Endométriose rectale : comparaison des résultats fonctionnels digestifs à long terme de la chirurgie conservatrice versus radicale

Mathilde Milles
In: https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01547033 · 2017 · W2735137811
article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 ⓘ

A prospective study of rectal endometriosis patients found that conservative surgery yielded significantly better long-term digestive quality of life, anal continence, and constipation scores compared to radical colorectal resection.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-27 · read from full text ⓘ

The provided text does not contain the body of a research paper titled "Endométriose rectale : comparaison des résultats fonctionnels digestifs à long terme de la chirurgie conservatrice versus radicale." Instead, it displays a security challenge page from a website protected by Anubis, which requires users to complete a Proof-of-Work scheme to verify they are not bots. The content explains the technical mechanism of this anti-scraping measure and advises users to disable certain browser plugins like JShelter. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Il existe deux approches chirurgicales dans le traitement de l’endometriose rectale : une approche « radicale » consistant a realiser systematiquement une resection colorectale et une approche « conservatrice » preferant la realisation d’un shaving ou d’une resection discoide chaque fois que ceux-ci sont possibles. Peu d’etudes comparent les deux types de traitement en terme de fonction digestive a long terme. Nous avons donc realise une etude comparant chaque groupe de traitement en terme de fonction digestive, avec un recul d’au moins 5 ans. Methode : Nous avons mene une etude prospective au CHU de Rouen. Toutes les patientes operees d’endometriose rectale entre janvier 2005 et janvier 2010 ont ete incluses. La fonction digestive etait evaluee par des questionnaires standardises : le GIQLI evaluant la qualite de vie digestive, le WEXNER l’incontinence anale, et le KESS la constipation post-operatoire. Resultats : 77 patientes ont ete incluses. 3 ont ete perdues de vue (4%). Le suivi moyen etait de 82 mois (60-120 mois). Environ les deux tiers des patientes ont beneficie d’un traitement conservateur (46 shavings et 3 resections discoides) et un tiers d’un traitement radical (25 resections colorectales). Les patientes traitees par chirurgie conservatrice presentaient significativement un meilleur score de qualite de vie digestive (GIQLI a 110+/-20 vs 91+/- 29, p=0,001), une meilleure preservation de la continence anale (WEXNER a 1,2+/-1,7 vs 2,5+/-3, p=0,025) et un score moindre de constipation post-operatoire (KESS a 9,9 +/-6,4 vs 15,6+/-7,5, p=0,001). Conclusion : Nos resultats suggerent que la fonction digestive chez les patientes operees d’une endometriose rectale est meilleure chez celles traitees par chirurgie conservatrice par rapport a celles traitees par resection colorectale.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK