Comparison of two phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae constitutes the capacity of these bacteria to synthesize enzymes known as carbapenemases, which degrade carbapenem antibiotics, thus rendering them ineffective. This mechanism plays a pivotal role in promoting antibiotic resistance, therefore posing a formidable threat to public health by restricting therapeutic options for bacterial infections. The objective of the present study was to detect and compare the types of carbapenemase produced by two phenotypic methods: the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) combined with the EDTA carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) and a combined disc test for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC). A total of 112 clinical isolates of CRE were obtained, of which 87 (77.6%) were metallo-beta lactamase (MBL) producers and 2 (1.8%) were serine carbapenemase producers. Among the tracheal isolates, predominantly K. pneumoniae produced MBL, whereas among the urine isolates, predominantly Escherichia coli were MBL producers. Since imipenem+EDTA (indigenous) is cost effective and easy to perform under laboratory conditions, it can be considered a reliable phenotypic method for the detection of carbapenemase production.
Full text 1,388 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract Carbapenemase production in Enterobacteriaceae constitutes the capacity of these bacteria to synthesize enzymes known as carbapenemases, which degrade carbapenem antibiotics, thus rendering them ineffective. This mechanism plays a pivotal role in promoting antibiotic resistance, therefore posing a formidable threat to public health by restricting therapeutic options for bacterial infections. The objective of the present study was to detect and compare the types of carbapenemase produced by two phenotypic methods: the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) combined with the EDTA carbapenem inactivation method (eCIM) and a combined disc test for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC). A total of 112 clinical isolates of CRE were obtained, of which 87 (77.6%) were metallo-beta lactamase (MBL) producers and 2 (1.8%) were serine carbapenemase producers. Among the tracheal isolates, predominantly K. pneumoniae produced MBL, whereas among the urine isolates, predominantly Escherichia coli were MBL producers. Since imipenem+EDTA (indigenous) is cost effective and easy to perform under laboratory conditions, it can be considered a reliable phenotypic method for the detection of carbapenemase production. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00