Analyzing the Energy Consumption of OECD Countries Through an Interval-Valued Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ahp-Based Cradis Approach

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-05 · read from full text

The study develops and applies an interval-valued circular intuitionistic fuzzy AHP–integrated CRADIS multi-criteria decision-making framework to evaluate energy consumption performance across OECD countries. It considers six criteria—primary energy consumption plus hydroelectric, wind, coal, gas, and oil consumption—using the reported criterion-weighting results to rank relative importance among categories, with fossil fuels receiving higher weight while coal, gas, and oil receive less weight than other categories. The authors report distinct cross-country differences, with Canada, Germany, and Japan showing more positive results, the UK and France described as having robust programs, and Hungary performing worst alongside comparatively weaker profiles for the Czech Republic, Greece, and Slovakia, while noting the work is a preprint and not peer reviewed. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract The complexity of energy management and policy development is increasing and it necessitates the use of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to offer solutions in concern to various energy sources and assessment criteria. In this context, an example is demonstrated, the interval-valued circular intuitionistic fuzzy (IVCIF) AHP-integrated CRADIS methodology, to evaluate the energy consumption performance of the OECD nations. This article discusses six basic criteria concerning primary energy consumption, hydroelectric consumption, wind consumption, coal consumption, gas consumption, and oil consumption. There is thus a variactivation analysis among the analyzed criteria; less critical criteria share the stage with the primary energy consumption criteria, including hydro and wind energy in the category of renewable energy sources. As discussed in the results, criterion weight increases for fossil fuels, whereas less weight is given to coal, gas, and oil compared to other categories. There are distinct differences in the energy efficiency achieved by OECD countries. Among the countries, effective energy management strategies and their implications present significant positive results in the case of Canada, Germany, and Japan, while the United Kingdom and France have relatively robust energy programs fostering practices in sustainable living. In contrast, the dismally performing country must be Hungary, with the Czech Republic, Greece, and Slovakia also not too promising, given the general profile. The study underscores the influence of the IVCIF-AHP&CRADIS approach to offset the complexity of assessing energy and channel the data-oriented policymaking agenda. This systematic prioritizing of the various criteria, with respect to energy consumption, will permit a comprehensive understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses in energy practices across OECD countries. The result will be a policy-effective outcome for the policymakers, as well as an incentive to further develop energy efficiency and renewable energy. It is one of the reasons certain strategies are focused on enhancing general sustainability within the OECD framework.
Full text 12,334 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Analyzing the Energy Consumption of OECD Countries Through an Interval-Valued Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ahp-Based Cradis Approach | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Analyzing the Energy Consumption of OECD Countries Through an Interval-Valued Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ahp-Based Cradis Approach FUAD AGHAMAMMADLI, ŞURA TOPTANCI, ÇAĞLAR KARAMAŞA This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6283480/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The complexity of energy management and policy development is increasing and it necessitates the use of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to offer solutions in concern to various energy sources and assessment criteria. In this context, an example is demonstrated, the interval-valued circular intuitionistic fuzzy (IVCIF) AHP-integrated CRADIS methodology, to evaluate the energy consumption performance of the OECD nations. This article discusses six basic criteria concerning primary energy consumption, hydroelectric consumption, wind consumption, coal consumption, gas consumption, and oil consumption. There is thus a variactivation analysis among the analyzed criteria; less critical criteria share the stage with the primary energy consumption criteria, including hydro and wind energy in the category of renewable energy sources. As discussed in the results, criterion weight increases for fossil fuels, whereas less weight is given to coal, gas, and oil compared to other categories. There are distinct differences in the energy efficiency achieved by OECD countries. Among the countries, effective energy management strategies and their implications present significant positive results in the case of Canada, Germany, and Japan, while the United Kingdom and France have relatively robust energy programs fostering practices in sustainable living. In contrast, the dismally performing country must be Hungary, with the Czech Republic, Greece, and Slovakia also not too promising, given the general profile. The study underscores the influence of the IVCIF-AHP&CRADIS approach to offset the complexity of assessing energy and channel the data-oriented policymaking agenda. This systematic prioritizing of the various criteria, with respect to energy consumption, will permit a comprehensive understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses in energy practices across OECD countries. The result will be a policy-effective outcome for the policymakers, as well as an incentive to further develop energy efficiency and renewable energy. It is one of the reasons certain strategies are focused on enhancing general sustainability within the OECD framework. Energy Consumption Multi-criteria Decision-making CRADIS Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets OECD Countries Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6283480","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":434248005,"identity":"96d679e1-55de-4d9e-aa21-7edaa8e9e84a","order_by":0,"name":"FUAD AGHAMAMMADLI","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Azerbaijan State University of Economics","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"FUAD","middleName":"","lastName":"AGHAMAMMADLI","suffix":""},{"id":434248006,"identity":"2b2d6b56-01db-46d3-b055-8366cd905599","order_by":1,"name":"ŞURA TOPTANCI","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Eskisehir Technical University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"ŞURA","middleName":"","lastName":"TOPTANCI","suffix":""},{"id":434248008,"identity":"35c3d044-c84f-4409-8800-84f2d5b101db","order_by":2,"name":"ÇAĞLAR KARAMAŞA","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Anadolu University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"ÇAĞLAR","middleName":"","lastName":"KARAMAŞA","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-03-22 12:08:04","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6283480/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6283480/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":81344809,"identity":"c78259f5-4158-4a1c-b57d-dcc1ac53d339","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-25 04:31:19","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1808536,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Fullmanuscriptenergylast1.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6283480/v1_covered_d83a7f14-b863-4948-b736-0e6a3059154d.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eAnalyzing the Energy Consumption of OECD Countries Through an Interval-Valued Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ahp-Based Cradis Approach\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Energy Consumption, Multi-criteria Decision-making, CRADIS, Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, OECD Countries","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6283480/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6283480/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe complexity of energy management and policy development is increasing and it necessitates the use of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches to offer solutions in concern to various energy sources and assessment criteria. In this context, an example is demonstrated, the interval-valued circular intuitionistic fuzzy (IVCIF) AHP-integrated CRADIS methodology, to evaluate the energy consumption performance of the OECD nations. This article discusses six basic criteria concerning primary energy consumption, hydroelectric consumption, wind consumption, coal consumption, gas consumption, and oil consumption. There is thus a variactivation analysis among the analyzed criteria; less critical criteria share the stage with the primary energy consumption criteria, including hydro and wind energy in the category of renewable energy sources. As discussed in the results, criterion weight increases for fossil fuels, whereas less weight is given to coal, gas, and oil compared to other categories.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere are distinct differences in the energy efficiency achieved by OECD countries. Among the countries, effective energy management strategies and their implications present significant positive results in the case of Canada, Germany, and Japan, while the United Kingdom and France have relatively robust energy programs fostering practices in sustainable living. In contrast, the dismally performing country must be Hungary, with the Czech Republic, Greece, and Slovakia also not too promising, given the general profile. The study underscores the influence of the IVCIF-AHP\u0026amp;CRADIS approach to offset the complexity of assessing energy and channel the data-oriented policymaking agenda. This systematic prioritizing of the various criteria, with respect to energy consumption, will permit a comprehensive understanding of the relative strengths and weaknesses in energy practices across OECD countries. The result will be a policy-effective outcome for the policymakers, as well as an incentive to further develop energy efficiency and renewable energy. It is one of the reasons certain strategies are focused on enhancing general sustainability within the OECD framework.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Analyzing the Energy Consumption of OECD Countries Through an Interval-Valued Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ahp-Based Cradis Approach","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-03 17:37:27","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6283480/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6c91a6dd-f701-40e2-8185-be5e5d055fd6","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 3rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-25T04:23:07+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-03 17:37:27","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6283480","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6283480","identity":"rs-6283480","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00