EASYstrata: An All-in-One Workflow for Genome Annotation and Genomic Divergence Analysis

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,726 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract New reference genomes and transcriptomes are increasingly available across the tree of life, opening new avenues to tackle exciting questions. However, there are still challenges associated with annotating genomes and inferring evolutionary processes and with a lack of methodological standardisation. Here, we propose a new workflow designed for evolutionary analyses to overcome these challenges, facilitating the detection of recombination suppression and its consequences in terms of rearrangements and transposable element accumulation. To do so, we assemble multiple bioinformatic steps in a single easy-to-use workflow. We combine state-of-the-art tools to detect transposable elements, annotate genomes, infer gene orthology relationships, compute divergence between sequences, infer evolutionary strata (i.e., footprints of stepwise extension of recombination suppression) and their structural rearrangements, and visualise the results. This workflow, called EASYstrata, was applied to reannotate 42 published genomes from Microbotryum fungi. We show in further case examples from a plant and an animal that we recover the same strata as previously described. While this tool was developed with the goal to infer divergence between sex or mating-type chromosomes, it can be applied to any pair of haplotypes whose patteern of divergence is of interest. This workflow will facilitate the study of non-model species for which newly sequenced phased diploid genomes are becoming available. Contact quentinrougemont{at}orange.fr Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes improved figures quality, minor changes in discussion add another exemple in Supplemental files

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0