Acid. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Benzoic-Acid\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Benzoic-Acid\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAcar, C., Dincer, I. \u0026amp; Mujumdar, A. A comprehensive review of recent advances in renewable-based drying technologies for a sustainable future. Dry Technol 40, 1029\u0026ndash;1050 (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1848858\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/07373937.2020.1848858\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFathi, F., Ebrahimi, S. N., Matos, L. C., Oliveira, M. B. P. P. \u0026amp; Alves, R. C. Emerging drying techniques for food safety and quality: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci F 21, 1125\u0026ndash;1160 (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12898\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/1541-4337.12898\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeighambardoust, S. H., Tafti, A. G. \u0026amp; Hesari, J. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech 22, 215\u0026ndash;224 (2011). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhuenpet, K. C., N.; Jaijit, S., Arayapoonpong, S., Jittanit, W. Investigation of suitable spray drying conditions for sugarcane juice powder production with an energy consumption study. Agriculture and Natural Resources 50(2), 149\u0026ndash;145 (2016).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEPA. Accelerated storage stability and corrosion characteristics study protocol. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/accelerated-storage-stability-and-corrosion-characteristics-study-protocol\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/accelerated-storage-stability-and-corrosion-characteristics-study-protocol\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2024).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang, X. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Chitosan/interfering RNA nanoparticle mediated gene silencing in disease vector mosquito larvae. J Vis Exp (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3791/52523\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3791/52523\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEPA. Bti for Mosquito Control. (2023).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlam, I. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Role of lectin in the response of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e against Bt Toxin. Front Immunol 13, 898198 (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.898198\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fimmu.2022.898198\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBunch, T. R., Bond, C.; Buhl, K.; Stone, D. \u003cem\u003eSpinosad General Fact Sheet\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/spinosadgen.html\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/spinosadgen.html\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2014).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLan, J. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Identification of the \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e nAChR gene family and molecular target of spinosad. Pest Manag Sci 77, 1633\u0026ndash;1641 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6183\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/ps.6183\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcGregor, B. L. \u0026amp; Connelly, C. R. A review of the control of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Culicidae) in the continental United States. J Med Entomol 58, 10\u0026ndash;25 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa157\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jme/tjaa157\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEPA. Methoprene. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/pdf/0030fact.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/web/pdf/0030fact.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (1991).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMarcombe, S., Farajollahi, A., Healy, S. P., Clark, G. G. \u0026amp; Fonseca, D. M. Insecticide resistance status of United States populations of \u003cem\u003eAedes albopictus\u003c/em\u003e and mechanisms involved. PLoS One 9, e101992 (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101992\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0101992\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLau, K. W., Chen, C. D., Lee, H. L., Norma-Rashid, Y. \u0026amp; Sofian-Azirun, M. Evaluation of insect growth regulators against field-collected \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAedes albopictus\u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Culicidae) from Malaysia. J Med Entomol 52, 199\u0026ndash;206 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tju019\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/jme/tju019\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrizzee, C. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Targeting mosquitoes through generation of an insecticidal RNAi yeast strain using Cas-CLOVER and super piggyBac engineering in \u003cem\u003eSaccharomyces cerevisiae\u003c/em\u003e. J Fungi (Basel) 9 (2023). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/jof9111056\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/jof9111056\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWHO. Vector alert: \u003cem\u003eAnopheles stephensi\u003c/em\u003e invasion and spread. (2019).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWHO. \u003cem\u003eLarval source management: A supplementary meausre for malaria vector control. An operational manual.\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/85379/9789241505604_eng.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/85379/9789241505604_eng.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2012).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMnzava, A., Monroe, A. C. \u0026amp; Okumu, F. \u003cem\u003eAnopheles stephensi\u003c/em\u003e in Africa requires a more integrated response. Malar J 21, 156 (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04197-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12936-022-04197-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarbison, J. E., Henry, M., Xamplas, C. \u0026amp; Dugas, L. R. Evaluation of \u003cem\u003eCulex pipiens\u003c/em\u003e populations in a residential area with a high density of catch basins in a suburb of Chicago, Illinois. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 30, 228\u0026ndash;230 (2014). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.2987/14-6414R.1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.2987/14-6414R.1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarbison, J. E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Variable Efficacy of extended-release mosquito larvicides observed in catch basins in the northeast Chicago metropolitan area. Environ Health Insights 10, 65\u0026ndash;68 (2016). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S38096\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4137/EHI.S38096\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarbison, J. E. \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e Observed loss and ineffectiveness of mosquito larvicides applied to catch basins in the northern suburbs of Chicago IL, 2014. Environ Health Insights 9, 1\u0026ndash;5 (2015). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S24311\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4137/EHI.S24311\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eClemons, A., Mori, A., Haugen, M., Severson, D. W. \u0026amp; Duman-Scheel, M. Culturing and egg collection of \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti. Cold Spring Harb Protoc\u003c/em\u003e 2010, pdb prot5507 (2010). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot5507\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1101/pdb.prot5507\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWHO. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-WHOPES-GCDPP-2005.13\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-WHOPES-GCDPP-2005.13\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. (2005).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566173/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566173/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eLarge household water storage containers are among the most productive habitats for \u003cem\u003eAedes aegypti\u003c/em\u003e, the primary mosquito vector for dengue and other arboviral pathogens. Increasing concerns for insecticide resistance and larvicide safety are limiting the successful treatment of large household water storage containers, which are among the most productive habitats for \u003cem\u003eAedes\u003c/em\u003e juveniles. The recent development of species-specific RNAi-based yeast larvicides could help overcome these problems, particularly if shelf stable ready-to-use formulations with significant residual activity in water can be developed. Here we examine the hypothesis that development of a shelf-stable controlled-release RNAi yeast formulation can facilitate lasting control of \u003cem\u003eA. aegypti\u003c/em\u003e juveniles in large water storage containers. In this study, a dried inactivated yeast was incorporated into a biodegradable matrix containing a mixture of polylactic acid, a preservative, and UV protectants. The formulation was prepared using food-grade level components to prevent toxicity to humans or other organisms. Both floating and sinking versions of the tablets were prepared for treatment of various sized water containers, including household water storage tank-sized containers. The tablets passed accelerated storage tests of shelf life stability and demonstrated up to six months residual activity in water. The yeast performed well in both small and large containers, including water barrels containing 20-1000 larvae each, and in outdoor barrel trials. Future studies will include the evaluation of the yeast larvicide in larger operational field trials that will further assess the potential for incorporating this new technology into integrated mosquito control programs worldwide.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Development of a Controlled-Release Mosquito RNAi Yeast Larvicide Suitable for the Sustained Control of Large Water Storage Containers","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-07-12 15:08:12","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566173/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-09-17T06:48:51+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-09-13T13:27:14+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"330506704503333416847707812756841058992","date":"2024-09-03T10:49:25+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"72343484783632997911280905053578924","date":"2024-08-16T18:34:44+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-07-08T17:50:33+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"84562381686440065914505230520786237348","date":"2024-06-30T09:06:18+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"302548530555914186219153778622274130924","date":"2024-06-28T20:55:50+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-06-28T07:20:39+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-06-28T07:18:17+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2024-06-21T10:51:24+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-06-19T04:25:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Scientific Reports","date":"2024-06-11T19:56:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"scientific-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"scirep","sideBox":"Learn more about [Scientific Reports](http://www.nature.com/srep/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"","title":"Scientific Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"Scientific Reports","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"d7ab7beb-0f1e-4ee5-b382-6e2dbb521691","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 12th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":33946225,"name":"Biological sciences/Biological techniques/Genetic techniques"},{"id":33946226,"name":"Biological sciences/Genetics"},{"id":33946227,"name":"Health sciences/Diseases/Infectious diseases"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-12-09T16:04:34+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4566173","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81800-5","journal":{"identity":"scientific-reports","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Reports"},"publishedOn":"2024-12-04 15:57:49","publishedOnDateReadable":"December 4th, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-07-12 15:08:12","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41598-024-81800-5","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81800-5","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4566173","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4566173","identity":"rs-4566173","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}