Sequestration drives diet choice in a toxic plant generalist
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
Toxic plant generalists shifted feeding to nutritionally poorer plant tissues to increase toxin sequestration, even when seeds provided better nutrition but lower toxin levels.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Many herbivores sequester plant toxins, and this occurs along a gradient of specialization including “toxic plant generalists” that also consume non-toxic hosts. We hypothesized that availability of toxins for sequestration may trade off with nutritional quality to shape dietary choices in a Lygaeid bug. In the absence of toxins (cardenolides) from a preferred food (milkweed seeds), bugs increased feeding on nutritionally poor, but cardenolide-rich milkweed plant tissue, corresponding to lower growth but greater sequestration. While bugs feeding on only milkweed plant tissue sequestered lower cardenolides than those feeding on seeds, they sequestered more diverse and less polar compounds. Cardenolide production was also induced by feeding on plant tissues, which may have downstream effects on future herbivory and sequestration. Accordingly, sequestration is a driver of diet choice in this toxic plant generalist, even at the cost of feeding on nutritionally poor plant tissue; reciprocally, plants defensively respond to such feeding choices.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00