Wolbachia: The architect of microbial assemblies in response to environmental changes

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Translocating organisms from their habitats to laboratories, a method common in microbial ecology and evolution experiments, alters their microbial communities. However, the impact of translocation on microbiomes is often overlooked, limiting our ability to assess how laboratory findings relate to field dynamics. It’s also crucial to examine organism responses with symbionts, as they can stabilise communities or increase vulnerability to changes. This study investigates the effects of laboratory introduction on host-microbiome interactions in the parasitic wasp Asobara japonica and its endosymbiont Wolbachia . Results indicate that transferring Wolbachia -infected (asexual) and uninfected (sexual) wasps to a laboratory decreased A. japonica’s bacterial diversity. Stochastic processes drive community changes, with distinct alterations in bacterial composition between reproductive modes. Over four generations, asexual wasps’ bacterial communities became more uniform, while sexual wasps showed greater diversity. Notably, bacterial changes appeared across generations rather than immediately. Additionally, Wolbachia abundance changed following laboratory introduction, affecting community structure and assembly. In conclusion, our research demonstrates how laboratory conditions affect host-associated microbial communities depending on symbiont presence. This, in turn, can affect their functions, host interactions, and overall community dynamics. Thus, our findings stress the importance of linking lab results to real-world implications, posing a broader challenge for researchers.
Full text 1,853 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Translocating organisms from their habitats to laboratories, a method common in microbial ecology and evolution experiments, alters their microbial communities. However, the impact of translocation on microbiomes is often overlooked, limiting our ability to assess how laboratory findings relate to field dynamics. It’s also crucial to examine organism responses with symbionts, as they can stabilise communities or increase vulnerability to changes. This study investigates the effects of laboratory introduction on host-microbiome interactions in the parasitic wasp Asobara japonica and its endosymbiont Wolbachia. Results indicate that transferring Wolbachia-infected (asexual) and uninfected (sexual) wasps to a laboratory decreased A. japonica’s bacterial diversity. Stochastic processes drive community changes, with distinct alterations in bacterial composition between reproductive modes. Over four generations, asexual wasps’ bacterial communities became more uniform, while sexual wasps showed greater diversity. Notably, bacterial changes appeared across generations rather than immediately. Additionally, Wolbachia abundance changed following laboratory introduction, affecting community structure and assembly. In conclusion, our research demonstrates how laboratory conditions affect host-associated microbial communities depending on symbiont presence. This, in turn, can affect their functions, host interactions, and overall community dynamics. Thus, our findings stress the importance of linking lab results to real-world implications, posing a broader challenge for researchers. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Co-fauthor emails: Joana Falcao Salles: j.falcao.salles{at}rug.nl, Leo W. Beukeboom: l.w.beukeboom{at}rug.nl, Michael C. Fontaine: Michael.FONTAINE{at}cnrs.fr

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00