OC22.02: Diagnostic accuracy of the transvaginal ultrasound “sliding sign”, direct visualisation and combination of both for the prediction of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and the rectosigmoid

In: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 50(S1) , pp. 45 · doi:10.1002/uog.17686 · W2753965011
article OA: bronze CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Transvaginal ultrasound direct visualization of rectal/rectosigmoid nodules demonstrated higher accuracy than the sliding sign for predicting deep infiltrating endometriosis, with their combination being reliable for ruling out the condition.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

1. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) direct visualisation (DV) of rectal/rectosigmoid (RS) nodules compared to the "sliding sign" (SS) to predict deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) of the rectum ® and the RS during laparoscopy. 2.To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the combination of both techniques (DV+SS) to predict DIE of the R or the RS. Multicentre prospective observational study from January 2009 to February 2017,including patients with suspected endometriosis. All women underwent TVS to evaluate the “sliding sign” or if a nodule within the rectal/rectosigmoid wall was visualised, followed by laparoscopic surgery. The association between the SS and the DV during the TVS were correlated to the presence of rectal/rectosigmoid DIE at laparoscopy. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis. Complete TVS and laparoscopic data were available for 376 women. 76/376 (20.21%) women had rectal and/or rectosigmoid DIE at laparoscopy. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for direct visualisation of rectal/rectosigmoid nodules was significantly higher than the negative “sliding sign” in the prediction of DIE affecting the rectum/rectosigmoid (91.2% vs. 87%, 86.8% vs. 73.7%, 92.3% vs. 9.03%, 74.2% vs. 65.9%, 96.5% vs. 93.1%) (p<0.05). The co-occurrence of a negative SS and the DV of a rectal/rectosigmoid nodule showed a higher specificity and positive predictive values (95.3% and 79.1%, respectively), but lower sensitivity than both the SS (69.7% vs. 73.7%) or the DV of the nodules alone (69.7% vs. 86.8%). In expert hands, direct visualisation of rectal or rectosigmoid nodules using transvaginal ultrasound scan is an accurate tool to rule-in the presence of rectal/rectosigmoid DIE with similar results to laparoscopic evaluation. The combination of both techniques (direct visualisation of rectal or rectosigmoid nodules and the sliding sign) is a reliable method to rule-out rectal/rectosigmoid DIE.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK