Ultrasonography and CT Findings of Abdominal Wall Endometrioma

In: Journal of the Korean Radiological Society · 1999 · vol. 40(2) , pp. 289 · doi:10.3348/jkrs.1999.40.2.289 · W2345480552
article OA: green CC0

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the US and CT findings of abdominal wall endometrioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We respectively reviewed nine patients with abdominal wall masses diagnosed as endometrioma during a recent three-year period. Both US and CT scans were performed in six cases, only ultrasound in one, and only CT scans in two. The location, size, shape, margin, internal echo or density, enhancement patterns, and relation to adjacent masses, as seen on US and CT images, were reviewed. RESULTS: All patients had a previous history of deliveries by caesarian section. All masses were 2-4.5cm in size ; five were located in subcutaneous layers and four in musclel ayers. In all cases, sonographic findings were low echoic masses with irregular margins(7/7). Internal echotextures were inhomogeneous in five cases and homogeneous in two. On CT, masses in subcutaneous layers(5/8)showed spiculated margins and linear enhancement of the rectus muscle fascia. In cases of lesion located in muscle(3/8), slight thickening of the rectus muscle was visible on precontrast CT scans, but on postcontrast CT scans, well-defined enhancing masses, separate from the rectus muscle were seen. CONCLUSION: When patients with a previous history of caesarian section present palpable abdominal wall masses, with cyclic pain, sonographic findings of a low echoic mass separated from the internal organs, and CT findings of a strongly enhanced mass are useful for the diagnosis of endometrioma.
Full text 1,619 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Published online Mar 14, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1999.40.2.289 Ultrasonography and CT Findings of Abdominal Wall Endometrioma Abstract PURPOSE: To evaluate the US and CT findings of abdominal wall endometrioma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We respectively reviewed nine patients with abdominal wall masses diagnosed as endometrioma during a recent three-year period. Both US and CT scans were performed in six cases, only ultrasound in one, and only CT scans in two. The location, size, shape, margin, internal echo or density, enhancement patterns, and relation to adjacent masses, as seen on US and CT images, were reviewed. RESULTS: All patients had a previous history of deliveries by caesarian section. All masses were 2-4.5cm in size ; five were located in subcutaneous layers and four in musclel ayers. In all cases, sonographic findings were low echoic masses with irregular margins(7/7). Internal echotextures were inhomogeneous in five cases and homogeneous in two. On CT, masses in subcutaneous layers(5/8)showed spiculated margins and linear enhancement of the rectus muscle fascia. In cases of lesion located in muscle(3/8), slight thickening of the rectus muscle was visible on precontrast CT scans, but on postcontrast CT scans, well-defined enhancing masses, separate from the rectus muscle were seen. CONCLUSION: When patients with a previous history of caesarian section present palpable abdominal wall masses, with cyclic pain, sonographic findings of a low echoic mass separated from the internal organs, and CT findings of a strongly enhanced mass are useful for the diagnosis of endometrioma.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometrioma

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK