Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a geriatric patient affected by SARS-CoV-2: complexity of a diagnosis, complexity of a virus

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,793 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Full text loading... Abstract Background. Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) has an important impact on the kidney through direct and indirect damage mechanisms. Most previous studies have highlighted lesions caused by this virus in the early segments of the nephron. However, due to the antigenic characteristics of the virus with almost ubiquitous receptors, and the molecular release it triggers, the distal segments of the nephron could also be affected. Methods. A 71 years old man with a respiratory failure in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia presented the typical symptoms of diabetes insipidus after about 20 days of hospitalization. The water deprivation test led to the diagnosis of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. The etiological study was complex particularly because due to the patient’s previous lithium therapy. Results. The sequence of pathognomonic events typical of diabetes insipidus associated with anamnestic, clinical and laboratory evidences supported strongly the diagnosis of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus due to SARS-CoV-2, rather than to other etiologies. Conclusions. The collecting duct could represent a target for SARS-CoV-2 infection, directly or indirectly as a result of lesions of upstream portions of the nephron which would cascade into the distal segment. Other molecules, besides angiotensin 2 converting enzyme, might be involved in facilitating the viral aggression. The complexity of the geriatric patient shows the importance of a comprehensive approach which integrates a careful monitoring of clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory and instrumental tests. This is especially important in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection and in the management of its unexpected complications. - Received: - Version Posted:

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00