Considerations for the use of contrast agents with diffuse in vivo flow cytometry to detect circulating cancer cell populations

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Significance Metastasis is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Disseminated circulating tumor cells (CTCs) through the bloodstream seed metastatic tumors at distant sites. Most methods for enumerating CTCs in humans clinically rely on drawing and analyzing small blood samples, but these may yield inaccurate estimates of CTC burden and cannot measure CTC changes over time. Identification and enumeration of CTCs for experimental or clinical purposes largely rely on marker-driven analyses by flow cytometry. Aim In principle, non-invasive fluorescence enumeration of CTCs directly in vivo could provide a more accurate method for enumerating CTCs. However, this will require specific contrast agent for CTCs. The goal of this work is to define characteristics of useful CTC contrast agents and perform preliminary testing of candidate contrast agents used for fluorescence guided surgery (FGS). Approach We evaluated a clinical small-molecule folate receptor targeted contrast agent (OTL38, pafolacianine), a fluorogenic pan-cathepsin contrast agent (VGT-309, abenacianine), and a set of custom designed, small-molecule prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted contrast agents. We tested these contrast agents using in vitro cell culture models and in in vivo murine models. Results All tested contrast agents showed high uptake and labeling by target cell lines, but also small but significant labeling of non-cancer blood cells. Contrast agents that exhibited rapid clearance from circulation and the fluorogenic approach resulted in significantly reduced non-specific interfering background fluorescence signals. Conclusions Although the fluorescence contrast agents tested have properties useful for labeling of CTCs, as yet none exhibited the required high specificity. This resulted in some labeling of non-cancer blood cells which presented false-positive CTC counts. Improved contrast agent design and multiplexed use of more than one contrast agent may improve this specificity.
Full text 2,092 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Significance Metastasis is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Disseminated circulating tumor cells (CTCs) through the bloodstream seed metastatic tumors at distant sites. Most methods for enumerating CTCs in humans clinically rely on drawing and analyzing small blood samples, but these may yield inaccurate estimates of CTC burden and cannot measure CTC changes over time. Identification and enumeration of CTCs for experimental or clinical purposes largely rely on marker-driven analyses by flow cytometry. Aim In principle, non-invasive fluorescence enumeration of CTCs directly in vivo could provide a more accurate method for enumerating CTCs. However, this will require specific contrast agent for CTCs. The goal of this work is to define characteristics of useful CTC contrast agents and perform preliminary testing of candidate contrast agents used for fluorescence guided surgery (FGS). Approach We evaluated a clinical small-molecule folate receptor targeted contrast agent (OTL38, pafolacianine), a fluorogenic pan-cathepsin contrast agent (VGT-309, abenacianine), and a set of custom designed, small-molecule prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted contrast agents. We tested these contrast agents using in vitro cell culture models and in in vivo murine models.

Results

All tested contrast agents showed high uptake and labeling by target cell lines, but also small but significant labeling of non-cancer blood cells. Contrast agents that exhibited rapid clearance from circulation and the fluorogenic approach resulted in significantly reduced non-specific interfering background fluorescence signals.

Conclusions

Although the fluorescence contrast agents tested have properties useful for labeling of CTCs, as yet none exhibited the required high specificity. This resulted in some labeling of non-cancer blood cells which presented false-positive CTC counts. Improved contrast agent design and multiplexed use of more than one contrast agent may improve this specificity. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00