laparotomy versus laparoscopy M.Busacca1,2,4, L.Fedele2,3, S.Bianchi1,2, M.Candiani1,2, B.Agnoli1, R.Raffaelli3 and M.Vignali1,2
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study compared laparotomy and laparoscopy as conservative surgical treatments for recurrent endometriosis in 81 women to determine which approach provided better clinical outcomes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The objective of this study was to clarify which is the better surgical conservative treatment for recurrent endo-metriosis. We compared two consecutive surgical series at a tertiary care centre for the cure of endometriosis. The patients were 81 women with recurrent endometriosis, 41 reoperated at laparotomy from 1986 to 1991 and 40
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:34:34.680553+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK