Impact of Telemedicine on Post-Bariatric Surgery Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic presents unique challenges for patients and healthcare providers, especially those working with obesity and related health problems. E-health has emerged as a crucial tool for the follow-up of users undergoing bariatric surgery during this period, allowing remote monitoring of users' health status and providing access to virtual consultation with health professionals. This study aims to analyze the impact of the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic on the results of bariatric surgery, surgical safety outcomes, and user satisfaction with this follow-up. METHOD: This was an observational study with retrospective data collection. The variables were divided into several groups: health data and associated comorbidities, surgical safety, and satisfaction with telemedicine monitoring. RESULTS: Surgery significantly affected weight loss; in general, there was a 75% loss of excess weight. Comorbidities were reversed over time, with 50% of the subjects maintaining excellent levels. Most users were satisfied with the monitoring, and surgical outcomes were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up via telemedicine did not modify the results of bariatric surgery, which may suggest that it may be an option to consider for regular monitoring of the post-bariatric surgery process.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00