Abstract
Large cooperative groups are a common sight in nature. Their existence is puzzling, however, because local competition should keep groups relatively small. A simple but untested way large groups can avoid local competition is by increasing their resource base. We conducted a systematic review and phylogenetic meta-analysis to look for evidence of this effect in wild populations of cooperatively breeding birds. Across 634 groups from 29 species, group size and resource availability (territory area) were strongly positively correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.52). Furthermore, when a specific group changed size, its territory changed size correspondingly (N = 34 groups). Our results support the prediction that large groups can avoid local competition by increasing their resource base and explain a sizeable fraction of group size variation in nature (R2 = 0.27).
Full text
1,764 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Large cooperative groups are a common sight in nature. Their existence is puzzling, however, because local competition should keep groups relatively small. A simple but untested way large groups can avoid local competition is by increasing their resource base. We conducted a systematic review and phylogenetic meta-analysis to look for evidence of this effect in wild populations of cooperatively breeding birds. Across 634 groups from 29 species, group size and resource availability (territory area) were strongly positively correlated (Pearson’s r = 0.52). Furthermore, when a specific group changed size, its territory changed size correspondingly (N = 34 groups). Our results support the prediction that large groups can avoid local competition by increasing their resource base and explain a sizeable fraction of group size variation in nature (R2 = 0.27).
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2QM1Q
Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Evolution
Comparative study, Aves, helper, alloparent, social evolution
Published: 2026-01-19 20:30
Last Updated: 2026-01-19 20:30
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
We declare no conflict of interest
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data, code currently available here: https://github.com/pipdowning/Birds_Local_Competition/tree/main
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.