Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome associated with a megabase-scale inversion separatingPITX2from a conserved enhancer locus

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Axenfeld–Rieger Syndrome (ARS) is an autosomal dominant condition with both ocular and non-ocular manifestations. ARS is primarily caused by coding variants at the PITX2 or FOXC1 loci, yet many cases still remain undiagnosed. Here we used whole-genome sequencing to identify two non-coding structural variants associated with a typical presentation of PITX2 -associated ARS: one with a 450 kb deletion removing a series of conserved enhancer elements distal to PITX2 , and the second with a 12.5 Mb inversion displacing the PITX2 gene from these same enhancer elements. Neither variant disrupted the PITX2 gene itself, and therefore both were expected to reduce PITX2 expression by disrupting its proximity or access to enhancer elements. Enhancer-disrupting intergenic inversions therefore represent a unique genetic mechanism for the development of ARS, which should be carefully considered in the context of ARS and other conditions without a conclusive genetic diagnosis.
Full text 30,206 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome associated with a megabase-scale inversion separating PITX2 from a conserved enhancer locus | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome associated with a megabase-scale inversion separating PITX2 from a conserved enhancer locus View ORCID Profile Lucas A. Mitchell , Joshua Schmidt , Emmanuelle Souzeau , Lachlan S. W. Knight , Giorgina Maxwell , Andrew Dubowsky , Ridia Lim , Edward Formaini , Matthew Welland , Cas Simons , Daniel G. MacArthur , Janey L. Wiggs , Jamie E. Craig , View ORCID Profile Owen M. Siggs doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.05.25327661 Lucas A. Mitchell 1 Genomics and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Lucas A. Mitchell Joshua Schmidt 1 Genomics and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University , Adelaide, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Emmanuelle Souzeau 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University , Adelaide, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Lachlan S. W. Knight 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University , Adelaide, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Giorgina Maxwell 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University , Adelaide, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Andrew Dubowsky 4 SA Pathology , Adelaide, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ridia Lim 5 Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney , New South Wales, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Edward Formaini 6 Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and UNSW Sydney , 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, Australia 7 Centre for Population Genomics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Melbourne, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Matthew Welland 6 Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and UNSW Sydney , 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, Australia 7 Centre for Population Genomics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Melbourne, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Cas Simons 6 Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and UNSW Sydney , 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, Australia 7 Centre for Population Genomics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Melbourne, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Daniel G. MacArthur 6 Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and UNSW Sydney , 384 Victoria Street, Sydney, Australia 7 Centre for Population Genomics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Melbourne, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Janey L. Wiggs 8 Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School , 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, United States Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jamie E. Craig 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders University , Adelaide, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Owen M. Siggs 1 Genomics and Inherited Disease Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2 Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Owen M. Siggs For correspondence: o.siggs{at}garvan.org.au Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Axenfeld–Rieger Syndrome (ARS) is an autosomal dominant condition with both ocular and non-ocular manifestations. ARS is primarily caused by coding variants at the PITX2 or FOXC1 loci, yet many cases still remain undiagnosed. Here we used whole-genome sequencing to identify two non-coding structural variants associated with a typical presentation of PITX2 -associated ARS: one with a 450 kb deletion removing a series of conserved enhancer elements distal to PITX2 , and the second with a 12.5 Mb inversion displacing the PITX2 gene from these same enhancer elements. Neither variant disrupted the PITX2 gene itself, and therefore both were expected to reduce PITX2 expression by disrupting its proximity or access to enhancer elements. Enhancer-disrupting intergenic inversions therefore represent a unique genetic mechanism for the development of ARS, which should be carefully considered in the context of ARS and other conditions without a conclusive genetic diagnosis. Introduction Axenfeld–Rieger Syndrome (ARS) is a rare autosomal dominant condition, with primarily ocular manifestations. Key ocular features of ARS include posterior embryotoxon, iridocorneal adhesions, corectopia, and polycoria, with up to a 75% increased risk of developing glaucoma. 1 Non-ocular syndromic features include dental anomalies (hypodontia, microdontia), mild craniofacial dysmorphism, and umbilical anomalies (redundant periumbilical skin, umbilical hernia). 2 – 4 ARS, as well as glaucoma associated with non-acquired ocular anomalies, is primarily caused by variation in PITX2 or FOXC1 . 5 Variants in these two genes account for approximately 70% of ARS cases, although it is unclear whether the remaining 30% are caused by undetected variants at these same loci, or others. 6 Furthermore, the presence of microdontia/hypodontia and umbilical anomalies is highly specific for PITX2 -associated ARS: in one case series these were observed in 91% and 94% of cases with PITX2 -associated ARS (n=59), as compared to 0% and 11% of FOXC1 -associated ARS (n=69). 6 ARS-associated variants in PITX2 have provided some important insight into this question. Initially reported in 1996, PITX2 encodes a bicoid-like homeobox transcription factor that plays a vital role in regulating transcription during embryogenesis, particularly in the development of the eye and its anterior segment. 7 The locus encodes at least three isoforms, one of which ( PITX2 c) exhibits cardiomyocyte specificity, and putative gain-of-function missense variants unique to this isoform (p.Pro41Ser) have recently been associated with atrial fibrillation. 8 Most ARS-associated PITX2 variants directly disrupt the canonical open reading frame via single nucleotide variants and short indels, or partial and full-length gene deletions. 6 However, upstream non-coding deletions of different sizes have also been described in at least seven unrelated ARS families. 9 – 14 These deletions all disrupt a series of conserved essential regulatory elements, with a common critical interval spanning three such elements (CE5-7, hg38 chr4:110926950-111115957). 9 , 14 Another two studies have identified balanced inversions or rearrangements disrupting PITX2 . 15 , 16 These variants all highlight the critical importance of conserved enhancer loci in ARS, as well as the need to carefully assess structural variation when investigating the genetic basis of ARS. Here we describe a unique genetic mechanism of ARS involving disruption of the PITX2 distal enhancer locus. Through short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) and structural variant calling, we identified two non-coding structural variants: the first a non-coding 450 kb deletion, and the second a 12.5Mb inversion segregating within a family with a typical PITX2 -associated ARS phenotype. While the PITX2 gene itself was not disrupted by either variant, its proximity to conserved enhancer loci was, with the inversion causing a significant spatial displacement of the gene from its enhancer. Methods Study participants Patients and family members were recruited as part of the Australian and New Zealand Registry of Advanced Glaucoma. 5 Written informed consent was provided under protocols approved by the Southern Adelaide Clinical Human Research Ethics Committee (305–08), and adhering to the tenets of the revised Declaration of Helsinki. Exome and genome sequencing and analysis DNA was prepared from venous blood samples, after temporary storage at -80°C, using the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Hilden, Germany) and according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Whole exome sequencing was performed as previously described. 17 PCR-free WGS was performed by the Clinical Research Sequencing Platform at the Broad Institute. Library construction was performed using a KAPA HyperPrep kit, with libraries dual-barcoded and sequenced with 150 bp paired-end reads to a mean coverage of 30x. Alignment and calling of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (indels) was performed using the Illumina DRAGEN (Dynamic Read Analysis for GENomics) pipeline. Structural variants (SV) were called using the GATK-SV pipeline ( https://github.com/broadinstitute/gatk-sv ). 18 All variants were analysed using the seqr platform, and are represented in hg38 coordinates. 19 SNP genotyping and CNV calling Individuals from Family 1 were genotyped on either HumanOmniExpress-12-v1-0-K (I:2) or HumanCoreExome-24v1-0_A genotype (II:2) arrays. Each of the individuals reported here were members of larger batches of samples, with each batch assessed for quality using Illumina GenomeStudio. After export of ‘Genotype’, ‘Log R Ratio’ and ‘B Allele Frequency’, samples were assayed for CNV using acne (available at https://github.com/joshuamschmidt/acne ), a nextflow pipeline for CNV calling that utilises PennCNV 20 as the CNV caller. CNV calls were annotated and filtered using thresholds recommended in the PennCNV documentation. Results We investigated two kindreds both with a combination of ocular and systemic features typical of PITX2 -associated ARS ( Table 1 ), and phenotypic segregation suggesting autosomal dominant inheritance. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1: Clinical features of recruited family members. Y, years; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; IOP, intraocular pressure; VCDR, vertical cup-to-disc ratio; CCT, central corneal thickness; RE, right eye; LE, left eye; CF, count fingers; HM, hand movements, CAKUT, congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Data is presented as RE/LE for each individual. Clinical data from individual III:1 (Family 1) was not available. Family 1 was initially identified during a copy number variant analysis of genotyping array data (see methods), which revealed a potential non-coding deletion distal to the PITX2 locus, inferred to be 482 kb in I:2 (g.4:110890464_111372690del) and 477 kb in II:2 (g.4:110891306_111368288del). These were further resolved on WGS, which confirmed a shared 450 kb deletion at (g.4:110871515_111321256del), overlapping a series of 6 conserved non-coding elements (CE5-9 and CE15, Figure 2B ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1: Ocular and systemic features of Axenfeld Rieger Syndrome. Photographs of all affected family members, including (from left to right) the anterior segment of the right eye, left eye, teeth, and umbilicus. Corectopia and dental hypoplasia are evident in all individuals, with redundant periumbilical skin documented in two individuals, polycoria in two individuals, and bilateral penetrating keratoplasties in one individual. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2: A 12.54 Mb inversion and 450 kb deletion at the PITX2 locus. (A) Schematic of chromosome 4, highlighting the g.4:98141399_110685792inv region in red. 21 (B) Schematic of the PITX2 locus and surrounding region, demonstrating the location of the deletion and inversion variants described here (hg38, g.4:110871515_111321256del and g.4:98141399_110685792inv), along with previously reported PITX2 enhancer deletions. Adapted from Protas et al. 2017. 9 Note that only the PITX2 gene is shown for simplicity: another 65 genes are within the inverted region indicated for Family 1. Read-level support for the g.4:110871515_111321256del (C) and g.4:98141399_110685792inv (D) variants. The absence of mapped reads at the proximal breakpoint in (C) is due to the presence of a common 4.89kb deletion in trans (4:111316365-111321256, gnomAD v4.1.0 NFE AF = 0.1243). 22 Based on the clinical presentation of Family 2 (II:2), in 2013 the complete coding sequence and intron-exon boundaries of FOXC1 and PITX2 were amplified by PCR and covered by capillary sequencing, and analysed for copy number variation by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), although neither assay revealed a likely genetic cause. Individual II:2 was also referred for karyotype studies and array CGH (BlueGnome Cytochip oligo ISCA (4080-5) 8x60K array, 0.2Mb resolution), including a detailed examination of the FOXC1 and PITX2 loci. Both assays were reported as normal. Four members of Family 2 (I:2, II:2, III:1, and III:2) were then subjected to whole exome sequencing. There were no rare and predicted deleterious SNVs or short indels in any genes associated with anterior segment dysgenesis, including missense, nonsense, and essential splice variants, although non-coding and structural variants could not be systematically examined. Manual inspection of all coding exons of FOXC1 and PITX2 also did not reveal any significant copy number variants to suggest a deletion or duplication, nor did a genome-wide analysis of copy number variation based on exome or genotyping array data (Schmidt et al., in preparation). Finally, the same four individuals were subjected to research-based whole genome sequencing. Again, close inspection of the FOXC1 and PITX2 loci did not reveal any rare SNVs or short indels with a predicted deleterious effect, nor did a careful manual inspection of coverage depth across both genes. A genome-wide structural variant callset was generated using the GATK-SV pipeline 18 : although this did not reveal any suspicious insertions or deletions at the FOXC1 and PITX2 loci, it did reveal a 12.54 Mb inversion on chromosome 4 (hg38, g.4:98141399_110685792inv), encompassing 66 genes including all coding exons of PITX2 ( Figure 2 ). This inversion variant was present in a heterozygous state in the proband (II:2) and their affected children (III:1, III:2), but absent in II:2’s parent (I:2) who was unaffected. It was absent from the gnomAD SV v4.1.0 callset, and from a jointly-called dataset of 8920 alleles from a variety of rare disease patients and their family members. Since PITX2 was the most distal gene in the inverted region and adjacent to the distal breakpoint (TSS 43.7 kb proximal to the breakpoint) ( Figure 2B ), we hypothesised that displacement from an enhancer locus could explain the observed phenotype. This distal breakpoint was found to be proximal to a series of conserved PITX2 enhancer loci 9 , 14 , including those deleted in Family 1 and other previously reported families ( Figure 2B ). The inversion variant would then be predicted to displace (and invert) the PITX2 gene another 12.54 Mb proximal to these enhancers, leading to a predicted reduction in PITX2 expression and haploinsufficient effect. Discussion Here we describe two ARS families with non-coding structural variants: the first a 450 kb deletion (g.4:110871515_111321256del), and the second a 12.54Mb inversion (g.4:98141399_110685792inv). Both disrupt a series of conserved enhancer elements distal to the PITX2 gene, three of which (CE5-7, hg38 chr4:110926950_111115957) form part of a shared critical interval across 7 previously reported families with enhancer deletions ( Figure 2B ). In the case of the deletion observed in Family 1 these same elements are lost (in addition to CE8, CE9, and CE15), and in the case of the inversion in Family 2 these same elements become displaced from the PITX2 gene body. In light of recurrent non-coding deletions at the PITX2 locus, the haploinsufficient nature of PITX2 -associated ARS, and the highly specific phenotype observed here, the most likely consequence of the Family 2 inversion appears to be a loss of PITX2 expression due to the displacement of the PITX2 gene body from its enhancer loci. A similar mechanism may also be at play in two ARS cases associated with balanced translocations t(4;16) and t(4;11)), where the breakpoints lie near the PITX2 gene although were not known to disrupt it. 23 We also note that a similar gene-sparing inversion mechanism (involving the PAX6 and PITX2 loci) has also been mentioned in conference proceedings 24 , although these are yet to be published. In summary, in addition to enhancer-disrupting deletions, intergenic inversions represent a unique genetic mechanism for the development of ARS, which should be carefully considered in any ARS families, or indeed any suspected monogenic condition, where a causal variant has not been confidently assigned. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors. Acknowledgements Supported by the NIH (R01 EY031820-01 to JW, JEC, OMS), NHMRC (to LM, ES, JEC), and the Snow Medical Research Foundation (Grant No. PF2019-040 to OMS). The funders were not involved in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, the writing of this report, or the decision to submit the article for publication. We thank the patients and their families for their participation, Angela Chappell for ophthalmic photography, and Dr John Pater for clinical support. Figure 1A and Figure 2B were created using BioRender.com. References ↵ Souzeau E et al. Glaucoma spectrum and age-related prevalence of individuals with FOXC1 and PITX2 variants . Eur J Hum Genet 2017 ; 25 : 839 – 847 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Reis LM , Seese SE , Costakos D , Semina EV . Congenital anterior segment ocular disorders: Genotype-phenotype correlations and emerging novel mechanisms . Prog Retin Eye Res 2024 ; 102 : 101288 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Souzeau E et al. Gene-specific facial dysmorphism in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome caused by FOXC1 and PITX2 variants . Am J Med Genet A 2021 ; 185 : 434 – 439 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ White S et al. Neuroimaging findings in Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome: A case series . AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023 ; 44 : 1231 – 1235 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Knight LSW et al. Childhood and Early Onset Glaucoma Classification and Genetic Profile in a Large Australasian Disease Registry . Ophthalmology 2021 ; 128 : 1549 – 1560 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Reis LM et al. Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome: more than meets the eye . J Med Genet 2023 ; 60 : 368 – 379 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Semina EV et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel bicoid-related homeobox transcription factor gene, RIEG, involved in Rieger syndrome . Nat Genet 1996 ; 14 : 392 – 399 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Sun BB et al. Genetic associations of protein-coding variants in human disease . Nature 2022 ; 603 : 95 – 102 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Protas ME et al. Mutations of conserved non-coding elements of PITX2 in patients with ocular dysgenesis and developmental glaucoma . Hum Mol Genet 2017 ; 26 : 3630 – 3638 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Reis LM et al. PITX2 and FOXC1 spectrum of mutations in ocular syndromes . Eur J Hum Genet 2012 ; 20 : 1224 – 1233 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Ansari M et al. Genetic analysis of ‘PAX6-negative’ individuals with aniridia or Gillespie syndrome . PLoS One 2016 ; 11 : e0153757 . OpenUrl PubMed Volkmann BA et al. Potential novel mechanism for Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome: deletion of a distant region containing regulatory elements of PITX2 . Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011 ; 52 : 1450 – 1459 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text Henkind P , Sigel IM , Carr RE . Mesodermal dysgenesis of the anterior segment: Rieger’s anomaly . Arch Ophthalmol 1965 ; 73 : 810 – 817 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Jiang Y et al. Intergenic sequences harboring potential enhancer elements contribute to Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome by regulating PITX2 . JCI Insight 2024 ; 9 . doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.177032 . OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Farris J et al. Complex balanced intrachromosomal rearrangement involving PITX2 identified as a cause of Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome . Am J Med Genet A 2024 ; 194 : e63542 . OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Maldžiene Ž, Preikšaitiene E , Ignotiene S , Kapitanova N , Utkus A , Kucinskas V. A de novo pericentric inversion in chromosome 4 associated with disruption of PITX2 and a microdeletion in 4p15.2 in a patient with axenfeld-Rieger syndrome and developmental delay . Cytogenet Genome Res 2017 ; 151 : 5 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed ↵ Siggs OM et al. Biallelic CPAMD8 Variants Are a Frequent Cause of Childhood and Juvenile Open-Angle Glaucoma . Ophthalmology 2020 ; 127 : 758 – 766 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Collins RL et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics . Nature 2020 ; 581 : 444 – 451 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Pais LS et al. seqr: A web-based analysis and collaboration tool for rare disease genomics . Hum Mutat 2022 . doi: 10.1002/humu.24366 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Wang K et al. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data . Genome Res 2007 ; 17 : 1665 – 1674 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Perez G et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2025 update . Nucleic Acids Res 2025 ; 53 : D1243 – D1249 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Robinson JT et al. Integrative genomics viewer . Nat Biotechnol 2011 ; 29 : 24 – 26 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Trembath DG et al. Analysis of two translocation breakpoints and identification of a negative regulatory element in patients with Rieger’s syndrome . Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2004 ; 70 : 82 – 91 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science ↵ Daruich A et al. Congenital aniridia beyond black eyes: From phenotype and novel genetic mechanisms to innovative therapeutic approaches . Prog Retin Eye Res 2023 ; 95 : 101133 . OpenUrl PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted June 06, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome associated with a megabase-scale inversion separating PITX2 from a conserved enhancer locus Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome associated with a megabase-scale inversion separating PITX2 from a conserved enhancer locus Lucas A. Mitchell , Joshua Schmidt , Emmanuelle Souzeau , Lachlan S. W. Knight , Giorgina Maxwell , Andrew Dubowsky , Ridia Lim , Edward Formaini , Matthew Welland , Cas Simons , Daniel G. MacArthur , Janey L. Wiggs , Jamie E. Craig , Owen M. Siggs medRxiv 2025.06.05.25327661; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.05.25327661 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome associated with a megabase-scale inversion separating PITX2 from a conserved enhancer locus Lucas A. Mitchell , Joshua Schmidt , Emmanuelle Souzeau , Lachlan S. W. Knight , Giorgina Maxwell , Andrew Dubowsky , Ridia Lim , Edward Formaini , Matthew Welland , Cas Simons , Daniel G. MacArthur , Janey L. Wiggs , Jamie E. Craig , Owen M. Siggs medRxiv 2025.06.05.25327661; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.05.25327661 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Genetic and Genomic Medicine Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4435) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1509) Epidemiology (15228) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1124) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6599) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4536) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (540) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15916) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (146) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6599) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1144) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3332) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5447) Public and Global Health (9231) Radiology and Imaging (2198) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a00600c8be8a8650',t:'MTc3OTU1OTY3Ng=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00