A brief note on the standard error of the Pearson correlation
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
The product-moment correlation is a central statistic in exploratory and confirmatory research including longitudinal and meta-analytic applications. Unfortunately, it has a rather complex sampling distribution which leads to sample correlations that are biased indicators of the respective population correlations. Moreover, there seems to be some uncertainty on how to properly calculate the standard error of these correlations. Because no simple analytical solution exists, several approximations have been previously introduced. This note aims to briefly summarize 10 different ways to calculate the standard error of the Pearson correlation. Moreover, a simulation study on the accuracy of these estimators compared their relative percentage biases for different population correlations and sample sizes. The results showed that all estimators were largely unbiased for sample sizes of at least 50. For smaller samples, a simple approximation by Bonnett and Wright (2000) led to the least biased results. Based on these results, it is recommended to use the expression \sfrac{\left(1-r^2\right)}{\sqrt{N-3}} for the calculation of the standard error of the Pearson correlation.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00