Diagnostic stewardship – Optimisation of superficial wound swab cultures can reduce the environmental impact of the microbiology laboratory

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Introduction: Optimisation of diagnostic testing is essential for the sustainable delivery of laboratory services. To date, little consideration has been given to the potential benefits of diagnostic stewardship to laboratories looking to reduce their environmental footprint. Hypothesis Implementing a pre-analytical diagnostic stewardship intervention for the testing of superficial wound swabs would result in a measurable reduction in the environmental footprint of the microbiology laboratory. Aim To assess the consequential impact of a diagnostic stewardship intervention on test volume, carbon footprint and quantity of non-recyclable plastic waste generated. Methodology Superficial wound swabs received in the absence of clinical details suggestive of active skin and soft tissue infection were rejected by the laboratory. The Carbon footprint of testing was estimated using Publicly available specification (PAS) 2050:2011 methodology in a cradle-grave, attributional life-cycle assessment within a defined system boundary. The mass of laboratory plastic waste was calculated through the accurate weighing of associated laboratory consumables. Results The intervention resulted in a reduction of 35.77 kgCO2e and 9.06kg of unrecyclable plastic waste over an 8-day period without measurable patient harm. Conclusion This study demonstrates, in relation to specific testing pathways, that the optimisation of microbiology laboratory diagnostic testing can result in a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and non-recyclable plastic waste generation without negatively impacting patient care.
Full text 1,660 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction Optimisation of diagnostic testing is essential for the sustainable delivery of laboratory services. To date, little consideration has been given to the potential benefits of diagnostic stewardship to laboratories looking to reduce their environmental footprint. Hypothesis Implementing a pre-analytical diagnostic stewardship intervention for the testing of superficial wound swabs would result in a measurable reduction in the environmental footprint of the microbiology laboratory. Aim To assess the consequential impact of a diagnostic stewardship intervention on test volume, carbon footprint and quantity of non-recyclable plastic waste generated. Methodology Superficial wound swabs received in the absence of clinical details suggestive of active skin and soft tissue infection were rejected by the laboratory. The Carbon footprint of testing was estimated using Publicly available specification (PAS) 2050:2011 methodology in a cradle-grave, attributional life-cycle assessment within a defined system boundary. The mass of laboratory plastic waste was calculated through the accurate weighing of associated laboratory consumables.

Results

The intervention resulted in a reduction of 35.77 kgCO2e and 9.06kg of unrecyclable plastic waste over an 8-day period without measurable patient harm.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates, in relation to specific testing pathways, that the optimisation of microbiology laboratory diagnostic testing can result in a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and non-recyclable plastic waste generation without negatively impacting patient care. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00