Does prolonged infusion time really improve the efficacy of meropenem therapy? A prospective study in critically ill patients

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background: Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic that has demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against gram-negative clinical isolates and is commonly used in critically ill patients. This study aimed to find the pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic of meropenem in critically ill patients and whether prolonged injection duration is really beneficial to meropenem therapy. Method: We included 209 samples in 64 patients in this prospective study. PPK analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were developed using Phoenix.Results: A two-compartment model described the data adequately. Clearance (CL), volume (V), clearance of peripheral compartment (CL2), volume of peripheral compartment (V2) were 6.15 L/h, 2.83 L/h, 17.40L, and 17.48L, respectively. Creatinine clearance and uric acid were significant covariates. Patients with creatinine clearance of 60 ml/min or less and uric acid greater than 400 μmol/l could achieve the target > 90% under the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 mg/L, even with the administration dose of 500 mg/8 h with a 2-h infusion. Prolonging the infusion time significantly improved the therapeutic effect when MIC<4. However, for the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of 100% fT > MIC and 100% fT > 4MIC, no significant statistical difference was observed in critically ill patients.Conclusions: Critically ill patients with lower creatinine clearance and higher uric acid levels were likely to need a lower dosage of meropenem. Prolonged infusion time were not always beneficial for those who need a higher therapeutic target (100% fT > MIC,100% fT > 4 MIC) or with MIC 4mg/L. Increasing dose or alternative therapeutic strategies may be required for critically ill patients with drug-resistant or severe infections. The study is of great significance to guide the rational use of meropenem in critically ill patients.Trial registration: The trial was registered in the China Clinical Trial (ChiCTR1900020672). Registered on 12 January 2019.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00