Differences in Demographics and Behaviors Across Two Web-Based Survey Platforms: Observations from a Study of Risk Perceptions of Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs)

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

There is an escalating popularity of online surveys in behavioral research, and it is critical to understand how different sources of participants can yield differing outcomes. While Mturk has been long used for online surveys, introduction of online panels allows to choose participants from a variety of pools. This study aims to contribute to the existing knowledge of how participants from different online platforms differ in their characteristics and behavioral responses which might affect the outcomes. 300 participants were recruited each from Mturk and Prime panels for a 20 mins long survey assessing perceptions and intentions to use Heated tobacco products (HTPs). Participants answered demographic and tobacco-use questions and their vaccination and masking for COVID-19. They were shown a picture and description of a recently launched HTP. Further, participants answered questions about their awareness of HTPs, risk perception of several health conditions from use of different tobacco products (cigarettes, e-cigarettes and HTPs) and perceived severity of COVID-19 infection in smokers, vapers and HTP users. Results showed significant differences in Mturk and Prime panel participants’ demographic composition and tobacco-use. Prime panels showed more racially diverse population (chi-sq =10.07, p<0.02) and had significantly more current smokers (chi-sq =44.74, p<0.01) and current e-cigarette users (chi-sq= 38.04, p<0.01) compared with Mturk. Mean perception scores for COVID risk in tobacco users were significantly different between Prime panels and Mturk. The study highlights significant differences in sample composition and responses that might be helpful in choosing one online platform over another based on specific study requirements.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00