Participant or population Premenopausal females
diagnosed with endometriosis surgically or
radiologically.
Intervention Combined oral contraceptive pills,
taken as the only hormonal medication understudy,
with different types and doses of estrogen and
progestogen, of any generation, monophasic or
multiphasic, cyclic or continuous. Medical
treatment duration should be at least 3 months.
Comparator No COCP: Placebo or no treatment;
Progestin only pills (POPs): any type of progestin
used, daily PO intake.
INPLASY 1
International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols
INPLASYThe Effect of Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills on the
Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Premenopausal
Females with Endometriosis- Systematic Review &
Meta-Analysis
Mohamad, M1; El-Hajj Fuleihan, G2; Akl, EA3; Abu Musa, A4.
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Support - None.
Review Stage at time of this submission - Risk of bias assessment.
Conflicts of interest - None declared.
INPLASY registration number: INPLASY202410028
Amendments - This protocol was registered with the International
Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols
(INPLASY) on 08 January 2024 and was last updated on 08 January
2024.
Corresponding author:
May Mohamad
[email protected]
Author Affiliation:
American University of Beirut.
Mohamad et al. INPLASY protocol 202410028. doi:10.37766/inplasy2024.1.0028
Mohamad et al. INPLASY protocol 202410028. doi:10.37766/inplasy2024.1.0028 Downloaded from https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2024-1-0028/
INPLASY202410028
doi: 10.37766/inplasy2024.1.0028
Received: 08 January 2024
Published: 08 January 2024
Study designs to be included Randomized and
non-randomized controlled clinical trials; Non-
randomized studies of intervention/s (NRSI).
Eligibility criteria Exclusion Criteria: Case reports
and cross-sectional studies; Studies using COCP
as complementary therapy or those comparing
COCP with medications other than progestin only
pills.
Information sources Our search includes four
electronic databases (Medline, Cochrane, Popline,
Embase) using MeSH and Keywords. The search
strategy was developed with the assistance of a
medical librarian and content experts based on
two concepts: Endometriosis and COCP . We
developed the search strategy initially for Medline
and adapted for the rest. The search was not
limited to language or year of publication. Google
Scholar, Clinical trial.gov, ICTRP , and references of
included studies were searched as part of grey
literature.
Main outcome(s) A. Clinical Outcomes
(Cardiovascular disease):
Cardiovascular diseases include coronary heart
disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral
arterial disease (PAD).
– Acute coronary syndrome: angina, fatal
myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal MI;
– Stroke: Transient Ischemic Attack, fatal stroke,
and non-fatal stroke;
– Peripheral arterial diseases: Claudication, Acute
Limb Ischemia, Critical Limb Ischemia, Ischemic
Amputation, Revascularization
– Cardiovascular mortality
– All-cause mortality.
B. Surrogate Outcomes (Cardiovascular profile):
Cardiovascular profile is defined as lipid profile,
inflammatory, and coagulation parameters.
– Lipid Profile: Castelli Index 1: (total cholesterol
(TC)/ high-density lipoprotein (HDL)), low-density
lipoprotein (LDL), Triglycerides (TG);
– Serum Inflammatory Markers: Interleukin 6 (IL-6),
High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP);
– Coagulation profile: Fibrinogen, homocysteine,
Prothrombin Time (PT), activated Partial
Thromboplastin Time (aPTT), and Thrombin Time
(TT);
The minimal follow up duration for surrogate and
clinical outcomes is 3 months and 1 year,
respectively.
Quality assessment / Risk of bias analysis We
will assess the risk of bias of each outcome in
duplicate and independently using Cochrane Risk
of Bias Tool 2 (ROB2) for RCTs and the risk of bias
(confounding, selection bias, reporting of selective
outcomes, inadequate methods of ascertainment
of exposure and outcomes) in comparative
observational studies using the criteria
recommended by GRADE. Using GRADE “Grades
of Recommendations Assessment, Development
and Evaluation”, we will evaluate the quality of
evidence by outcome.
Strategy of data synthesis We will use random-
effects model to quantitatively synthesize study.
We will perform the meta-analyses of RCTs
separate from that of observational studies.
• Using Review Manager software (Revman), we
will pool the means of each continuous outcome in
RCTs separately from the adjusted means (when
applicable) of cohorts and case-control studies.
After the collection of number of events per each
treatment arm for each categorical outcome in
RCTs, we will pool the effect estimates to yield an
overall Relative risk (in addition to absolute risk,
when applicable) and will pool the adjusted effect
estimates (when applicable) of observational
studies to yield an overall Odds ratio (in addition to
absolute risk, when applicable). We will compare in
parallel the effect estimates of randomized vs
comparative observed studies for each outcome.
• We will test for heterogeneity between studies:
(I^2: 0-100). In case of high heterogeneity (I^2>=50
or P<0.1), we will attempt to provide an
explanation by subgroup analysis.
In case quantitative synthesis is not appropriate,
we will report a narrative summary of the findings.
Subgroup analysis Subgroup analysis, when
applicable and data are available, will include the
following, smoking status, age, COCP generations.
In case data were not available other factors can
be added to subgroup analysis, e.g.: BMI,
treatment duration, time of assessment and
cardiovascular risk.
Sensitivity analysis We will perform sensitivity
analysis for studies of high risk of bias (omitting vs
inclusion of those studies) and for studies with
missing data (considering “data are not randomly
missing” and replacing missing data using
imputation methods).
Country(ies) involved Lebanon.