An observational study to classify cause of abnormal uterine bleeding according to PALM-COEIN classification

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20252903 · W4414088616
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This observational study classified abnormal uterine bleeding in 200 women using the PALM-COEIN system, finding adenomyosis, leiomyoma, and ovulatory dysfunction as most common causes, with medical management effective in 64.48% of patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This observational cross-sectional study of 200 non-pregnant women with abnormal uterine bleeding evaluated causes using the FIGO PALM-COEIN classification, using clinical history, examination, investigations, imaging, and biopsy when indicated, and then recorded medical versus surgical treatment over a 3-month follow-up. The most common PALM-COEIN cause was adenomyosis (AUB-A, 33%), followed by leiomyoma (AUB-L, 30.5%) and ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O, 14%), with ovulatory dysfunction predominant among non-structural causes. The paper reports that among cases of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (4 cases), half improved with medical treatment, with medical management effective in 64.48% of treated patients while 65.5% required surgical intervention. The study explicitly frames PALM-COEIN as a useful tool for standardizing diagnosis and comparing outcomes, though it is limited by its single-center observational design and short follow-up. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis — it classifies abnormal uterine bleeding causes and finds adenomyosis (AUB-A) as the most common category.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a frequent gynecological complaint affecting women of all ages, significantly impacting quality of life. To standardize its diagnosis and management, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) introduced the PALM-COEIN classification system, which categorizes AUB into structural and non-structural causes. To classify AUB according to PALM-COEIN classification, to know associated risk factors, to know their demography and modality of treatment required. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at New Civil Hospital, Surat, from May 2024 to April 2025. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Research Review Committee (Approval ID: GMCS/RRC-2/13433/24). A total of 200 consenting women with AUB (non-pregnancy related) were included. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy-related bleeding or refusal to consent. Detailed clinical history, examination, investigations, imaging and biopsy when indicated were done. Classification was as per PALM-COEIN. Treatment included medical or surgical modalities. Response was assessed over a 3-month follow-up. Results: The most common cause of AUB was adenomyosis (AUB-A, 33%), followed by leiomyoma (AUB-L, 30.5%) and ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O, 14%). Among non-structural causes, AUB-O was predominant. In this study simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia in 4 cases and half of those patients improved with medical treatment. Medical management was effective in 64.48% of treated patients, while 65.5% required surgical intervention. Obesity (26%) and thyroid disorders (17.5%) were the most common comorbid risk factors. Conclusions: The PALM-COEIN classification system was a useful and thorough tool for understanding the causes of AUB, helping to standardize diagnoses, plan better treatments and achieve better results in patient care. It also facilitated effective communication and comparison across clinical and research settings.
Full text 5,231 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a frequent gynecological complaint affecting women of all ages, significantly impacting quality of life. To standardize its diagnosis and management, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) introduced the PALM-COEIN classification system, which categorizes AUB into structural and non-structural causes. To classify AUB according to PALM-COEIN classification, to know associated risk factors, to know their demography and modality of treatment required.

Methods

This observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at New Civil Hospital, Surat, from May 2024 to April 2025. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Research Review Committee (Approval ID: GMCS/RRC-2/13433/24). A total of 200 consenting women with AUB (non-pregnancy related) were included. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy-related bleeding or refusal to consent. Detailed clinical history, examination, investigations, imaging and biopsy when indicated were done. Classification was as per PALM-COEIN. Treatment included medical or surgical modalities. Response was assessed over a 3-month follow-up.

Results

The most common cause of AUB was adenomyosis (AUB-A, 33%), followed by leiomyoma (AUB-L, 30.5%) and ovulatory dysfunction (AUB-O, 14%). Among non-structural causes, AUB-O was predominant. In this study simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia in 4 cases and half of those patients improved with medical treatment. Medical management was effective in 64.48% of treated patients, while 65.5% required surgical intervention. Obesity (26%) and thyroid disorders (17.5%) were the most common comorbid risk factors.

Conclusions

The PALM-COEIN classification system was a useful and thorough tool for understanding the causes of AUB, helping to standardize diagnoses, plan better treatments and achieve better results in patient care. It also facilitated effective communication and comparison across clinical and research settings. Metrics

References

Berek JS. Berek, Novak’s Gynecology. 16th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer. 2019:131. Sood M, Devi A, Daher A, Razali S, Nawawi H, Hashim S, et al. Poor correlation of stress levels and menstrual patterns among medical students. J Asian Behav Stud. 2017;2(5):73–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/jabs.v2i5.221 Awwad JT, Toth TL, Schiff I. Abnormal uterine bleeding in the perimenopause. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993;38(5):261-9. Livingstone M, Fraser IS. Mechanisms of abnormal uterine bleeding. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8(1):60–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/8.1.60 World Health Organization. Research on menopause in the 1990s: report of a WHO scientific group. WHO Technical Report Series No. 866. Geneva: WHO; 1996. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris. Accessed on 21 March 2025. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with ovulatory dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(4):891–6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Heavy menstrual bleeding: assessment and management (NG88). London: NICE; 2018. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance. Accessed on 21 March 2025 Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS. FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(1):3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011 Sharma A, Dogra Y. Trends of abnormal uterine bleeding in tertiary centre of Shimla hills. J Midlife Health. 2013;4(1):67–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-7800.109648 Prabhudev P, Sapna IS, Pujar TV, Achala KP. A prospective study on abnormal uterine bleeding with sonological and histopathological correlation in women attending tertiary care hospital. International J Reprod, Cont, Obst Gynecol. 2022;11(1):3023–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20222789 Mahapatra M, Mishra P, Behera AK. Clinical study of abnormal uterine bleeding and its management. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(5):328–31. Ratnani R, Jain M, Ratnani S. A study of abnormal uterine bleeding in women using PALM-COEIN system. J Clin Diag Res. 2017;11(6):10–4. Gouri S, Jindal S, Aggarwal N. Clinical spectrum of abnormal uterine bleeding using PALM-COEIN classification. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(3):626–31. Goel P, Rathore SB. PALM-COEIN FIGO classification for diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding. Sch J App Med Sci. 2016;4(8):2771-3. Divya A, Nair V, Kumar S. Endometrial hyperplasia: clinical and histological study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(8):3569–73. Singh S, Sahoo S, Das PC. A study of thyroid dysfunction in dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Int J Repr Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):1002-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180881

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK