The Neurosurgical Outpatient Clinic: Comparison Between Accesses in Public and Private Activities

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Neurosurgical clinic assesses presence and extent of pathologies of central and peripheral nervous system or disorders affecting the spine, to identify most effective treatment and possible recourse to surgery. Aim of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of patients evaluation requests either in public or private neurosurgical clinics. Materials: and Methods We collected and analyzed all the reports of outpatient visits of public and private clinic over a period between January and December 2018. Results: There were 0.62% real urgent visits in the public sector and 1.19% in the private sector (p=0.05). Peripheral pathologies represented 12.53% and 6.21% of pathologies evaluated in public and private sector respectively (p<0.00001). In addition, 15.76% of visits in public lead to surgery, while they represented 11.45% in private (p=0.0003). Conclusions: No study is available comparing accesses of patients in neurosurgical outpatient clinics. In public clinic, visits are booked as urgent on the prescription of the general practitioner: in reality, only 5% of these visits were really confirmed as urgent by the specialist. Peripheral pathologies are more frequent in public clinic, while cranial pathologies are more frequent in private one. Patients with cranial pathologies prefer to choose their surgeon by accessing private clinic.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00