A systematic review and meta-analysis on the application of three-dimensional reconstruction in partial nephrectomy

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Objective: Three dimensional (3D) reconstruction is widely used in complicated renal surgery. This article focus on investigating the role of three-dimensional reconstruction participated in partial nephrectomy (PN) from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched published studies that reported the relationship between 3D reconstruction and PN using PubMed and Embase up to December 8, 2022. STATA version 12.0was used to conduct all analyses. Results Seventeen studies were finally progressed to data extraction. Meta-analysis indicated a significant reduction in operation time ([SMD] =-0.34; confidence interval [CI]: -0.59 to -0.09), global ischemia time ([SMD] =-0.42; CI: -0.64 to -0.21) and opening collecting system rate (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to0.47).There are no statistically significant differences between 3d reconstruction assisted PN and 2D control group considering estimated blood loss, GFR change, positive surgical margin, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative complication. Conclusion Our study provides evidence that 3D reconstruction played an important role in PN, especially for complex renal tumors. However, more high-quality, larger sample size and more rigorously designed randomized controlled trials which report this topic are still needed to support our conclusions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00