Abstract
Importance Vascular dementia (VaD) is a devastating cerebrovascular disease with no disease-modifying treatments available. Repurposing existing drugs for VaD risk factors could have an important clinical impact.
Objective
To determine whether lipid-lowering, anti-hypertensive, or anti-inflammatory drug targets affect the risk of vascular dementia using Mendelian randomization.
Design Evidence suggests that higher cholesterol and blood pressure are associated with increased VaD risk, and inflammation is thought to play a key role in pathogenesis. Two-sample MR was conducted using cis-acting genetic variants in genes encoding each drug target, and data on five VaD-related outcomes. Instrument performance was assessed with positive controls (coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and rheumatoid arthritis).
Setting Summary-level genetic data
Participants Publicly available genetic association data from large cohorts of European ancestry. To maximize the sample size for vascular dementia risk as an outcome, we conducted a meta-analysis of case-control data from FinnGen & MEGAVCID.
Exposures Genetically proxied drug effects for 46 lipid-lowering (n=17), antihypertensive (n=18), and anti-inflammatory (n=11) targets.
Main Outcomes and Measures Odds ratios/betas and 95% CIs for VaD outcomes (clinical diagnosis, white matter hyperintensity volume, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and lacunar stroke diagnosis) were estimated per 1-unit change in the exposure.
Results
For VaD risk, N=7,009 cases and N=899,672 controls were used. Neuroimaging outcome datasets included a maximum of N=50,559 participants. Beta-1 adrenergic receptor (ADRB1) was the only target for which there was consistent, albeit modest, evidence of benefit for four out of the five outcomes (clinical diagnosis: OR= 0.90, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.01, white matter hyperintensities: β= -0.03, 95%CI -0.07 to 0.00, mean diffusivity: β= -0.18, 95%CI -0.37 to 0.00, lacunar stroke: OR= 0.91, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.03). Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition was suggested to increased VaD risk (OR= 1.12, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.24). There was little evidence to suggest other targets affect the outcomes.
Conclusions
and relevance ARDB1 antagonism may be a promising repurposing candidate for VaD. Pharmacovigilance studies are required to further examine ACE inhibitors’ potential to increase VaD risk. There is little evidence to support repurposing of many licensed lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and anti-inflammatory drugs for VaD prevention or treatment.
Question Can existing drugs with potential neurovascular benefits (lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-inflammatory therapies) be repurposed for vascular dementia (VaD) treatment/prevention?
Findings We used large genetic datasets for VaD and its neuroimaging features in drug target Mendelian randomization. ARDB1 antagonist exposure was associated with lower VaD risk and better neuroimaging phenotypes. Conversely, exposure to ACE inhibitors may increase VaD risk. There was little evidence for other drug targets.
Meaning ADRB1 antagonists could be promising candidates for drug repurposing for VaD prevention and treatment. Pharmacovigilance research is warranted to confirm or refute a link between ACE inhibitor use and VaD risk.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ELA is supported by a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/W011581/1). DMW is supported by an Alzheimers Research UK Senior Fellowship (ARUK-SRF2023B-008). LTN is supported by the Research Council at the Capital Region of Denmark and Independent Research Fund Denmark grant ID: 10.46540/3100-00007B. NMD is supported via a Norwegian Research Council 295989.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study used only openly available human data and links to all data used are in supplemental table 1
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.