Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection--case report.

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09

This case report describes the first robotic-assisted Piver type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection for cervical cancer, demonstrating feasibility and potentially greater precision compared to conventional laparoscopy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the first robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for a patient with Stage Ib1 cervical carcinoma. CASE: A 43-year-old woman G1, P1, previously operated on due to endometriosis with removal of the left ovary and fallopian tube, came under our care. In addition, hysteroscopic myomectomy had been done two years before. Otherwise the patient was healthy. Preoperative conization histology revealed 6 mm of stromal infiltration. The patient was offered the da Vinci robotic Wertheim operation for the first time which was well accepted and she was discharged uneventfully on the 4th day postoperatively. Four months later at a routine check-up we found asymptomatic bilateral lymphocysts but otherwise normal status. CONCLUSION: It is fully possible to perform Piver type III laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using the da Vinci robotic system and it seems that radical dissection is much more precise than the conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Carcinoma in Situ Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Hysterectomy Lymph Node Excision Robotics Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Adult Carcinoma in Situ Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Female Humans Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Lymph Node Excision Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:06.633332+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK