Poor prognosis in IBD-complicated colon cancer through gut dysbiosis-related immune response failure

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 3,413 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) results from the accumulation of mutations and epigenetic changes in gut epithelial cells likely due to gut microbiota dysbiosis. However, limited research has been done to explore the link between host tumour dysbiosis and disease outcome.

Methods

The mechanisms influencing outcomes of 97 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, including 13 with Lynch syndrome, 20 with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 64 sporadic cases, were analyzed using a multiomics approach. These patients were categorized into two groups: “disease-free/stable disease” and “progression disease” survival outcomes. The analysis included tumor adherent microbiota composition (16S rRNA), somatic gene mutations (WES), gene expression (RNAseq), immune markers (RNAscope), and immune infiltrate cells (immunohistochemistry).

Results

IBD-CRC patients had worse outcomes than those with Lynch or sporadic CRC, regardless of TNM staging or treatment. Symbiotic bacteria like Lactococcus lactis were significantly reduced in IBD-CRC tissues. Patient outcomes were influenced by the abundance of virulent (Escherichia coli) relative to beneficial bacteria (Lactococcus lactis). Although no significant increase in deleterious somatic mutations was found in IBD-CRC. 16sRNA revealed increased virulent- and decreased anti-inflammatory symbiotic-bacteria correlating with the upregulation of oncogenes and downregulation of anti-oncogenes like PHLPP1. The multiplex in situ hybridization of CD8, IFNγ and PHLPP1 an anti-oncogene revealed significant decrease of immune cells with detectable PHLPP1 expression in IBD-CRC tumour tissues as compared to sporadic CRCs.

Conclusion

The poor outcomes in IBD-CRC patients are likely due to gut dysbiosis and immune cell alterations, possibly triggered by microbiota-related epigenetic pathways.

Background

AND CONTEXT Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with gut microbiota dysbiosis. Inflammatory bowel disease-related CRC (IBD-CRC) is classified as an environment-related condition. NEW FINDINGS In relation with patient outcomes, tumour tissues from three types of CRC (Sporadic-, IBD-, and Lynch syndrome-CRC) were analyzed using a multiomic approach. This included examining tissue adherent virulent bacteria, gene analyses, and quantifying immune cell infiltration in the mucosa. IBD-CRC patients had the worst outcomes, associated with the down regulation of PHLPP1 gene, virulent/symbiotic imbalance, and immune response failure.

Limitations

Lack of animal experiments using FMT of fresh stool from IBD-CRC patients. CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH RELEVANCE Among the different types of CRC, IBD-CRC patients showed a greater imbalance between harmful and beneficial bacteria, along with immune response failure. Lay summary This study compares the pathological and clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) across three distinct etiologies: sporadic CRC, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated CRC, and Lynch syndrome-associated CRC (LS-CRC). Distinct differences in tumor-adherent microbiota, gene expression and immune response profiles were observed. Notably, IBD-CRC patients demonstrated the poorest prognosis depending on microbe-host gene interaction highlighting potential biomarkers for disease prognosis and treatment strategies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00