The genetically-encoded amino acids distribute non-randomly within a functionally-relevant chemical space

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,805 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The standard set of 20 genetically-encoded amino acids (C20) exhibits a statistically non-random distribution in primarily two structurally-relevant physicochemical properties: hydrophobicity and molecular volume, and to a lesser extent charge. It remains an open question, however, whether evolutionary pressures similarly optimized the same alphabet for the distribution of functionally-relevant properties, such as reactivity. In this study, we used semi-empirical quantum chemistry simulations to calculate the highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gaps for 84 xeno amino acids and constructed 10 million random 20-mer amino acid alphabets to determine where C20 fit amongst this background. The HOMO-LUMO gap measurements demonstrated that C20, similar to hydrophobicity and volume, also exhibits a non-random distribution. However, unlike hydrophobicity and volume, this distribution is non-random across an unevenly broad range. The results expand upon previous theory and suggest HOMO-LUMO gap energies as one synthetic biologists may consider when developing novel protein design tools or designing functional xeno amino acid alphabets. Highlights Life’s amino acid alphabet is non-randomly distributed within an expanded computationally-generated chemistry space generated from large-scale quantum chemistry simulations. Amino acid alphabet coverage theory applies beyond structurally-relevant physicochemical descriptors to include functionally-relevant properties like reactivity as measured by frontier molecular orbitals Findings here provide a theoretical framework to guide the design of novel proteins and development of synthetic amino acid alphabets. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00