Abstract
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound scanning are complementary in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Fusion is a new technique with encouraging preliminary results in the evaluation of deep endometriosis. The main objective of our study is to evaluate the evolution of endometriosis lesions in patients with IVF using MRI fusion ultrasound. Materials & Methods: Between November 2017 and November 2018,we conducted an observational, prospective, mono-centric, cohort study within the Reproductive Medicine Department of the University Hospital of Grenoble Alpes. The main endpoint was the size of each endometriosis lesions in fusion ultrasound before and after IVF, obtained by averaging the measurements of the 3 diameters when they were measurable,or the measurement of the largest axis of the lesion. In the absence of pregnancy, a second evaluation, the cycle following IVF, was performed. Results: Between November 2017 and October 2018, 564 patients underwent IVF at Grenoble University Hospital. 47 had endometriosis lesions, 20 agreed to participate in the study and received initial imaging. Among these, 10 underwent second evaluation the cycle following IVF and were thus included. No new lesions were detected after the hormonal stimulation protocol. The mean size of the deep lesions before IVF was 16.5±7.8 mm compared to 20.62 ± 11.1 mm after IVF with an insignificant difference (p=0.54). There was no significant difference in the size of endometriomas before and after IVF (21.3 ± 8 mm / 19 ± 10.1 mm, p = 0.95). Conclusion: Fusion imaging for endometriosis diagnosis is a new technique that is feasible and reproducible.Hormonal stimulation during IVF does not appear to have an impact on the evolution of the size of endometriosis lesions.
Full text
1,068 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot!
Loading...
You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone.
Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive.
Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate.
Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
is the canonical version.