Beyond listening: Social media as support, story, and influence in the endometriosis experience

Other OA: gold public-domain-us
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-30 ⓘ

This paper analyzes social media narratives to understand the endometriosis experience, highlighting how online platforms facilitate support and stigma reduction while potentially disseminating incomplete health information that requires triangulation with clinical data.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-22 · read from full text ⓘ

This study examines the role of social media in shaping the endometriosis experience by analyzing how online platforms serve as sources of support, narrative construction, and influence for patients. The authors highlight that digital spaces allow individuals to share personal stories, find community validation, and exert collective influence on public perception and healthcare discourse regarding their condition. By focusing on user-generated content, the research underscores the shift from passive patienthood to active advocacy and peer support within the endometriosis community. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically exploring the psychosocial and communicative aspects of the disease through digital media engagement.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Social media has emerged as a valuable source of patient-generated data, offering insights into the lived experiences of individuals with endometriosis. While social listening research provides important perspectives on pain, treatment decisions, and community support, the interpretation of online narratives requires careful consideration. Experiences shared publicly may not fully represent the broader endometriosis community, as individuals with particularly distressing or positive experiences may be more likely to post, while others may remain silent because of privacy concerns, stigma, or personal preference. Furthermore, peer narratives can complement clinical expertise but may also contribute to the dissemination of incomplete or non-evidence-based health information, potentially influencing treatment decisions and disease management. The role of social media algorithms also warrants attention, as algorithmic amplification may increase the visibility of emotionally engaging or controversial narratives over nuanced medical information. Nevertheless, social media remains an important space for understanding how patients articulate symptoms, interpret medical advice, and navigate chronic illness while reducing isolation and stigma. We propose viewing social media as both a source of patient experience and a dynamic environment where experiences and health information are negotiated. Triangulation with qualitative interviews, clinical data, and participatory methods may strengthen its contribution to patient-centered endometriosis research.
Full text 748 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Ack

The authors would like to thank their respective university administrations for their support.

Orcid

Reymark Padla Malinda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-6661 Abraham Fessehaye Sium https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-0804

Ethical

This manuscript did not involve human participants; therefore, no ethical approval or informed consent was required.

Fn Group

Author contributions: Reymark Padla Malinda : Writing–Original Draft, Writing–Review & Editing. Tyreese L. Matias : Writing–Review & Editing. Kehinde Precious Fadele : Writing–Review & Editing. Reuben Victor M. Laguitan : Writing–Review & Editing. Shuaibu Saidu Musa : Writing–Review & Editing. Abraham Fessehaye Sium : Writing–Review & Editing. Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno III : Writing–Review & Editing.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:09:08.764285+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:01:36.263981+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:03:27.856944+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine