The changing landscape of text mining - a review of approaches for ecology and evolution

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

In ecology and evolutionary biology, synthesis and modelling of data from published literature is a common practice for generating insight and testing theories across systems. However, the tasks of searching, screening, and extracting data from literature are often arduous. Researchers may manually process hundreds to thousands of articles for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and compiling synthetic datasets. As relevant articles expand to tens or hundreds of thousands, computer-based approaches can increase efficiency and dramatically improve the transparency and reproducibility of literature-based research. Methods available for text mining are rapidly changing due to developments in machine learning-based language models. Here we review the growing landscape of approaches, mapping them onto three broad paradigms (Frequency-based approaches, Traditional Natural Language Processing, and Deep learning-based language models). This review serves as an entry point to learn foundational and cutting edge concepts, vocabularies, and methods, and foster better integration of these tools into ecological and evolutionary research. We discuss approaches for modelling ecological texts, generating training data, developing custom models, and interacting with Large Language Models, and we present challenges and possible solutions to implementing these methods in ecology and evolution.
Full text 2,017 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

In ecology and evolutionary biology, synthesis and modelling of data from published literature is a common practice for generating insight and testing theories across systems. However, the tasks of searching, screening, and extracting data from literature are often arduous. Researchers may manually process hundreds to thousands of articles for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and compiling synthetic datasets. As relevant articles expand to tens or hundreds of thousands, computer-based approaches can increase efficiency and dramatically improve the transparency and reproducibility of literature-based research. Methods available for text mining are rapidly changing due to developments in machine learning-based language models. Here we review the growing landscape of approaches, mapping them onto three broad paradigms (Frequency-based approaches, Traditional Natural Language Processing, and Deep learning-based language models). This review serves as an entry point to learn foundational and cutting edge concepts, vocabularies, and methods, and foster better integration of these tools into ecological and evolutionary research. We discuss approaches for modelling ecological texts, generating training data, developing custom models, and interacting with Large Language Models, and we present challenges and possible solutions to implementing these methods in ecology and evolution. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X2VG87 Subjects Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

natural language processing, large language models, Deep learning, literature synthesis, Information Extraction, database construction Dates Published: 2024-02-20 08:43 License CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: N/A Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00