Approaches for estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational data in administrative databases: a systematic review

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Background COVID-19 vaccine policy relied on observational vaccine-effectiveness (VE) studies conducted amid rapid variant turnover, evolving schedules, and shifting surveillance, yielding substantial heterogeneity in methodological approaches across studies. Prior reviews emphasised pooled or variant-specific VE, with limited attention to how methodological practice varied across countries and over time. Yet, understanding the landscape of methodological practices used during this period is essential for identifying opportunities to improve VE study design and conduct in future pandemic responses. This review systematically characterises the methodological practices in registry-based observational COVID-19 VE studies (2021–2024), documenting patterns in study design, statistical approaches, and analytical choices to establish an empirical foundation for methodological development in pandemic vaccine evaluation. Methods We ran a PRISMA-guided search of PubMed and Embase (via Ovid) from inception to Oct 14, 2024, for peer-reviewed observational studies estimating COVID-19 VE in routine (non-trial) settings that leveraged administrative/registry data (e.g., immunisation registries, laboratory/PCR databases, EHR/claims, hospitalisation/mortality registries, national-ID–linked datasets) and reported sufficient methodological detail to classify design, estimator, treatment of time, adjustment/matching/weighting, and sensitivity/validation checks. We excluded randomised trials; studies without administrative/registry data or confined to specialised populations; non-English publications; and duplicate analyses of the same cohort/time window. Descriptive summaries are presented overall, by calendar year, and by World Bank income group. Results 253 studies from 61 countries met eligibility; most were from high-income settings (187/253, 73.9%). The median publication lag was 257 days (IQR 157–421), lengthening from 141 days in 2021 to 673 in 2024, while median cohort size declined over time. Cohorts (46.6%) and test-negative designs (43.1%) dominated; target-trial emulations (2.0%) and quasi-experimental studies (1.2%) were uncommon. Logistic regression (56.1%) and Cox models (24.8%) comprised the majority of primary estimator. Adjustment emphasised demographics, comorbidity, calendar time, and geography; variables proximate to testing behaviour and exposure opportunity were less frequent. Most studies reported no matching/weighting (155/253, 61.2%); among those that did, exact matching predominated and weighting was rare. Sensitivity analyses were not described in 98/253 (38.7%) of studies. Endpoints concentrated on infection, hospitalisation, and mortality, while variant-resolved analyses waned as PCR testing and sequencing contracted. Conclusions Observational COVID-19 vaccine VE studies scaled rapidly where registries existed, but remained concentrated in high-income settings, relied on a narrow estimator set, and infrequently applied validity checks. Strengthening privacy-preserving linkages (including sequencing), aligning designs to target-trial principles with marginal weighting, and normalising a lean validity toolkit could enhance interpretability and policy relevance. Funding This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant (MOH-001572) and administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council. J.T.L. is supported by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore Start-up Grant. L.E.W. is supported by the National Medical Research Council through the Clinician Scientist New Investigator Award.
Full text 150,444 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Approaches for estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational data in administrative databases: a systematic review | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Approaches for estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational data in administrative databases: a systematic review View ORCID Profile Jo Yi Chow , Zhi Jie Goh , Ruiqi Li , Darren Zi Yang Lim , Liang En Wee , David Chien Boon Lye , Kelvin Bryan Tan , Jue Tao Lim doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.29.25336864 Jo Yi Chow 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore 2 National Centre for Infectious Diseases , Singapore Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jo Yi Chow For correspondence: joyi001{at}e.ntu.edu.sg Zhi Jie Goh 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore MBBS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ruiqi Li 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore MBBS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Darren Zi Yang Lim 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore MBBS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Liang En Wee 3 Communicable Diseases Agency , Singapore 4 Singapore General Hospital , Singapore MPH Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site David Chien Boon Lye 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore 2 National Centre for Infectious Diseases , Singapore 3 Communicable Diseases Agency , Singapore 4 Singapore General Hospital , Singapore 5 Tan Tock Seng Hospital , Singapore MBBS Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Kelvin Bryan Tan 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore 2 National Centre for Infectious Diseases , Singapore 7 Ministry of Health , Singapore PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jue Tao Lim 1 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore 2 National Centre for Infectious Diseases , Singapore PhD Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Background COVID-19 vaccine policy relied on observational vaccine-effectiveness (VE) studies conducted amid rapid variant turnover, evolving schedules, and shifting surveillance, yielding substantial heterogeneity in methodological approaches across studies. Prior reviews emphasised pooled or variant-specific VE, with limited attention to how methodological practice varied across countries and over time. Yet, understanding the landscape of methodological practices used during this period is essential for identifying opportunities to improve VE study design and conduct in future pandemic responses. This review systematically characterises the methodological practices in registry-based observational COVID-19 VE studies (2021–2024), documenting patterns in study design, statistical approaches, and analytical choices to establish an empirical foundation for methodological development in pandemic vaccine evaluation. Methods We ran a PRISMA-guided search of PubMed and Embase (via Ovid) from inception to Oct 14, 2024, for peer-reviewed observational studies estimating COVID-19 VE in routine (non-trial) settings that leveraged administrative/registry data (e.g., immunisation registries, laboratory/PCR databases, EHR/claims, hospitalisation/mortality registries, national-ID–linked datasets) and reported sufficient methodological detail to classify design, estimator, treatment of time, adjustment/matching/weighting, and sensitivity/validation checks. We excluded randomised trials; studies without administrative/registry data or confined to specialised populations; non-English publications; and duplicate analyses of the same cohort/time window. Descriptive summaries are presented overall, by calendar year, and by World Bank income group. Results 253 studies from 61 countries met eligibility; most were from high-income settings (187/253, 73.9%). The median publication lag was 257 days (IQR 157–421), lengthening from 141 days in 2021 to 673 in 2024, while median cohort size declined over time. Cohorts (46.6%) and test-negative designs (43.1%) dominated; target-trial emulations (2.0%) and quasi-experimental studies (1.2%) were uncommon. Logistic regression (56.1%) and Cox models (24.8%) comprised the majority of primary estimator. Adjustment emphasised demographics, comorbidity, calendar time, and geography; variables proximate to testing behaviour and exposure opportunity were less frequent. Most studies reported no matching/weighting (155/253, 61.2%); among those that did, exact matching predominated and weighting was rare. Sensitivity analyses were not described in 98/253 (38.7%) of studies. Endpoints concentrated on infection, hospitalisation, and mortality, while variant-resolved analyses waned as PCR testing and sequencing contracted. Conclusions Observational COVID-19 vaccine VE studies scaled rapidly where registries existed, but remained concentrated in high-income settings, relied on a narrow estimator set, and infrequently applied validity checks. Strengthening privacy-preserving linkages (including sequencing), aligning designs to target-trial principles with marginal weighting, and normalising a lean validity toolkit could enhance interpretability and policy relevance. Funding This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant (MOH-001572) and administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council. J.T.L. is supported by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore Start-up Grant. L.E.W. is supported by the National Medical Research Council through the Clinician Scientist New Investigator Award. Introduction Following identification of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019, vaccines were developed at exceptional pace, with the first authorised for emergency use by December 2020 on the basis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).( 1 , 2 ) These trials, with high internal validity conferred by randomisation, established efficacy and safety sufficient for regulatory approval. The subsequent rapid deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, however, shifted the evidentiary burden from pre-licensure efficacy to post-authorisation vaccine effectiveness (VE), as RCTs could not feasibly encompass all age groups, dosing schedules, circulating variants, time-since-vaccination intervals, or clinically relevant outcomes.( 3 – 7 ) In routine settings, VE is an estimand defined by contrasts between specified vaccination strategies and comparator strategies over a stated risk period.( 8 ) Its magnitude reflects both vaccine biology and context— population mixing, prior infection (including hybrid immunity), and the contemporaneous force of infection that varies over calendar time and place.( 9 ) Administrative databases and national record linkages enabled VE estimation at scale,( 10 , 11 ) enabling assessment of outcomes that were rare or underpowered in trials,( 12 ) and facilitating analyses across demographic and clinical subgroups reflective of local epidemiology.( 6 , 13 ) Such evidence guided policy decisions on vaccine allocation, booster timing, and the coordination of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions across successive pandemic phases.( 14 – 16 ) The context in which COVID-19 VE was estimated evolved rapidly. Successive variant waves altered baseline risk and immune escape; vaccine programmes progressed from primary series to multiple boosters and, later, bivalent formulations; and cumulative infections generated heterogeneous hybrid immunity.( 17 – 19 ) In parallel, surveillance systems changed: testing intensity shifted, genomic sequencing capacity fluctuated, and the completeness and linkage of vaccination, testing, and clinical registries varied across jurisdictions.( 20 ) These dynamics influenced eligibility to enter analysis, how exposures and outcomes are ascertained, which time scales were relevant, and the extent to which confounding, selection, and misclassification can be mitigated. Therefore, a range of observational designs deployed during the pandemic, from case-based sampling frameworks (such as test-negative designs), prospective and retrospective cohorts, and quasi-experimental approaches. Although their data requirements and analytic implementations differ, these designs face shared challenges: confounding by indication and by prior infection;( 21 ) calendar-time confounding during periods of rapidly changing incidence and variant emergence;( 22 ) immortal-time and depletion-of-susceptibles bias;( 23 – 25 ) differential testing and outcome misclassification;( 26 ) and informative censoring.( 27 ) Addressing these threats required explicit specification of estimands and comparator definitions, careful handling of calendar time and time-since-vaccination, and sufficient covariate information to support adjustment, matching, or weighting. The implementation of these approaches varies substantially across studies due to differences in population characteristics, data availability, and analytical choices, affecting the interpretability and comparability of published VE estimates. Given these dynamics, a structured description of observational VE estimation across settings, calendar years, vaccines, comparators, and outcomes is needed to clarify the evidence base and its limits. Although several groups have synthesised VE magnitudes,( 6 , 28 , 29 ) only one prior review focused on real-world study designs and was conducted mid-pandemic, before widespread booster programmes.( 30 ) Accordingly, the present review provides a descriptive map of methodologies used in observational COVID-19 VE studies. We catalogue study settings, observation windows, vaccine and comparator definitions, study designs and estimators, covariate adjustment and matching/weighting, validation and sensitivity analyses, outcomes, and stated limitations. By organising common design and reporting elements, the review aims to support transparent interpretation of published VE estimates and to inform planning of future evaluations when capacity for randomised evidence is limited. Methods Literature search strategy This systematic review mapped methodological approaches used in observational studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE); no meta-analysis of VE magnitudes was planned. Reporting followed PRISMA 2020 ( Supplementary Table 1a, 1b ). As the objective was methods characterisation rather than pooled effect estimation, a priori protocol registration (e.g., PROSPERO) was not undertaken. We identified relevant studies through searches in PubMed and Embase (via Ovid) from database inception through October 14, 2024. The search strategy combined controlled vocabulary (MeSH/Emtree) and free-text terms aligned to the PICOS framework, with the search done for terms mentioned in the Title/Abstract ( Table 1 ). Limits were applied to human, English-language, peer-reviewed publications; preprints and conference abstracts were excluded. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1 Search strategy following the PICOS framework utilised for identifying peer-reviewed observational studies estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness from administrative databases. Terms were categorised by patient/population (COVID-19 or related terms), intervention (vaccination and immunisation), comparator groups (various vaccination statuses), outcomes (measures of vaccine effectiveness), and observational study designs. Searches were restricted to human studies published in English, excluding preprints. Eligibility criteria required peer-reviewed studies that estimated COVID-19 VE in routine (non-trial) settings using observational designs that leveraged administrative or registry data (e.g., immunisation registries, laboratory/PCR databases, electronic health records or claims, hospitalisation and mortality registries, national ID–linked datasets) and reported sufficient methodological detail to classify design, estimator, adjustment, and sensitivity/validation checks. No restrictions were imposed on geography or outcomes. Randomised trials, immunogenicity- or laboratory-only studies, modelling/economic evaluations, case reports/series, studies without use of administrative/registry data, and duplicate analyses of the same cohort and window (retaining the most complete) were excluded. Additionally, to focus on broadly replicable approaches with typical administrative systems, studies confined to specialised subpopulations (e.g., healthcare workers, immunocompromised cohorts) were excluded, as were non-English publications due to limited accurate translation resources available to the team. Data extraction and analysis Records were de-duplicated using unique identifiers (PMID/DOI) in EndNote. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts against eligibility criteria, followed by full-text assessment for potentially eligible studies; discrepancies were resolved by consensus and, if needed, a third reviewer. A PRISMA flow diagram summarises identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion ( Figure 1 ). When multiple reports analysed the same underlying dataset but addressed distinct methodological questions (e.g., different designs, estimators, comparators, or endpoints), each report was retained as a separate methodological observation. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. PRISMA reporting flowchart for studies on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness Four reviewers (JYC, ZJG, RL, DZYL) independently extracted data in duplicate using a standardised template refined through pilot testing on a subset of included studies ( Supplementary Table 2 ). Briefly, extracted items included: study identifiers (publication year, country/region, observational period); study design with sample size/unit; exposure and comparator definitions; estimators/models; adjustment/matching/weighting variables and methods; outcomes and their ascertainment; sensitivity/validation checks; and author-stated limitations. Operational definitions and decision rules were prespecified ( Supplementary Table 2 ). Comparator contrasts were coded hierarchically as baseline (e.g., primary series vs unvaccinated; one dose vs unvaccinated), booster (e.g., boosted vs unvaccinated; boosted vs eligible-but-unboosted), and platform/variant comparisons; studies could contribute multiple contrasts. Publication lag was defined as days from the start of the observational period to the journal publication date. Study setting income groups followed the 2023 World Bank Atlas method.( 31 ) A hierarchical coding framework supported consistent cataloguing ( Supplementary Table 2 ). Sensitivity/validation analyses were grouped into nine domains: alternate exposure definitions; alternate outcome definitions/ascertainment; alternative model specifications; comparator re-definitions; calendar-period restrictions; negative controls; eligibility-criteria changes; missing-data handling; and checks for unmeasured confounding (including E-values). Reported covariates were mapped into ten themes: demographic; temporal; clinical comorbidities/health status; geography/residence; socioeconomic; prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination history; healthcare utilisation; exposure risk/occupation; testing behaviour/prior infections; and household/living conditions. As the objective was to characterise methods rather than pool VE, formal instrument-based risk-of-bias appraisal (e.g., ROBINS-I) was not applied. Instead, presence or absence of assumption checks, together with author-stated limitations, was catalogued as an indicator of methodological rigour. Descriptive summaries were produced overall, by calendar year (2021–2024), and by World Bank income group.( 31 ) Categorical variables are presented as counts (percentages) and continuous variables as median (in publication lag) or totals (with cohort size) and corresponding interquartile ranges (IQR). Analyses and visualisations were generated in R (version 2023.06.1+524). The full list of studies and corresponding characteristics is available as Supplementary Table 3 . Results We identified 1,213 articles through the database search, with 405 identified from PubMed and 808 from Ovid, as documented in Figure 1 . No additional articles were identified from searching reference lists. After removal of duplicates (687) and exclusion of studies based on screening the abstract ( 263 ), full text ( 6 ), or non-retrievability ( 4 ), a total of 253 eligible studies were identified. Of the 6 studies excluded during full text screening, 4 did not evaluate vaccine effectiveness,( 32 – 35 ) and 2 were protocols or reviews lacking new empirical data.( 36 , 37 ) Figure 2 illustrates the global distribution of the 253 observational COVID-19 VE studies across 61 countries (grey denotes no identified studies). Regionally, Asia accounted for the greatest share (n = 87),( 38 – 118 ) followed by Europe( 119 – 183 ) and North America( 184 – 250 ) (n = 67 each), South America (n = 18),( 251 – 267 ) Africa (n = 6)( 268 – 273 ) and Oceania (n = 5);( 274 – 278 ) three studies spanned more than one continent (Europe & South America, n = 3).( 279 – 281 ) Study counts were highest in the United States (n = 47),( 185 , 186 , 188 – 195 , 197 – 200 , 202 , 204 – 206 , 208 , 210 – 213 , 215 – 217 , 219 – 221 , 224 – 226 , 229 , 231 – 233 , 235 , 237 – 243 , 247 – 249 ) the United Kingdom (n = 23)( 131 , 133 , 135 , 138 , 140 , 155 , 157 , 158 , 164 , 170 , 172 , 179 ) and Mainland China (n = 17).( 45 , 50 , 51 , 58 , 65 – 67 , 70 – 72 , 94 , 95 , 102 , 105 , 113 , 118 , 282 ) In contrast, Central Asia, much of sub-Saharan Africa and large areas of South America remain largely unrepresented in the observational VE evidence base. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Global distribution of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness observational studies (n = 253). Countries are shaded according to the number of included studies (darker colours = more studies; grey = no studies identified). Table 2 summarises the methodological and epidemiological features of the 253 included studies. Publications spanned 2021–mid-2024, with a median publication lag of 257 days (IQR 157–421). Most were conducted in high-income settings (187/253, 73.9%), peaked in 2022 (113/253, 44.7%), and were predominantly retrospective (219/253, 86.6%). Cohort (118/253, 46.6%) and test-negative case-control designs (109/253, 43.1%) dominated; quasi-experimental designs were rare (3/253, 1.2%). For estimators, logistic regression (147, 56.1%)and Cox proportional hazards models (65, 24.8%) together comprised ∼81% of uses. Overall, the 253 studies collectively evaluated 364 334 082 (IQR 9 813–960 307) individuals, 194 220 (IQR 58 880–135 340) households, and 117 951 198 (IQR 38 995–444 220) COVID-19 RAT/PCR tests. View this table: View inline View popup Table 2. Overall characteristics of the included studies (N = 253). Values are n (%) unless stated; medians and totals are shown with interquartile ranges (IQR). Abbreviations: VE, vaccine effectiveness; IQR, interquartile range; ED, emergency department; ICU, intensive care unit; SARI, severe acute respiratory infection; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; sIPT, stabilised inverse probability of treatment weights. See Supplementary Table S2 (codebook) for the full mapping from study-reported variables to covariate domains and sensitivity-analysis categories. * Percentages are calculated within each domain. For single-select domains (e.g., publication year, study timing, study design), the denominator is the number of studies contributing data to that domain (typically N=253). For multi-select domains marked with an asterisk (*) (i.e. estimation method, comparator group, vaccine type, weighting/matching, covariates, sensitivity analyses, outcomes), the denominator is the total number of domain-specific observations after expanding multi-category contributions (e.g., distinct contrasts, vaccine products, covariate domains). Thus a study may contribute >1 observation within a domain; totals may exceed 100% across subcategories, and minor deviations from 100% reflect rounding. a Time to publication is calculated as days from the start of study follow-up to its journal publication date, reported as median (IQR). b Income group per World Bank country income classifications 2023; ( 31 ) ‘Multinational’ indicates studies spanning countries in more than one income group. c Assigned from authors’ primary analysis; ‘test-negative’ treated as a case-control variant; ‘target trial emulation’ used only when explicitly stated. If a study reported multiple designs, classification follows the analysis prespecified or labelled ‘primary’ by the authors. d Cohort size is reported as the sum total with across studies with its corresponding IQR by unit of analysis (individuals, households, tests). Totals and IQRs computed only among studies reporting that unit. ‘Tests’ counts specimens/episodes, not unique individuals. e Method reflects the primary effect estimator; ‘logistic regression’ includes conditional and mixed-effects; “crude statistics” includes unadjusted risk/odds/rate comparisons; ‘Kaplan–Meier’ denotes unadjusted survival contrasts. f ‘Primary series’ follows country-appropriate schedule; ‘bivalent’ = Omicron-containing products; ‘any vaccinated’ = ≥1 dose with study-specific risk window (typically ≥14 days). g ‘Propensity score’ under covariates means entered as a covariate, not used for matching/weighting. h Percentages are computed within domain [sensitivity analyses (n=291), weighting/matching (n=103), covariates (n=1,148)] except rows marked **, i.e. ‘No weighting/matching’, ‘None’ (covariates), and ‘None described’ (sensitivity analyses/validation). Marked rows use the total number of studies (N=253), i.e., the share of studies with no such feature. Each study can only contribute to a particular category once. i Definitions follow each study; ‘infection’ = laboratory-confirmed (PCR or antigen) unless stated; ‘hospitalisation’ and ‘ICU’ as reported (COVID-related vs all-cause may vary); ICU includes HDU where combined; severity definitions follow each study’s criteria (WHO/ICD or country-specific). See Supplementary Table S2 (codebook) for the full mapping from study-reported sensitivity analyses to outcome categories. Comparator structures most often contrasted primary series vs unvaccinated (165, 34.0%) or one dose vs unvaccinated (118, 24.3%); contrasts involving booster doses were less common (e.g., first booster vs unvaccinated: 80, 16.5%; primary series vs first booster 37, 7.6%), as were natural-immunity comparisons (2, 0.4%). Vaccine products most frequently evaluated were Pfizer-BioNTech (136, 29.2%), Moderna (71, 15.3%), and AstraZeneca (68, 14.6%), with CoronaVac (39, 8.4%) and BBIBP-CorV (22, 4.7%) also represented. Most studies used no matching or weighting (155/253, 61.2%). Among analyses that did, exact matching predominated (69.9%), followed by propensity-score matching (15.5%); weighting approaches included IPTW (6.8%), overlap weighting (1.0%), and stabilised IPT weights (1.0%). Covariate control most often covered demographic (242, 20.9%), temporal (169, 14.6%), and clinical comorbidity/health-status domains (167, 14.4%). About three in five studies reported at least one sensitivity analysis (i.e., 61.3% had ≥1; 98/253, 38.7% reported none). The most frequent checks involved changes to inclusion/exclusion criteria (63, 17.5%), alternative exposure definitions (36, 10.0%), alternative outcome definitions/ascertainment (35, 9.7%), and alternative model specifications (33, 9.2%). Outcomes (multi-select) most commonly included infection (152, 29.9%), hospitalisation (125, 24.6%), and mortality (87, 17.1%), with fewer analyses of ICU admission (26, 5.1%), ED attendance (16, 3.1%), and immunological markers (≤0.4% each). Cohort size medians by unit (individuals, households, tests) are reported in Table 2 . Commonly cited limitations included residual confounding (e.g., incomplete data on prior infection or healthcare-seeking), exposure/outcome misclassification, and variability in geographic coverage, variant surveillance, and follow-up windows. Stratification by income group revealed marked differences, particularly in publication speed and sample scale ( Table 3 ). High-income country (HIC) studies were published fastest among country strata with a median of 245 (IQR 144–391) days, followed by lower-middle-income (LMIC) studies at 338 (IQR 173–398) days and upper-middle-income (UMIC) studies with 391 (IQR 200–598) days; multinational analyses had the shortest lag overall with a median of 111 (IQR 90–187) days. Median cohort sizes likewise tracked resources: HIC studies enrolled a median of 178 153 individuals (IQR 17 898–1 096 216) versus 16 201 (IQR 3 353–278 642) in UMIC and 1 731 (IQR 1 315–4 414) in LMIC; household-unit cohorts were observed only in HIC (median 97 110 [IQR 58 881–135 340]), and studies using tests were largest in HIC (median 143 112 [IQR 47 951–444 220]), with UMIC far smaller (median 10 077 [IQR 9 018–104 018]). View this table: View inline View popup Table 3. Characteristics of included studies by World Bank income group. Values are n (%) within each income stratum unless stated; medians are shown with interquartile ranges (IQR). Column denominators are the number of studies in each stratum: High-income N = 187; Upper-middle N = 52; Lower-middle N = 11; Multinational N = 3. Definitions for study design categories, estimation methods, comparator mappings, vaccine product labels, and outcome groupings follow those in Table 2 . Abbreviations: VE, vaccine effectiveness; IQR, interquartile range; ED, emergency department; ICU, intensive care unit; SARI, severe acute respiratory infection; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting.; sIPT, stabilised inverse probability of treatment weights. * denotes multi-select domains. These use the domain-specific observation total within each income group stratum as the denominator; studies may contribute >1 observation; minor deviations reflect rounding. † Denominator rule. For the rows “No weighting/matching,” “None” (covariates), and “None described” (sensitivity analyses), percentages use the study counts by income group (HIC N=187; UMIC N=52; LMIC N=11; Multinational N=3). All other rows are calculated within their section, excluding those “None/No …” rows, using these denominators: Matching/Weighting —HIC n=83, UMIC n=17, LMIC n=4, Multinational n=1; Covariates —HIC n=906, UMIC n=150, LMIC n=34, Multinational n=63; Sensitivity analyses —HIC n=210, UMIC n=42, LMIC n=3, Multinational n=6. (N = number of studies; n = within-section total.) On study designs, LMIC studies used test-negative case-control designs most often (7/11, 63.6%) and cohort designs less frequently (2/11, 18.2%); HIC balanced both (cohort 95/187, 50.8%; test-negative 73/187, 39.0%), and UMIC leaned toward test-negative designs (27/52, 51.9%). Estimator use was overwhelmingly logistic regression in LMIC (11/11, 100.0%), common in UMIC (39/54, 72.2%), and less dominant in HIC (95/194, 49.0%), while Cox regression models were concentrated in HIC studies (59/194, 30.4%) and rare elsewhere (UMIC 6/54, 11.1%; LMIC 0/11). Within the vaccine-product domain, HIC studies most often assessed Pfizer-BioNTech (111, 34.3%) and Moderna (65, 20.1%), whereas UMIC emphasised CoronaVac (27, 24.1%) and Pfizer-BioNTech (20, 17.9%); LMIC studies frequently assessed AstraZeneca (7, 28.0%) and BBIBP-CorV (6, 24.0%). Booster and bivalent comparisons were largely confined to HIC studies (e.g., first-booster vs unvaccinated: 63, 17.5%; bivalent vs monovalent: 2, 0.6%), with no booster-vs-unvaccinated contrasts in LMIC. Most studies reported no matching/weighting (HIC 111/187, 59.4%; UMIC 35/52, 67.3%; LMIC 7/11, 63.6%; multinational 2/3, 66.7%). Among analyses using these tools (domain denominators: HIC n=83, UMIC n=17, LMIC n=4, multinational n=1), exact matching (including coarsened exact matching) predominated (HIC 66.3%; UMIC 76.5%; LMIC 75.0%; multinational 100%), with IPTW was used only in HIC (8.4%). Very few studies omitted covariate adjustment entirely (HIC 3/187, 1.6%; UMIC 2/52, 3.8%; LMIC 2/11, 18.2%; multinational 0/3, 0). Sensitivity analyses were least common in LMIC studies (none described in 9/11, 81.8%), compared with HIC (65/187, 34.8%) and UMIC (24/52, 46.2%). Outcome emphasis differed modestly: infection was most frequently analysed across strata (HIC 111, 29.0%; UMIC 33, 33.7%; LMIC 6, 28.6%), with hospitalisation (HIC 102, 26.6%; UMIC 16, 16.3%; LMIC 5, 23.8%) and mortality (HIC 65, 17.0%; UMIC 16, 16.3%; LMIC 4, 19.0%) next most common. Stratified by year ( Table 4 ), the geographic mix shifted from HIC-dominant (28/33, 84.8% in 2021) toward greater UMIC representation (11/35, 31.4% in 2024). Over the same period, publication lag lengthened sharply—from 141 days (IQR 107–178) in 2021 to 673 (IQR 548–863) in 2024—while median individual-level cohort size fell from 156 930 (IQR 15 101–982 005) to 19 314 (IQR 6 864–769 448). Comparator mixes moved away from primary-series vs unvaccinated (38.7% to 33.8%) and one-dose vs unvaccinated (41.9% to 20.0%), toward first-booster vs unvaccinated (0% to 16.9) and primary-series vs first-booster (1.6% to 10.8%). Vaccine portfolios in 2021–2022 were led by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, broadening to include bivalents only in 2023–2024. The share reporting no sensitivity analyses was 12/33 (36.4%) in 2021 and 16/35 (45.7%) in 2024. Across years, infection, hospitalisation, and mortality remained the leading endpoints (infection: 28.2–31.9%; hospitalisation: 21.5–30.4%; mortality: 13.8–23.2%), with transmission and immunologic markers consistently rare. Target-trial emulation as a study design first appeared in 2022 (1/113, 0.9%) and rose to 2/35 (5.7%) in 2024. Within the estimation-method domain, logistic regression remained predominant (55.9%, 56.4%, 57.3%, 52.8% in 2021– 2024), while the shares using Cox and Poisson increased (Cox 17.6% to 33.3%; Poisson 2.9% to 8.3%) and Kaplan–Meier and negative binomial fell to 0% by 2024. Studies with no matching/weighting comprised the majority each year, with 18/33 (54.5%), 74/113 (65.5%), 43/72 (59.7%), and 20/35 (57.1%) in 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Among analyses that did match/weight, exact matching remained the most common, and usage of propensity-score matching increased from 12.5% (2021) to 31.2% (2024). Covariate adjustment tightened over time: studies with no adjustment fell from 3/33 (9.1%) in 2021 to 0/35 (0%) in 2024, with demographics (∼20% each year) and calendar time (∼14–15%) being the dominant factors adjusted for. Additionally, clinical comorbidity adjustment rose to 17.1% by 2024. Accounting for prior immunity/vaccination increased after 2021 (3.4% to 7.3%), but adjustment for testing behaviour, socioeconomic, and behavioural factors is sparse from 2021–2024 (≈1–9%). View this table: View inline View popup Table 4. Characteristics of included studies by publication year. Values are n (%) within each publication-year stratum unless stated; medians are reported with interquartile ranges (IQR). Column denominators (studies per year): 2021, N=33; 2022, N=113; 2023, N=72; 2024, N=35. Definitions for study-design categories, estimation methods, comparator mappings, vaccine product labels, and outcome groupings follow Table 2 . Abbreviations: VE, vaccine effectiveness; IQR, interquartile range; ED, emergency department; ICU, intensive care unit; SARI, severe acute respiratory infection; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; sIPT, stabilised inverse probability of treatment weights. * denotes multi-select domains. These use the domain-specific observation total within each year stratum as the denominator; studies may contribute >1 observation; minor deviations reflect rounding. † Rows “No weighting/matching,” “None” (covariates), and “None described” (sensitivity analyses) use per-year study counts: 2021 N=33; 2022 N=113; 2023 N=72; 2024 N=35. All other rows use within-section totals excluding the “None/No …” row: Matching/Weighting n=16, 40, 33, 16 (2021–2024); Covariates n=145, 499, 341, 163; Sensitivity analyses n=37, 116, 76, 32. (N = studies; n = within-section total.) There was a clustering of analytic approaches around a few familiar methods to obtain VE estimates ( Table 5 ). Almost every test-negative study used logistic regression (106/109, 97.2%), whereas cohort studies split across time-to-event modelling [Cox regression: 60/118, 48.0%; Kaplan–Meier (7/118, 5.6%)], count models (Poisson + negative binomial regression: 18/118, 15.3%), and logistic models (26/118, 20.8%); log-binomial regression (6/118, 4.8%), and crude estimates (8/118, 6.4%) were less common. Articles employing a case-control design leaned heavily on logistic regression (15/16, 83.3%). Quasi-experimental analyses all employed a regression discontinuity design (3/3, 100%), while the single cross-sectional study reported crude statistics and an ecological study used a proportional incidence rate model. View this table: View inline View popup Table 5. Analytic methods, sensitivity analyses, and covariate adjustment by study design. Values are n (%) within each study-design stratum unless stated. Column denominators (number of studies per stratum): Cohort n = 118; Test-negative case-control n = 109; Case-control n = 16; Target-trial emulation n = 5; Quasi-experimental n = 3; Cross-sectional n = 1; Ecological n = 1. Percentages in strata with very small n (e.g., target-trial emulation, quasi-experimental, cross-sectional, ecological) should be interpreted cautiously. * denotes multi-select domains. These use the domain-specific observation total within each study-design stratum as the denominator; studies may contribute >1 observation; minor deviations reflect rounding. † Rows “None described” (sensitivity analyses/validation) and “None” (covariates) use the study counts in each design stratum: Cohort N=118; Test-negative case-control N=109; Case-control N=16; Target-trial emulation N=5; Quasi-experimental N=3; Cross-sectional N=1; Ecological study N=1. All other rows in multi-contribution domains use the design-specific observation totals (a study may contribute >1 observation within a domain). Sensitivity analyses (excluding “Not described ”): Cohort n=101, Test-negative n=130, Case-control n=10, Target-trial emulation n=10, Quasi-experimental n=7, Cross-sectional n=1, Ecological n=2. Covariates weighted/matched/adjusted for (excluding “None”) : Cohort n=526, Test-negative n=520, Case-control n=72, Target-trial emulation n=29, Quasi-experimental n=5, Cross-sectional n=1, Ecological n= A moderate number of studies probed robustness: about half of cohort reports described no sensitivity analysis (60/118, 50.8%). Negative-control checks and assessments of unmeasured confounding were rare across designs; when present, they were proportionally more common in target-trial emulations (negative controls 4/10, 40.0%; unmeasured confounding 1/10, 10.0%) than in cohorts (5/101, 5.0%; 7/101, 6.9%) or test-negative studies (9/130, 6.9%; 2/130, 1.5%), though absolute counts were small overall. Across designs, adjustment clustered in demographics and clinical comorbidity domains—cohorts: 113 (21.5%) and 80 (15.2%); test-negative: 106 (20.4%) and 66 (12.7%); case-control: 15 (20.8%) and 14 (19.4%). Calendar time was routinely controlled (test-negative 83 [16.0%]; cohorts 68 [12.9%]), and geography/residence was also common (test-negative 70 [13.5%]; cohorts 61 [11.6%]). Covariates closest to infection risk or selection into testing (behaviour/exposure, testing or prior infection, household context, healthcare utilisation) were used less often with generally ≤7% within a design though test-negative studies more often included testing behaviour/prior infection (31 [6.0%]). Use of propensity scores as an adjustment covariate was rare (cohorts 1 [0.2%]; test-negative 4 [0.8%]). Purely unadjusted models were uncommon (e.g., cohorts 4/118, 3.4%; test-negative 2/109, 1.8%). Discussion The present review extends early appraisals of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) by tracing how observational methods evolved across 253 studies from 61 countries (2021–2024), highlighting how methodological choices were shaped by available infrastructures, the shifting epidemiological context, and the urgency of decision-making. Before COVID-19, observational VE work, especially for influenza,relied primarily on the test-negative design (TND) which can be easily implemented when data on routine laboratory testing for medically attended acute respiratory illness is available. The TND’s efficiency and its partial control for health-care–seeking bias are well described, as are its identification conditions and pitfalls (calendar-time control, constancy of non-target pathogens across vaccination strata, care-seeking patterns).( 21 , 283 , 284 ) COVID-19 marked a decisive shift in settings with robust registries: individual-level vaccination and testing records made large-scale cohorts feasible, yielding near parity between cohorts assembled from person-level registries (118/253, 46.6%) and TND studies based on routine laboratory databases (109/253, 43.1%). Where linkage remained incomplete—more common in upper-and lower-middle-income settings—TND persisted as the default. Quasi-experimental strategies were rare (3/253, 1.2%), with all employing regression discontinuity design.( 6 , 192 , 244 ) This is likely as rollout programmes seldom created sharp, stable discontinuities as eligibility thresholds were introduced and relaxed quickly, rollouts were staggered, and multiple eligibility routes coexisted (e.g., age bands alongside occupational or clinical indications).( 17 , 285 , 286 ) Given limited data around cut-off thresholds and frequent cross-overs, there is often insufficient exogenous variation to apply regression-discontinuity designs for estimating VE. Additionally, contrasting with influenza VE literature where instrumental variables (IV) have been used to address unmeasured confounding,( 287 , 288 ) IV analyses were absent in the COVID-19 VE literature, likely as overlapping, rapidly shifting rollouts made valid instruments difficult to defend.( 289 ) Analytical choices tracked data infrastructure and surveillance capacity. High-income countries contributed 187/253 (73.9%) of studies, and outcomes that require record linkage—documented infection (152 occurrences across studies), hospitalisation (125 occurrences), and mortality (87 occurrences)—predominated. Publication speed and scale varied by income group: median time to publication was shorter in high-income settings (245 days) than in LMICs (338) and UMICs (391), and median cohort size fell from 178 153 (HIC) to 16 201 (UMIC) and 1 731 (LMIC). Timeliness deteriorated overall, more than quadrupling from a median of 141 days in 2021 to 673 days in 2024, while median individual-level cohort size fell from 156 930 (15 101–982 005) to 19 314 (6 864–769 448). These patterns are consistent with the transition from emergency pipelines to routine reporting, the expiration of temporary data-sharing arrangements, and reductions in PCR testing and genomic sequencing that complicated lineage linkage and variant-specific VE. In the United States, surveillance cadence shifted after the public-health emergency ended;( 20 ) WHO guidance likewise moved toward genomic integration within sentinel systems.( 290 ) Concurrently, sequencing volumes declined sharply in 2023-24, further limiting variant attribution.( 291 ) Nonetheless, this publication lag implies that variant-resolved VE for updated formulations is increasingly generated with substantial delay, risking lagged policy decisions precisely when timely evidence against more immune-evasive lineages is most needed. This concentration of COVID-19 VE studies in HICs with unequal participation in such studies from LMICs illustrates major disparities in both vaccine access and research capacity across countries. While efforts have been made to strengthen infrastructure in LMICs to support large scale phase-3 clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines,( 292 ) existing surveillance and research capacity needs to be continuously maintained and upgraded. For instance, automated surveillance systems for acute-respiratory-infection, enabled through access to electronic-health-records (EHRs), can be pivoted towards real-world vaccine-effectiveness studies during a pandemic scenario.( 293 ) While the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the pivotal role of EHRs in enabling real-world vaccine-effectiveness studies, progress on implementing and using EHRs remains sluggish globally; a 2021 OECD survey found that only 15 countries had a nationally unified EHR.( 294 ) Limitations of electronic data capture for population-based data collection in LMICs include language barriers, unstable internet connection, and overly complicated data collection templates.( 295 ) Additionally, access to diagnostic testing is pivotal in identifying cases of vaccine-breakthrough infection, yet substantial disparities exist in testing capacity, with stark heterogeneities associated with socioeconomic and gender disparities.( 296 ) Improved geographical accessibility to vaccination,( 297 ) and research capacity enhancement pertaining to real-world evaluation of VE is essential to both pandemic preparedness and global health equity. Estimator choices reflected data availability and pre-pandemic practice. Logistic regression (148/253, 56.1%) and Cox regression (65/253, 24.8%) accounted for ∼81% of estimators with the choice of estimation methods reflecting the availability of data. Early studies with access to person-level data employed person-day Poisson regressions to account for rapid changes in the force of infection;( 38 , 97 ) with later work employing Cox models with calendar-date time scales to study time-since-vaccination.( 42 , 48 , 49 , 56 , 71 , 73 , 75 , 78 , 85 , 92 , 96 , 120 , 121 , 128 – 130 , 132 , 134 , 136 , 138 , 139 , 141 , 144 , 146 , 149 – 152 , 156 , 158 , 160 , 161 , 172 , 190 , 193 , 202 , 215 , 224 , 228 , 231 – 233 , 238 , 241 , 246 , 253 , 258 , 266 , 272 , 275 , 276 , 278 , 298 – 304 ) Studies which only had access to hospitalisation or medical attendance data large relied on TND methods. Nearly all TND studies used logistic regression (106/109, 97.2%), while cohorts split across Cox regression (60/118, 48.0%), logistic regression (26/118, 20.8%), and regression models for count data (Poisson + negative binomial 18/118, 15.3%). These choices are understandable under registry constraints and consistent with pre-pandemic influenza VE practice.( 7 , 305 ) However, in a pandemic setting characterised by time-varying vaccination, rapid variant turnover, and shifting testing regimes, credible VE estimation required aligning time zero by calendar date/variant period so vaccinated and comparators enter risk simultaneously; using consistent risk windows (e.g., start ≥14 days post-dose) and censoring rules (e.g. booster receipt, infection, death); and harmonising testing opportunity (restrict or adjust for testing frequency).( 23 , 306 ) Target-trial emulations provide this alignment, but were seldom used despite mature guidance.( 24 ) Comparability was further limited by operational heterogeneity: definitions of ‘fully vaccinated’ (e.g., ≥ 7 vs ≥ 14 days post-dose), exclusion rules (e.g. prior infection, early post-dose person-time, immunocompromised individuals), and measures of association (odds ratios, relative risk and hazards ratios). Adjustment and validation strategies were also notably uneven. Most studies adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, calendar time, and geography, but fewer incorporated variables closer to the principal threats in VE settings—testing behaviour and prior infection (selection into testing), exposure opportunity (household/occupation), and health-care utilisation. Several TND analyses additionally adjusted for health-care– seeking/utilisation; yet because TND already conditions on testing, further control for care-seeking can open collider pathways and bias VE estimates.( 7 , 21 ) When comparability was enforced, exact matching (72/103, 69.9%) was favoured over weighting. Outside population-scale registries with dense covariate support, high-dimensional exact or strict matching, especially when it includes calendar date, can exclude large fractions of comparators when overlap is limited, thereby eroding power;( 307 ) on the other hand, omitting calendar date risks residual confounding from differences in force of infection and variant mix.( 308 ) Marginal weighting (stabilised IPTW or overlap weighting) preserves information and targets effects in regions of common support,( 309 ) but was rarely used. Given that 155/253 (61.2%) of studies reported no matching/weighting at all, explicit weight diagnostics and positivity checks are needed. Additionally, about two-fifths of studies reported no sensitivity analyses overall, and negative-control outcomes/exposures or quantitative bias methods (e.g., E-values) were infrequently applied, despite accessible frameworks that make such checks feasible and interpretable for decision-makers,( 26 , 310 ) which could reflect binding data constraints (limited capture of prior infection/testing, limited data on negative-exposure or outcome controls, incomplete linkages, sparse variant attribution).( 308 ) Consequently, the limited use of validation checks leaves a non-negligible risk that some reported VE estimates are biased, either through residual confounding, study design or analytical strategy, which warrants cautious interpretation and privileging estimates with explicit identifying assumptions and documented robustness analyses. Endpoints and comparators often aligned with programme priorities and objectives. As Omicron and its sublineages became predominant in 2023-24, baseline risks of severe outcomes declined;( 138 ) together with smaller cohorts and shorter follow-up, this reduced power for rare endpoints (e.g. hospitalisation, ICU, death) and shifted attention toward infection or symptomatic disease, often as composites. As PCR testing and sequencing reduced, variant attribution increasingly relied on calendar-period proxies for dominant variant circulation, rather than sequence confirmation, limiting variant-specific severe-outcome analyses.( 20 , 311 , 312 ) Early in the rollout, registry-rich settings such as Israel and England produced near-real-time estimates by linking vaccination, PCR, admissions, deaths, and sequencing; as emergency pipelines and legal authorities were withdrawn, this model became harder to sustain.( 97 , 313 ) Comparator contrasts evolved with programme phases—initially one-dose or primary-series vs unvaccinated, later first-booster comparisons—while head-to-head platforms, heterologous schedules, bivalent-versus-monovalent boosters, and natural-immunity comparators remained uncommon. Platform focus also reflected supply and logistics: mRNA products were most evaluated in high-income settings, whereas inactivated vaccines were assessed more often in upper-middle-income settings, consistent with COVAX deliveries and uneven ultra-cold-chain expansion.( 314 , 315 ) Future pandemic preparedness would benefit from more equitable VE evaluation capacity across income settings and continued assessment of updated vaccine formulations in endemic contexts. This review has a few process limitations. This review was limited to peer-reviewed, English-language articles in PubMed/Ovid, which may bias toward high-income settings; however, only one additional non-English study (in Spanish) was identified and would have been excluded per eligibility criteria.( 316 ) Meanwhile, focusing on routine administrative/registry data and excluding specialised cohorts was intended to keep data-generating processes comparable across jurisdictions, but may narrow generalisability to COVID-19 VE estimation methods in specialised populations. We did not preregister a synthesis protocol or apply ROBINS-I/GRADE, as the aim was to map methods rather than pool effects; however, data were extracted in duplicate with adjudication, study-level validity checks were catalogued across domains, and the extraction template, codebook, datasets, and analysis code are available to support replication. Overall, the field delivered timely answers by leveraging available infrastructures, but with heterogeneity in design and robustness checks as the pandemic matured. A pragmatic way forward is not to discard familiar designs but to upgrade the workflow around them: (i) invest in routine, privacy-preserving linkage across vaccination, testing, encounters, vital records, and sequencing, especially in under-resourced settings; (ii) support VE research in underrepresented regions (e.g. LMICs) through capacity building and resource sharing to ensure findings are representative of global populations and healthcare contexts; (iii) pre-specify target-trial emulations where feasible and estimate marginal effects with inverse-probability or overlap weighting (or other doubly robust procedures); and (iv) make sensitivity and validity checks routine: at a minimum, confirm overlap (that vaccinated and unvaccinated groups exist across key strata), inspect depletion-of-susceptibles—particularly salient in later phases of the pandemic—by reporting VE stratified by prior-infection status (to distinguish true waning from faster infection among the unvaccinated), report E-values to appraise unmeasured confounding, and run negative-outcome control tests when data permits. Implemented together, these steps respond to the specific deficiencies documented here within the real data constraints, and could make observational VE estimates more transportable and decision-grade in future pandemics. Data Availability Full-text extraction, supplementary codebook and related code used will be available on GitHub at first author's repository. Declarations Contribution statement JYC and JTL conceived the study and developed the methodology. JYC, ZJG, RL, and DZYL performed screening and data extraction. All authors (JYC, ZJG, RL, DZYL, LEW, DCL, KBT, JTL) critically reviewed and edited the manuscript. JYC, LEW, and KBT contributed to literature search and writing of the manuscript. LEW, DCL, KBT, and JTL provided supervision. All authors had full access to the data and approved the final manuscript and the decision to submit. Funding This research is supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant (MOH-001572) and administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council. J.T.L. is supported by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Singapore Start-up Grant. L.E.W. is supported by the National Medical Research Council through the Clinician Scientist New Investigator Award. Competing interests All authors have declare: no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Data sharing The template data-collection form and codebook are provided in the Supplementary Data S2. The study-level extraction dataset and the analysis-ready dataset used to generate all tables/figures are provided as Supplementary Data S3 (Excel). Analytic code (R scripts) will be publicly available on GitHub (repository link to be added). References 1. ↵ Polack FP , Thomas SJ , Kitchin N , Absalon J , Gurtman A , Lockhart S , et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine . New England Journal of Medicine . 2020 Dec 30; 383 ( 27 ): 2603 – 15 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Baden LR , Sahly HME , Essink B , Kotloff K , Frey S , Novak R , et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine . New England Journal of Medicine . 2021 Feb 3; 384 ( 5 ): 403 – 16 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ D’Souza RS , Wolfe I . COVID-19 vaccines in high-risk ethnic groups . The Lancet . 2021 Apr; 397 ( 10282 ): 1348 . OpenUrl 4. ↵ Herieka H , Babalis D , Tzala E , Budhathoki S , Johnson NA . How inclusive were UK-based randomised controlled trials of COVID-19 vaccines? A systematic review investigating enrolment of Black adults and adult ethnic minorities . Trials . 2024 Apr 12; 25 ( 1 ): 255 . OpenUrl PubMed 5. Khalil L , Leary M , Rouphael N , Ofotokun I , Rebolledo PA , Wiley Z . Racial and Ethnic Diversity in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Clinical Trials Conducted in the United States . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 Feb 14; 10 ( 2 ): 290 . OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Feikin DR , Higdon MM , Abu-Raddad LJ , Andrews N , Araos R , Goldberg Y , et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression . The Lancet . 2022 Mar 5; 399 ( 10328 ): 924 – 44 . OpenUrl CrossRef 7. ↵ Lipsitch M , Jha A , Simonsen L . Observational studies and the difficult quest for causality: lessons from vaccine effectiveness and impact studies . International Journal of Epidemiology . 2016 Dec 1; 45 ( 6 ): 2060 – 74 . OpenUrl PubMed 8. ↵ Halloran ME , Longini IM , Struchiner CJ. Overview of Vaccine Effects and Study Designs. In: Halloran ME, Longini IM, Struchiner CJ, editors. Design and Analysis of Vaccine Studies [Internet] . New York, NY : Springer ; 2010 [cited 2025 Aug 11]. p. 19–45. Available from : doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-68636-3_2 OpenUrl CrossRef 9. ↵ Halloran ME , Longini IM , Struchiner CJ . Design and Analysis of Vaccine Studies [Internet] . New York, NY : Springer ; 2010 [cited 2025 Aug 11]. (Statistics for Biology and Health). Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-387-68636-3 10. ↵ Dagan N , Barda N , Kepten E , Miron O , Perchik S , Katz MA , et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting . New England Journal of Medicine . 2021 Apr 14; 384 ( 15 ): 1412 – 23 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Tartof SY , Slezak JM , Fischer H , Hong V , Ackerson BK , Ranasinghe ON , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study . The Lancet . 2021 Oct 16; 398 ( 10309 ): 1407 – 16 . OpenUrl CrossRef 12. ↵ Hippisley-Cox J , Patone M , Mei XW , Saatci D , Dixon S , Khunti K , et al. Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study . 2021 Aug 27 [cited 2025 May 21]; Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1931 13. ↵ Wang X , Pahwa A , Bausch-Jurken MT , Chitkara A , Sharma P , Malmenäs M , et al. Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adults with Underlying Medical Conditions: Systematic Literature Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis Using GRADE . Adv Ther . 2025 ; 42 ( 5 ): 2040 – 77 . OpenUrl PubMed 14. ↵ Moghadas SM , Vilches TN , Zhang K , Nourbakhsh S , Sah P , Fitzpatrick MC , et al. Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose . PLoS Biol . 2021 Apr 21; 19 ( 4 ): e3001211 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. CDC . COVID-19. 2025 [cited 2025 May 21]. Vaccine Effectiveness Studies . Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/covid/php/surveillance/vaccine-effectiveness-studies.html 16. ↵ Interim statement on the use of additional booster doses of Emergency Use Listed mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 21]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-05-2022-interim-statement-on-the-use-of-additional-booster-doses-of-emergency-use-listed-mrna-vaccines-against-covid-19 17. ↵ WHO SAGE Roadmap for prioritizing uses of COVID-19 vaccines: An approach to optimize the global impact of COVID-19 vaccines, based on public health goals, global and national equity, and vaccine access and coverage scenarios [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Vaccines-SAGE-Prioritization-2023.1 18. Bobrovitz N , Ware H , Ma X , Li Z , Hosseini R , Cao C , et al. Protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omicron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression . The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 2023 May 1; 23 ( 5 ): 556 – 67 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Willett BJ , Grove J , MacLean OA , Wilkie C , De Lorenzo G , Furnon W , et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is an immune escape variant with an altered cell entry pathway . Nat Microbiol . 2022 Aug; 7 ( 8 ): 1161 – 79 . OpenUrl PubMed 20. ↵ Silk BJ . COVID-19 Surveillance After Expiration of the Public Health Emergency Declaration ― United States, May 11, 2023 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 11];72. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7219e1.htm 21. ↵ Sullivan SG , Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ , Cowling BJ . Theoretical Basis of the Test-Negative Study Design for Assessment of Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness . Am J Epidemiol . 2016 Sep 1; 184 ( 5 ): 345 – 53 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Guidance on conducting vaccine effectiveness evaluations in the setting of new SARS-CoV-2 variants: Interim guidance, 22 July 2021 . Addendum to Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness [Internet]. [cited 2025 Mar 7]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccine_effectiveness-variants-2021.1 23. ↵ Renoux C , Azoulay L , Suissa S . Biases in Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19: Designing Real-World Evidence Studies . Am J Epidemiol . 2021 Aug 1; 190 ( 8 ): 1452 – 6 . OpenUrl PubMed 24. ↵ Hernán MA , Robins JM . Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available . Am J Epidemiol . 2016 Apr 15; 183 ( 8 ): 758 – 64 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Kahn R , Schrag SJ , Verani JR , Lipsitch M . Identifying and Alleviating Bias Due to Differential Depletion of Susceptible People in Postmarketing Evaluations of COVID-19 Vaccines . Am J Epidemiol . 2022 Mar 24; 191 ( 5 ): 800 – 11 . OpenUrl PubMed 26. ↵ Lipsitch M , Tchetgen ET , Cohen T . Negative Controls: A Tool for Detecting Confounding and Bias in Observational Studies . Epidemiology . 2010 May; 21 ( 3 ): 383 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 27. ↵ Hernan MA , Robins JM . Causal Inference: What If . Taylor & Francis ; 2023 . book. 28. ↵ Resource Library | ViewHub [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://view-hub.org/resources 29. ↵ Zheng C , Shao W , Chen X , Zhang B , Wang G , Zhang W . Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis . International Journal of Infectious Diseases . 2022 Jan 1; 114 : 252 – 60 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Teerawattananon Y , Anothaisintawee T , Pheerapanyawaranun C , Botwright S , Akksilp K , Sirichumroonwit N , et al. A systematic review of methodological approaches for evaluating real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: Advising resource-constrained settings . PLoS One . 2022 Jan 11; 17 ( 1 ): e0261930 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ World Bank Country and Lending Groups – World Bank Data Help Desk [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 8]. Available from: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups 32. ↵ Piernas C , Patone M , Astbury NM , Gao M , Sheikh A , Khunti K , et al. Associations of BMI with COVID-19 vaccine uptake, vaccine effectiveness, and risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes after vaccination in England: a population-based cohort study . Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol . 2022 Aug; 10 ( 8 ): 571 – 80 . OpenUrl PubMed 33. Yang H , Ma J , Li A , Lei J , Shang F , Cheng Y , et al. Inactivated vaccine injection and immunoglobulin G levels related to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Delta) pneumonia in Xi’an, China: A single-centered, retrospective, observational study . Front Cell Infect Microbiol . 2022 ; 12 : 933100 . OpenUrl PubMed 34. Fillmore NR , La J , Zheng C , Doron S , Do NV , Monach PA , et al. The COVID-19 hospitalization metric in the pre- and postvaccination eras as a measure of pandemic severity: A retrospective, nationwide cohort study . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol . 2022 Dec; 43 ( 12 ): 1767 – 72 . OpenUrl PubMed 35. ↵ Sagiraju HKR , Elavarasi A , Gupta N , Garg RK , Paul SS , Vig S , et al. The Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Preventing Severe Illness and Death - Real-world Data from a Cohort of Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 . Indian J Community Med . 2022 ; 47 ( 4 ): 510 – 6 . OpenUrl PubMed 36. ↵ Mohseni Afshar Z , Barary M , Hosseinzadeh R , Alijanpour A , Hosseinzadeh D , Ebrahimpour S , et al. Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after vaccination: a critical review . Hum Vaccin Immunother . 2022 Nov 30; 18 ( 5 ): 2051412 . OpenUrl PubMed 37. ↵ Adeloye D , Katikireddi SV , Woolford L , Simpson CR , Shah SA , Agrawal U , et al. Uptake, effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in children and young people in Scotland: Protocol for early pandemic evaluation and enhanced surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II) . J Glob Health . 2021 ; 11 : 05026 . 38. ↵ Barda N , Dagan N , Cohen C , Hernán MA , Lipsitch M , Kohane IS , et al. Effectiveness of a third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for preventing severe outcomes in Israel: an observational study . The Lancet . 2021 Dec 4; 398 ( 10316 ): 2093 – 100 . OpenUrl CrossRef 39. Tamada Y , Takeuchi K , Kusama T , Maeda M , Murata F , Osaka K , et al. Bivalent mRNA vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 among older adults in Japan: a test-negative study from the VENUS study . BMC Infect Dis . 2024 Jan 29; 24 ( 1 ): 135 . OpenUrl PubMed 40. Tang P , Hasan MR , Chemaitelly H , Yassine HM , Benslimane FM , Al Khatib HA , et al. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Qatar . Nat Med . 2021 Dec; 27 ( 12 ): 2136 – 43 . OpenUrl PubMed 41. Akaishi T , Kushimoto S , Katori Y , Sugawara N , Egusa H , Igarashi K , et al. Effectiveness of third vaccine dose for coronavirus disease 2019 during the Omicron variant pandemic: a prospective observational study in Japan . Sci Rep . 2022 Aug 10; 12 ( 1 ): 13589 . OpenUrl PubMed 42. ↵ Al Kaabi N , Oulhaj A , Ganesan S , Al Hosani FI , Najim O , Ibrahim H , et al. Effectiveness of BBIBP-CorV vaccine against severe outcomes of COVID-19 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates . Nat Commun . 2022 Jun 9; 13 ( 1 ): 3215 . OpenUrl PubMed 43. Sritipsukho P , Khawcharoenporn T , Siribumrungwong B , Damronglerd P , Suwantarat N , Satdhabudha A , et al. Comparing real-life effectiveness of various COVID-19 vaccine regimens during the delta variant-dominant pandemic: a test-negative case-control study . Emerg Microbes Infect . 2022 Dec; 11 ( 1 ): 585 – 92 . OpenUrl PubMed 44. Arashiro T , Arima Y , Muraoka H , Sato A , Oba K , Uehara Y , et al. Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Vaccine Effectiveness Against Symptomatic Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection During Delta-Dominant and Omicron-Dominant Periods in Japan: A Multicenter Prospective Case-control Study (Factors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Study) . Clin Infect Dis . 2023 Feb 8; 76 ( 3 ): e108 – 15 . OpenUrl PubMed 45. ↵ Zeng T , Wang K , Guo Z , Sun S , Zhai Z , Lu Y , et al. Distinguishing the Vaccine Effectiveness of Inactivated BBIBP-CorV Vaccine Booster Against the Susceptibility, Infectiousness, and Transmission of Omicron Stains: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Urumqi, China . Infect Dis Ther . 2023 Oct; 12 ( 10 ): 2405 – 16 . OpenUrl PubMed 46. Kumwichar P , Poonsiri C , Botwright S , Sirichumroonwit N , Loharjun B , Thawillarp S , et al. Durability of the Effectiveness of Heterologous COVID-19 Vaccine Regimens in Thailand: Retrospective Cohort Study Using National Registration Data . JMIR Public Health Surveill . 2024 Mar 5; 10 : e48255 . OpenUrl 47. Bansal D , Abdulmajeed J , Al-Shamali MHMA , Albayat SSA , Himatt SM , Cyprian FS , et al. Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 Jun 28; 10 ( 7 ): 1036 . OpenUrl PubMed 48. ↵ Hammerman A , Sergienko R , Friger M , Beckenstein T , Peretz A , Netzer D , et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19 . New England Journal of Medicine . 2022 Mar 30; 386 ( 13 ): 1221 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 49. ↵ Ismail AlHosani F , Eduardo Stanciole A , Aden B , Timoshkin A , Najim O , Abbas Zaher W , et al. Impact of the Sinopharm’s BBIBP-CorV vaccine in preventing hospital admissions and death in infected vaccinees: Results from a retrospective study in the emirate of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE) . Vaccine . 2022 Mar 18; 40 ( 13 ): 2003 – 10 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 50. ↵ Zhang X , Wang Y , Hu C , Xu P , Ma L , Liu L , et al. Effectiveness of a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccines during an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.2 in China: A case-control study . Hum Vaccin Immunother . 2023 Dec 31; 19 ( 1 ): 2194189 . OpenUrl PubMed 51. ↵ Ma C , Sun W , Tang T , Jia M , Liu Y , Wan Y , et al. Effectiveness of adenovirus type 5 vectored and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19, COVID-19 pneumonia, and severe COVID-19 caused by the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant: Evidence from an outbreak in Yunnan, China, 2021 . Vaccine . 2022 May 3; 40 ( 20 ): 2869 – 74 . OpenUrl PubMed 52. Bhatnagar T , Chaudhuri S , Ponnaiah M , Yadav PD , Sabarinathan R , Sahay RR , et al. Effectiveness of BBV152/Covaxin and AZD1222/Covishield vaccines against severe COVID-19 and B.1.617.2/Delta variant in India, 2021: a multi-centric hospital-based case-control study . Int J Infect Dis . 2022 Sep; 122 : 693 – 702 . OpenUrl PubMed 53. Yan VKC , Wan EYF , Ye X , Mok AHY , Lai FTT , Chui CSL , et al. Waning effectiveness against COVID-19-related hospitalization, severe complications, and mortality with two to three doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2: a case-control study . Emerg Microbes Infect . 2023 Dec; 12 ( 1 ): 2209201 . OpenUrl PubMed 54. Wan EYF , Mok AHY , Yan VKC , Chan CIY , Wang B , Lai FTT , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 omicron infection in people aged 60 years or above: a case-control study . J Travel Med . 2022 Dec 27; 29 ( 8 ):taac119. 55. Yan VKC , Cheng FWT , Chui CSL , Lai FTT , Wong CKH , Li X , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections, hospitalizations, and severe complications in the pediatric population in Hong Kong: a case-control study . Emerg Microbes Infect . 2023 Dec; 12 ( 1 ): 2185455 . OpenUrl PubMed 56. ↵ Mimura W , Ishiguro C , Maeda M , Murata F , Fukuda H . Effectiveness of messenger RNA vaccines against infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the periods of Delta and Omicron variant predominance in Japan: the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety (VENUS) study . Int J Infect Dis . 2022 Dec; 125 : 58 – 60 . OpenUrl PubMed 57. Hara M , Ohta Y , Fusazaki N , Hirota Y . Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine Against Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children Aged 5-11 Years in Japan During Omicron Variant Predominate Periods . J Epidemiol . 2024 May 5; 34 ( 5 ): 205 – 10 . OpenUrl PubMed 58. ↵ He X , Zeng B , Wang Y , Pang Y , Zhang M , Hu T , et al. Effectiveness of booster vaccination with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 infection in Guangdong, China: a cohort study . Front Immunol . 2023 ; 14 : 1257360 . OpenUrl PubMed 59. Thiruvengadam R , Awasthi A , Medigeshi G , Bhattacharya S , Mani S , Sivasubbu S , et al. Effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection during the delta (B.1.617.2) variant surge in India: a test-negative, case-control study and a mechanistic study of post-vaccination immune responses . Lancet Infect Dis . 2022 Apr; 22 ( 4 ): 473 – 82 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 60. Singh C , Naik BN , Pandey S , Biswas B , Pati BK , Verma M , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine in preventing infection and disease severity: a case-control study from an Eastern State of India . Epidemiol Infect . 2021 Oct 11; 149 : e224 . OpenUrl 61. Aldawish S , Abusaris R , Almohammadi E , Althobiti F , Albarrag A . Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against ICU admission during Omicron surge in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study . BMC Infect Dis . 2023 Oct 31; 23 ( 1 ): 746 . OpenUrl PubMed 62. Veerapu N , Inamdar DP , Kumar BPR , Anuradha B , Guddanti P , Issapuri SD , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Persons Attending the RT-PCR center at a Medical College Hospital in Telangana: A Case-Control Study . Indian J Community Med . 2022 ; 47 ( 4 ): 587 – 90 . OpenUrl PubMed 63. Lee JE , Jin KN , Hong H , Jeong YJ , Yoon SH . Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Over Time Against Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Related to Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection . Radiology . 2024 Jan; 310 ( 1 ): e231928 . OpenUrl PubMed 64. Park SK , Choe YJ , Jang EJ , Kim RK , Lee SW , Kwon GY , et al. Effectiveness of Heterologous COVID-19 Vaccine Booster in Korean Elderly Population, 2022 . J Korean Med Sci . 2023 May 15; 38 ( 19 ): e143 . OpenUrl PubMed 65. ↵ Huang Z , Xu S , Liu J , Wu L , Qiu J , Wang N , et al. Effectiveness of inactivated and Ad5-nCoV COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant infection, severe illness, and death . BMC Med . 2022 Oct 20; 20 ( 1 ): 400 . OpenUrl PubMed 66. Kang M , Yi Y , Li Y , Sun L , Deng A , Hu T , et al. Effectiveness of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines Against Illness Caused by the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant During an Outbreak in Guangdong, China : A Cohort Study . Ann Intern Med . 2022 Apr; 175 ( 4 ): 533 – 40 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 67. ↵ Li XN , Huang Y , Wang W , Jing QL , Zhang CH , Qin PZ , et al. Effectiveness of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against the Delta variant infection in Guangzhou: a test-negative case-control real-world study . Emerg Microbes Infect . 2021 Dec; 10 ( 1 ): 1751 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 68. Ng RWY , Sze RKH , Chong KC , Zhao S , Ling L , Lui G , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines: A test-negative study in an infection-naïve Hong Kong population . J Infect . 2023 Aug; 87 ( 2 ): 136 – 43 . OpenUrl PubMed 69. Al-Momani H , Aldajah K , Alda’ajah E , ALjafar Y , Abushawer Z . Effectiveness of Pfizer/BioNTech and Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccines in reducing hospital admissions in prince Hamza hospital, Jordan . Front Public Health . 2022 ; 10 : 1008521 . 70. ↵ Liu C , Zhang J , Zeng Y , Huang C , Chen F , Cao Y , et al. Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2-inactivated vaccine and the correlation to neutralizing antibodies: A test-negative case-control study . J Med Virol . 2023 Jan; 95 ( 1 ): e28280 . OpenUrl PubMed 71. ↵ Huang Z , Xu S , Liu J , Wu L , Qiu J , Wang N , et al. Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines among older adults in Shanghai: retrospective cohort study . Nat Commun . 2023 Apr 10; 14 ( 1 ): 2009 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 72. ↵ Zeng T , Lu Y , Zhao Y , Guo Z , Sun S , Teng Z , et al. Effectiveness of the booster dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine against Omicron BA.5 infection: a matched cohort study of adult close contacts . Respir Res . 2023 Oct 12; 24 ( 1 ): 246 . OpenUrl PubMed 73. ↵ Kim RK , Choe YJ , Jang EJ , Chae C , Hwang JH , Lee KH , et al. Comparative Effectiveness of COVID-19 Bivalent Versus Monovalent mRNA Vaccines in the Early Stage of Bivalent Vaccination in Korea: October 2022 to January 2023 . J Korean Med Sci . 2023 Nov 27; 38 ( 46 ): e396 . OpenUrl PubMed 74. Sukik L , Chemaitelly H , Ayoub HH , Coyle P , Tang P , Yassine HM , et al. Effectiveness of two and three doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines against infection, symptoms, and severity in the pre-omicron era: A time-dependent gradient . Vaccine . 2024 May 22; 42 ( 14 ): 3307 – 20 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 75. ↵ Nabirova D , Horth R , Smagul M , Nukenova G , Yesmagambetova A , Singer D , et al. Effectiveness of four vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in Almaty, Kazakhstan in 2021: retrospective population-based cohort study . Front Public Health . 2023 ; 11 : 1205159 . OpenUrl PubMed 76. Toh TH , Qi YY , Yong SM , Lee JSY , Liyana NF , See RYH , et al. Effectiveness of vero cell inactivated vaccine against severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) in Sibu, Malaysia: A retrospective test-negative design . Hum Vaccin Immunother . 2023 Dec 31; 19 ( 1 ): 2167438 . OpenUrl PubMed 77. Dogan M , Yilmaz B . Efficacy of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 . Acta Pharm . 2023 Jun 1; 73 ( 2 ): 257 – 68 . OpenUrl PubMed 78. ↵ Ono S , Michihata N , Yamana H , Uemura K , Ono Y , Jo T , et al. Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Booster Dose After BNT162b2 Primary Vaccination Against the Omicron Variants: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Large-Scale Population-Based Registries in Japan . Clin Infect Dis . 2023 Jan 6; 76 ( 1 ): 18 – 24 . OpenUrl PubMed 79. Wei Y , Jia KM , Zhao S , Hung CT , Mok CKP , Poon PKM , et al. Estimation of Vaccine Effectiveness of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 Against Severe Outcomes Over Time Among Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Omicron . JAMA Netw Open . 2023 Feb 1; 6 ( 2 ): e2254777 . OpenUrl 80. Lim AH , Ab Rahman N , Ong SM , Paraja J , Rashid R , Parmar IS , et al. Evaluation of BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness in Malaysia: test negative case-control study . Vaccine . 2022 Sep 16; 40 ( 39 ): 5675 – 82 . OpenUrl PubMed 81. Khosravi Shadmani F , Moradi G , Naghipour M , Torkaman Asadi F , Ahmadi A , Mirahmadizadeh A , et al. Evaluation of the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness on the outcomes of COVID 19 disease in Iran: a test-negative case-control study . Front Immunol . 2024 ; 15 : 1420651 . 82. Arashiro T , Arima Y , Kuramochi J , Muraoka H , Sato A , Chubachi K , et al. Immune escape and waning immunity of COVID-19 monovalent mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection with BA.1/BA.2 and BA.5 in Japan . Vaccine . 2023 Nov 13; 41 ( 47 ): 6969 – 79 . OpenUrl PubMed 83. Khanam F , Islam MT , Ahmmed F , Ahmed SU , Hossen MI , Rajib MH , et al. Measuring the Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Used during a Surge of the Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2 in Bangladesh: A Test-Negative Design Evaluation . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 Dec 2; 10 ( 12 ): 2069 . OpenUrl PubMed 84. Chemaitelly H , Yassine HM , Benslimane FM , Al Khatib HA , Tang P , Hasan MR , et al. mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants and severe COVID-19 disease in Qatar . Nat Med . 2021 Sep; 27 ( 9 ): 1614 – 21 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 85. ↵ Tsang NNY , So HC , Cowling BJ , Leung GM , Ip DKM. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccination against asymptomatic and symptomatic infection of SARS-CoV-2 omicron BA.2 in Hong Kong: a prospective cohort study . The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 2023 Apr 1; 23 ( 4 ): 421 – 34 . OpenUrl PubMed 86. Sritipsukho P , Khawcharoenporn T , Siribumrungwong B , Damronglerd P , Suwantarat N , Satdhabudha A , et al. Real-life effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine during the Omicron variant-dominant pandemic: how many booster doses do we need? Emerg Microbes Infect . 2023 Dec; 12 ( 1 ): 2174779 . OpenUrl PubMed 87. Suphanchaimat R , Nittayasoot N , Jiraphongsa C , Thammawijaya P , Bumrungwong P , Tulyathan A , et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Mix-and-Match Vaccine Regimens against SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant in Thailand: A Nationwide Test-Negative Matched Case-Control Study . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 Jul 5; 10 ( 7 ): 1080 . OpenUrl PubMed 88. Hara M , Furue T , Fukuoka M , Iwanaga K , Matsuishi E , Miike T , et al. Real-World Effectiveness of the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Japan: A Case-Control Study . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 May 14; 10 ( 5 ): 779 . OpenUrl PubMed 89. Choi YS , Ryu S , Kim RK , Chiara A , Baek S , Nam H , et al. Effectiveness of the Bivalent mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine for Preventing Critical Infection From the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in the Republic of Korea . J Korean Med Sci . 2024 Sep 30; 39 ( 37 ): e258 . OpenUrl PubMed 90. Nadeem I , Ul Munamm SA , Ur Rasool M , Fatimah M , Abu Bakar M , Rana ZK , et al. Safety and efficacy of Sinopharm vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) in elderly population of Faisalabad district of Pakistan . Postgrad Med J . 2023 Jun 8; 99 ( 1171 ): 463 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 91. Gazit S , Saciuk Y , Perez G , Peretz A , Pitzer VE , Patalon T . Short term, relative effectiveness of four doses versus three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in people aged 60 years and older in Israel: retrospective, test negative, case-control study . BMJ . 2022 May 24; 377 : e071113 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 92. ↵ Jangiam W , Swangpun K , Iamsirithaworn S , Piriyasatit S , Bhukdee D . Relative vaccine effectiveness of ChAdOx1/AZD1222 vaccines as booster dose via intradermal injection with a one-fifth dose compared with the intramuscular injection in the prevention of SAR-CoV-2 infections in Phuket: A retrospective cohort study . Int J Infect Dis . 2024 Oct; 147 : 107179 . 93. Chodick G , Tene L , Rotem RS , Patalon T , Gazit S , Ben-Tov A , et al. The Effectiveness of the Two-Dose BNT162b2 Vaccine: Analysis of Real-World Data . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 Feb 11; 74 ( 3 ): 472 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 94. ↵ Wang K , Guo Z , Zeng T , Sun S , Lu Y , Wang J , et al. Transmission Characteristics and Inactivated Vaccine Effectiveness Against Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 Variants in Urumqi, China . JAMA Netw Open . 2023 Mar 1; 6 ( 3 ): e235755 . OpenUrl PubMed 95. ↵ He X , Liao Y , Liang Y , Yu J , Gao W , Wan J , et al. Transmission characteristics and inactivated vaccine effectiveness against transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2 variant in Shenzhen, China . Front Immunol . 2023 ; 14 : 1290279 . OpenUrl PubMed 96. ↵ Uemura K , Ono S , Michihata N , Yamana H , Yasunaga H . Duration of effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using large-scale population-based registry data . BMC Infectious Diseases . 2024 Jun 28; 24 ( 1 ): 648 . OpenUrl PubMed 97. ↵ Haas EJ , Angulo FJ , McLaughlin JM , Anis E , Singer SR , Khan F , et al. Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data . The Lancet . 2021 May 15; 397 ( 10287 ): 1819 – 29 . OpenUrl 98. Gim H , Seo H , Chun BC . Vaccine Effectiveness Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reinfection by Type and Frequency of Vaccine: A Community-Based Case-Control Study . J Korean Med Sci . 2024 Jun 3; 39 ( 21 ): e174 . OpenUrl PubMed 99. Patalon T , Saciuk Y , Peretz A , Perez G , Lurie Y , Maor Y , et al. Waning effectiveness of the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine . Nat Commun . 2022 Jun 9; 13 ( 1 ): 3203 . OpenUrl PubMed 100. Chemaitelly H , Tang P , Hasan MR , AlMukdad S , Yassine HM , Benslimane FM , et al. Waning of BNT162b2 Vaccine Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Qatar . N Engl J Med . 2021 Dec 9; 385 ( 24 ): e83 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 101. Emani VR , Nandanoor D , Reddy R , Nakka AS , Goswami KK , Emani SR , et al. SARS-CoV2 Breakthrough Infections in Elderly Third Booster and Vaccinated Population Considered Vaccine Immune During Omicron (B.1.1.529)Variant Surge in Israel . Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy . 2022 May 20; 16 ( 2 ): 235 – 52 . OpenUrl CrossRef 102. ↵ Hua Q , Zheng D , Yu B , Tan X , Chen Q , Wang L , et al. Effectiveness of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines against COVID-19 Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Variants: A Retrospective Cohort Study . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 Oct 19; 10 ( 10 ): 1753 . OpenUrl PubMed 103. June Choe Y , Yi S , Hwang I , Kim J , Park YJ , Cho E , et al. Safety and effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in adolescents . Vaccine . 2022 Jan 31; 40 ( 5 ): 691 – 4 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 104. Chiew CJ , Premikha M , Chong CY , Wei WE , Ong B , Lye DC , et al. Effectiveness of primary series and booster vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adolescents aged 12-17 years in Singapore: a national cohort study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2023 Feb; 23 ( 2 ): 177 – 82 . OpenUrl PubMed 105. ↵ Ma C , Huang C , Wang W , Song Y , Jiang X , Tian X , et al. Effectiveness of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines against Delta-Variant COVID-19: Evidence from an Outbreak in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region , China. Vaccines (Basel ). 2023 Jan 28; 11 ( 2 ): 292 . OpenUrl PubMed 106. Osman K , Mundodan J , Chowdhury J , Ravi R , Baaboura R , Albuquerque J , et al. Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA Vaccine Protection among Children and Adolescents Aged 12-17 Years against COVID-19 Infection in Qatar . Vaccines (Basel ). 2023 Sep 25; 11 ( 10 ): 1522 . OpenUrl PubMed 107. Tan CY , Chiew CJ , Pang D , Lee VJ , Ong B , Lye DC , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against Delta, Omicron BA.1, and BA.2 in a highly vaccinated Asian setting: a test-negative design study . Clin Microbiol Infect . 2023 Jan; 29 ( 1 ): 101 – 6 . OpenUrl PubMed 108. Wee LE , Pang D , Chiew C , Tan J , Lee V , Ong B , et al. Long-term Real-world Protection Afforded by Third mRNA Doses Against Symptomatic Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infections, Coronavirus Disease 19-related Emergency Attendances and Hospitalizations Amongst Older Singaporeans During an Omicron XBB Wave . Clin Infect Dis . 2023 Oct 13; 77 ( 8 ): 1111 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 109. Wee LE , Tang N , Pang D , Chiew C , Yung CF , Chong CY , et al. Effectiveness of Monovalent mRNA Vaccines Against Omicron XBB Infection in Singaporean Children Younger Than 5 Years . JAMA Pediatr . 2023 Dec 1; 177 ( 12 ): 1324 – 31 . OpenUrl PubMed 110. Yung CF , Pang D , Kam KQ , Lye DC , Ong B , Chong CY , et al. BNT162b2 vaccine protection against omicron and effect of previous infection variant and vaccination sequence among children and adolescents in Singapore: a population-based cohort study . Lancet Child Adolesc Health . 2023 Jul; 7 ( 7 ): 463 – 70 . OpenUrl PubMed 111. Zhao S , Guo Z , Sun S , Hung CT , Leung EYM , Wei Y , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and Sinovac vaccines against the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during Omicron-predominance in Hong Kong: A retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 cases . J Clin Virol . 2023 Sep; 166 : 105547 . 112. Suzuki T , Asai Y , Tsuzuki S , Nomoto H , Matsunaga N , Kodama EN , et al. Real-world effectiveness of full and booster mRNA vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 against disease severity during the delta- and omicron-dominant phases: A propensity score-matched cohort study using the nationwide registry data in Japan . J Microbiol Immunol Infect . 2024 Feb; 57 ( 1 ): 20 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 113. ↵ Zhao D , Sun Y , Li J , LI X , Ma Y , Cao Z , et al. Effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalization during the Omicron BF.7-predominant epidemic wave in Beijing, China: a cohort study . BMC Infectious Diseases . 2024 Sep 17; 24 ( 1 ): 991 . OpenUrl PubMed 114. Chodick G , Tene L , Patalon T , Gazit S , Ben Tov A , Cohen D , et al. Assessment of Effectiveness of 1 Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Infection 13 to 24 Days After Immunization . JAMA Netw Open . 2021 Jun 7; 4 ( 6 ): e2115985 . OpenUrl PubMed 115. Zacay G , Shasha D , Bareket R , Kadim I , Hershkowitz Sikron F , Tsamir J , et al. BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Asymptomatic Infection With SARS-CoV-2 Virus: A Nationwide Historical Cohort Study . Open Forum Infect Dis . 2021 Jun; 8 ( 6 ):ofab262. 116. Tomioka K , Uno K , Yamada M . Association between vaccination status and COVID-19-related health outcomes among community-dwelling COVID-19 patients in Nara, Japan . Environ Health Prev Med . 2023 ; 28 : 7 . 117. Mimura W , Ishiguro C , Terada-Hirashima J , Matsunaga N , Sato S , Kawazoe Y , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Against Infection, Symptomatic Infection, and Hospitalization Among Older Adults Aged ≥65 Years During the Delta Variant Predominance in Japan: The VENUS Study . J Epidemiol . 2024 Jun 5; 34 ( 6 ): 278 – 85 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 118. ↵ Tang L , Wang FZ , Rodewald LE , Wang XY , Liu SY , Liu QQ , et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Primary Series and Booster Doses of Inactivated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Against Omicron BA.2 Variant Infection in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study . J Infect Dis . 2023 Aug 11; 228 ( 3 ): 261 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 119. ↵ Musa S , Merdrignac L , Skocibusic S , Nedic R , Cilovic-Lagarija S , Kissling E . BBIBP-CorV vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 in patients aged 60 years and older during the Delta-dominant period in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, a test-negative case-control study . Vaccine . 2024 May 31; 42 ( 15 ): 3467 – 73 . OpenUrl PubMed 120. ↵ Amodio E , Genovese D , Mazzeo L , Martino L , Restivo V , Vella G , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Adolescents Over 6 Months . Pediatrics . 2022 Nov 1; 150 ( 5 ): e2022057394 . OpenUrl PubMed 121. ↵ Amodio E , Vella G , Restivo V , Casuccio A , Vitale F . Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 in Sicily over an Eight-Month Period . Vaccines (Basel ). 2022 Mar 11; 10 ( 3 ): 426 . OpenUrl PubMed 122. Salinas-Martínez AM , Rodríguez-Vidales EP , Garza-Carrillo D , Robles-Rodríguez OA , Oca-Luna RM de , Marroquín-Escamilla AR . Comparison of the effectiveness of four SARS-COV-2 v accines in Nuevo Leon, Mexico: A test-negative control study . Aten Primaria . 2023 May; 55 ( 5 ): 102606 . OpenUrl PubMed 123. Rosolen V , Turoldo F , Zamaro G , Del Bianco F , Pezzotti P , Castriotta L , et al. COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness in the population of Friuli Venezia Giulia, North-East Italy. Control of bias associated with divergent compliance to policies in a test-negative case-control study . BMC Public Health . 2023 Dec 11; 23 ( 1 ): 2476 . OpenUrl PubMed 124. van Ewijk CE , Kooijman MN , Fanoy E , Raven SF , Middeldorp M , Shah A , et al. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Delta period, a nationwide study adjusting for chance of exposure, the Netherlands, July to December 2021 . Euro Surveill . 2022 Nov; 27 ( 45 ): 2200217 . OpenUrl PubMed 125. Kerr S , Vasileiou E , Robertson C , Sheikh A . COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes from Delta AY.4.2: Cohort and test-negative study of 5.4 million individuals in Scotland . J Glob Health . 2022 Jul 9; 12 :05025. 126. Lang AL , Hohmuth N , Višković V , Konigorski S , Scholz S , Balzer F , et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Digital Pandemic Surveillance in Germany (eCOV Study): Web Application-Based Prospective Observational Cohort Study . J Med Internet Res . 2024 Jun 4; 26 : e47070 . OpenUrl PubMed 127. Barchuk A , Bulina A , Cherkashin M , Berezina N , Rakova T , Kuplevatskaya D , et al. COVID-19 vaccines effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 during Delta variant surge: a preliminary assessment from a case-control study in St. Petersburg, Russia . BMC Public Health . 2022 Sep 22; 22 ( 1 ): 1803 . OpenUrl PubMed 128. ↵ Del Cura-Bilbao A , López-Mendoza H , Chaure-Pardos A , Vergara-Ugarriza A , Guimbao-Bescós J . Effectiveness of 3 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infections, January-May 2021, Aragon, Spain . Emerg Infect Dis . 2022 Mar; 28 ( 3 ): 591 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 129. Fano V , Crielesi A , Coviello E , Fabiani M , Salvatore Miglietta A , Colaiocco G , et al. Effectiveness of the Comirnaty and the Vaxzevria vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among residents in Lazio region (Italy) . Vaccine . 2022 Apr 20; 40 ( 18 ): 2540 – 5 . OpenUrl PubMed 130. ↵ Gram MA , Emborg HD , Schelde AB , Friis NU , Nielsen KF , Moustsen-Helms IR , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 hospitalization with the Alpha, Delta, or Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: A nationwide Danish cohort study . PLoS Med . 2022 Sep; 19 ( 9 ): e1003992 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 131. ↵ Andrews N , Tessier E , Stowe J , Gower C , Kirsebom F , Simmons R , et al. Duration of Protection against Mild and Severe Disease by Covid-19 Vaccines . N Engl J Med . 2022 Jan 27; 386 ( 4 ): 340 – 50 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 132. ↵ Homan T , Mazzilli S , Chieti A , Musa A , Roth A , Fortunato F , et al. Covid-19 vaccination programme effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 related infections, hospital admissions and deaths in the Apulia region of Italy: a one-year retrospective cohort study . Sci Rep . 2022 Nov 3; 12 ( 1 ): 18597 . OpenUrl PubMed 133. ↵ Kirsebom FCM , Andrews N , Stowe J , Ramsay M , Bernal JL . Duration of protection of ancestral-strain monovalent vaccines and effectiveness of bivalent BA.1 boosters against COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: a test-negative case-control study . The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 2023 Nov 1; 23 ( 11 ): 1235 – 43 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 134. ↵ Kislaya I , Machado A , Magalhães S , Rodrigues AP , Franco R , Leite PP , et al. COVID-19 mRNA vaccine effectiveness (second and first booster dose) against hospitalisation and death during Omicron BA.5 circulation: cohort study based on electronic health records, Portugal, May to July 2022 . Euro Surveill . 2022 Sep; 27 ( 37 ): 2200697 . OpenUrl PubMed 135. ↵ Hyams C , Marlow R , Maseko Z , King J , Ward L , Fox K , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 COVID-19 vaccination at preventing hospitalisations in people aged at least 80 years: a test-negative, case-control study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2021 Nov; 21 ( 11 ): 1539 – 48 . OpenUrl PubMed 136. ↵ Machado A , Kislaya I , Rodrigues AP , Sequeira D , Lima J , Cruz C , et al. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths, among individuals aged ≥65 years in Portugal: A cohort study based on data-linkage of national registries February-September 2021 . PLoS One . 2022 ; 17 ( 9 ):e0274008. 137. Monge S , Rojas-Benedicto A , Olmedo C , Mazagatos C , José Sierra M , Limia A , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA vaccine boosters against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in Spain: a nationwide cohort study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2022 Sep; 22 ( 9 ): 1313 – 20 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 138. ↵ Nyberg T , Ferguson NM , Nash SG , Webster HH , Flaxman S , Andrews N , et al. Comparative analysis of the risks of hospitalisation and death associated with SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England: a cohort study . The Lancet . 2022 Apr 2; 399 ( 10332 ): 1303 – 12 . OpenUrl 139. ↵ Semenzato L , Botton J , Baricault B , Deloumeaux J , Joachim C , Sylvestre E , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 outcomes within the French overseas territories: A cohort study of 2-doses vaccinated individuals matched to unvaccinated ones followed up until September 2021 and based on the National Health Data System . PLoS One . 2022 ; 17 ( 9 ): e0274309 . OpenUrl PubMed 140. ↵ Stowe J , Andrews N , Kirsebom F , Ramsay M , Bernal JL . Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta hospitalisation, a test negative case-control study . Nat Commun . 2022 Sep 30; 13 ( 1 ): 5736 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 141. ↵ Starrfelt J , Danielsen AS , Buanes EA , Juvet LK , Lyngstad TM , Rø GØI , et al. Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July–November 2021 . BMC Medicine . 2022 Sep 2; 20 ( 1 ): 278 . OpenUrl PubMed 142. Lopez Bernal J , Andrews N , Gower C , Gallagher E , Simmons R , Thelwall S , et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant . N Engl J Med . 2021 Aug 12; 385 ( 7 ): 585 – 94 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 143. Bermingham C , Morgan J , Ayoubkhani D , Glickman M , Islam N , Sheikh A , et al. Estimating the Effectiveness of First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine Against Mortality in England: A Quasi-Experimental Study . Am J Epidemiol . 2023 Feb 1; 192 ( 2 ): 267 – 75 . OpenUrl PubMed 144. ↵ Auvigne V , Tamandjou Tchuem CR , Schaeffer J , Vaux S , Parent Du Chatelet I . Protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred by the Pfizer-BioNTech Original/BA.4-5 bivalent vaccine compared to the mRNA Original monovalent vaccines - A matched cohort study in France . Vaccine . 2023 Aug 31; 41 ( 38 ): 5490 – 3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 145. Lopez Bernal J , Andrews N , Gower C , Robertson C , Stowe J , Tessier E , et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study . BMJ . 2021 May 13; 373 : n1088 . 146. ↵ Lundberg-Morris L , Leach S , Xu Y , Martikainen J , Santosa A , Gisslén M , et al. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against post-covid-19 condition among 589 722 individuals in Sweden: population based cohort study . BMJ . 2023 Nov 22; 383 : e076990 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 147. Stoliaroff-Pepin A , Peine C , Herath T , Lachmann J , Perriat D , Dörre A , et al. Effectiveness of vaccines in preventing hospitalization due to COVID-19: A multicenter hospital-based case-control study, Germany, June 2021 to January 2022 . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 9; 41 ( 2 ): 290 – 3 . OpenUrl PubMed 148. Mason TFD , Whitston M , Hodgson J , Watkinson RE , Lau YS , Abdulrazeg O , et al. Effects of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine on COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation amongst older people: matched case control study for England . BMC Med . 2021 Oct 18; 19 ( 1 ): 275 . OpenUrl PubMed 149. ↵ Nordström P , Ballin M , Nordström A . Safety and effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and risk factors for hospitalisation caused by the omicron variant in 0.8 million adolescents: A nationwide cohort study in Sweden . PLoS Med . 2023 Feb; 20 ( 2 ): e1004127 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 150. Nordström P , Ballin M , Nordström A . Risk of infection, hospitalisation, and death up to 9 months after a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine: a retrospective, total population cohort study in Sweden . The Lancet . 2022 Feb 26; 399 ( 10327 ): 814 – 23 . OpenUrl 151. Riefolo F , Castillo-Cano B , Martín-Pérez M , Messina D , Elbers R , Brink-Kwakkel D , et al. Effectiveness of homologous/heterologous booster COVID-19 vaccination schedules against severe illness in general population and clinical subgroups in three European countries . Vaccine . 2023 Nov 13; 41 ( 47 ): 7007 – 18 . OpenUrl PubMed 152. ↵ Stecher M , Kristoffersen AB , Lie K , Andersen SR , Meijerink H , Starrfelt J . Effectiveness and durability of a second COVID-19 booster against severe outcomes among older people in Norway: a population-based cohort study comparing mono- and bivalent booster doses . Int J Epidemiol . 2023 Dec 25; 52 ( 6 ): 1716 – 24 . OpenUrl PubMed 153. Birk NM , Christensen AV , Nygaard U , Bundgaard H , Nielsen SD , Berg SK , et al. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 following Second Dose Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 in Danish Adolescents Aged 12-18 Years: A Real-World Nationwide Danish Cohort Study . Viruses . 2023 Dec 29; 16 ( 1 ): 56 . OpenUrl PubMed 154. Meeraus W , de Munter L , Gray CM , Dwivedi A , Wyndham-Thomas C , Ouwens M , et al. Protection against COVID-19 hospitalisation conferred by primary-series vaccination with AZD1222 in non-boosted individuals: first vaccine effectiveness results of the European COVIDRIVE study and meta-regression analysis . Lancet Reg Health Eur . 2023 Aug; 31 : 100675 . 155. ↵ Chatzilena A , Hyams C , Challen R , Marlow R , King J , Adegbite D , et al. Relative vaccine effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 boosters in people aged at least 75 years during the spring-summer (monovalent vaccine) and autumn-winter (bivalent vaccine) booster campaigns: a prospective test negative case-control study , United Kingdom , 2022 . Euro Surveill. 2023 Nov;28(48):2300173. 156. ↵ Chalupka A , Richter L , Chakeri A , El-Khatib Z , Theiler-Schwetz V , Trummer C , et al. Effectiveness of a fourth SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose in previously infected individuals from Austria . Eur J Clin Invest . 2024 Mar; 54 ( 3 ): e14136 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 157. ↵ Antonelli M , Penfold RS , Canas LDS , Sudre C , Rjoob K , Murray B , et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection following booster vaccination: Illness and symptom profile in a prospective, observational community-based case-control study . J Infect . 2023 Dec; 87 ( 6 ): 506 – 15 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 158. ↵ Horne EMF , Hulme WJ , Parker EPK , Keogh RH , Williamson EJ , Walker VM , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines as First Booster Doses in England: An Observational Study in OpenSAFELY-TPP . Epidemiology . 2024 Jul 1; 35 ( 4 ): 568 – 78 . OpenUrl PubMed 159. Blanquart F , Abad C , Ambroise J , Bernard M , Débarre F , Giannoli JM , et al. Temporal, age, and geographical variation in vaccine efficacy against infection by the Delta and Omicron variants in the community in France, December 2021 to March 2022 . Int J Infect Dis . 2023 Aug; 133 : 89 – 96 . OpenUrl PubMed 160. ↵ Meijerink H , Veneti L , Kristoffersen AB , Danielsen AS , Stecher M , Starrfelt J . Estimating vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 using cause-specific sick leave as an indicator: a nationwide population-based cohort study, Norway, July 2021 - December 2022 . BMC Public Health . 2024 Jul 11; 24 ( 1 ): 1861 . OpenUrl PubMed 161. ↵ Seppälä E , Dahl J , Veneti L , Rydland KM , Klüwer B , Rohringer A , et al. Covid-19 and influenza vaccine effectiveness against associated hospital admission and death among individuals over 65 years in Norway: A population-based cohort study, 3 October 2022 to 20 June 2023 . Vaccine . 2024 Jan 25; 42 ( 3 ): 620 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 162. Luong Nguyen LB , Bauer R , Lesieur Z , Galtier F , Duval X , Vanhems P , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization in adults in France: A test negative case control study . Infect Dis Now . 2022 Feb; 52 ( 1 ): 40 – 3 . OpenUrl PubMed 163. Niessen FA , Knol MJ , Hahné SJM , VECTOR study group , Bonten MJM , Bruijning-Verhagen PCJL . Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 related hospital admission in the Netherlands: A test-negative case-control study . Vaccine . 2022 Aug 12; 40 ( 34 ): 5044 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 164. ↵ Kirsebom FCM , Harman K , Lunt RJ , Andrews N , Groves N , Abdul Aziz N , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation estimated using a test-negative case-control study design, and comparative odds of hospital admission and severe outcomes with COVID-19 sub-lineages BQ.1, CH.1.1. and XBB.1.5 in England . Lancet Reg Health Eur . 2023 Dec;35: 100755 . 165. Barchuk A , Cherkashin M , Bulina A , Berezina N , Rakova T , Kuplevatskaya D , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against referral to hospital after SARS-CoV-2 infection in St. Petersburg, Russia, during the Delta variant surge: a test-negative case-control study . BMC Med . 2022 Sep 20; 20 ( 1 ): 312 . OpenUrl PubMed 166. Stoliaroff-Pepin A , Peine C , Herath T , Lachmann J , Hellenbrand W , Perriat D , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 during the Omicron wave in Germany: results from the COViK study . Infection . 2023 Aug; 51 ( 4 ): 1093 – 102 . OpenUrl PubMed 167. McKeigue PM , McAllister DA , Hutchinson SJ , Robertson C , Stockton D , Colhoun HM . Vaccine efficacy against severe COVID-19 in relation to delta variant (B.1.617.2) and time since second dose in patients in Scotland (REACT-SCOT): a case-control study . Lancet Respir Med . 2022 Jun; 10 ( 6 ): 566 – 72 . OpenUrl PubMed 168. Nunes B , Rodrigues AP , Kislaya I , Cruz C , Peralta-Santos A , Lima J , et al. mRNA vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19-related hospitalisations and deaths in older adults: a cohort study based on data linkage of national health registries in Portugal, February to August 2021 . Euro Surveill . 2021 Sep; 26 ( 38 ): 2100833 . OpenUrl PubMed 169. Gomes D , Beyerlein A , Katz K , Hoelscher G , Nennstiel U , Liebl B , et al. Is the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine effective in elderly populations? Results from population data from Bavaria, Germany . PLoS One . 2021 ; 16 ( 11 ): e0259370 . OpenUrl PubMed 170. ↵ Glampson B , Brittain J , Kaura A , Mulla A , Mercuri L , Brett SJ , et al. Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Effectiveness Through the North West London Vaccination Program: Retrospective Cohort Study . JMIR Public Health Surveill . 2021 Sep 17; 7 ( 9 ): e30010 . OpenUrl PubMed 171. Đurić-Petković D , Šuljagić V , Begović-Kuprešanin V , Rančić N , Nikolić V . Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Infection during the Circulation of Alpha, Delta, or Omicron Variants: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Serbia . Vaccines (Basel ). 2024 Feb 18; 12 ( 2 ): 211 . OpenUrl PubMed 172. ↵ Català M , Burn E , Rathod-Mistry T , Xie J , Delmestri A , Prieto-Alhambra D , et al. Observational methods for COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness research: an empirical evaluation and target trial emulation . Int J Epidemiol . 2024 Feb 1; 53 ( 1 ):dyad138. 173. Björk J , Inghammar M , Moghaddassi M , Rasmussen M , Malmqvist U , Kahn F . High level of protection against COVID-19 after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in the working age population - first results from a cohort study in Southern Sweden . Infect Dis (Lond ). 2022 Feb; 54 ( 2 ): 128 – 33 . OpenUrl PubMed 174. Fabiani M , Mateo-Urdiales A , Sacco C , Rota MC , Petrone D , Bressi M , et al. Relative effectiveness of a 2nd booster dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine up to four months post administration in individuals aged 80 years or more in Italy: A retrospective matched cohort study . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 4; 41 ( 1 ): 76 – 84 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 175. Cornforth F , Webber L , Kerr G , Dinsdale H , Majeed A , Greengross P . Impact of COVID-19 vaccination on COVID-19 hospital admissions in England during 2021: an observational study . J R Soc Med . 2023 May; 116 ( 5 ): 167 – 76 . OpenUrl PubMed 176. Andersson NW , Thiesson EM , Baum U , Pihlström N , Starrfelt J , Faksová K , et al. Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study . BMJ . 2023 Jul 25; 382 : e075286 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 177. Vokó Z , Kiss Z , Surján G , Surján O , Barcza Z , Pályi B , et al. Nationwide effectiveness of five SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Hungary-the HUN-VE study . Clin Microbiol Infect . 2022 Mar; 28 ( 3 ): 398 – 404 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 178. Tonnara G , Piselli P , Cimaglia C , Arlotti M , Sacchini E , Manoni S , et al. The impact of COVID-19 vaccination programme in the Republic of San Marino: Focus on effectiveness of Gam-Covid-Vac . Clin Microbiol Infect . 2022 Dec; 28 ( 12 ): 1636 – 43 . OpenUrl PubMed 179. ↵ Kläser K , Molteni E , Graham M , Canas LS , Österdahl MF , Antonelli M , et al. COVID-19 due to the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant compared to B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant of SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort study . Sci Rep . 2022 Jun 28; 12 ( 1 ): 10904 . OpenUrl PubMed 180. Kildegaard H , Lund LC , Højlund M , Stensballe LG , Pottegård A . Risk of adverse events after covid-19 in Danish children and adolescents and effectiveness of BNT162b2 in adolescents: cohort study . 2022 Apr 11 [cited 2025 Sep 8]; Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-068898 181. Fano V , Coviello E , Consonni D , Agresta A , Orsini N , Crielesi A , et al. COVID-19 vaccines coverage and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection among residents in the largest Health Authority of Lazio region (Italy): a population-based cohort study . Expert Rev Vaccines . 2022 Aug; 21 ( 8 ): 1147 – 57 . OpenUrl PubMed 182. Fabiani M , Puopolo M , Morciano C , Spuri M , Alegiani SS , Filia A , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA vaccines and waning of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 during predominant circulation of the delta variant in Italy: retrospective cohort study . BMJ . 2022 Feb 10; 376 : e069052 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 183. ↵ Baum U , Poukka E , Palmu AA , Salo H , Lehtonen TO , Leino T . Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 hospitalisation among Finnish elderly and chronically ill-An interim analysis of a nationwide cohort study . PLoS One . 2021 ; 16 ( 11 ): e0258704 . OpenUrl PubMed 184. ↵ Ionescu IG , Skowronski DM , Sauvageau C , Chuang E , Ouakki M , Kim S , et al. BNT162b2 Effectiveness Against Delta and Omicron Variants of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Adolescents Aged 12-17 Years, by Dosing Interval and Duration . J Infect Dis . 2023 Apr 26; 227 ( 9 ): 1073 – 83 . OpenUrl PubMed 185. ↵ Price AM , Olson SM , Newhams MM , Halasa NB , Boom JA , Sahni LC , et al. BNT162b2 Protection against the Omicron Variant in Children and Adolescents . N Engl J Med . 2022 May 19; 386 ( 20 ): 1899 – 909 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 186. ↵ Lauring AS , Tenforde MW , Chappell JD , Gaglani M , Ginde AA , McNeal T , et al. Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid-19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study . BMJ . 2022 Mar 9; 376 : e069761 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 187. Skowronski DM , Setayeshgar S , Zou M , Prystajecky N , Tyson JR , Sbihi H , et al. Comparative Single-Dose mRNA and ChAdOx1 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, Including Variants of Concern: Test-Negative Design, British Columbia, Canada . J Infect Dis . 2022 Aug 12; 226 ( 1 ): 485 – 96 . OpenUrl PubMed 188. ↵ Young-Xu Y , Korves C , Roberts J , Powell EI , Zwain GM , Smith J , et al. Coverage and Estimated Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Among US Veterans . JAMA Netw Open . 2021 Oct 1; 4 ( 10 ): e2128391 . OpenUrl PubMed 189. Tartof SY , Slezak JM , Puzniak L , Hong V , Xie F , Ackerson BK , et al. Durability of BNT162b2 vaccine against hospital and emergency department admissions due to the omicron and delta variants in a large health system in the USA: a test-negative case-control study . Lancet Respir Med . 2022 Jul; 10 ( 7 ): 689 – 99 . OpenUrl PubMed 190. ↵ Florea A , Sy LS , Luo Y , Qian L , Bruxvoort KJ , Ackerson BK , et al. Durability of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 in the time of Delta: Interim results from an observational cohort study . PLoS One . 2022 ; 17 ( 4 ):e0267824. 191. Polinski JM , Weckstein AR , Batech M , Kabelac C , Kamath T , Harvey R , et al. Durability of the Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine in the Prevention of COVID-19 Infections and Hospitalizations in the US Before and During the Delta Variant Surge . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Mar 1; 5 ( 3 ): e222959 . OpenUrl PubMed 192. ↵ Greene SK , Levin-Rector A , McGibbon E , Baumgartner J , Devinney K , Ternier A , et al. Reduced COVID-19 hospitalizations among New York City residents following age-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine eligibility: Evidence from a regression discontinuity design . Vaccine X . 2021 Dec 22; 10 : 100134 . 193. ↵ Ioannou GN , Bohnert ASB , O’Hare AM , Boyko EJ , Maciejewski ML , Smith VA , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters Against Infection, Hospitalization, and Death: A Target Trial Emulation in the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant Era . Ann Intern Med . 2022 Dec; 175 ( 12 ): 1693 – 706 . OpenUrl PubMed 194. Tartof SY , Slezak JM , Puzniak L , Hong V , Frankland TB , Xie F , et al. Effectiveness and durability of BNT162b2 vaccine against hospital and emergency department admissions due to SARS-CoV-2 omicron sub-lineages BA.1 and BA.2 in a large health system in the USA: a test-negative, case-control study . Lancet Respir Med . 2023 Feb; 11 ( 2 ): 176 – 87 . OpenUrl PubMed 195. ↵ Tartof SY , Frankland TB , Slezak JM , Puzniak L , Hong V , Xie F , et al. Effectiveness Associated With BNT162b2 Vaccine Against Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters for Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Adolescents Aged 12 to 17 Years . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Aug 1; 5 ( 8 ): e2225162 . OpenUrl PubMed 196. Chung H , He S , Nasreen S , Sundaram ME , Buchan SA , Wilson SE , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 outcomes in Ontario, Canada: test negative design study . BMJ . 2021 Aug 20; 374 : n1943 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 197. ↵ Tartof SY , Slezak JM , Puzniak L , Hong V , Frankland TB , Ackerson BK , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent mRNA vaccine against a range of COVID-19 outcomes in a large health system in the USA: a test-negative case-control study . Lancet Respir Med . 2023 Dec; 11 ( 12 ): 1089 – 100 . OpenUrl PubMed 198. Moffa MA , Shively NR , Carr DR , Bremmer DN , Buchanan C , Trienski TL , et al. Description of Hospitalizations due to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron Variant Based on Vaccination Status . Open Forum Infect Dis . 2022 Sep; 9 ( 9 ):ofac438. 199. Klein NP , Demarco M , Fleming-Dutra KE , Stockwell MS , Kharbanda AB , Gaglani M , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccination in Children and Adolescents . Pediatrics . 2023 May 1; 151 ( 5 ): e2022060894 . OpenUrl PubMed 200. ↵ Olson SM , Newhams MM , Halasa NB , Price AM , Boom JA , Sahni LC , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Critical Covid-19 in Adolescents . N Engl J Med . 2022 Feb 24; 386 ( 8 ): 713 – 23 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 201. Razafimandimby H , Sauvageau C , Ouakki M , Carazo S , Skowronski DM , De Serres G . Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine Against Omicron-SARS-CoV-2 Subvariants in Children 5-11 Years of Age in Quebec, Canada, January 2022 to January 2023 . Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2024 Jan 1; 43 ( 1 ): 32 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 202. ↵ Ostropolets A , Hripcsak G . COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias: a retrospective cohort study . 2022 Aug 1 [cited 2025 Aug 11]; Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/8/e061126 203. Nasreen S , Febriani Y , Velásquez García HA , Zhang G , Tadrous M , Buchan SA , et al. Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccines Against Hospitalization and Death in Canada: A Multiprovincial, Test-Negative Design Study . Clin Infect Dis . 2023 Feb 18; 76 ( 4 ): 640 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 204. ↵ Plumb ID . Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19– Associated Hospitalization Among Adults with Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection — United States, June 2021–February 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Sep 7];71. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/This report describes COVID-19 mRNA vaccination effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 hospitalizations among people previously infected. 205. Klein NP , Stockwell MS , Demarco M , Gaglani M , Kharbanda AB , Irving SA , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Nonimmunocompromised Children and Adolescents Aged 5-17 Years - VISION Network, 10 States, April 2021-January 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Mar 4; 71 ( 9 ): 352 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 206. ↵ Rane MS , Robertson MM , Kulkarni SG , Frogel D , Gainus C , Nash D . Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 23; 41 ( 4 ): 989 – 98 . OpenUrl PubMed 207. Nasreen S , Chung H , He S , Brown KA , Gubbay JB , Buchan SA , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes with variants of concern in Ontario . Nat Microbiol . 2022 Mar; 7 ( 3 ): 379 – 85 . OpenUrl PubMed 208. ↵ Thompson MG , Stenehjem E , Grannis S , Ball SW , Naleway AL , Ong TC , et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines in Ambulatory and Inpatient Care Settings . N Engl J Med . 2021 Oct 7; 385 ( 15 ): 1355 – 71 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 209. Grewal R , Nguyen L , Buchan SA , Wilson SE , Nasreen S , Austin PC , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster doses against Omicron severe outcomes . Nat Commun . 2023 Mar 7; 14 ( 1 ): 1273 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 210. ↵ Young-Xu Y , Zwain GM , Izurieta HS , Korves C , Powell EI , Smith J , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron and Delta variants in a matched test-negative case-control study among US veterans . BMJ Open . 2022 Aug 3; 12 ( 8 ): e063935 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 211. Bruxvoort KJ , Sy LS , Qian L , Ackerson BK , Luo Y , Lee GS , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against delta, mu, and other emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2: test negative case-control study . BMJ . 2021 Dec 15;375:e068848. 212. Tseng HF , Ackerson BK , Luo Y , Sy LS , Talarico CA , Tian Y , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta variants . Nat Med . 2022 May; 28 ( 5 ): 1063 – 71 . OpenUrl PubMed 213. ↵ Tseng HF , Ackerson BK , Bruxvoort KJ , Sy LS , Tubert JE , Lee GS , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12.1, BA.4, and BA.5 . Nat Commun . 2023 Jan 12; 14 (1):189. 214. Carazo S , Skowronski DM , Brisson M , Sauvageau C , Brousseau N , Fafard J , et al. Effectiveness of previous infection-induced and vaccine-induced protection against hospitalisation due to omicron BA subvariants in older adults: a test-negative, case-control study in Quebec , Canada. Lancet Healthy Longev . 2023 Aug; 4 ( 8 ): e409 – 20 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 215. ↵ Ku JH , Sy LS , Qian L , Ackerson BK , Luo Y , Tubert JE , et al. Effectiveness of a fourth dose of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 among older adults in the United States: Interim results from an observational cohort study . Vaccine . 2023 Jun 29; 41 ( 29 ): 4212 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 216. Kim SS , Chung JR , Talbot HK , Grijalva CG , Wernli KJ , Kiniry E , et al. Effectiveness of two and three mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses against Omicron- and Delta-Related outpatient illness among adults, October 2021–February 2022 . Influenza Other Respir Viruses . 2022 Nov; 16 ( 6 ): 975 – 85 . OpenUrl PubMed 217. ↵ Khan FL , Nguyen JL , Singh TG , Puzniak LA , Wiemken TL , Schrecker JP , et al. Estimated BNT162b2 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Infection With Delta and Omicron Variants Among US Children 5 to 11 Years of Age . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Dec 1; 5 ( 12 ): e2246915 . OpenUrl PubMed 218. Buchan SA , Chung H , Brown KA , Austin PC , Fell DB , Gubbay JB , et al. Estimated Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines Against Omicron or Delta Symptomatic Infection and Severe Outcomes . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Sep 1; 5 ( 9 ): e2232760 . OpenUrl PubMed 219. ↵ Tartof SY , Slezak JM , Frankland TB , Puzniak L , Hong V , Ackerson BK , et al. Estimated Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 XBB Vaccine Against COVID-19 . JAMA Intern Med . 2024 Aug 1; 184 ( 8 ): 932 – 40 . OpenUrl PubMed 220. Link-Gelles R , Levy ME , Natarajan K , Reese SE , Naleway AL , Grannis SJ , et al. Estimation of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness and COVID-19 Illness and Severity by Vaccination Status During Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 Sublineage Periods . JAMA Netw Open . 2023 Mar 15; 6 ( 3 ): e232598 . OpenUrl PubMed 221. ↵ Pawlowski C , Lenehan P , Puranik A , Agarwal V , Venkatakrishnan AJ , Niesen MJM , et al. FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective per real-world evidence synthesized across a multi-state health system . Med . 2021 Aug 13; 2 ( 8 ): 979 – 992 .e8. OpenUrl PubMed 222. Ting DK , Rosychuk RJ , Hau JP , Righolt CH , Kwong JC , Skowronski DM , et al. Leveraging a clinical emergency department dataset to estimate two-dose COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection in Canada . Vaccine . 2024 Oct 3; 42 ( 23 ): 126058 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 223. Pérez-Then E , Miric M , Qian HZ , Chen YQ , Wang Y , Vallejo V , et al. Population-Level Effectiveness of an Inactivated Whole-Virion COVID-19 Vaccine: A Test Negative Case-Control Study in the Dominican Republic . Open Forum Infect Dis . 2023 Mar; 10 ( 3 ):ofad075. 224. ↵ Tseng HF , Ackerson BK , Sy LS , Tubert JE , Luo Y , Qiu S , et al. mRNA-1273 bivalent (original and Omicron) COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 outcomes in the United States . Nat Commun . 2023 Sep 20; 14 ( 1 ): 5851 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 225. Andrejko KL , Pry J , Myers JF , Jewell NP , Openshaw J , Watt J , et al. Prevention of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) by mRNA-Based Vaccines Within the General Population of California . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 Apr 28; 74 ( 8 ): 1382 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 226. ↵ Mallow C , Ferreira T , Shukla B , Warde P , Sosa MA , Parekh DJ , et al. Real world SARS-COV-2 vaccine effectiveness in a Miami academic institution . The American Journal of Emergency Medicine . 2022 Apr 1; 54 : 97 – 101 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 227. Rodrigues C de O , Spinardi J , Rosa RG , Falavigna M , de Souza EM , Manfio JL , et al. Real-world effectiveness of original BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 against symptomatic Omicron infection among children 5-11 years of age in Brazil: A prospective test-negative design study . Immunol Lett . 2024 Oct; 269 : 106903 . 228. ↵ Fisman DN , Simmons AE , Tuite AR . Case-cohort design as an efficient approach to evaluating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, waning, heterologous immune effect and optimal dosing interval . Vaccine . 2024 Nov 14; 42 ( 25 ): 126134 . OpenUrl PubMed 229. ↵ Butt AA , Omer SB , Yan P , Shaikh OS , Mayr FB . SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Effectiveness in a High-Risk National Population in a Real-World Setting . Ann Intern Med . 2021 Oct; 174 ( 10 ): 1404 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 230. Skowronski DM , Setayeshgar S , Zou M , Prystajecky N , Tyson JR , Galanis E , et al. Single-dose mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Including Alpha and Gamma Variants: A Test-negative Design in Adults 70 Years and Older in British Columbia, Canada . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 Apr 9; 74 ( 7 ): 1158 – 65 . OpenUrl PubMed 231. ↵ Layton JB , Peetluk L , Wong HL , Jiao Y , Djibo DA , Bui C , et al. Effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 booster/additional vaccine doses in the United States . Vaccine X . 2024 Jan 20; 16 : 100447 . 232. Ogilvie RP , Layton JB , Lloyd PC , Jiao Y , Djibo DA , Wong HL , et al. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 COVID-19 primary series vaccination in children aged 5-17 years in the United States: a cohort study . BMC Pediatr . 2024 Apr 26; 24 ( 1 ): 276 . OpenUrl PubMed 233. ↵ Plaxco AP , Kmet J , Smeltzer MP , Jiang Y , Taylor M , Nolan VG . Comparative 60-day effectiveness of bivalent versus monovalent mRNA vaccines in Shelby County: a population-level analysis . Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother . 2024 ; 12 : 25151355241278852 . 234. Skowronski DM , Febriani Y , Ouakki M , Setayeshgar S , El Adam S , Zou M , et al. Two-Dose Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Effectiveness With Mixed Schedules and Extended Dosing Intervals: Test-Negative Design Studies From British Columbia and Quebec, Canada . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 Nov 30; 75 ( 11 ): 1980 – 92 . OpenUrl PubMed 235. ↵ Bennett JC , Luiten KG , O’Hanlon J , Han PD , McDonald D , Wright T , et al. Utilizing a university testing program to estimate relative effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccine versus two-dose primary series against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection . Vaccine . 2024 Feb 27; 42 ( 6 ): 1332 – 41 . OpenUrl PubMed 236. Simmons AE , Amoako A , Grima AA , Murison KR , Buchan SA , Fisman DN , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization among adolescent and pediatric SARS-CoV-2 cases between May 2021 and January 2022 in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective cohort study . PLoS One . 2023 ; 18 ( 3 ): e0283715 . OpenUrl PubMed 237. ↵ Risk M , Miao H , Freed G , Shen C . Vaccine Effectiveness, School Reopening, and Risk of Omicron Infection Among Adolescents Aged 12-17 Years . J Adolesc Health . 2023 Jan; 72 ( 1 ): 147 – 52 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 238. ↵ Butt AA , Talisa VB , Shaikh OS , Omer SB , Mayr FB . Relative Vaccine Effectiveness of a Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Messenger RNA Vaccine Booster Dose Against the Omicron Variant . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 Dec 19; 75 ( 12 ): 2161 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 239. Ferdinands JM , Rao S , Dixon BE , Mitchell PK , DeSilva MB , Irving SA , et al. Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance - VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021-January 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Feb 18; 71 ( 7 ): 255 – 63 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 240. Giannouchos TV , Hair NL , Olatosi B , Li X . Waning effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against inpatient and emergency department encounters . PLoS One . 2024 ; 19 ( 3 ): e0300198 . OpenUrl PubMed 241. ↵ Florea A , Sy LS , Qian L , Ackerson BK , Luo Y , Tubert JE , et al. Effectiveness of Messenger RNA-1273 Vaccine Booster Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Immunocompetent Adults . Clin Infect Dis . 2023 Jan 13; 76 ( 2 ): 252 – 62 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 242. Andrejko KL , Pry JM , Myers JF , Mehrotra M , Lamba K , Lim E , et al. Waning of 2-Dose BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Accounting for Depletion-of-Susceptibles Bias . Am J Epidemiol . 2023 Jun 2; 192 ( 6 ): 895 – 907 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 243. ↵ Ferdinands JM , Rao S , Dixon BE , Mitchell PK , DeSilva MB , Irving SA , et al. Waning of vaccine effectiveness against moderate and severe covid-19 among adults in the US from the VISION network: test negative, case-control study . 2022 Oct 3 [cited 2025 Sep 7]; Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj-2022-072141 244. ↵ Toledo-Romaní ME , Valenzuela-Silva C , Montero-Díaz M , Iñiguez-Rojas L , Rodríguez-González M , Martínez-Cabrera M , et al. Real-world effectiveness of the heterologous SOBERANA-02 and SOBERANA-Plus vaccine scheme in 2–11 years-old children during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave in Cuba: a longitudinal case-population study . The Lancet Regional Health – Americas [Internet ]. 2024 Jun 1 [cited 2025 Aug 11];34. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X(24)00077-2/fulltext 245. Yan P , Mullah MAS , Tuite A . A proportional incidence rate model for aggregated data to study the vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospital and ICU admissions . Biometrics . 2023 Dec; 79 ( 4 ): 3954 – 67 . OpenUrl PubMed 246. ↵ Hernández Bautista PF , Grajales Muñiz C , Cabrera Gaytán DA , Rojas Mendoza T , Vallejos Parás A , Santacruz Tinoco CE , et al. Impact of vaccination on infection or death from COVID-19 in individuals with laboratory-confirmed cases: Case-control study . PLoS One . 2023 Aug 3; 18 ( 8 ): e0265698 . OpenUrl PubMed 247. ↵ Winkelman TNA , Rai NK , Bodurtha PJ , Chamberlain AM , DeSilva M , Jeruzal J , et al. Trends in COVID-19 Vaccine Administration and Effectiveness Through October 2021 . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Mar 1; 5 ( 3 ): e225018 . OpenUrl PubMed 248. Tande AJ , Pollock BD , Shah ND , Farrugia G , Virk A , Swift M , et al. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine on Asymptomatic Infection Among Patients Undergoing Preprocedural COVID-19 Molecular Screening . Clin Infect Dis . 2022 Jan 7; 74 ( 1 ): 59 – 65 . OpenUrl PubMed 249. ↵ Saciuk Y , Kertes J , Shamir Stein N , Ekka Zohar A . Effectiveness of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine . J Infect Dis . 2022 Jan 5; 225 ( 1 ): 30 – 3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 250. ↵ Rosero-Bixby L . The Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccines to Prevent Severe COVID-19 in Costa Rica: Nationwide , Ecological Study of Hospitalization Prevalence. JMIR Public Health Surveill . 2022 May 20; 8 ( 5 ): e35054 . OpenUrl PubMed 251. ↵ Rosa RG , Falavigna M , Manfio JL , de Araujo CLP , Cohen M , do Valle Barbosa GRG , et al. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 against symptomatic Omicron infection following a mass vaccination campaign in southern Brazil: A prospective test-negative design study . Vaccine . 2023 Aug 23; 41 ( 37 ): 5461 – 8 . OpenUrl PubMed 252. Paternina-Caicedo A , Quevedo DS , Ríos DS , Moyano D , Alvis-Guzmán N , Alviz-Zakzuk NR , et al. Comparative effectiveness and duration of protection of ChAdOx1, CoronaVac, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccines for symptomatic and hospitalized Mu, Delta, and Omicron: A test-negative case-control study . Vaccine . 2023 Oct 6; 41 ( 42 ): 6291 – 9 . OpenUrl PubMed 253. ↵ Jara A , Undurraga EA , Zubizarreta JR , González C , Pizarro A , Acevedo J , et al. Effectiveness of homologous and heterologous booster doses for an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a large-scale prospective cohort study . Lancet Glob Health . 2022 Jun; 10 ( 6 ): e798 – 806 . OpenUrl 254. Cerqueira-Silva T , de Araujo Oliveira V , Paixão ES , Júnior JB , Penna GO , Werneck GL , et al. Duration of protection of CoronaVac plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster in the Omicron period in Brazil . Nat Commun . 2022 Jul 18; 13 ( 1 ): 4154 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 255. Cerqueira-Silva T , Andrews JR , Boaventura VS , Ranzani OT , de Araújo Oliveira V , Paixão ES , et al. Effectiveness of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in Brazil: a test-negative, case-control study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2022 Jun; 22 ( 6 ): 791 – 801 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 256. Pérez-Tasigchana F , Valcárcel-Pérez I , Arias-Quispe M , Astudillo L , Bruno A , Herrera G M , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in Ecuador: A test-negative design . Vaccine X . 2023 Dec; 15 : 100404 . 257. Castelli JM , Rearte A , Olszevicki S , Voto C , Del Valle Juarez M , Pesce M , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and BBIBP-CorV vaccines against infection and mortality in children in Argentina, during predominance of delta and omicron covid-19 variants: test negative, case-control study . BMJ . 2022 Nov 30; 379 : e073070 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 258. ↵ Jara A , Cuadrado C , Undurraga EA , García C , Nájera M , Bertoglia MP , et al. Effectiveness of the second COVID-19 booster against Omicron: a large-scale cohort study in Chile . Nat Commun . 2023 Oct 27; 14 ( 1 ): 6836 . OpenUrl PubMed 259. Ranzani OT , Hitchings MDT , Dorion M , D’Agostini TL , de Paula RC , de Paula OFP , et al. Effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in older adults during a gamma variant associated epidemic of covid-19 in Brazil: test negative case-control study . BMJ . 2021 Aug 20; 374 : n2015 . 260. Costa Clemens SA , Fortaleza CMCB , Crowe M , Tasca KI , Spadaro AG , Souza-Neto JA , et al. Effectiveness of the Fiocruz recombinant ChadOx1-nCoV19 against variants of SARS-CoV-2 in the Municipality of Botucatu-SP . Front Public Health . 2022 ; 10 : 1016402 . 261. Silva-Valencia J , Soto-Becerra P , Escobar-Agreda S , Fernandez-Navarro M , Elorreaga OA , Mayta-Tristán P , et al. Relative vaccine effectiveness of the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine for preventing death in individuals with a primary regimen based on the BBIBP-CorV, ChAdOx1-S, or BNT162b2 vaccines during the Omicron wave in Peru: A nested case-control study using national population data . Vaccine . 2022 Oct 26; 40 ( 45 ): 6512 – 9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 262. Oliveira EA , Oliveira MCL , Colosimo EA , Simões E , Silva AC , Mak RH , Vasconcelos MA , et al. Vaccine Effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Adolescents from 15 to 90 Days after Second Dose: A Population-Based Test-Negative Case-Control Study . J Pediatr . 2023 Feb; 253 : 189 – 196 .e2. OpenUrl PubMed 263. ↵ Ranzani OT , Silva AAB , Peres IT , Antunes BBP , Gonzaga-da-Silva TW , Soranz DR , et al. Vaccine effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 against COVID-19 in a socially vulnerable community in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a test-negative design study . Clin Microbiol Infect . 2022 May; 28 ( 5 ): 736 .e1- 736 .e4. OpenUrl 264. Florentino PTV , Alves FJO , Cerqueira-Silva T , Oliveira V de A , Júnior JBS , Jantsch AG , et al. Vaccine effectiveness of CoronaVac against COVID-19 among children in Brazil during the Omicron period . Nat Commun . 2022 Aug 13; 13 ( 1 ): 4756 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 265. Cerqueira-Silva T , Katikireddi SV , de Araujo Oliveira V , Flores-Ortiz R , Júnior JB , Paixão ES , et al. Vaccine effectiveness of heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in Brazil . Nat Med . 2022 Apr; 28 ( 4 ): 838 – 43 . OpenUrl PubMed 266. ↵ Arregocés-Castillo L , Fernández-Niño J , Rojas-Botero M , Palacios-Clavijo A , Galvis-Pedraza M , Rincón-Medrano L , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in older adults in Colombia: a retrospective, population-based study of the ESPERANZA cohort . Lancet Healthy Longev . 2022 Apr; 3 ( 4 ): e242 – 52 . OpenUrl 267. ↵ González S , Olszevicki S , Salazar M , Calabria A , Regairaz L , Marín L , et al. Effectiveness of the first component of Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) on reduction of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infections, hospitalisations and mortality in patients aged 60-79: a retrospective cohort study in Argentina . EClinicalMedicine . 2021 Oct; 40 : 101126 . 268. ↵ Chanda D , Hines JZ , Itoh M , Fwoloshi S , Minchella PA , Zyambo KD , et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Against Progression to In-Hospital Mortality in Zambia, 2021-2022 . Open Forum Infect Dis . 2022 Sep; 9 ( 9 ): ofac469 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 269. Chiwandire N , Walaza S , von Gottberg A , Wolter N , Du Plessis M , Moosa F , et al. Estimation of vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2-associated hospitalization using sentinel surveillance in South Africa . Int J Epidemiol . 2024 Aug 14; 53 ( 5 ):dyae116. 270. Mziou E , Hchaichi A , Letaief H , Dhaouadi S , Safer M , Talmoudi K , et al. Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19: A test negative case-control study in Tunisia, August 2021 . Vaccine . 2024 Mar 7; 42 ( 7 ): 1738 – 44 . OpenUrl PubMed 271. Zhang Y , Belayachi J , Yang Y , Fu Q , Rodewald L , Li H , et al. Real-world study of the effectiveness of BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) COVID-19 vaccine in the Kingdom of Morocco . BMC Public Health . 2022 Aug 20; 22 ( 1 ): 1584 . OpenUrl PubMed 272. ↵ Theresa Pool SN , Shroff EH , Chetty A , Lewis L , Nonhlanhla YZ , Abdool Karim SS . Effectiveness of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BBIBP-CorV vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalisation and death in the Seychelles infected adult population . PLoS One . 2024 ; 19 ( 4 ): e0299747 . OpenUrl PubMed 273. ↵ Belayachi J , Obtel M , Mhayi A , Razine R , Abouqal R . Long term effectiveness of inactivated vaccine BBIBP-CorV (Vero Cells) against COVID-19 associated severe and critical hospitalization in Morocco . PLOS ONE . 2022 Dec 7; 17 ( 12 ): e0278546 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 274. ↵ Vogt F , Rebuli N , Cretikos M , Liu B , Macartney K , Kaldor J , et al. Assessing the effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on the risk of household transmission during delta variant circulation: a population-based data linkage cohort study . Lancet Reg Health West Pac . 2024 Jan; 42 : 100930 . 275. ↵ Liu B , Gidding H , Stepien S , Cretikos M , Macartney K . Relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with 3 compared to 2 doses against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) among an Australian population with low prior rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection . Vaccine . 2022 Oct 12; 40 ( 43 ): 6288 – 94 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 276. ↵ Liu B , Stepien S , Dobbins T , Gidding H , Henry D , Korda R , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against COVID-19 specific and all-cause mortality in older Australians: a population based study . Lancet Reg Health West Pac . 2023 Nov; 40 : 100928 . 277. Smoll NR , Al Imam MH , Shulz C , Booy R , Khandaker G . The effectiveness of vaccination for preventing hospitalisation with COVID-19 in regional Queensland: a data linkage study . Med J Aust . 2023 Aug 21; 219 ( 4 ): 162 – 5 . OpenUrl PubMed 278. ↵ Mbinta JF , Sporle AA , Sheppard J , Su’a-Tavila A , Nguyen BP , French N , et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation, death and infection over time in Aotearoa New Zealand: a retrospective cohort study . N Z Med J . 2024 Sep 6; 137 ( 1602 ): 65 – 101 . OpenUrl 279. ↵ Florentino PTV , Millington T , Cerqueira-Silva T , Robertson C , de Araújo Oliveira V , Júnior JBS , et al. Vaccine effectiveness of two-dose BNT162b2 against symptomatic and severe COVID-19 among adolescents in Brazil and Scotland over time: a test-negative case-control study . Lancet Infect Dis . 2022 Nov; 22 ( 11 ): 1577 – 86 . OpenUrl PubMed 280. Cerqueira-Silva T , Shah SA , Robertson C , Sanchez M , Katikireddi SV , de Araujo Oliveira V , et al. Effectiveness of mRNA boosters after homologous primary series with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 against symptomatic infection and severe COVID-19 in Brazil and Scotland: A test-negative design case-control study . PLoS Med . 2023 Jan; 20 ( 1 ): e1004156 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 281. ↵ Katikireddi SV , Cerqueira-Silva T , Vasileiou E , Robertson C , Amele S , Pan J , et al. Two-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine protection against COVID-19 hospital admissions and deaths over time: a retrospective, population-based cohort study in Scotland and Brazil . Lancet . 2022 Jan 1; 399 ( 10319 ): 25 – 35 . OpenUrl PubMed 282. ↵ He T , Wang M , Mi H , Xu L , Lu W , Ouyang X , et al. Effectiveness of Inactivated Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Infection in Xiamen , China-A Test-Negative Case-Control Study. Vaccines (Basel ). 2023 Feb 23; 11 ( 3 ): 532 . OpenUrl PubMed 283. ↵ Chua H , Feng S , Lewnard JA , Sullivan SG , Blyth CC , Lipsitch M , et al. The use of test-negative controls to monitor vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review of methodology . Epidemiology . 2020 Jan; 31 ( 1 ): 43 – 64 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 284. ↵ Jackson ML , Nelson JC . The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness . Vaccine . 2013 Apr 19; 31 ( 17 ): 2165 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 285. ↵ Lee DS , Lemieux T . Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics . Journal of Economic Literature . 2010 Jun; 48 ( 2 ): 281 – 355 . OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 286. ↵ Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation: advice on priority groups for COVID-19 vaccination . 287. ↵ Wong K , Campitelli MA , Stukel TA , Kwong JC . Estimating Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Community-Dwelling Elderly Patients Using the Instrumental Variable Analysis Method . Arch Intern Med . 2012 Mar 26; 172 ( 6 ): 484 – 91 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 288. ↵ Young-Xu Y , Snider JT , van Aalst R , Mahmud SM , Thommes EW , Lee JKH , et al. Analysis of relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines using an instrumental variable method . Vaccine . 2019 Mar 7; 37 ( 11 ): 1484 – 90 . OpenUrl PubMed 289. ↵ Greenland S . An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists . 290. ↵ COVID-19 epidemiological update – 22 December 2023 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-epidemiological-update---22-december-2023 291. ↵ Ma KC . Genomic Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Circulation of Omicron XBB and JN.1 Lineages — United States, May 2023–September 2024 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 11]; 73 . Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7342a1.htm 292. ↵ Kang SSY , Tadesse BT , Jeon HJ , Fallah MP , Dereje N , Ilesanmi OS , et al. Enhancing Clinical Trial Sites in Low- and Middle-Income Countries to Facilitate Product Development in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic . Clin Infect Dis . 2025 Jun 15; 80 (Supplement_1):S1–8. 293. ↵ Lomholt FK , Møller KL , Nielsen J , Valentiner-Branth P , Vestergaard LS . Surveillance of severe acute respiratory infections using ICD-10 diagnosis codes and national electronic health records, Denmark, 2022 to 2024 . Euro Surveill . 2025 Aug; 30 ( 33 ): 2400801 . OpenUrl PubMed 294. ↵ OECD [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2025 Aug 27]. Progress on implementing and using electronic health record systems . Available from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/progress-on-implementing-and-using-electronic-health-record-systems_4f4ce846-en.html 295. ↵ Le HT , Vu DVT , Nguyen TNA , Thi HT , Nguyen TV , Tran TP , et al. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) for Population-Based Data Collection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions . Journal of Medical Internet Research . 2025 Jun 11; 27 ( 1 ): e65377 . OpenUrl PubMed 296. ↵ Moreira-Soto A , Beuchel C , Tabares X , Wulf B , Gade N , Fischer C , et al. Socioeconomic determinants potentially underlying differential global SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity: an ecological study . BMJ Open [Internet ]. 2025 Mar 3 [cited 2025 Aug 27]; Available from: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=8d831df0-fc52-4986-b833-97342f3c1e0b 297. ↵ Cao Y , Li T , Chen H , Zhao Q , Sun J , Grépin KA , et al. Evaluating geographic accessibility to COVID-19 vaccination across 54 countries/regions . BMJ Glob Health . 2025 Feb 19; 10 ( 2 ): e017761 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 298. ↵ Kerr S , Vasileiou E , Robertson C , Sheikh A . COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 outcomes from Delta AY.4.2: Cohort and test-negative study of 5.4 million individuals in Scotland . J Glob Health . 2022 Jul 9; 12 : 05025 . OpenUrl PubMed 299. Tartof SY , Slezak JM , Puzniak L , Hong V , Frankland TB , Ackerson BK , et al. Effectiveness of a third dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a large US health system: A retrospective cohort study . Lancet Reg Health Am . 2022 Feb 14; 9 : 100198 . 300. Mimura W , Ishiguro C , Maeda M , Murata F , Fukuda H . Effectiveness of a Third Dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine During the Omicron BA.1-and BA.2-Predominant Periods in Japan: The VENUS Study . Open Forum Infect Dis . 2022 Dec; 9 ( 12 ): ofac636 . OpenUrl PubMed 301. Aldawish S , Abusaris R , Almohammadi E , Althobiti F , Albarrag A . Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against ICU admission during Omicron surge in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study . BMC Infect Dis . 2023 Oct 31; 23 ( 1 ): 746 . OpenUrl PubMed 302. Wong CKH , Lau KTK , Au ICH , Lau EHY , Cowling BJ . Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 and inactivated CoronaVac vaccines against severe COVID-19 outcomes among non-hospitalised children aged 1-3 years with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection . Int J Antimicrob Agents . 2024 Mar; 63 ( 3 ): 107094 . OpenUrl PubMed 303. Wei Y , Jia KM , Zhao S , Hung CT , Mok CKP , Poon PKM , et al. Estimation of Vaccine Effectiveness of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 Against Severe Outcomes Over Time Among Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Omicron . JAMA Netw Open . 2023 Feb 1; 6 ( 2 ): e2254777 . OpenUrl 304. ↵ Reina-Bolaños CA , Arbeláez-Montoya MP , Brango H , Ortega D , Tovar-Acero C , López-Carvajal L , et al. Real-world effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine in a retrospective population-based cohort in four Colombian cities (2021-2022) . International Journal of Infectious Diseases [Internet ]. 2024 Oct 1 [cited 2025 Aug 11];147. Available from: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(24)00227-3/fulltext 305. ↵ Sullivan SG , Feng S , Cowling BJ . Potential of the test-negative design for measuring influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review . Expert Review of Vaccines . 2014 Dec 1; 13 ( 12 ): 1571 – 91 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 306. ↵ Agampodi S , Tadesse BT , Sahastrabuddhe S , Excler JL , Kim JH . Biases in COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness studies using cohort design . Front Med [Internet]. 2024 Oct 30 [cited 2025 Mar 6];11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2024.1474045/full 307. ↵ Stuart EA . Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward . Stat Sci . 2010 Feb 1; 25 ( 1 ): 1 – 21 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 308. ↵ Patel MK , Bergeri I , Bresee JS , Cowling BJ , Crowcroft NS , Fahmy K , et al. Evaluation of post-introduction COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness: Summary of interim guidance of the World Health Organization . Vaccine . 2021 Jul 5; 39 ( 30 ): 4013 – 24 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 309. ↵ Li F , Morgan KL , Zaslavsky AM . Balancing Covariates via Propensity Score Weighting . Journal of the American Statistical Association . 2018 Jan 2; 113 ( 521 ): 390 – 400 . OpenUrl CrossRef 310. ↵ VanderWeele TJ , Ding P . Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value . Ann Intern Med . 2017 Aug 15; 167 ( 4 ): 268 – 74 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 311. ↵ Linkins LA , Iorio A , Little J , Lavis J . Extended reporting guidance for vaccine effectiveness studies for variants of concern for COVID-19 . Vaccine . 2022 May 11; 40 ( 22 ): 2986 – 7 . OpenUrl PubMed 312. ↵ BEST Initiative Assessment of Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States Protocol Addendum . 313. ↵ Bernal JL , Andrews N , Gower C , Gallagher E , Simmons R , Thelwall S , et al. Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant . New England Journal of Medicine . 2021 Aug 11; 385 ( 7 ): 585 – 94 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 314. ↵ COVAX: 1 billion vaccines delivered | UNICEF Supply Division [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/supply/stories/covax-1-billion-vaccines-delivered 315. ↵ Supply Annual Report 2021 | UNICEF Supply Division [Internet]. [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/supply/supply-annual-report-2021 316. ↵ Gras-Valentí P , Chico-Sánchez P , Algado-Sellés N , Jiménez-Sepúlveda NJ , Gómez-Sotero IL , Fuster-Pérez M , et al. [Effectiveness of the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine to preventing covid-19 in healthcare personnel .]. Rev Esp Salud Publica . 2021 Apr 29; 95 : e202104070 . OpenUrl PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 30, 2025. Download PDF Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Approaches for estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational data in administrative databases: a systematic review Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Approaches for estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational data in administrative databases: a systematic review Jo Yi Chow , Zhi Jie Goh , Ruiqi Li , Darren Zi Yang Lim , Liang En Wee , David Chien Boon Lye , Kelvin Bryan Tan , Jue Tao Lim medRxiv 2025.09.29.25336864; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.29.25336864 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Approaches for estimating COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness using observational data in administrative databases: a systematic review Jo Yi Chow , Zhi Jie Goh , Ruiqi Li , Darren Zi Yang Lim , Liang En Wee , David Chien Boon Lye , Kelvin Bryan Tan , Jue Tao Lim medRxiv 2025.09.29.25336864; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.29.25336864 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Public and Global Health Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (568) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (300) Cardiovascular Medicine (4435) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (444) Dermatology (382) Emergency Medicine (608) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1509) Epidemiology (15228) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1124) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6599) Geriatric Medicine (668) Health Economics (997) Health Informatics (4536) Health Policy (1368) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1613) Hematology (540) HIV/AIDS (1264) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15916) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (623) Medical Ethics (146) Nephrology (667) Neurology (6599) Nursing (346) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1144) Occupational and Environmental Health (957) Oncology (3332) Ophthalmology (974) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (436) Palliative Medicine (130) Pathology (663) Pediatrics (1693) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (711) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5447) Public and Global Health (9231) Radiology and Imaging (2198) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1370) Respiratory Medicine (1196) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (712) Sports Medicine (530) Surgery (712) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (289) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a005e83f3eff1b23',t:'MTc3OTU1ODY3MQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

MUSA

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00