Angular reproduction numbers improve estimates of transmissibility when disease generation times are misspecified or time-varying
preprint
OA: gold
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
We introduce the angular reproduction number Ω, which measures time-varying changes in epidemic transmissibility resulting from variations in both the effective reproduction number R , and generation time distribution w . Predominant approaches for tracking pathogen spread either infer R or the epidemic growth rate r . However, R is biased by mismatches between the assumed and true w , while r is difficult to interpret in terms of the individual-level branching process underpinning transmission. R and r may also disagree on the relative transmissibility of epidemics or variants (i.e., r A > r B does not imply R A > R B for variants A and B). We find that Ω responds meaningfully to mismatches and time-variations in w while mostly maintaining the interpretability of R . We prove that Ω>1 implies R >1 and that Ω agrees with r on the relative transmissibility of pathogens. Estimating Ω is no more difficult than inferring R , uses existing software, and requires no generation time measurements. These advantages come at the expense of selecting one free parameter. We propose Ω as complementary statistic to R and r that improves transmissibility estimates when w is misspecified or time-varying and better reflects the impact of interventions, when those interventions concurrently change R and w or alter the relative risk of co-circulating pathogens.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0