Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic fimbrioplasty in nonocclusive distal tubal disease

Saleh WA, Walid A. Saleh, W A Saleh, Alexander M. Dlugi, A M Dlugi, Dlugi AM
Fertility and sterility · 1997 · vol. 67(3) , pp. 474–480 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80072-6 · PMID:9091333 · W1980592884
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 ⓘ

This study investigated pregnancy outcomes following laparoscopic fimbrioplasty for nonocclusive distal tubal disease.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine pregnancy rates (PR) after fimbrioplasty and salpingostomy in nonocclusive distal tubal disease. To evaluate the relative impact of various factors using contemporary statistical analysis.DesignProspective cohort.SettingTertiary institutional infertility clinic.Patients(s)Infertility patients.Intervention(s)Fimbrioplasty and salpingostomy.Main outcome measure(s)Cumulative PR, monthly fecundity rates, monthly probability of pregnancy, crude PR, and cure rates.Results(s)Thirty-five percent of patients conceived with a cure rate of 72.2%, monthly probability of pregnancy of 3.9%, and monthly fecundity rate of 3.9%. Cumulative PRs were 22%, 35%, and 58% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Pairwise comparisons (unilateral, bilateral, or either) failed to detect any statistical difference between the salpingostomy and fimbrioplasty groups. Salpingostomy patients initially may have a higher tendency to become pregnant but appear to lose that advantage after the first few months. When patients with tubo-ovarian adhesions are excluded from the analysis, patients who underwent a bilateral salpingostomy as their sole procedure had better outcome compared with those who only underwent bilateral fimbrioplasty. There was no significant association between pregnancy outcome and the presence of endometriosis, other infertility factors, or tubo-ovarian adhesions. The staging of adnexal adhesions and endometriosis did not predict pregnancy outcome.Conclusion(s)Laparoscopic fimbrioplasty and salpingostomy are clinically efficacious for the treatment of nonocclusive distal tubal disease. After accounting for statistical interactions of various factors among them, no particular association with pregnancy outcome could be identified. This illustrates the need for a revision of the classification of patients with distal tubal disease.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Fallopian Tube Diseases Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Pregnancy Outcome Salpingostomy Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Spontaneous Adult Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Fertility Follow-Up Studies Humans Infertility, Female Pregnancy Pregnancy, Ectopic Pregnancy, Ectopic Probability Prospective Studies Time Factors

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-06T06:07:45.168820+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:52.568893+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK