A Perspective on Microbubble Systems for Infectious Microenvironment Restoration and Antibiotic Delivery

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This perspective proposes a modular, ultrasound-responsive microbubble platform that can restore infectious microenvironments and augment antibiotic delivery for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This perspective article discusses microbubble-based systems intended to restore disrupted microenvironments in infectious settings and to enable antibiotic delivery, focusing on the underlying concepts and technological approach rather than presenting new human or animal efficacy data. It reviews how microbubbles can be engineered for delivery functions in the context of infection and discusses relevant considerations for such systems. The key limitation is that it is a perspective/review-style piece that does not provide original experimental results with defined study populations or effect sizes. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections frequently arise in hostile tissue microenvironments—acidic pH, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and biofilm architecture—that blunt antibiotic activity and drive clinical failure. While isolated attempts to restore individual microenvironmental factors, such as pH or oxygenation, have shown promise, they rarely address the full spectrum of physicochemical disruptions at infection sites. This perspective proposes a modular, ultrasound-responsive microbubble (MB) platform that transiently reconditions infected niches in situ and thereby may augment standard antibiotics. Each MB population carries a single restorative cargo (for example, a pH buffer, an oxygen donor, or a redox modulator) and is designed for on-demand, spatially confined release via focused ultrasound (FUS); antibody functionalization can be added when needed to enhance site specificity. By selectively reprogramming multiple aspects of the infectious microenvironment, this approach aims to improve the performance of subsequent or concomitant antibiotic therapy, and even modest local gains may be clinically meaningful in critically ill patients with MDR infections. Preclinical work in oncology and infectious disease has reported that ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) can remodel tissue architecture, enhance perfusion and oxygenation, disperse biofilms, and improve drug penetration. Integrating advances in microbubble engineering, ultrasound-triggered release, and microenvironment modulation, this perspective synthesizes the current evidence, outlines a translation-oriented workflow, and proposes a development roadmap that includes dosing screens under infection-mimicking conditions, infection-site imaging and safety studies using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and first-in-human feasibility in difficult biofilm infections.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00