Modified Elek test improves in-vitro detection of diphtheria toxin

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose Diphtheria is caused by toxigenic strains of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae complex, mainly Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans . The diagnosis of diphtheria relies on detecting the diphtheria toxin (DT), for which Engler’s method of Elek’s immunoprecipitation test is the gold standard. A recent optimization of Engler’s method was proposed by Melnikov and colleagues, showing higher sensitivity for C. ulcerans . The goal of our study was to test and adapt this optimized method, and to re-analyze apparent non-toxigenic tox gene bearing (NTTB) isolates from our collection. Methods We included 48 C. ulcerans, C. ramonii and C. diphtheriae isolates previously categorized as NTTB but for which no genetic explanation was found for the lack of DT expression. DT production was tested using Melnikov’s method with further modifications made by us: i ) increasing the antitoxin concentration; ii ) using 5°C as the incubation temperature after 24h; and iii ) modifying the layout of control and test strains on agar plates. Results 35 of 38 C. ulcerans , 3 C. ramonii and 8 of 10 C. diphtheriae were found to be toxigenic. No genetic explanation was found regarding two non-toxigenic isolates (1 C. diphtheriae and 1 C. ulcerans ), whereas for one C. diphtheriae, IS1132 was detected upstream of the tox gene. Conclusion Our modified implementation of Melnikov’s Elek test improved our ability to detect diphtheria toxin production. Most isolates previously considered as NTTB but with no genetic explanation, were shown to be toxigenic using the novel method.
Full text 1,657 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Diphtheria is caused by toxigenic strains of the Corynebacterium diphtheriae complex, mainly Corynebacterium diphtheriae and C. ulcerans. The diagnosis of diphtheria relies on detecting the diphtheria toxin (DT), for which Engler’s method of Elek’s immunoprecipitation test is the gold standard. A recent optimization of Engler’s method was proposed by Melnikov and colleagues, showing higher sensitivity for C. ulcerans. The goal of our study was to test and adapt this optimized method, and to re-analyze apparent non-toxigenic tox gene bearing (NTTB) isolates from our collection.

Methods

We included 48 C. ulcerans, C. ramonii and C. diphtheriae isolates previously categorized as NTTB but for which no genetic explanation was found for the lack of DT expression. DT production was tested using Melnikov’s method with further modifications made by us: i) increasing the antitoxin concentration; ii) using 5°C as the incubation temperature after 24h; and iii) modifying the layout of control and test strains on agar plates.

Results

35 of 38 C. ulcerans, 3 C. ramonii and 8 of 10 C. diphtheriae were found to be toxigenic. No genetic explanation was found regarding two non-toxigenic isolates (1 C. diphtheriae and 1 C. ulcerans), whereas for one C. diphtheriae, IS1132 was detected upstream of the tox gene.

Conclusion

Our modified implementation of Melnikov’s Elek test improved our ability to detect diphtheria toxin production. Most isolates previously considered as NTTB but with no genetic explanation, were shown to be toxigenic using the novel method. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00