Optimizing progeny allocation strategies in breeding schemes while updating genomic prediction models

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Genomic selection has revolutionized breeding by enabling the early identification of superior individuals using genome-wide markers, enhancing breeding efficiency and accelerating variety development. Over the past decade, new selection and mating strategies — leveraging optimization methods and other approaches — have been introduced to improve various decision-making processes in breeding programs. However, optimizing breeding remains challenging when the positions and effects of quantitative trait loci are unknown. We developed a framework that optimizes breeding strategies while updating genomic prediction models during breeding schemes. By implementing intermediate model updates, we enabled re-optimization of allocation strategies based on updated predictions. Our simulations compared this approach with equal allocation and optimal cross selection methods across various selection intensities and genetic architectures. Results demonstrated our optimized allocation strategy significantly outperformed the other approaches under moderate to low selection intensities, particularly when combined with model updates. While genetic gains plateaued without updates, our approach enabled continuous improvement through the final generation. The framework showed exceptional robustness across different simulation conditions and better maintained genetic diversity while controlling changes in population structure. This confirms that optimized allocation strategies remain effective when using estimated marker effects rather than true effects, providing a practical framework for improving real-world breeding programs.
Full text 1,803 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Genomic selection has revolutionized breeding by enabling the early identification of superior individuals using genome-wide markers, enhancing breeding efficiency and accelerating variety development. Over the past decade, new selection and mating strategies — leveraging optimization methods and other approaches — have been introduced to improve various decision-making processes in breeding programs. However, optimizing breeding remains challenging when the positions and effects of quantitative trait loci are unknown. We developed a framework that optimizes breeding strategies while updating genomic prediction models during breeding schemes. By implementing intermediate model updates, we enabled re-optimization of allocation strategies based on updated predictions. Our simulations compared this approach with equal allocation and optimal cross selection methods across various selection intensities and genetic architectures. Results demonstrated our optimized allocation strategy significantly outperformed the other approaches under moderate to low selection intensities, particularly when combined with model updates. While genetic gains plateaued without updates, our approach enabled continuous improvement through the final generation. The framework showed exceptional robustness across different simulation conditions and better maintained genetic diversity while controlling changes in population structure. This confirms that optimized allocation strategies remain effective when using estimated marker effects rather than true effects, providing a practical framework for improving real-world breeding programs. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Member or nonmember of the Japanese Society of Breeding: Kosuke Hamazaki

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00