An Observational Assessment of the Correlation of Laparoscopic Finding with USG and HSG Findings in Females Diagnosed with Infertility

Observational OA: green CC0
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-08 · read from full text ⓘ

This observational prospective study evaluated the correlation between laparoscopic findings and imaging results from ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography in 100 women diagnosed with infertility. The researchers identified that while tubal blockage was a frequent finding on HSG, laparoscopy revealed endometriosis as the most common abnormality, occurring in 20% of the cohort alongside various other pelvic pathologies such as adhesions and cysts. The authors concluded that diagnostic accuracy is significantly enhanced when combining these procedures, as they serve complementary rather than competitive roles in identifying the underlying causes of infertility. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically noting it as the most prevalent laparoscopic finding among infertile patients, though the primary focus remains on the diagnostic utility of combined imaging techniques.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Aim: Correlation of laparoscopic finding with ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography findings in females with infertility. Material and methods: This observational prospective study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Netaji Subhas Medical College and Hospital, Bihta, Patna, Bihar, India. Couples who had not lived together for at least 12 months and patients with absolute or relative contraindication for laparoscopy i.e. any pre-existing cardiovascular or respiratory condition, generalized peritonitis, intestinal ileus or obstruction and abdominal hernia, were excluded. Sample size taken was 100. Results: Out of the 50 patients with abnormal findings on USG, 20 had polycystic ovaries (20%) which was the most common finding. The other findings were fibroid uterus in 5 (5%), ovarian cyst in 3 (3%), adnexal mass in 4 (4%), endometrioma in 5 (5%), uterine polyp in 4 (4%) patients. Out of the 50 patients with abnormal findings on hysterosalpingography, most common finding was tubal block. 10 patients (10%) had bilateral tubal block, left tubal block in 20 (20%), right tubal block in 20 (20%) patients. The other findings were intra uterine filling defects in 4 patients (4%), extravasation in 1(1%) patient, intra uterine septum in 5 (5%) patients and hydrosalpinx in 5 (5%) patients. On hysteroscopy, 7 patients (7%) had septum and in 3 (3%) ostia were not seen. One patient had bicornuate uterus confirmed on laparoscopy. On laparoscopy 60 patients (60%) had abnormal finding. Most common finding was endometriosis in 20 patients (20%). The other findings were B/L tubal block in 12 (12%) patients, left tubal block in 20(20%) and right tubal block in 18 (18%) patients, pelvic adhesions in 12 (12%), fibroid in 10 (10%), PCO in 10(10%), endometrioma in 7 (7%), ovarian cyst in 4 (4%), hydrosalpinx in 4 (4%) patients. Conclusion: HSG and Laparoscopy are complimentary rather that competitive procedures. The accuracy of diagnosis is enhanced when two procedures are combined especially in those cases where the result of one of the tests is doubtful.
Full text 9,218 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

(English) Aim: Correlation of laparoscopic finding with ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography findings in females with infertility. Material and methods: This observational prospective study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Netaji Subhas Medical College and Hospital, Bihta, Patna, Bihar, India. Couples who had not lived together for at least 12 months and patients with absolute or relative contraindication for laparoscopy i.e. any pre-existing cardiovascular or respiratory condition, generalized peritonitis, intestinal ileus or obstruction and abdominal hernia, were excluded. Sample size taken was 100. Results: Out of the 50 patients with abnormal findings on USG, 20 had polycystic ovaries (20%) which was the most common finding. The other findings were fibroid uterus in 5 (5%), ovarian cyst in 3 (3%), adnexal mass in 4 (4%), endometrioma in 5 (5%), uterine polyp in 4 (4%) patients. Out of the 50 patients with abnormal findings on hysterosalpingography, most common finding was tubal block. 10 patients (10%) had bilateral tubal block, left tubal block in 20 (20%), right tubal block in 20 (20%) patients. The other findings were intra uterine filling defects in 4 patients (4%), extravasation in 1(1%) patient, intra uterine septum in 5 (5%) patients and hydrosalpinx in 5 (5%) patients. On hysteroscopy, 7 patients (7%) had septum and in 3 (3%) ostia were not seen. One patient had bicornuate uterus confirmed on laparoscopy. On laparoscopy 60 patients (60%) had abnormal finding. Most common finding was endometriosis in 20 patients (20%). The other findings were B/L tubal block in 12 (12%) patients, left tubal block in 20(20%) and right tubal block in 18 (18%) patients, pelvic adhesions in 12 (12%), fibroid in 10 (10%), PCO in 10(10%), endometrioma in 7 (7%), ovarian cyst in 4 (4%), hydrosalpinx in 4 (4%) patients. Conclusion: HSG and Laparoscopy are complimentary rather that competitive procedures. The accuracy of diagnosis is enhanced when two procedures are combined especially in those cases where the result of one of the tests is doubtful. Files IJPCR,Vol14,Issue2,Article72.pdf Files (137.5 kB) | Name | Size | Download all | |---|---|---| | md5:09b0f5a0d818cd46c558d5a872fe1bf5 | 137.5 kB | Preview Download | Additional details Dates - Accepted - 2021-12-18 Software - Repository URL - https://impactfactor.org/PDF/IJPCR/14/IJPCR,Vol14,Issue2,Article72.pdf - Development Status - Active

References

- 1. Inhorn MC. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(9):1837–51. 2. Bushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, Tough S, Collins J. Estimating theprevalence of infertility in Canada. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):738–46. 3. Omoaregba JO, James BO, Lawani AO, Morakinyo O, Olotu OS. Psychosocial characteristics of female infertility in a tertiary health institution in Nigeria. Ann Afr Med. 2011;10(1):19–24. 4. Adamson PC, Krupp K, Freeman AH, Klausner JD, Reingold AL, Madhivanan P. Prevalence & correlates of primary infertility among young women in Mysore. India Indian J Med Res. 2011; 134:440–6. 5. Sami N, Ali TS, Wasim S, Saleem S. Risk factors for secondary infertility among women in Karachi, Pakistan. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35828. 6. Tsuji I, Ami K, Fujinami N, Hoshiai H. The significance of laparoscopy in determining the optimal management plan for infertile patients with suspected tubal pathology revealed by hysterosalpingography. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012;227(2):105– 8. 7. Robabeh M, Roozbeh T. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile Iranian women with tubal factor. Ginekol Pol. 2012;83(11):841–3. 8. Sakar MN, Gul T, Atay AE, Celik Y. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertile women. Saudi Med J. 2008;29(9):1315–8. 9. Jani RS, Munshi DS, Jani SK, Munshi SP. Application of laparoscopy in current fertility practice. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 3:362-5. 10. Ashok Kumar K, Priyanka Jogi Y, Bharathi A. Diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of female factor infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 6:383-7. 11. Shetty SK, Shetty H. Diagnostic laparoscopy in infertility - A retrospective study. Int Study Biomed Res. 2013; 04:07. 12. Krishna C, Prathima S, Chandraiah S, Anitha GS. Laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in evaluation of female factors in infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 6:864-7. 13. Gour A, Zawiejska A, Mettler L. Hysteroscopy- Current trends and challenges. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2008;58(1):57-62. 14. Zhu H, Fu J, Lei H, Song Y, Shen L, Huang W. Evaluation of transvaginal sonography in detecting endometrial polyps and the pregnancy outcome following hysteroscopic polypectomy in infertile women. Experiment Therapeutic Med. 2016; 12:1196-1200. 15. Yantapant A. Comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps at Rajavithi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012; 95Suppl3:S92- S97. 16. Vitner D, Filmer S, Goldstein I, Khatib N and Weiner Z. A comparison between ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 171:143- 5. 17. Babacan A, Gun I, Kizilaslan C, Ozden O, Muhcu M, Mungen E, et al. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathologies. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7(3):764-769. 18. Jain P, Bansal D, Deodhar P. Reemerging role of HSG Vs laparoscopy for infertility work–up at rural hospital set up. J Res Med Dental Sci. 2015 Oct 1;3(4):287-9. 19. M, S. ., Ibrahima, C. ., Nouhoum, G. ., Gounon, S. ., Brainima, C. ., Adama, G. ., Abdoulaye, N. . ., & Fatoumata, S. . (2021). La rétinopathie de Valsalva et le travail d'accouchement au CHUIOTA. Journal of Medical Researchand Health Sciences, 4(8), 1428–1431. Lavy, Lev-Sagie A, Holtzer H, Revel A, Hurwitz A. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;114(1):64-8. 20. Prasanta K Nayak, Purna C Mahapatra, JJ Mallack, Et al, Role of diagnostic hysteron laparoscopy in infertility: a retrospective study of 300 infertile patients. J Human Reprod Sci. 2013;6(1):32-34. 21. Gao M. Analysis of 188 Cases of Laparoscopic Diagnosis of Infertility. IJEME. 2013 Feb 29;3(2):1. 22. Butt ZU, Khan GH. Study of Infertility in Females by Laparoscopy in Remote Area. JRMC. 2009;13(2):89-91. 23. Parveen S. Study of combined diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in infertile patients. J Surg Pak. 2010;15(1).

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisendometriomainfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T10:50:55.528521+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK