Are island plants really poorly defended? No support for the loss of defense hypothesis in domatia-bearing plants

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

1. The loss of defense hypothesis posits that island colonizers experience a release from predation on the mainland and subsequently lose their defensive adaptations. While support for the hypothesis is abundant, it has never been tested in domatia-bearing plants. Leaf domatia are cave-like structures produced on the underside of leaves that facilitate a defensive mutualism with predatory and fungivorous mites. I tested the loss of defense hypothesis in six domatia-bearing taxa inhabiting New Zealand and its offshore islands. No support for the loss of defense hypothesis was found. Changes in domatia investment were instead associated with changes in leaf size – a trait that has been repeatedly observed to undergo rapid evolution on islands. Overall results demonstrate that not all types of defense are lost on islands, suggesting a higher-resolution approach is needed when studying the evolution of defense on islands.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00