A Multi-Objective Framework for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly with Augmented Reality Visualization

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The paper studies how to design adaptive human–robot collaborative assembly systems for Industry 5.0 by proposing an integrated multi-objective optimization framework with four modules: optimal assembly sequence planning, optimal resource allocation, optimal layout planning, and immersive augmented-reality (AR) validation. Using part concatenation for assembly sequences, multi-criteria optimization for resource-task assignment (Nelder–Mead simplex), and linear programming with separation constraints for layout planning, the authors test the framework on two industrial case studies (a vibration generator and a transmission assembly), reporting over 70% reduction in layout generation time versus a modified particle swarm optimization baseline and improvements in space utilization and task sequencing. A key limitation is that the evaluation is limited to two industrial assembly scenarios and does not describe clinical validation or biological relevance beyond manufacturing context. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 10,786 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Multi-Objective Framework for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly with Augmented Reality Visualization | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Multi-Objective Framework for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly with Augmented Reality Visualization Anil Kumar Inkulu, Chiranjibi Champatiray, Eswaran Moorthy, Satish Pujari, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7054537/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The increasing complexity of customized manufacturing in Industry 5.0 has amplified the need for human-robot collaboration (HRC) to enhance assembly systems’ flexibility, adaptability, and real-time responsiveness. This study proposes an integrated optimization framework comprising four key modules: Optimal Assembly Sequence Planning (OASP), Optimal Resource Allocation (ORA), Optimal Layout Planning (OLP), and immersive lay out validation using augmented reality (AR). Assembly sequences are developed via a part concatenation strategy, while resource-task assignments are formulated as a multi-criteria optimization problem and solved using the Nelder–Mead simplex algorithm. Layout plan ning employs linear programming under separation constraints to prevent spatial overlap. AR-based visualization enables real-time layout validation and operator interactions. The framework wastested on two industrial case studies—a vibration generator and a transmis sion assembly—demonstrating over 70% reduction in layout generation time compared with modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) and improvements in space utilization and task sequencing. These results establish the framework as a scalable, digital twin-ready decision support tool for designing adaptive HRC systems in smart manufacturing. Industry 5.0 Reconfigurable HRC Multi-Criteria Optimization Layout Planning Digital twin-ready system Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7054537","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":510833405,"identity":"091fcdd9-398a-4a69-bacc-83cb3308b973","order_by":0,"name":"Anil Kumar Inkulu","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8926-3832","institution":"Lendi Institute of Engineering and Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anil","middleName":"Kumar","lastName":"Inkulu","suffix":""},{"id":510833406,"identity":"6d9dad5d-9f0f-4f2c-a44b-85caef1a62a2","order_by":1,"name":"Chiranjibi Champatiray","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chiranjibi","middleName":"","lastName":"Champatiray","suffix":""},{"id":510833407,"identity":"3c063eed-8355-43c0-b7bb-f70a11aa2536","order_by":2,"name":"Eswaran Moorthy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eswaran","middleName":"","lastName":"Moorthy","suffix":""},{"id":510833408,"identity":"77c00162-56f3-4732-9da9-72edaa9543c3","order_by":3,"name":"Satish Pujari","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Satish","middleName":"","lastName":"Pujari","suffix":""},{"id":510833409,"identity":"b357b842-8734-4f23-9335-c17583514f61","order_by":4,"name":"Raju Bahubalendruni","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Raju","middleName":"","lastName":"Bahubalendruni","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-07-05 18:16:47","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7054537/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7054537/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":101205703,"identity":"6c82b3e1-dcbd-48d7-886e-93a72211f55c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-27 09:50:10","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1054725,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7054537/v1_covered_46998a57-839c-4f95-a91a-dcd9e33d631a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"A Multi-Objective Framework for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly with Augmented Reality Visualization","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Industry 5.0, Reconfigurable, HRC, Multi-Criteria Optimization, Layout Planning, Digital twin-ready system","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7054537/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7054537/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"The increasing complexity of customized manufacturing in Industry 5.0 has amplified the need for human-robot collaboration (HRC) to enhance assembly systems’ flexibility, adaptability, and real-time responsiveness. This study proposes an integrated optimization framework comprising four key modules: Optimal Assembly Sequence Planning (OASP), Optimal Resource Allocation (ORA), Optimal Layout Planning (OLP), and immersive lay out validation using augmented reality (AR). Assembly sequences are developed via a part concatenation strategy, while resource-task assignments are formulated as a multi-criteria optimization problem and solved using the Nelder–Mead simplex algorithm. Layout plan ning employs linear programming under separation constraints to prevent spatial overlap. AR-based visualization enables real-time layout validation and operator interactions. The framework wastested on two industrial case studies—a vibration generator and a transmis sion assembly—demonstrating over 70% reduction in layout generation time compared with modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO) and improvements in space utilization and task sequencing. These results establish the framework as a scalable, digital twin-ready decision support tool for designing adaptive HRC systems in smart manufacturing.","manuscriptTitle":"A Multi-Objective Framework for Human–Robot Collaborative Assembly with Augmented Reality Visualization","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-11 22:29:23","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7054537/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9be9caae-5bc0-48de-b23d-f23239250a92","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-25T16:01:18+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-11 22:29:23","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7054537","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7054537","identity":"rs-7054537","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00