A Counterfactual Framework for Directional Cell–Cell Interaction Analysis in Spatial Transcriptomics

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Understanding how neighboring cells influence cellular states is central to spatial transcriptomics, yet most existing methods rely on correlation or predefined ligand–receptor (LR) pairs and do not explicitly test directionality. We introduce a counterfactual, intervention-based framework for inferring directional cell–cell influence that is LR-agnostic and tests sender specificity. A neighborhood-conditioned graph model predicts receiver cell state from local spatial context. Directional influence is quantified by counterfactually replacing neighbors of a candidate sender type and measuring the resulting displacement in predicted receiver state. We define a Counterfactual Directionality Score (CDS) that quantifies directional influence, and compute pair-level CDS by aggregating across receiver cells and test cores for each ordered sender–receiver pair. Applied to Xenium cholangiocarcinoma tissue microarrays (38 cores), the framework identified reproducible, asymmetric interactions between tumor, immune, and stromal compartments, most prominently Tumor-EMT → Macrophage (CDS = 0.0828) and Fibroblast → Macrophage (CDS = 0.0582). Effects exceeded label-permutation and spatial-shuffle null models ( p < 0.001, FDR-controlled) and remained stable under core-level bootstrap resampling. Inferred directional strengths correlated strongly with matched LR scores ( r = 0.758, p = 0.0027), supporting biological concordance. These results demonstrate counterfactual testing as a statistically rigorous and scalable approach for directional cell–cell communication analysis in spatial transcriptomics.
Full text 2,041 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Understanding how neighboring cells influence cellular states is central to spatial transcriptomics, yet most existing methods rely on correlation or predefined ligand–receptor (LR) pairs and do not explicitly test directionality. We introduce a counterfactual, intervention-based framework for quantifying directional dependence within a predictive model of spatial transcriptomics, enabling interpretability analysis without ligand–receptor priors. A neighborhood-conditioned graph model predicts receiver cell state from local spatial context. Directional influence is quantified by counterfactually replacing neighbors of a candidate sender type and measuring the resulting displacement in predicted receiver state. We define a Counterfactual Directionality Score (CDS) that quantifies directional influence, and compute pair-level CDS by aggregating across receiver cells and test cores for each ordered sender–receiver pair. Applied to Xenium cholangiocarcinoma tissue microarrays (38 cores), the framework identified reproducible, asymmetric interactions between tumor, immune, and stromal compartments, most prominently Tumor- EMT → Macrophage (CDS = 0.0828) and Fibroblast → Macrophage (CDS = 0.0582). Effects exceeded label-permutation and spatial-shuffle null models (p < 0.001, FDR-controlled) and remained stable under core-level bootstrap resampling. Inferred directional strengths correlated strongly with matched LR scores (r = 0.758, p = 0.0027), supporting biological concordance. These results demonstrate counterfactual testing as a statistically rigorous and scalable approach for model-based directional dependence analysis in spatial transcriptomics. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes We have done some additional experimentations (sensitivity analysis, top programs/genes) to prove our model more rigorously from biological point of view. We have also corrected a few type and added pseudocode and block diagram for the better understanding of our paper.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00