[Morphological prognosis factors in ovarian carcinoma]
Review
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This paper reviews morphological prognostic factors in ovarian carcinoma, highlighting nuclear polymorphism, mitotic count, and necrosis as key predictive criteria for malignant epithelial tumors.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Ovarian tumours form a broad spectrum of histological types which reflect significant differences with regard to their biological behaviour and their responsiveness to radiological and cytostatical therapy. Precise subclassification is a precondition for selective therapy. A special subclass of tumours is represented by so-called borderline tumours which form a significant proportion of the overall group of epithelian ovarian neoplasms. Borderline tumours are histologically defined tumours which are neither fully benign nor overtly malignant. Though capable to metastasise they are of low malignant potential and favourable prognosis. In clinical statistics borderline tumours should be registered as a special entity. Within the ordinary group of malignant epithelial tumours histological grading has proven to be of prognostic significance. Amongst a great spectrum of useful cyto-histological criteria, nuclear polymorphism. The number of mitoses, and necrosis are the most important predictive factors.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:22:24.294217+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-30T06:30:42.975179+00:00