The stem galler Eurosta solidaginis induces both localized and systemic physiological changes in the leaves of Solidago canadensis

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Eurosta solidaginis oviposits in the apical bud of Solidago canadensis , leading to the development of a stem gall. Whether the presence of a stem gall affects leaf physiology and whether such effects are beneficial or detrimental to Solidago are unknown. We examined the physiological effects of Eurosta infection on Solidago leaves at two locations on the stem: close to the gall and far from the gall (i.e., near the ground). Chlorophyll levels were not impacted by Eurosta infection, but stomatal density was higher in leaves from infected plants close to the gall, suggesting elevated CO 2 uptake capacity in infected plants. Starch concentration was lower in infected plants, but only in leaves far from the gall. Starch accumulates within the galls, which may act as such powerful carbon sinks that leaves near the ground cannot maintain their own starch reserves. Catalase activity was higher in infected plants but only close to the gall. Notwithstanding, cells within leaves close to the gall were not more resistant to membrane damage from exogenous H 2 O 2 . We propose that Eurosta induced higher catalase activity, but only within the chloroplasts, to protect itself from photosynthetic reactive oxygen species (ROS) from nearby leaves. Levels of salicylic caid (SA), which is involved in plant defense, were elevated in infected plants but only close to the gall, suggesting a localized defense response only. Overall, Eurosta maximizes its energy supply and minimizes its oxidative damage by modulating Solidago leaf physiology, thereby increasing its own fitness at the expense of its host.
Full text 143,319 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
The stem galler Eurosta solidaginis induces both localized and systemic physiological changes in the leaves of Solidago canadensis | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The stem galler Eurosta solidaginis induces both localized and systemic physiological changes in the leaves of Solidago canadensis Michelle J. Chin, Mari Alkassam, Su Hyun (Elizabeth) Ko, Jason C. L. Brown This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6966162/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 Mar, 2026 Read the published version in Arthropod-Plant Interactions → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Eurosta solidaginis oviposits in the apical bud of Solidago canadensis , leading to the development of a stem gall. Whether the presence of a stem gall affects leaf physiology and whether such effects are beneficial or detrimental to Solidago are unknown. We examined the physiological effects of Eurosta infection on Solidago leaves at two locations on the stem: close to the gall and far from the gall (i.e., near the ground). Chlorophyll levels were not impacted by Eurosta infection, but stomatal density was higher in leaves from infected plants close to the gall, suggesting elevated CO 2 uptake capacity in infected plants. Starch concentration was lower in infected plants, but only in leaves far from the gall. Starch accumulates within the galls, which may act as such powerful carbon sinks that leaves near the ground cannot maintain their own starch reserves. Catalase activity was higher in infected plants but only close to the gall. Notwithstanding, cells within leaves close to the gall were not more resistant to membrane damage from exogenous H 2 O 2 . We propose that Eurosta induced higher catalase activity, but only within the chloroplasts, to protect itself from photosynthetic reactive oxygen species (ROS) from nearby leaves. Levels of salicylic caid (SA), which is involved in plant defense, were elevated in infected plants but only close to the gall, suggesting a localized defense response only. Overall, Eurosta maximizes its energy supply and minimizes its oxidative damage by modulating Solidago leaf physiology, thereby increasing its own fitness at the expense of its host. catalase galls stomatal density parasitism host manipulation salicylic acid Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Introduction A considerable number of herbivorous insects (and mites) are known to induce the formation of galls—enlarged regions of plant tissue—in flowering plants (Desnitskiy et al. 2023 ), yet, according to Harris and Pitzchke (2020), “galls are an understudied phenomenon in plant developmental biology”. Several studies have been conducted to understand how insects induce gall formation. Broadly, galls are induced either by feeding or oviposition (Desnitskiy et al. 2023 ), with chemical inducers, such as auxins, cytokinins, and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), being introduced to the plant via saliva or venom glands, respectively (Mapes and Davies 2001 ; Giron et al. 2016 ). Despite the morphological diversity of insect-induced galls, the adaptive significance of which remains unresolved (Stone and Schonrogge 2003 ), Takeda et al. ( 2019 ) showed that a common set of genes is upregulated in galls induced by a variety of insects, especially those genes regulating developmental processes. Several genes involved in gall formation are also involved in flower and fruit formation, suggesting that abhorrent induction of reproductive genes may also play some role in gall formation (Takeda et al. 2021 ). Gatjens-Boniche ( 2019 ) recently proposed that insects may additionally inject bacteria into their plant hosts, with these bacteria incorporating new genetic material into the plant genome, leading to altered development and gall formation. Many researchers have examined how gall tissue compares to the surrounding non-gall tissue within infected plants. For example, Hartley ( 1998 ) compared gall and non-gall tissue in 11 different plant species and found lower nitrogen levels and higher phenolics levels in the former. Motta et al. ( 2005 ) showed that galls in Tibouchina pulchra had significantly higher contents of soluble phenols, tannins, lignin, fibers, soluble carbohydrates, and lipids, and significantly lower contents of flavonoids and organic nitrogen, compared to non-gall tissue. Additionally, Huang et al. ( 2014 ) showed that gall tissue from three unrelated plant species contained lower concentrations of both chlorophyll and carotenoids compared to ungalled tissue. More recently, Pandey and Kate ( 2024 ) showed that gall tissue from Alstonia scholaris contained high levels of aluminum, phosphorus, and carbon, as well as higher levels of plant secondary compounds, some of which have not been identified, compared to ungalled tissue. Therefore, it is abundantly clear that gall tissue has a different chemical composition from the surrounding ungalled tissue within the same plant, which likely contributes to the various proposed adaptive benefits of the galls in terms of insect survival (Price et al. 1987 ). Galls might be expected to exert physiological changes in other regions of the plant as well. Indeed, a considerable amount of research suggests that galls act as a sink for many resources, thereby reducing resource availability in other plant tissues. For example, Larson and Whitman (1991) showed that galls acted as carbon sinks, competing against other carbon sinks, such as flowers. Galls act as such powerful resource sinks that even when the surrounding vasculature is disrupted, galls are still able to draw resources towards themselves (Giertych et al. 2023 ). This likely explains why seed output is often significantly reduced in galled plants (e.g., Sarratt et al. 2023 ). Little research has been conducted on the effect of galls on plant tissues beyond source-sink relationships. One study of the plant Silphium integrifolium revealed that its photosynthetic and water transport capacity were higher in galled plants, but only under drought conditions (Fay et al. 1993 ). Given the paucity of research on the physiological effects of galls on other regions of the infected plant, in the present study, we examined chlorophyl content, starch content, stomatal density, catalase activity, ROS-induced cell membrane damage, and salicylic acid (SA) levels in naturally-growing populations of Solidago canadensis (hereafter Solidago ) that displayed stem galls induced by Eurosta solidaginis (hereafter Eurosta ). In particular, we addressed two important questions regarding the physiological impacts of stem galls on leaves: i) are any physiological changes observed in the leaves of galled plants restricted to those leaves adjacent to the gall location, or do they occur throughout the entire plant; and ii) do any physiological changes observed in the leaves of galled plants persist throughout the entire lifespan of the plant, or do they occur only in the period immediately following gall formation. We examined these characteristics in leaves from plants exhibiting galls and immediately adjacent plants without galls, thereby minimizing any effects of environmental variation on our findings. For each plant, we examined leaves at two positions along the stem—close to the gall and near the bottom of the plant, which is far from the gall site—which allowed us to address our first research question. Moreover, we made measurements throughout the late summer and autumn, which allowed us to address our second research question. Understanding whether the physiological impacts of galls on other plant regions are widespread—both spatially and temporally—will help us assess the effectiveness of gall inducers as biological control agents (Harris and Shorthouse 2012). Eurosta is a small, herbivorous insect that is widespread throughout much of North America and has been studied extensively for its freeze tolerance (Lee et al. 1995 ). Its entire life cycle occurs in association with Solidago , with specific host preferences having evolved in some regions (Abrahamson et al. 1989 ). After males and females mate, females deposit their eggs into the apical bud of goldenrod (Abrahamson and Weis 1997 ). The eggs develop into larvae that induce the formation of a gall in which they develop, feed, and overwinter, eventually undergoing pupation and emerging as adults in early spring. Solidago is a perennial species that reproduces both sexually (via seeds) and clonally (via rhizomes and ramets; Huang et al. 2007 ). It is characterized by a large cluster of small, yellow flowers at the top of a stem that can be as high as 200cm. It is native to North America where it is considered a pest species in perennial gardens and crops (Werner et al. 1980 ), and it has become invasive in Europe and Asia (Tian et al. 2023 ). The key to the invasive nature of Solidago is its high reproductive allocation (Cheng et al. 2021 ) and the long-distance wind dispersal of its seeds (Zhang et al. 2022 ). Ren et al. ( 2022 ) have shown that climate warming is likely to accelerate the invasiveness of Solidago , which makes understanding its relationship with its galling insects even more important. Several studies have investigated how Eurosta gall formation affects the morphology, ecology, and evolution of Solidago. Hartnett and Abrahamson ( 1979 ) showed that gall formation in Solidago increased stem growth, decreased rhizome production, and lowered seed output. Stinner and Abrahamson ( 1979 ) found that 7% of ramet energy production was utilized for the formation of the gall and the growth of Eurosta , which might account for decreased investment in reproductive output. McCrea and Abrahamson ( 1985 ) found that galled ramets become isolated from their clones in order to minimize the impact of resource drain induced by gall formation. More recently, Meyer et al. ( 2013 ) showed that gall presence did not impact pollinator visits. There have also been several studies regarding how Eurosta infection affects the physiology and biochemistry of Solidago plants. For example, Indigo et al. ( 2025 ) recently showed that natural dyes extracted from Solidago leaves and inflorescences had different colours in infected plants compared to uninfected controls. Additionally, Helms et al. ( 2013 ) showed that Solidago plants exposed to olfactory cues from Eurosta were less vulnerable to herbivory than unexposed controls, suggesting that Solidago must synthesize some kind of herbivore deterrent in the presence of Eurosta. Our study has found that Eurosta gall formation, even though it occurs on the stem, has profound physiological effects on the leaves of Solidago plants, mostly those leaves in close proximity to the gall location. Broadly, our work provides a deeper understanding of how insects can alter the physiology of their hosts, even beyond the specific site of their interaction, a concept which remains sparsely understood. Specifically, our work provides new insight regarding how a plant species that is dominant in many North American habitats—sometimes to the detriment of other plant species (Eckberg et al. 2023 )—is impacted by insect interactions, which could serve as the basis for the development of future control strategies. Methods Leaf sampling The University of Toronto Scarborough is located in the easternmost part of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Solidago is abundant in many campus and near-campus locations, including the Highland Creek Valley and Morningside Park, which are adjacent to the campus. For three consecutive years (2022, 2023, and 2024), from September to November, we harvested leaves from Solidago plants exhibiting galls and from uninfected plants in their immediate vicinity. Two leaves were harvested from each plant: one adjacent to the gall (“close” to the infection) and one at a location just above the ground (“far” from the infection). The leaves were placed in a plastic bag and transported to our laboratory for immediate analysis of several parameters. The leaf harvesting date was recorded in most instances in order to allow for analysis of seasonal changes in the parameters measured. Chlorophyll content Chlorophyll content of the leaves was assessed using the procedure described in Nisbett et al. ( 2024 ). Briefly, leaves were homogenized in 1.5mL of 100% acetone with a mortar and pestle at room temperature. The homogenate was pipetted into an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 10,000 RPM for 10 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant was removed and transferred to a new Eppendorf tube. To measure chlorophyll concentration, 200 µL of supernatant was diluted into 3 mL of 100% acetone inside a glass cuvette. Samples were then placed inside of a spectrophotometer (Vinmax Visible Spectrophotometer 721) and their absorbance was measured at 662nm and 644nm, which allowed for determination of chlorophyll a and b concentrations using previously published equations (Holm, 1954 ). Absorbance values were measured after zeroing the spectrophotometer using 100% acetone. Chlorophyll concentrations were standardized based on wet weight of the leaves. Starch content Starch content of Solidago leaves was assessed using a procedure modified from Berkholst and Gonzales (1989). A 2cm 2 section of leaf tissue was submerged in boiling water for 3 minutes within a test tube. After, the water was replaced with isopropyl alcohol. The test tubes were then placed within a pot kept inside an insulated cooler bag. 1.5L of boiling water was poured into the pot, which was then covered with aluminum foil, and the cooler bag was sealed. After 25 minutes, 1L of boiling water was added to the pot to ensure the temperature did not get too low. The temperature of the water within the pot ranged between 70–85℃. The tubes were removed from the pot after another 25 minutes. The isopropyl alcohol was poured out, and the leaf tissue were placed in a Petri dish. Two drops of Lugol’s solution (J. Crow’s) were applied to the leaf tissue. After 3 minutes, the Petri dishes were placed on a white background and photographed using an iPhone 11 camera from a distance of 25cm directly above. All samples were analyzed using the RGB analysis in ImageJ. The starch content in the leaves was quantified using a starch colorimetric index (SCI) formula used by Dinu et al. ( 2024 ), which compared the RGB values from the sample and the RGB values from a 100% potato starch solution to which Lugol’s solution had been added. The SCI formula used was: $$\:SCI=\:\frac{(Rleaf+Gleaf+Bleaf)}{3}\:\:-\:\:\:\frac{(Rstarch+Gstarch+Bstarch)}{3}$$ Stomatal density Images of leaf samples were captured at 400x magnification using an OMAX A35 camera mounted to an OMAX M83E compound microscope. The images were analyzed in ImageJ. The scale was set using a micrometer as reference (44.0454 pixels = 0.01mm). A 0.05mm2 (1026.25 pixels x 1026.25 pixels) box was created, and any stomata that were fully or more than half in the box were counted. The box location was randomly generated by ImageJ to prevent selection bias. We then standardized the stomatal density per mm 2 . Catalase activity Catalase activity of leaf tissue was determined using a procedure based on Iwase et al. ( 2013 ) and utilized previously in other plant species (e.g., flax; Santacroce et al. 2024 ). Leaf samples were weighed and homogenized in water at room temperature. The homogenate was centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. Subsequently, 100 µL of supernatant was added to 100 µL of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Biopharm) and 100 µL 3% (w/v) H 2 O 2 within a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube. This sample tube was inverted gently to mix the reagents and allowed to sit at room temperature until apparent bubbling (indicative of catalase activity) had stopped. The height of the bubble layer formed was measured using digital calipers. The height of the bubble layer of a control tube processed in parallel was subtracted from the height of the bubble layer of the sample tube. The control tube contained 100 µL of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 100 µL of 3% (w/v) H 2 O 2 , and 100 µL of water (in place of supernatant). The height of the bubble layer was expressed on a weight-specific basis (i.e., mm/g fresh weight). H 2 O 2 -specific electrolyte leakage When the cell membrane is damaged, the internal contents of the cell—including any electrolytes—are released into the extracellular environment. Quantification of the rate at which these electrolytes accumulate in the extracellular environment can be used to assess the rate at which a given treatment causes damage to the cell membrane (Hatsugai and Katagiri 2018 ) and has been used previously to assess leaf cell membrane susceptibility to exogenous H 2 O 2 (Santacroce et al. 2024 ). Leaves were divided into two samples. One sample was submerged in a small jar containing 20 mL of distilled water (i.e., control medium), and the other sample was submerged in a small jar containing 20 mL of 30 mM H 2 O 2 (i.e., experimental medium). The conductivity of the medium was immediately measured using a conductivity meter (Extech EC400). Subsequently, all jars were left at room temperature for 24 h, after which the conductivity of the medium was measured again. Then, all jars were submerged into a water bath continuously filled with boiling water for 60 min in order to completely damage all cell membranes within the leaf. After the jars had cooled down to room temperature, the conductivity of the medium was measured again. This conductivity represented the maximum electrolyte leakage. The percentage of electrolyte leakage that occurred during the 24-h exposure to exogenous H 2 O 2 , which was taken to represent to the susceptibility of cell membranes to H 2 O 2 -induced damage, was calculated as follows: $$\:\%\:H2O2-specific\:electrolyte\:leakage=\frac{\left(cond.\: [email protected] @0h\right)}{cond.H2O2@boiling}-\:\frac{( [email protected] @0h)}{cond.water@boiling)}$$ Salicylic Acid Concentration Estimation of SA levels in leaf samples was based on a procedure modified from Warrier et al. ( 2013 ), which has been used previously to measure endogenous SA levels in plants (e.g., flax; Santacroce et al. 2024 ). Leaf samples were homogenized at room temperature in 1.5 mL of 100% acetone. The homogenate was pipetted into an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. A 0.1% FeCl 3 solution was prepared by diluting 135 µL of 38% FeCl 3 stock solution (MG Chemicals) with 50 mL tap water. 300 µL of supernatant and 3 mL of the 0.1% FeCl 3 solution were mixed by inversion in a glass cuvette. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a 721-Vis Spectrophotometer. As a blank, 300 µL supernatant and 3 mL of tap water were combined and mixed in another glass cuvette. The absorbance value of this blank was subtracted from the absorbance value of the sample with FeCl 3 . Net absorbance values were converted to SA concentrations by constructing a standard curve using known SA concentrations ranging from 0 to 12 mM. SA concentrations were expressed on a fresh weight-specific basis (i.e., µmol/g fresh weight). Statistical Analysis We used a linear model in R (version 4.3.0) to analyze the effect of infection status and leaf location, as well as their interaction, with sampling date as a covariate. Results Total leaf chlorophyll content did not differ between infected and uninfected plants, nor did it differ between leaves close to the infection site and leaves far from the infection site (Fig. 1 a). Total chlorophyll content also did not change significantly over the course of the autumn season in any leaves (Fig. 1 b). Leaf starch content was evaluated by comparing the colour obtained when Lugol’s solution was added to a decolorized leaf and the colour obtained when Lugol’s solution was added to a pure starch solution. The resulting starch colour index (SCI) gives a value that correlates inversely with the leaf starch content. SCI was found to be significantly higher only for leaves from infected plants that were far from the gall, suggesting that starch levels are lowest in these leaves (Fig. 2 a). As expected, SCI increased significantly over the course of the autumn (Fig. 2 b), likely reflecting how the gradually decreasing daylength in autumn increasingly limited photosynthetic starch production. Notwithstanding the seasonal changes observed in leaf starch levels, they were consistently lower throughout the entire autumn in leaves far from the gall site in infected plants. Stomata were examined on the abaxial side of all leaves only. Stomatal density was found to be significantly higher in leaves from infected plants but only at a location close to the infection site (Fig. 3 a). In most plants, stomatal density decreased as the autumn season progressed, except for leaves near the base of the stem in uninfected plants, which showed a significant increase in stomatal density (Fig. 3 b). Consequently, the higher stomatal density of leaves near the gall site of infected plants was only present until late October. Catalase activity was significantly higher in the leaves from Eurosta -infected plants, but only for those leaves close to the infection site (Fig. 4 a). Catalase activity in the leaves of all plants showed a significant decline over the duration of autumn, with the rate of decline being the same in all plants (Fig. 4 b). Thus, the elevated catalase activity in leaves from infected plants close to the infection site was present at the start of autumn and persisted throughout the season. Electrolyte leakage is a common metric for assessing the degree of membrane damage (and, by extension, cell death) caused by exposure to a particular condition. In the present study, Solidago leaves were exposed to either distilled water or H 2 O 2 in order to determine to what degree Solidago leaves were susceptible to H 2 O 2 damage specifically. H 2 O 2 -specific electrolyte leakage was found to be the same for all leaves regardless of the infection status of their plant or their location on the stem (Fig. 5 a). We did observe that H 2 O 2 -specific electrolyte leakage increased over time throughout the autumn season, to the same degree in all leaf types (Fig. 5 b). SA concentration was significantly higher in the leaves from Eurosta -infected plants, but only for those leaves close to the infection site (Fig. 6 a). SA concentration in the leaves of all plants showed a significant decline over the duration of autumn, with the rate of decline being the same in all leaf types (Fig. 6 b). Thus, the elevated SA concentration in leaves from infected plants close to the infection site was present at the start of autumn and persisted throughout the season. Discussion Eurosta induces increased stomatal density in Solidago leaves in order to increase starch availability for itself at the expense of Solidago fitness The overwintering survival of Eurosta larvae, as well as their reproductive output in the subsequent spring, depend on the size and rate of utilization of their pre-winter energy reserves (Irwin and Lee 2003 ). Eurosta are known to undergo diapause from early autumn until early spring, during which they suppress their metabolic rate up to 80% (Irwin et al. 2001 ), thereby minimizing their rate of utilization of their energy reserves. Notwithstanding, it would still be beneficial for Eurosta to maximize the size of its energy reserves. The primary fuel reserve supporting metabolism during winter is glycogen (Storey and Storey 1986 ), with glycogen reserves accruing within Eurosta during late summer and early autumn, likely derived from the consumption of starch within the gall tissue. On this basis, it would be adaptive for Eurosta to induce physiological changes in Solidago leaves that maximize their photosynthesis rate, as this would permit Eurosta to accumulate a larger glycogen reserve. Two factors that affect the photosynthesis rate of leaves—and that could, at least theoretically, be modified by Eurosta larvae via chemical signaling—are chlorophyll concentration (Croft et al. 2017 ) and stomatal CO 2 uptake (Tanaka et al. 2013 ). Given that Eurosta -induced galls on Solidago stems have a greenish appearance (JCLB, personal observations; Connor et al. 2012 ), they likely contain chlorophyll and should, therefore, be capable of photosynthesis; however, in other plant-insect systems (e.g., Acacia longifolia and Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae) , it has been found that the survival of larvae within galls does not depend on photosynthesis by the gall tissue itself (Haiden et al. 2012 ), likely because gall tissue typically has lower chlorophyll levels than surrounding tissue (Huang et al. 2014 ; Huang et al. 2015 ). This finding suggests that leaf photosynthesis (and, thus, leaf chlorophyll content) is likely a key determinant of larval survival for gall-forming insects. On this basis, it might be expected that gall-forming insects would induce an increase in leaf chlorophyll concentrations in order to increase their survival likelihood. This would be possible for Eurosta given that females oviposit into the apical bud and, therefore, leaf development in the region adjacent to the gall occurs only after oviposition has taken place (Craig et al. 1993 ). Once eggs hatch, they develop into larvae and begin feeding on stem tissue, releasing phytohormones (esp. auxins, cytokinins, and indole-3-acetic acid [IAA]) in the process (Mapes and Davies 2001 ; Ponce 2021) that could alter adjacent leaf development. In the present study, however, we observed no difference in leaf chlorophyll concentration between infected and uninfected Solidago plants. Given that chlorophyll concentration was preserved in infected Solidago leaves, if Eurosta could induce an increase in stomatal density, it might increase starch production by infected Solidago plants through increasing leaf CO 2 uptake and, thus, photosynthesis rate. Indeed, in the present study, we found that stomatal density was significantly higher in leaves from infected Solidago plants, but only for leaves close to the gall. This would suggest that whatever hormones and/or signaling molecules are synthesized and released by Eurosta only have a localized impact on leaf development. This likely reflects that the stomatal density of already mature leaves is fixed and only newly developing leaves can respond to insect cues (Shimada et al. 2011 ). While direct measurements of leaf photosynthesis rate in infected and uninfected Solidago leaves will be needed to confirm that increased stomatal density leads to higher photosynthetic starch production, we believe that it is a reasonable proposition given our findings. The higher stomatal density in Eurosta -infected plants might also increase their water transpiration rate, though this was not measured in the present study. Willliams et al. (2004) showed that, concomitant with their increasing cold tolerance during autumn, Eurosta also greatly reduce their water loss rate; therefore, they would not likely be negatively impacted by any increase in transpiration rate caused by their induction of increased stomatal density. While the starch content of leaves near the gall in infected plants was similar to that of leaves at the same position in uninfected plants, the starch content of leaves near the base of infected plants was lower than that of leaves near the base of uninfected plants. Given that photosynthetic starch production is likely elevated in infected plants, as rationalized above, we propose two possible explanations for this observation, both of which are based on the notion that the inner region of the gall contains an abundance of starch (Murakami et al. 2021 ). First, sucrose produced within the leaves above gall is being taken up into the gall tissue in order to support the energetic needs of the developing insect larva, leaving less sucrose to be transported to the lower leaves, where it is converted into starch. Consistent with this idea, McCrea et al. ( 1985 ) showed that radiolabelled carbon ( 14 C) added to S. altissima plants as CO 2 through leaves above the gall location was less likely to be transported to the roots compared to 14 C added to plants through leaves below the gall location, with the degree of 14 C transport reduction being correlated with gall size. The main drawback of this explanation is that most studies suggest that mature leaves, even older ones, are a source—rather than a sink—for photosynthetically-fixed carbon (Lemoine et al. 2013 ). If this notion is true for Solidago leaves, then our second explanation may be more reasonable. Galls have been described as “phloem parasites” (Larson and Whitham 1997 ) because they act as such strong sinks for photosynthetically-fixed carbon. It is possible that the lower leaves of Solidago are exporting more sucrose than they can produce due to shading from upper leaves, thereby leading to net starch depletion over time. It should be noted the reduced starch levels in the lower leaves of infected Solidago plants could be observed as early as late summer, and in the absence of any reduction in chlorophyll concentration, which seems to preclude the notion that infected Solidago plants commence the senescence of their lower leaves—and remobilization of their resources—prematurely. Regardless of the underlying reason why the lower leaves of infected Solidago plants have lower starch levels, this reduction in starch content might have significant ecological implications. As leaves undergo senescence prior to winter, their starch is remobilized to the roots (Wojciechowska et al. 2020 ), serving as an energy source to power overwintering metabolism in the roots but also as a source of energy for shoot growth in the spring. Wyka ( 1999 ) showed that, in Oxytropis sericea , plants that were intentionally shaded to minimize their carbohydrate content showed less leaf growth in the following spring and were less likely to flower. This suggests that Eurosta infection may reduce the Solidago fitness by siphoning starch away from its leaves, leaving less starch available to be transported into the roots for overwintering storage. This might explain why Eurosta does not typically infect all S olidago plants within a given population, with infection rates generally not exceeding 50% (Cronin and Abrahamson 2011): higher infection rates may lead to shrinking plant (host) populations, which would limit host availability for Eurosta and eventually compromise its own fitness. Eurosta induces increased catalase activity in Solidago leaves, which does not protect Solidago leaves from oxidative damage but may protect Eurosta from photosynthetic ROS production Catalase activity was significantly higher in leaves from infected Solidago plants, but only near the site of infection, suggesting a localized rather than systemic response. Despite elevated catalase activity in leaves near the infection site, these leaves were not more resistant to the damaging effects of exogenous H 2 O 2 , at least as assessed via the electrolyte leakage assay. One possible interpretation of these findings is that Eurosta , upon establishing its infection, releases signaling molecules that cause upregulation of catalase activity for its own protection against oxidative stress. The photosynthetic electron transport system produces a large amount of ROS during light exposure (Ivanov and Khorobrykh 2003 ), which could migrate towards the gall (via “ROS waves; Zandalinas et al. 2020 ) and subject the developing larva to elevated oxidative stress. By inducing increased catalase expression in Solidago leaves, Eurosta would minimize its degree of oxidative damage by stimulating greater ROS degradation within the leaves. Given the likely energetic costs associated with the maintenance of catalase (and other antioxidant) activity (Pamplona and Costantini 2011 ), inducing Solidago to synthesize catalase rather than synthesizing catalase itself allows Eurosta to increase survivability without compromising energetic investment in its growth. The notion that Eurosta induces its host plant to synthesize compounds for its own protection—and not the protection of the plant—is not unprecedented. Indeed, a previous study in Solidago altissima found that phenolic compounds were elevated in gall tissue compared to adjacent stem tissue, likely having been induced by Eurosta in order to minimize its chances of pathogen infection (Abrahamson et al. 1991 ). The catalase activity of Solidago leaves declined over the course of the autumn season. As autumn progresses, the leaves become less valuable to the plant as light intensity and daylength decrease; therefore, it seems justifiable that the plant would invest less energy in protecting its leaves from oxidative stress. Notwithstanding, not all studies of seasonal variation in catalase activity in plants has observed this gradual decline. For example, Badiani et al. ( 1996 ) showed that catalase activity gradually increased in wheat leaves over time since their emergence except in the last 10–20 days prior to senescence. Consistent with the observed decrease in catalase activity over the autumn, we also observed that H 2 O 2 -specific electrolyte leakage increased over the same period. This inverse relationship between catalase activity and H 2 O 2 -specific electrolyte leakage suggests that, as leaf catalase activity declines over the season, the leaves become more susceptible to oxidative damage. Of course, given this seasonal relationship between catalase and H 2 O 2 -specific electrolyte leakage, we were surprised that the increase in catalase activity observed in Solidago leaves close to the site of infection did not also make these leaves less susceptible to exogenous oxidative stress. Our proposed explanation for this lack of correlation is that the increased catalase expression induced by Eurosta infection may only occur within the chloroplasts. Such a targeted increase in catalase expression would neutralize ROS within their major site of production, thereby preventing them from diffusing to the larvae within the gall but would also preserve the structural integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus, thereby ensuring that the leaves can produce enough carbohydrate to meet the energetic demands of the developing Eurosta larva. When we exposed the leaves to exogenous H 2 O 2 , it reached all regions of the plant cells—not only the chloroplasts—allowing it to cause damage to the cell membrane, which is not better protected even in leaves close to the infection site. Indeed, our finding is reminiscent of animal studies showing that maximum lifespan can be increased by targeted catalase expression within the mitochondria (Schriner et al. 2005 ) but not by the broad distribution of increased antioxidant activity (Page et al. 2010 ). Elevated levels of SA in leaves close to the infection site suggest that Solidago plants activate a localized defense response only or that Eurosta induces localized SA production to protect itself from pathogens SA is a primarily a pathogen defense hormone in plants (Ding and Ding 2020 ), though other roles have been demonstrated (Rivas-San Vicente and Plasencia 2011 ). In other plant species that are infected by gall-forming insects, SA levels have been shown to correlate with resistance to gall induction. For example, among four species of pine ( Pinus spp. ), those that were resistant to gall formation contained a significant amount of SA, whereas those that were susceptible to gall formation did not (Son et al. 1999 ). Similarly, willow ( Salix viminalis ) plants that were resistant to gall induction by the gall midge ( Dasineura marginemtorquens ) had significantly higher SA levels than conspecifics that were susceptible to gall induction (Ollerstam and Larson 2003). In the present study, we did not measure SA concentrations until after infections had taken place, so we cannot assess whether interindividual variation in SA concentration may determine which plants within a population are likely to become infected by Eurosta. However, our data suggest that Eurosta infection likely triggers a localized defense response in Solidago , as SA levels were elevated in the leaves of infected plants that were close to the site of infection. We were surprised that SA levels were not also found to be elevated in the distal leaves of infected plants. The vast majority of studies on plant pathogen infection indicate that SA plays a role in systemic acquired resistance (SAR). For example, Gaffney et al. ( 1993 ) showed that tobacco plants infected with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) showed elevated SA levels in uninfected leaves that protected them against subsequent TMV infection. Of course, Eurosta is a unique invader because, following its spring emergence, adult females only live for 5 days (Uhler 1951 ); therefore, there is only a short period during each season in which Solidago plants can become infected with Eurosta . This likely explains why, although the occurrence of multiple galls on a single Solidago stem has been reported (Cane and Kurczewski 1976 ), it is, at least in our experience, very rare. On this basis, the development of SAR may be futile in Solidago in response to Eurosta infection. Moreover, Wise and Abrahamson ( 2017 ) showed that, under certain environmental conditions, the cost of resistance to Eurosta infection exceeds its benefit, in terms of reproductive output, so, once infected, mounting a systemic defense response against further infection may actually cause increased harm to the plant. Alternatively, the localized increase in SA in the leaves near the gall location may have been induced by Eurosta rather than initiated by Solidago. Wilson ( 1995 ) showed that wasp-induced galls in oak leaves exhibited significant mortality from fungal pathogens, likely because these pathogens depleted the nutrients within the gall tissue, thereby depriving the wasp of energy. Though, to our knowledge, no studies have demonstrated fungal infection of Eurosta galls in Solidago , a localized SA induction by Eurosta could minimize the chances of fungal (or other pathogens) invasion of its gall. In leaves from all Solidago plants, we observed a gradual decline in SA levels from early September to late November. This finding makes sense in light of the role of SA in pathogen defense, as plants should invest less energy in defending leaves from pathogens as their leaves get closer to senescence. Indeed, this idea is consistent with Griebel and Zeier ( 2008 ) who showed that increases in SA levels in response to a pathogen attack was more pronounced during periods of high light, yet we examined SA levels during autumn, when solar intensity and day length are decreasing. Our findings contrast with Zhang et al. ( 2024 ), who found that SA levels were significantly higher in leaves during later growing stages compared to earlier growing stages, although, in their study, measurements were made from May to September. Linked to its role in pathogen defence (and abiotic stress resistance, more broadly), SA is also known to promote flowering in many species, perhaps to transition stressed plants to reproductive growth before stress depletes their energy reserves (Martinez et al. 2004). Thus, it is possible that the declining SA levels observed in Solidago leaves in the present study reflects that our sampling occurred after flowering had already taken place. Conclusions As Chen et al. ( 2020 ) noted, “it has been a long-standing question as to whether the interaction between gall-forming insects and their host plants is merely parasitic or whether it may also benefit the host.” Our work suggests that Eurosta are parasitic on Solidago , inducing physiological changes—predominantly in the leaves adjacent to the gall—that benefit the insect at the expense of the plant. By understanding the physiological effects that Eurosta infection imposes upon Solidago leaves, we can better explain the ecological effects that Eurosta infection imposes upon Solidago. Future research should seek to elucidate how the occurrence and magnitude of these physiological changes may be influenced by environmental parameters. Indeed, it is well known that Eurosta infection of Solidago is patchy, with some populations experiencing high infection rates and other populations experiencing no infections. Most of the current hypotheses to explain this distribution pattern are ecology-based. For example, Confer and Orloff ( 1990 ) showed that Eurosta galls are less frequency observed near forest edges, which they proposed was due to increased bird predation risk in these regions. However, photosynthesis rates are typically lower in plants at the forest edge (Svriz et al. 2014 ), so Eurosta may avoid ovipositing in forest edge plants as such plants may not be able to supply its larvae with sufficient starch to survive the winter. Thus, we encourage more research on the physiological nature of the relationship between gall insects and their plant hosts. Declarations Acknowledgements We would like the acknowledge Andrew Cline for maintenance of the greenhouse laboratory space where we conducted our experiments. Author Contributions JCLB conceived the study and wrote the manuscript. MJC, MA, and SHK collected leaf samples and conducted the assays. This study was funded by the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Toronto Scarborough. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. References Abrahamson WG, McCrea KD, Whitwell AJ, Vernieri LA (1991) The role of phenolics in goldenrod ball gall resistance and formation. Biochem System Ecol 19:615–622 Abrahamson WG, McCrea KD, Anderson SS (1989) Host preference and recognition by the goldenrod ball gallmaker Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). American Midland Naturalist 121:322–330 Abrahamson WG, Weis AE (1997) Evolutionary Ecology across Three Trophic Levels: Goldenrods, Gallmakers, and Natural Enemies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780691209432 Badiani M, Paolacci AR, Miglietta F, Kimball BA, Pinter PJ, Garcia RL, Hunsaker DJ, LaMorte RL, Wall GW (1996) Seasonal variations of antioxidants in wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves grown under field conditions. Funct Plant Biol 23:687–698 Berkholst CE, Gonzáles MN (1989) A simple test for starch in rose petals. Adv Hort Sci 1:24-28 Cane JH, Kurczewski FE (1976) Mortality factors affecting Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society. 1:275-282 Chen X, Yang Z, Chen H, Qi Q, Liu J, Wang C, Shao S, Lu Q, Li Y, Wu H, King-Jones K (2020) A complex nutrient exchange between a gall-forming aphid and its plant host. Front Plant Sci 11:811 Cheng H, Wang S, Wei M, Wu B, Du D, Wang C (2021) Reproductive allocation of Solidago canadensis L. plays a key role in its invasiveness across a gradient of invasion degrees. Population Ecology 63:290-301 Confer JL, Orloff J (1990) Spatial distribution of the goldenrod ball gall insects. Great Lakes Entomologist 23:33-37 Connor EF, Bartlett L, O’Toole S, Byrd S, Biskar K, Orozco J (2012) The mechanism of gall induction makes galls red. Arthropod-Plant Interact 6:489–495 Craig TP, Itami JK, Abrahamson WG, Horner JD (1993) Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47:1696–1710 Cronin JT, Abrahamson WG (2001) Goldenrod stem galler preference and performance: effects of multiple herbivores and plant genotypes. Oecologia. 127:87-96 Croft H, Chen JM, Luo X, Bartlett P, Chen B, Staebler RM (2017) Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Glob Change Biol 23:3513–3524 Desnitskiy AG, Chetverikov PE, Ivanova LA, Kuzmin IV, Ozman-Sullivan SK, Sukhareva SI (2023) Molecular aspects of gall formation induced by mites and insects. Life 13:1347 Ding P, Ding Y (2020) Stories of salicylic acid: a plant defense hormone. Trends Plant Sci 25:549–565 Dinu DG, Nuzzo V, Gestri G, Montanaro G, Rustioni L (2024) Image-based appraisal of woody starch reserves in grapevine. Agricultural Research 13:182-187 Eckberg JN, Hubbard A, Schwarz ET, Smith ET, Sanders NJ (2023) The dominant plant species Solidago canadensis structures multiple trophic levels in an old-field ecosystem. Ecosphere 14:e4393 Fay PA, Hartnett DC, Knapp AK (1993) Increased photosynthesis and water potentials in Silphium integrifolium galled by cynipid wasps. Oecologia 93:114-120 Gaffney T, Friedrich L, Vernooij B, Negrotto D, Nye G, Uknes S, Ward E, Kessmann H, Ryals J (1993) Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science 261:754-756 Gatjens-Boniche O (2019) The mechanism of plant gall induction by insects: clues, facts, and consequences in a cross-kingdom complex interaction. Rev Biol Trop 67:1359–1382 Giertych MJ, Łukowski A, Karolewski P (2023) Cynipid galls on oak leaves are resilient to leaf vein disruption. J Plant Res 136:527–534 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-023-01462-8 Giron D, Huguet E, Stone GN, Body M (2016) Insect-induced effects on plants and possible effectors used by galling and leaf-mining insects to manipulate their host-plant. J Insect Physiol 84:70–89 Griebel T, Zeier J (2008) Light regulation and daytime dependency of inducible plant defenses in Arabidopsis : phytochrome signaling controls systemic acquired resistance rather than local defense. Plant Physiol 147:790-801 Haiden SA, Hoffmann JH, Cramer MD (2012) Benefits of photosynthesis for insects in galls. Oecologia 170:987–997 Harris MO, Pitzschke (2020). Plants make galls to accommodate foreigners: some are friends, most are foes. New Phytologist 225:1852-1872 Harris P, Shorthouse JD (1996) Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control1. Canadian Entomologist 128:1021-1055 Hartley SE (1998) The chemical composition of plant galls: are levels of nutrients and secondary compounds controlled by the gall-former? Oecologia 113:492–501 Hartnett DC, Abrahamson WG (1979) The effects of stem gall insects on life history patterns in Solidago canadensis. Ecology 60:910–917 Hatsugai N, Katagiri F (2018) Quantification of plant cell death by electrolyte leakage assay. Bio-protocol 8:e2758 Helms AM, De Moraes CM, Tooker JF, Mescher MC (2013) Exposure of Solidago altissima plants to volatile emissions of an insect antagonist ( Eurosta solidaginis ) deters subsequent herbivory. PNAS 110:199-204 Holm G (1954) Chlorophyll mutations in barley. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 4:457-471 Huang H, Guo S, Chen G (2007) Reproductive biology in an invasive plant Solidago canadensis. Front Biol China 2:196–204 Huang MY, Huang WD, Chou HM, Chen CC, Chang YT, Yang CM (2014) Herbivorous insects alter the chlorophyll metabolism of galls on host plants. J Asia Pac Entomol 17:431–434 Huang, MY, Huang WD, Chou HM et al (2015) Structural, biochemical, and physiological characterization of photosynthesis in leaf-derived cup-shaped galls on Litsea acuminata . BMC Plant Biol 15:61 Indigo A, Sun X, Manning P (2025) Eurosta solidaginis‐induced stem galls affect strength and colour of botanical dyes extracted from giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea). Plants, People, Planet (Early View) Irwin JT, Lee, Jr RE (2003) Cold winter microenvironments conserve energy and improve overwintering survival and potential fecundity of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis . Oikos 100:71-78 Irwin JT, Bennett VA, Lee Jr RE (2001) Diapause development in frozen larvae of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis Fitch (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Comp Physiol 171B:181-188 Ivanov B, Khorobrykh S (2003) Participation of photosynthetic electron transport in production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 5:43-53 Iwase T, Tajima A, Sugimoto S, Okuda KI, Hironaka I, Kamata Y, Takada K, Mizunoe Y (2013) A simple assay for measuring catalase activity: a visual approach. Sci Rep 3:3081 Larson KC, Whitham TG (1991) Manipulation of food resources by a gall-forming aphid: the physiology of sink-source interactions. Oecologia 88:15–21 Larson KC, Whitham TG (1997) Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia 109:575-582 Lee RE Jr, Dommel RA, Joplin KH, Denlinger DL (1995) Cryobiology of the freeze-tolerant gall fly Eurosta solidaginis: overwintering energetics and heat shock proteins. Clim Res 5:61–67 Lemoine R, Camera SL, Atanassova R, Dédaldéchamp F, Allario T, Pourtau N, Bonnemain JL, Laloi M, Coutos-Thévenot P, Maurousset L, Faucher M (2013) Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci 4:272 Mapes CC, Davies PJ (2001) Indole-3-acetic acid and ball gall development on Solidago altissima . New Phytol 151:195–202 Martínez C, Pons E, Prats G, León J (2004) Salicylic acid regulates flowering time and links defence responses and reproductive development. Plant J 37:209-217 McCrea KD, Abrahamson WG (1985) Evolutionary impacts of the goldenrod ball gallmaker on Solidago altissima clones. Oecologia 68:20–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379467 McCrea KD, Abrahamson WG, Weis AE (1985) Goldenrod ball gall effects on Solidago altissima: 14C translocation and growth. Ecology 66:1902–1907 Meyer A, Salter N, Shooner S (2013) The effect of Eurosta solidaginis parasitism on pollinator preference in Solidago canadensis. McGill Sci Undergrad Res J 8:24–29 Motta LB, Kraus JE, Salatino A, Salatino ML (2005) Distribution of metabolites in galled and non-galled foliar tissues of Tibouchina pulchra. Biochem Syst Ecol 33:971-981 Murakami R, Ushima R, Sugimoto R, Tamaoki D, Karahara I, Hanba Y, Wakasugi T, Tsuchida T (2021) A new galling insect model enhances photosynthetic activity in an obligate holoparasitic plant. Sci Rep 11:13013 Nisbett KJ, Alokozai A, Ko SH, Mott GA, Brown JCL (2024) Degradation and resynthesis of chlorophyll during increased oxidative stress and prolonged darkness differ between annual and perennial flax ( Linum L.). Oil Crop Sci 9:121-130 Ollerstam O, Larsson S (2003) Salicylic acid mediates resistance in the willow Salix viminalis against the gall midge Dasineura marginemtorquens. J Chem Ecol 29:163–174 Page MM, Richardson J, Wiens BE, Tiedtke E, Peters CW, Faure PA, Burness G, Stuart JA (2010) Antioxidant enzyme activities are not broadly correlated with longevity in 14 vertebrate endotherm species. Age 32:255–270 Pamplona R, Costantini D (2011) Molecular and structural antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress in animals. Am J Physiol 301:R843–R863 Pandey K, Kate AS (2024) Comparative analysis of foliar galls and ungalled leaves of Alstonia scholaris with a focus on tissue ultrastructure and phytochemistry. Biochem Syst Ecol 115:104851 Ponce GE, Fuse M, Chan A, Connor EF (2021) The localization of phytohormones within the gall-inducing insect Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Arthropod-Plant Interactions 15:375-385 Price PW, Fernandes GW, Waring GL (1987) Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environ Entomol 16:15–24 Ren G, Yang B, Cui M, Dai Z, Xiang Y, Zhang H, Li G, Li J, Javed Q, Du D (2022) Warming and elevated nitrogen deposition accelerate the invasion process of Solidago canadensis L. Ecol Process 11:62 Rivas-San Vicente M, Plasencia J (2011) Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. J Exp Botany 62:3321-3338 Santacroce A, Kothari S, Wang M, Thiyagarajah B, Ko SH, Gunasekar S, Ridi SA, Chin MJ, Brown JCL (2024) Oxidative stress tolerance and salicylic acid levels in early-flowering populations derived from two cultivars of annual flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.). Plant Growth Regulation 104:925-937 Sarratt JV, Perryman MJ, Pratt PD (2023) Galls formed by Aceria genistae (Acari: Eriophyidae) alter reproduction of the invasive weed Scotch broom ( Cytisus scoparius ) in the USA. Biocontrol Sci Tech 33:805-19 Schriner SE, Linford NJ, Martin GM, Treuting P, Ogburn CE, Emond M, Coskun PE, Ladiges W, Wolf N, Van Remmen H, Wallace DC (2005) Extension of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to mitochondria. Science 308:1909–1911 Shimada T, Sugano SS, Hara-Nishimura I (2011) Positive and negative peptide signals control stomatal density. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:2081–2088 Son DS, Eom TJ, Choi CO, Zhang RM (1999) Effects of controlling the pine needle gall midges by salicylic acid content in needles of some Pinus spp. J Korean Soc For Sci 88:31–37 Stinner BR, Abrahamson WG (1979) Energetics of the Solidago canadensis–stem gall insect–parasitoid guild interaction. Ecology 60:918–926 Storey JM, Storey KB (1986) Winter survival of the gall fly larva, Eurosta solidaginis: profiles of fuel reserves and cryoprotectants in a natural population. J Insect Physiol 32:549–556 Stone GN, Schonrogge K (2003) The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:512–522 Svriz M, Damascos MA, Lediuk KD, Varela SA, Barthélémy D (2014) Effect of light on the growth and photosynthesis of an invasive shrub in its native range. AoB Plants 6:plu033 Takeda S, Hirano T, Ohshima I, Sato MH (2021) Recent progress regarding the molecular aspects of insect gall formation. Int J Mol Sci 22:9424 Takeda S, Yoza M, Amano T, Ohshima I, Hirano T, Sato MH, Sakamoto T, Kimura S (2019) Comparative transcriptome analysis of galls from four different host plants suggests the molecular mechanism of gall development. PLoS One 14:e0223686 Tanaka Y, Sugano SS, Shimada T, Hara-Nishimura I (2013) Enhancement of leaf photosynthetic capacity through increased stomatal density in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 198:757–764 Tian Z, Cheng J, Xu J, Feng D, Zhong J, Yuan X, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Mao Z, Qiang S (2023) Cytogeography of naturalized Solidago canadensis populations in Europe. Plants 12:1113 Uhler LD (1951) Biology and ecology of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis (Fitch). Cornell Univ Agric Exp Stn Memoir 300:1–47 Warrier RR, Paul M, Vineetha MV (2013) Estimation of salicylic acid in Eucalyptus leaves using spectrophotometric methods. Genet Plant Physiol 3:90-97 Werner PA, Gross RS, Bradbury IK (1980) The Biology of Canadian Weeds.: 45. Solidago canadensis L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 60:1393-1409 Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2017) Constraints on the evolution of resistance to gall flies in Solidago altissima : resistance sometimes costs more than it is worth. New Phytologist 215:423-433 Williams JB, Ruehl NC, Lee RE Jr (2004) Partial link between the seasonal acquisition of cold-tolerance and desiccation resistance in the goldenrod gall fly Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Exp Biol 207:4407–4414 Wilson D (1995) Fungal endophytes which invade insect galls: insect pathogens, benign saprophytes, or fungal inquilines?. Oecologia 103:255-260 Wojciechowska N, Marzec-Schmidt K, Kalemba EM, Ludwików A, Bagniewska-Zadworna A (2020) Seasonal senescence of leaves and roots of Populus trichocarpa —is the scenario the same or different?. Tree Physiol 40:987-1000 Wyka T (1999) Carbohydrate storage and use in an alpine population of the perennial herb, Oxytropis sericea . Oecologia 120:198-208 Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Mittler R (2020) Vascular bundles mediate systemic reactive oxygen signaling during light stress. Plant Cell 32:3425-3435 Zhang L, Wu X, Tian C, Schneiter R (2024) Seasonal changes in salicylic and jasmonic acid levels in poplar with differing stress responses. Forests 15:1896 Zhang Z, Wen G, Bu D, Sun G, Qiang S (2022) Long-distance wind dispersal drives population range expansion of Solidago canadensis. Plants 11:2734 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 18 Mar, 2026 Read the published version in Arthropod-Plant Interactions → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6966162","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":489452804,"identity":"47334f2c-cf65-49c2-99a9-e508371e28c6","order_by":0,"name":"Michelle J. Chin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Toronto Scarborough","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Michelle","middleName":"J.","lastName":"Chin","suffix":""},{"id":489452807,"identity":"e4b6bfdc-474f-453c-bac5-66f2e87c078d","order_by":1,"name":"Mari Alkassam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Toronto Scarborough","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mari","middleName":"","lastName":"Alkassam","suffix":""},{"id":489452808,"identity":"f0bb08ea-73cf-45b4-9489-71dd0360bb2a","order_by":2,"name":"Su Hyun (Elizabeth) Ko","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Toronto Scarborough","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Su","middleName":"Hyun (Elizabeth)","lastName":"Ko","suffix":""},{"id":489452810,"identity":"a4f37139-a89f-4723-a290-51691bb93b84","order_by":3,"name":"Jason C. L. Brown","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Toronto Scarborough","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jason","middleName":"C. L.","lastName":"Brown","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-24 13:23:20","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6966162/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6966162/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-026-10239-4","type":"published","date":"2026-03-18T15:59:10+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":88075273,"identity":"8d8c6cb8-8360-4e6b-9057-f4ed79e7e42f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 06:54:22","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":56291,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTotal chlorophyll content in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolidago \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eleaves. \u003c/strong\u003e(a) Leaves were collected from \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e-infected plants and uninfected controls in the same location. From each plant, leaves were collected from a location close to the infection site and at a location near the bottom of the stem (i.e., far from the infection site). Bars represent mean total chlorophyll content ± SEM. Dots represent individual data points. (b) In 2024 only, leaves were collected on various days throughout the autumn season in order to assess whether any differences among leaves (due to infection status and/or stem location) were transient or persistent. Dot and line colours correspond to those in panel (a). There was no significant difference in chlorophyll content among leaf types, and there was no significant change in chlorophyll content over the course of the autumn.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/e59a1d1484c08bb96214f3ee.png"},{"id":88075274,"identity":"369a7b18-fb97-4329-a2df-7abfcff874ef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 06:54:22","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":57848,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStarch content in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolidago \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eleaves. \u003c/strong\u003eSee Figure 1 for explanation of data formatting. Starch colour index (SCI) is inversely related to the starch concentration within the leaves. SCI was significantly higher in “Infected Far” leaves compared to all other leaf types. In addition, SCI increased significantly over the autumn season in all leaf types.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/d7c7f5ab44a0edf9feb71d5e.png"},{"id":88075275,"identity":"85be7306-2877-431d-b9c8-b74cd77b90d2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 06:54:22","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":57485,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStomatal density in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolidago \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eleaves. \u003c/strong\u003eSee Figure 1 for explanation of data formatting. Stomatal density was measured on the abaxial surface. Stomatal density was significantly higher in “Infected Close” leaves compared to all other leaf types. In addition, stomatal density decreased significantly in all leaf types over the autumn season except for the “Uninfected Far” plants, where it increased significantly.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/30dee6623cf6ec19a4a372be.png"},{"id":88075276,"identity":"f9bfc272-f6b6-4a7a-ac3c-0eff4f5c88cf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 06:54:22","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":81224,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCatalase activity in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolidago \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eleaves. \u003c/strong\u003eSee Figure 1 for explanation of data formatting. Catalase activity was significantly higher in “Infected Close” leaves compared to all other leaf types. In addition, for all leaf types, catalase activity declined significantly over the course of the autumn.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/757c44cd0a54726cf504b167.png"},{"id":88075282,"identity":"9b7ae094-abd8-4888-93a4-42f3fec8b4b3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 06:54:23","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":243523,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eH\u003c/strong\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eO\u003c/strong\u003e\u003csub\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e2\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/sub\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolidago \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eleaves. \u003c/strong\u003eSee Figure 1 for explanation of data formatting. Electrolyte leakage represents the percentage of the total leaf electrolytes that leaked out of leaves during 24 hours of exposure to H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e (compared to 24 hours of exposure to water). Electrolyte leakage was similar among all leaf types, but it increased significantly over the autumn season in all leaf types.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/1f8f2049b6411273786fe6b7.png"},{"id":88075278,"identity":"e329cd56-68f0-4162-a067-92f048747a3e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-08-01 06:54:22","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":58408,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSalicylic acid (SA) concentration in \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSolidago \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eleaves. \u003c/strong\u003eSee Figure 1 for explanation of data formatting. SA levels were significantly higher in “Infected Close” leaves compared to all other leaf types. In addition, SA levels declined over the course of the autumn season (data for 2023 only) in all leaf types.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/b9394d1cfc77c2cbb6570f20.png"},{"id":105223815,"identity":"2bc8b0a4-fc5d-4cdb-9370-d51184a98c8b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-23 16:11:14","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1178357,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6966162/v1/20a9cb1b-55a9-4f6b-a2cb-1119d57a6b58.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The stem galler Eurosta solidaginis induces both localized and systemic physiological changes in the leaves of Solidago canadensis","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eA considerable number of herbivorous insects (and mites) are known to induce the formation of galls\u0026mdash;enlarged regions of plant tissue\u0026mdash;in flowering plants (Desnitskiy et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), yet, according to Harris and Pitzchke (2020), \u0026ldquo;galls are an understudied phenomenon in plant developmental biology\u0026rdquo;. Several studies have been conducted to understand how insects induce gall formation. Broadly, galls are induced either by feeding or oviposition (Desnitskiy et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), with chemical inducers, such as auxins, cytokinins, and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), being introduced to the plant via saliva or venom glands, respectively (Mapes and Davies \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Giron et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Despite the morphological diversity of insect-induced galls, the adaptive significance of which remains unresolved (Stone and Schonrogge \u003cspan citationid=\"CR67\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e), Takeda et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) showed that a common set of genes is upregulated in galls induced by a variety of insects, especially those genes regulating developmental processes. Several genes involved in gall formation are also involved in flower and fruit formation, suggesting that abhorrent induction of reproductive genes may also play some role in gall formation (Takeda et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR69\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Gatjens-Boniche (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) recently proposed that insects may additionally inject bacteria into their plant hosts, with these bacteria incorporating new genetic material into the plant genome, leading to altered development and gall formation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMany researchers have examined how gall tissue compares to the surrounding non-gall tissue within infected plants. For example, Hartley (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e) compared gall and non-gall tissue in 11 different plant species and found lower nitrogen levels and higher phenolics levels in the former. Motta et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) showed that galls in \u003cem\u003eTibouchina pulchra\u003c/em\u003e had significantly higher contents of soluble phenols, tannins, lignin, fibers, soluble carbohydrates, and lipids, and significantly lower contents of flavonoids and organic nitrogen, compared to non-gall tissue. Additionally, Huang et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e) showed that gall tissue from three unrelated plant species contained lower concentrations of both chlorophyll and carotenoids compared to ungalled tissue. More recently, Pandey and Kate (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) showed that gall tissue from \u003cem\u003eAlstonia scholaris\u003c/em\u003e contained high levels of aluminum, phosphorus, and carbon, as well as higher levels of plant secondary compounds, some of which have not been identified, compared to ungalled tissue. Therefore, it is abundantly clear that gall tissue has a different chemical composition from the surrounding ungalled tissue within the same plant, which likely contributes to the various proposed adaptive benefits of the galls in terms of insect survival (Price et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1987\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGalls might be expected to exert physiological changes in other regions of the plant as well. Indeed, a considerable amount of research suggests that galls act as a sink for many resources, thereby reducing resource availability in other plant tissues. For example, Larson and Whitman (1991) showed that galls acted as carbon sinks, competing against other carbon sinks, such as flowers. Galls act as such powerful resource sinks that even when the surrounding vasculature is disrupted, galls are still able to draw resources towards themselves (Giertych et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). This likely explains why seed output is often significantly reduced in galled plants (e.g., Sarratt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Little research has been conducted on the effect of galls on plant tissues beyond source-sink relationships. One study of the plant \u003cem\u003eSilphium integrifolium\u003c/em\u003e revealed that its photosynthetic and water transport capacity were higher in galled plants, but only under drought conditions (Fay et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGiven the paucity of research on the physiological effects of galls on other regions of the infected plant, in the present study, we examined chlorophyl content, starch content, stomatal density, catalase activity, ROS-induced cell membrane damage, and salicylic acid (SA) levels in naturally-growing populations of \u003cem\u003eSolidago canadensis\u003c/em\u003e (hereafter \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e) that displayed stem galls induced by \u003cem\u003eEurosta solidaginis\u003c/em\u003e (hereafter \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e). In particular, we addressed two important questions regarding the physiological impacts of stem galls on leaves: i) are any physiological changes observed in the leaves of galled plants restricted to those leaves adjacent to the gall location, or do they occur throughout the entire plant; and ii) do any physiological changes observed in the leaves of galled plants persist throughout the entire lifespan of the plant, or do they occur only in the period immediately following gall formation. We examined these characteristics in leaves from plants exhibiting galls and immediately adjacent plants without galls, thereby minimizing any effects of environmental variation on our findings. For each plant, we examined leaves at two positions along the stem\u0026mdash;close to the gall and near the bottom of the plant, which is far from the gall site\u0026mdash;which allowed us to address our first research question. Moreover, we made measurements throughout the late summer and autumn, which allowed us to address our second research question. Understanding whether the physiological impacts of galls on other plant regions are widespread\u0026mdash;both spatially and temporally\u0026mdash;will help us assess the effectiveness of gall inducers as biological control agents (Harris and Shorthouse 2012).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e is a small, herbivorous insect that is widespread throughout much of North America and has been studied extensively for its freeze tolerance (Lee et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e). Its entire life cycle occurs in association with \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e, with specific host preferences having evolved in some regions (Abrahamson et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e). After males and females mate, females deposit their eggs into the apical bud of goldenrod (Abrahamson and Weis \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e). The eggs develop into larvae that induce the formation of a gall in which they develop, feed, and overwinter, eventually undergoing pupation and emerging as adults in early spring.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e is a perennial species that reproduces both sexually (via seeds) and clonally (via rhizomes and ramets; Huang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). It is characterized by a large cluster of small, yellow flowers at the top of a stem that can be as high as 200cm. It is native to North America where it is considered a pest species in perennial gardens and crops (Werner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR75\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1980\u003c/span\u003e), and it has become invasive in Europe and Asia (Tian et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR72\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). The key to the invasive nature of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e is its high reproductive allocation (Cheng et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) and the long-distance wind dispersal of its seeds (Zhang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR83\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Ren et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) have shown that climate warming is likely to accelerate the invasiveness of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e, which makes understanding its relationship with its galling insects even more important.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSeveral studies have investigated how \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e gall formation affects the morphology, ecology, and evolution of \u003cem\u003eSolidago.\u003c/em\u003e Hartnett and Abrahamson (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1979\u003c/span\u003e) showed that gall formation in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e increased stem growth, decreased rhizome production, and lowered seed output. Stinner and Abrahamson (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1979\u003c/span\u003e) found that 7% of ramet energy production was utilized for the formation of the gall and the growth of \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e, which might account for decreased investment in reproductive output. McCrea and Abrahamson (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e) found that galled ramets become isolated from their clones in order to minimize the impact of resource drain induced by gall formation. More recently, Meyer et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) showed that gall presence did not impact pollinator visits. There have also been several studies regarding how \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection affects the physiology and biochemistry of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants. For example, Indigo et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e) recently showed that natural dyes extracted from \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves and inflorescences had different colours in infected plants compared to uninfected controls. Additionally, Helms et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) showed that \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants exposed to olfactory cues from \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e were less vulnerable to herbivory than unexposed controls, suggesting that \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e must synthesize some kind of herbivore deterrent in the presence of \u003cem\u003eEurosta.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOur study has found that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e gall formation, even though it occurs on the stem, has profound physiological effects on the leaves of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants, mostly those leaves in close proximity to the gall location. Broadly, our work provides a deeper understanding of how insects can alter the physiology of their hosts, even beyond the specific site of their interaction, a concept which remains sparsely understood. Specifically, our work provides new insight regarding how a plant species that is dominant in many North American habitats\u0026mdash;sometimes to the detriment of other plant species (Eckberg et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e)\u0026mdash;is impacted by insect interactions, which could serve as the basis for the development of future control strategies.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\n\u003ch3\u003eLeaf sampling\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe University of Toronto Scarborough is located in the easternmost part of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e is abundant in many campus and near-campus locations, including the Highland Creek Valley and Morningside Park, which are adjacent to the campus. For three consecutive years (2022, 2023, and 2024), from September to November, we harvested leaves from \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants exhibiting galls and from uninfected plants in their immediate vicinity. Two leaves were harvested from each plant: one adjacent to the gall (\u0026ldquo;close\u0026rdquo; to the infection) and one at a location just above the ground (\u0026ldquo;far\u0026rdquo; from the infection). The leaves were placed in a plastic bag and transported to our laboratory for immediate analysis of several parameters. The leaf harvesting date was recorded in most instances in order to allow for analysis of seasonal changes in the parameters measured.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eChlorophyll content\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eChlorophyll content of the leaves was assessed using the procedure described in Nisbett et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Briefly, leaves were homogenized in 1.5mL of 100% acetone with a mortar and pestle at room temperature. The homogenate was pipetted into an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 10,000 RPM for 10 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant was removed and transferred to a new Eppendorf tube. To measure chlorophyll concentration, 200 \u0026micro;L of supernatant was diluted into 3 mL of 100% acetone inside a glass cuvette. Samples were then placed inside of a spectrophotometer (Vinmax Visible Spectrophotometer 721) and their absorbance was measured at 662nm and 644nm, which allowed for determination of chlorophyll \u003cem\u003ea\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eb\u003c/em\u003e concentrations using previously published equations (Holm, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1954\u003c/span\u003e). Absorbance values were measured after zeroing the spectrophotometer using 100% acetone. Chlorophyll concentrations were standardized based on wet weight of the leaves.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eStarch content\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStarch content of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves was assessed using a procedure modified from Berkholst and Gonzales (1989). A 2cm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e section of leaf tissue was submerged in boiling water for 3 minutes within a test tube. After, the water was replaced with isopropyl alcohol. The test tubes were then placed within a pot kept inside an insulated cooler bag. 1.5L of boiling water was poured into the pot, which was then covered with aluminum foil, and the cooler bag was sealed. After 25 minutes, 1L of boiling water was added to the pot to ensure the temperature did not get too low. The temperature of the water within the pot ranged between 70\u0026ndash;85℃. The tubes were removed from the pot after another 25 minutes. The isopropyl alcohol was poured out, and the leaf tissue were placed in a Petri dish. Two drops of Lugol\u0026rsquo;s solution (J. Crow\u0026rsquo;s) were applied to the leaf tissue. After 3 minutes, the Petri dishes were placed on a white background and photographed using an iPhone 11 camera from a distance of 25cm directly above. All samples were analyzed using the RGB analysis in ImageJ. The starch content in the leaves was quantified using a starch colorimetric index (SCI) formula used by Dinu et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), which compared the RGB values from the sample and the RGB values from a 100% potato starch solution to which Lugol\u0026rsquo;s solution had been added. The SCI formula used was:\u003cdiv id=\"Equa\" class=\"Equation\"\u003e\u003cdiv format=\"TEX\" class=\"mathdisplay\" id=\"FileID_Equa\" name=\"EquationSource\"\u003e\n$$\\:SCI=\\:\\frac{(Rleaf+Gleaf+Bleaf)}{3}\\:\\:-\\:\\:\\:\\frac{(Rstarch+Gstarch+Bstarch)}{3}$$\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eStomatal density\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eImages of leaf samples were captured at 400x magnification using an OMAX A35 camera mounted to an OMAX M83E compound microscope. The images were analyzed in ImageJ. The scale was set using a micrometer as reference (44.0454 pixels\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.01mm). A 0.05mm2 (1026.25 pixels x 1026.25 pixels) box was created, and any stomata that were fully or more than half in the box were counted. The box location was randomly generated by ImageJ to prevent selection bias. We then standardized the stomatal density per mm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eCatalase activity\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCatalase activity of leaf tissue was determined using a procedure based on Iwase et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e) and utilized previously in other plant species (e.g., flax; Santacroce et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Leaf samples were weighed and homogenized in water at room temperature. The homogenate was centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. Subsequently, 100 \u0026micro;L of supernatant was added to 100 \u0026micro;L of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Biopharm) and 100 \u0026micro;L 3% (w/v) H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e within a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube. This sample tube was inverted gently to mix the reagents and allowed to sit at room temperature until apparent bubbling (indicative of catalase activity) had stopped. The height of the bubble layer formed was measured using digital calipers. The height of the bubble layer of a control tube processed in parallel was subtracted from the height of the bubble layer of the sample tube. The control tube contained 100 \u0026micro;L of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 100 \u0026micro;L of 3% (w/v) H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, and 100 \u0026micro;L of water (in place of supernatant). The height of the bubble layer was expressed on a weight-specific basis (i.e., mm/g fresh weight).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen the cell membrane is damaged, the internal contents of the cell\u0026mdash;including any electrolytes\u0026mdash;are released into the extracellular environment. Quantification of the rate at which these electrolytes accumulate in the extracellular environment can be used to assess the rate at which a given treatment causes damage to the cell membrane (Hatsugai and Katagiri \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e) and has been used previously to assess leaf cell membrane susceptibility to exogenous H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e (Santacroce et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Leaves were divided into two samples. One sample was submerged in a small jar containing 20 mL of distilled water (i.e., control medium), and the other sample was submerged in a small jar containing 20 mL of 30 mM H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e (i.e., experimental medium). The conductivity of the medium was immediately measured using a conductivity meter (Extech EC400). Subsequently, all jars were left at room temperature for 24 h, after which the conductivity of the medium was measured again. Then, all jars were submerged into a water bath continuously filled with boiling water for 60 min in order to completely damage all cell membranes within the leaf. After the jars had cooled down to room temperature, the conductivity of the medium was measured again. This conductivity represented the maximum electrolyte leakage. The percentage of electrolyte leakage that occurred during the 24-h exposure to exogenous H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, which was taken to represent to the susceptibility of cell membranes to H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-induced damage, was calculated as follows:\u003cdiv id=\"Equb\" class=\"Equation\"\u003e\u003cdiv format=\"TEX\" class=\"mathdisplay\" id=\"FileID_Equb\" name=\"EquationSource\"\u003e\n$$\\:\\%\\:H2O2-specific\\:electrolyte\\:leakage=\\frac{\\left(cond.\\:[email protected]@0h\\right)}{cond.H2O2@boiling}-\\:\\frac{([email protected]@0h)}{cond.water@boiling)}$$\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eSalicylic Acid Concentration\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eEstimation of SA levels in leaf samples was based on a procedure modified from Warrier et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR74\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e), which has been used previously to measure endogenous SA levels in plants (e.g., flax; Santacroce et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Leaf samples were homogenized at room temperature in 1.5 mL of 100% acetone. The homogenate was pipetted into an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. A 0.1% FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e solution was prepared by diluting 135 \u0026micro;L of 38% FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e stock solution (MG Chemicals) with 50 mL tap water. 300 \u0026micro;L of supernatant and 3 mL of the 0.1% FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e solution were mixed by inversion in a glass cuvette. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a 721-Vis Spectrophotometer. As a blank, 300 \u0026micro;L supernatant and 3 mL of tap water were combined and mixed in another glass cuvette. The absorbance value of this blank was subtracted from the absorbance value of the sample with FeCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e. Net absorbance values were converted to SA concentrations by constructing a standard curve using known SA concentrations ranging from 0 to 12 mM. SA concentrations were expressed on a fresh weight-specific basis (i.e., \u0026micro;mol/g fresh weight).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe used a linear model in R (version 4.3.0) to analyze the effect of infection status and leaf location, as well as their interaction, with sampling date as a covariate.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eTotal leaf chlorophyll content did not differ between infected and uninfected plants, nor did it differ between leaves close to the infection site and leaves far from the infection site (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ea). Total chlorophyll content also did not change significantly over the course of the autumn season in any leaves (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eb).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eLeaf starch content was evaluated by comparing the colour obtained when Lugol\u0026rsquo;s solution was added to a decolorized leaf and the colour obtained when Lugol\u0026rsquo;s solution was added to a pure starch solution. The resulting starch colour index (SCI) gives a value that correlates inversely with the leaf starch content. SCI was found to be significantly higher only for leaves from infected plants that were far from the gall, suggesting that starch levels are lowest in these leaves (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea). As expected, SCI increased significantly over the course of the autumn (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003eb), likely reflecting how the gradually decreasing daylength in autumn increasingly limited photosynthetic starch production. Notwithstanding the seasonal changes observed in leaf starch levels, they were consistently lower throughout the entire autumn in leaves far from the gall site in infected plants.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eStomata were examined on the abaxial side of all leaves only. Stomatal density was found to be significantly higher in leaves from infected plants but only at a location close to the infection site (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ea). In most plants, stomatal density decreased as the autumn season progressed, except for leaves near the base of the stem in uninfected plants, which showed a significant increase in stomatal density (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb). Consequently, the higher stomatal density of leaves near the gall site of infected plants was only present until late October.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCatalase activity was significantly higher in the leaves from \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e-infected plants, but only for those leaves close to the infection site (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea). Catalase activity in the leaves of all plants showed a significant decline over the duration of autumn, with the rate of decline being the same in all plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb). Thus, the elevated catalase activity in leaves from infected plants close to the infection site was present at the start of autumn and persisted throughout the season.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eElectrolyte leakage is a common metric for assessing the degree of membrane damage (and, by extension, cell death) caused by exposure to a particular condition. In the present study, \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves were exposed to either distilled water or H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e in order to determine to what degree \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves were susceptible to H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e damage specifically. H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage was found to be the same for all leaves regardless of the infection status of their plant or their location on the stem (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea). We did observe that H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage increased over time throughout the autumn season, to the same degree in all leaf types (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003eb).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSA concentration was significantly higher in the leaves from \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e-infected plants, but only for those leaves close to the infection site (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ea). SA concentration in the leaves of all plants showed a significant decline over the duration of autumn, with the rate of decline being the same in all leaf types (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eb). Thus, the elevated SA concentration in leaves from infected plants close to the infection site was present at the start of autumn and persisted throughout the season.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eEurosta \u003cem\u003einduces increased stomatal density in\u003c/em\u003e Solidago \u003cem\u003eleaves in order to increase starch availability for itself at the expense of\u003c/em\u003e Solidago \u003cem\u003efitness\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe overwintering survival of \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e larvae, as well as their reproductive output in the subsequent spring, depend on the size and rate of utilization of their pre-winter energy reserves (Irwin and Lee \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e are known to undergo diapause from early autumn until early spring, during which they suppress their metabolic rate up to 80% (Irwin et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e), thereby minimizing their rate of utilization of their energy reserves. Notwithstanding, it would still be beneficial for \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e to maximize the size of its energy reserves. The primary fuel reserve supporting metabolism during winter is glycogen (Storey and Storey \u003cspan citationid=\"CR66\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1986\u003c/span\u003e), with glycogen reserves accruing within \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e during late summer and early autumn, likely derived from the consumption of starch within the gall tissue. On this basis, it would be adaptive for \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e to induce physiological changes in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves that maximize their photosynthesis rate, as this would permit \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e to accumulate a larger glycogen reserve. Two factors that affect the photosynthesis rate of leaves\u0026mdash;and that could, at least theoretically, be modified by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e larvae via chemical signaling\u0026mdash;are chlorophyll concentration (Croft et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) and stomatal CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e uptake (Tanaka et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR71\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGiven that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e-induced galls on \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e stems have a greenish appearance (JCLB, personal observations; Connor et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e), they likely contain chlorophyll and should, therefore, be capable of photosynthesis; however, in other plant-insect systems (e.g., \u003cem\u003eAcacia longifolia\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTrichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae)\u003c/em\u003e, it has been found that the survival of larvae within galls does not depend on photosynthesis by the gall tissue itself (Haiden et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e), likely because gall tissue typically has lower chlorophyll levels than surrounding tissue (Huang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Huang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This finding suggests that leaf photosynthesis (and, thus, leaf chlorophyll content) is likely a key determinant of larval survival for gall-forming insects. On this basis, it might be expected that gall-forming insects would induce an increase in leaf chlorophyll concentrations in order to increase their survival likelihood. This would be possible for \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e given that females oviposit into the apical bud and, therefore, leaf development in the region adjacent to the gall occurs only after oviposition has taken place (Craig et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e). Once eggs hatch, they develop into larvae and begin feeding on stem tissue, releasing phytohormones (esp. auxins, cytokinins, and indole-3-acetic acid [IAA]) in the process (Mapes and Davies \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e; Ponce 2021) that could alter adjacent leaf development. In the present study, however, we observed no difference in leaf chlorophyll concentration between infected and uninfected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGiven that chlorophyll concentration was preserved in infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves, if \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e could induce an increase in stomatal density, it might increase starch production by infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants through increasing leaf CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e uptake and, thus, photosynthesis rate. Indeed, in the present study, we found that stomatal density was significantly higher in leaves from infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants, but only for leaves close to the gall. This would suggest that whatever hormones and/or signaling molecules are synthesized and released by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e only have a localized impact on leaf development. This likely reflects that the stomatal density of already mature leaves is fixed and only newly developing leaves can respond to insect cues (Shimada et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). While direct measurements of leaf photosynthesis rate in infected and uninfected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves will be needed to confirm that increased stomatal density leads to higher photosynthetic starch production, we believe that it is a reasonable proposition given our findings. The higher stomatal density in \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e-infected plants might also increase their water transpiration rate, though this was not measured in the present study. Willliams et al. (2004) showed that, concomitant with their increasing cold tolerance during autumn, \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e also greatly reduce their water loss rate; therefore, they would not likely be negatively impacted by any increase in transpiration rate caused by their induction of increased stomatal density.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile the starch content of leaves near the gall in infected plants was similar to that of leaves at the same position in uninfected plants, the starch content of leaves near the base of infected plants was lower than that of leaves near the base of uninfected plants. Given that photosynthetic starch production is likely elevated in infected plants, as rationalized above, we propose two possible explanations for this observation, both of which are based on the notion that the inner region of the gall contains an abundance of starch (Murakami et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). First, sucrose produced within the leaves above gall is being taken up into the gall tissue in order to support the energetic needs of the developing insect larva, leaving less sucrose to be transported to the lower leaves, where it is converted into starch. Consistent with this idea, McCrea et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1985\u003c/span\u003e) showed that radiolabelled carbon (\u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003eC) added to \u003cem\u003eS. altissima\u003c/em\u003e plants as CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e through leaves above the gall location was less likely to be transported to the roots compared to \u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003eC added to plants through leaves below the gall location, with the degree of \u003csup\u003e14\u003c/sup\u003eC transport reduction being correlated with gall size. The main drawback of this explanation is that most studies suggest that mature leaves, even older ones, are a source\u0026mdash;rather than a sink\u0026mdash;for photosynthetically-fixed carbon (Lemoine et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). If this notion is true for \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves, then our second explanation may be more reasonable. Galls have been described as \u0026ldquo;phloem parasites\u0026rdquo; (Larson and Whitham \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) because they act as such strong sinks for photosynthetically-fixed carbon. It is possible that the lower leaves of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e are exporting more sucrose than they can produce due to shading from upper leaves, thereby leading to net starch depletion over time. It should be noted the reduced starch levels in the lower leaves of infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants could be observed as early as late summer, and in the absence of any reduction in chlorophyll concentration, which seems to preclude the notion that infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants commence the senescence of their lower leaves\u0026mdash;and remobilization of their resources\u0026mdash;prematurely.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRegardless of the underlying reason why the lower leaves of infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants have lower starch levels, this reduction in starch content might have significant ecological implications. As leaves undergo senescence prior to winter, their starch is remobilized to the roots (Wojciechowska et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR79\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), serving as an energy source to power overwintering metabolism in the roots but also as a source of energy for shoot growth in the spring. Wyka (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e) showed that, in \u003cem\u003eOxytropis sericea\u003c/em\u003e, plants that were intentionally shaded to minimize their carbohydrate content showed less leaf growth in the following spring and were less likely to flower. This suggests that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection may reduce the \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e fitness by siphoning starch away from its leaves, leaving less starch available to be transported into the roots for overwintering storage. This might explain why \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e does not typically infect all S\u003cem\u003eolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants within a given population, with infection rates generally not exceeding 50% (Cronin and Abrahamson 2011): higher infection rates may lead to shrinking plant (host) populations, which would limit host availability for \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e and eventually compromise its own fitness.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eEurosta \u003cem\u003einduces increased catalase activity in\u003c/em\u003e Solidago \u003cem\u003eleaves, which does not protect\u003c/em\u003e Solidago \u003cem\u003eleaves from oxidative damage but may protect\u003c/em\u003e Eurosta \u003cem\u003efrom photosynthetic ROS production\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eCatalase activity was significantly higher in leaves from infected \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants, but only near the site of infection, suggesting a localized rather than systemic response. Despite elevated catalase activity in leaves near the infection site, these leaves were not more resistant to the damaging effects of exogenous H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, at least as assessed via the electrolyte leakage assay. One possible interpretation of these findings is that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e, upon establishing its infection, releases signaling molecules that cause upregulation of catalase activity for its own protection against oxidative stress. The photosynthetic electron transport system produces a large amount of ROS during light exposure (Ivanov and Khorobrykh \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e), which could migrate towards the gall (via \u0026ldquo;ROS waves; Zandalinas et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR81\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and subject the developing larva to elevated oxidative stress. By inducing increased catalase expression in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves, \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e would minimize its degree of oxidative damage by stimulating greater ROS degradation within the leaves. Given the likely energetic costs associated with the maintenance of catalase (and other antioxidant) activity (Pamplona and Costantini \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e), inducing \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e to synthesize catalase rather than synthesizing catalase itself allows \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e to increase survivability without compromising energetic investment in its growth. The notion that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e induces its host plant to synthesize compounds for its own protection\u0026mdash;and not the protection of the plant\u0026mdash;is not unprecedented. Indeed, a previous study in \u003cem\u003eSolidago altissima\u003c/em\u003e found that phenolic compounds were elevated in gall tissue compared to adjacent stem tissue, likely having been induced by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e in order to minimize its chances of pathogen infection (Abrahamson et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe catalase activity of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves declined over the course of the autumn season. As autumn progresses, the leaves become less valuable to the plant as light intensity and daylength decrease; therefore, it seems justifiable that the plant would invest less energy in protecting its leaves from oxidative stress. Notwithstanding, not all studies of seasonal variation in catalase activity in plants has observed this gradual decline. For example, Badiani et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1996\u003c/span\u003e) showed that catalase activity gradually increased in wheat leaves over time since their emergence except in the last 10\u0026ndash;20 days prior to senescence. Consistent with the observed decrease in catalase activity over the autumn, we also observed that H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage increased over the same period. This inverse relationship between catalase activity and H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage suggests that, as leaf catalase activity declines over the season, the leaves become more susceptible to oxidative damage.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOf course, given this seasonal relationship between catalase and H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e-specific electrolyte leakage, we were surprised that the increase in catalase activity observed in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves close to the site of infection did not also make these leaves less susceptible to exogenous oxidative stress. Our proposed explanation for this lack of correlation is that the increased catalase expression induced by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection may only occur within the chloroplasts. Such a targeted increase in catalase expression would neutralize ROS within their major site of production, thereby preventing them from diffusing to the larvae within the gall but would also preserve the structural integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus, thereby ensuring that the leaves can produce enough carbohydrate to meet the energetic demands of the developing \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e larva. When we exposed the leaves to exogenous H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, it reached all regions of the plant cells\u0026mdash;not only the chloroplasts\u0026mdash;allowing it to cause damage to the cell membrane, which is not better protected even in leaves close to the infection site. Indeed, our finding is reminiscent of animal studies showing that maximum lifespan can be increased by targeted catalase expression within the mitochondria (Schriner et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) but not by the broad distribution of increased antioxidant activity (Page et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eElevated levels of SA in leaves close to the infection site suggest that\u003c/em\u003e Solidago \u003cem\u003eplants activate a localized defense response only or that\u003c/em\u003e Eurosta \u003cem\u003einduces localized SA production to protect itself from pathogens\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSA is a primarily a pathogen defense hormone in plants (Ding and Ding \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), though other roles have been demonstrated (Rivas-San Vicente and Plasencia \u003cspan citationid=\"CR59\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). In other plant species that are infected by gall-forming insects, SA levels have been shown to correlate with resistance to gall induction. For example, among four species of pine (\u003cem\u003ePinus spp.\u003c/em\u003e), those that were resistant to gall formation contained a significant amount of SA, whereas those that were susceptible to gall formation did not (Son et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, willow (\u003cem\u003eSalix viminalis\u003c/em\u003e) plants that were resistant to gall induction by the gall midge (\u003cem\u003eDasineura marginemtorquens\u003c/em\u003e) had significantly higher SA levels than conspecifics that were susceptible to gall induction (Ollerstam and Larson 2003). In the present study, we did not measure SA concentrations until after infections had taken place, so we cannot assess whether interindividual variation in SA concentration may determine which plants within a population are likely to become infected by \u003cem\u003eEurosta.\u003c/em\u003e However, our data suggest that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection likely triggers a localized defense response in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e, as SA levels were elevated in the leaves of infected plants that were close to the site of infection.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe were surprised that SA levels were not also found to be elevated in the distal leaves of infected plants. The vast majority of studies on plant pathogen infection indicate that SA plays a role in systemic acquired resistance (SAR). For example, Gaffney et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e) showed that tobacco plants infected with tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) showed elevated SA levels in uninfected leaves that protected them against subsequent TMV infection. Of course, \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e is a unique invader because, following its spring emergence, adult females only live for 5 days (Uhler \u003cspan citationid=\"CR73\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1951\u003c/span\u003e); therefore, there is only a short period during each season in which \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants can become infected with \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e. This likely explains why, although the occurrence of multiple galls on a single \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e stem has been reported (Cane and Kurczewski \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1976\u003c/span\u003e), it is, at least in our experience, very rare. On this basis, the development of SAR may be futile in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e in response to \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection. Moreover, Wise and Abrahamson (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR76\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e) showed that, under certain environmental conditions, the cost of resistance to \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection exceeds its benefit, in terms of reproductive output, so, once infected, mounting a systemic defense response against further infection may actually cause increased harm to the plant. Alternatively, the localized increase in SA in the leaves near the gall location may have been induced by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e rather than initiated by \u003cem\u003eSolidago.\u003c/em\u003e Wilson (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR78\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e) showed that wasp-induced galls in oak leaves exhibited significant mortality from fungal pathogens, likely because these pathogens depleted the nutrients within the gall tissue, thereby depriving the wasp of energy. Though, to our knowledge, no studies have demonstrated fungal infection of \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e galls in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e, a localized SA induction by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e could minimize the chances of fungal (or other pathogens) invasion of its gall.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn leaves from all \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e plants, we observed a gradual decline in SA levels from early September to late November. This finding makes sense in light of the role of SA in pathogen defense, as plants should invest less energy in defending leaves from pathogens as their leaves get closer to senescence. Indeed, this idea is consistent with Griebel and Zeier (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e) who showed that increases in SA levels in response to a pathogen attack was more pronounced during periods of high light, yet we examined SA levels during autumn, when solar intensity and day length are decreasing. Our findings contrast with Zhang et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR82\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), who found that SA levels were significantly higher in leaves during later growing stages compared to earlier growing stages, although, in their study, measurements were made from May to September. Linked to its role in pathogen defence (and abiotic stress resistance, more broadly), SA is also known to promote flowering in many species, perhaps to transition stressed plants to reproductive growth before stress depletes their energy reserves (Martinez et al. 2004). Thus, it is possible that the declining SA levels observed in \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves in the present study reflects that our sampling occurred after flowering had already taken place.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eAs Chen et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) noted, \u0026ldquo;it has been a long-standing question as to whether the interaction between gall-forming insects and their host plants is merely parasitic or whether it may also benefit the host.\u0026rdquo; Our work suggests that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e are parasitic on \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e, inducing physiological changes\u0026mdash;predominantly in the leaves adjacent to the gall\u0026mdash;that benefit the insect at the expense of the plant. By understanding the physiological effects that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection imposes upon \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves, we can better explain the ecological effects that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection imposes upon \u003cem\u003eSolidago.\u003c/em\u003e Future research should seek to elucidate how the occurrence and magnitude of these physiological changes may be influenced by environmental parameters. Indeed, it is well known that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection of \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e is patchy, with some populations experiencing high infection rates and other populations experiencing no infections. Most of the current hypotheses to explain this distribution pattern are ecology-based. For example, Confer and Orloff (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e) showed that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e galls are less frequency observed near forest edges, which they proposed was due to increased bird predation risk in these regions. However, photosynthesis rates are typically lower in plants at the forest edge (Svriz et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR68\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e), so \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e may avoid ovipositing in forest edge plants as such plants may not be able to supply its larvae with sufficient starch to survive the winter. Thus, we encourage more research on the physiological nature of the relationship between gall insects and their plant hosts.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like the acknowledge Andrew Cline for maintenance of the greenhouse laboratory space where we conducted our experiments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Author Contributions\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJCLB conceived the study and wrote the manuscript. MJC, MA, and SHK collected leaf samples and conducted the assays.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study was funded by the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Toronto Scarborough. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbrahamson WG, McCrea KD, Whitwell AJ, Vernieri LA (1991) The role of phenolics in goldenrod ball gall resistance and formation. Biochem System Ecol 19:615\u0026ndash;622\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbrahamson WG, McCrea KD, Anderson SS (1989) Host preference and recognition by the goldenrod ball gallmaker Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). American Midland Naturalist 121:322\u0026ndash;330\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbrahamson WG, Weis AE (1997) Evolutionary Ecology across Three Trophic Levels: Goldenrods, Gallmakers, and Natural Enemies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780691209432\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBadiani M, Paolacci AR, Miglietta F, Kimball BA, Pinter PJ, Garcia RL, Hunsaker DJ, LaMorte RL, Wall GW (1996) Seasonal variations of antioxidants in wheat (Triticum aestivum) leaves grown under field conditions. Funct Plant Biol 23:687\u0026ndash;698\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBerkholst CE, Gonz\u0026aacute;les MN (1989) A simple test for starch in rose petals. Adv Hort Sci 1:24-28\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCane JH, Kurczewski FE (1976) Mortality factors affecting \u003cem\u003eEurosta solidaginis\u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society. 1:275-282\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen X, Yang Z, Chen H, Qi Q, Liu J, Wang C, Shao S, Lu Q, Li Y, Wu H, King-Jones K (2020) A complex nutrient exchange between a gall-forming aphid and its plant host. Front Plant Sci 11:811\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCheng H, Wang S, Wei M, Wu B, Du D, Wang C (2021) Reproductive allocation of Solidago canadensis L. plays a key role in its invasiveness across a gradient of invasion degrees. Population Ecology 63:290-301\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConfer JL, Orloff J (1990) Spatial distribution of the goldenrod ball gall insects. Great Lakes Entomologist 23:33-37\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConnor EF, Bartlett L, O\u0026rsquo;Toole S, Byrd S, Biskar K, Orozco J (2012) The mechanism of gall induction makes galls red. Arthropod-Plant Interact 6:489\u0026ndash;495\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCraig TP, Itami JK, Abrahamson WG, Horner JD (1993) Behavioral evidence for host-race formation in Eurosta solidaginis. Evolution 47:1696\u0026ndash;1710\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCronin JT, Abrahamson WG (2001) Goldenrod stem galler preference and performance: effects of multiple herbivores and plant genotypes. Oecologia. 127:87-96\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCroft H, Chen JM, Luo X, Bartlett P, Chen B, Staebler RM (2017) Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity. Glob Change Biol 23:3513\u0026ndash;3524\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDesnitskiy AG, Chetverikov PE, Ivanova LA, Kuzmin IV, Ozman-Sullivan SK, Sukhareva SI (2023) Molecular aspects of gall formation induced by mites and insects. Life 13:1347\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDing P, Ding Y (2020) Stories of salicylic acid: a plant defense hormone. Trends Plant Sci 25:549\u0026ndash;565\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDinu DG, Nuzzo V, Gestri G, Montanaro G, Rustioni L (2024) Image-based appraisal of woody starch reserves in grapevine. Agricultural Research 13:182-187\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEckberg JN, Hubbard A, Schwarz ET, Smith ET, Sanders NJ (2023) The dominant plant species Solidago canadensis structures multiple trophic levels in an old-field ecosystem. Ecosphere 14:e4393\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFay PA, Hartnett DC, Knapp AK (1993) Increased photosynthesis and water potentials in \u003cem\u003eSilphium integrifolium\u003c/em\u003e galled by cynipid wasps. Oecologia 93:114-120\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGaffney T, Friedrich L, Vernooij B, Negrotto D, Nye G, Uknes S, Ward E, Kessmann H, Ryals J (1993) Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science 261:754-756\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGatjens-Boniche O (2019) The mechanism of plant gall induction by insects: clues, facts, and consequences in a cross-kingdom complex interaction. Rev Biol Trop 67:1359\u0026ndash;1382\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGiertych MJ, Łukowski A, Karolewski P (2023) Cynipid galls on oak leaves are resilient to leaf vein disruption. J Plant Res 136:527\u0026ndash;534 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-023-01462-8\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGiron D, Huguet E, Stone GN, Body M (2016) Insect-induced effects on plants and possible effectors used by galling and leaf-mining insects to manipulate their host-plant. J Insect Physiol 84:70\u0026ndash;89\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGriebel T, Zeier J (2008) Light regulation and daytime dependency of inducible plant defenses in \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e: phytochrome signaling controls systemic acquired resistance rather than local defense. Plant Physiol 147:790-801\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHaiden SA, Hoffmann JH, Cramer MD (2012) Benefits of photosynthesis for insects in galls. Oecologia 170:987\u0026ndash;997\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarris MO, Pitzschke (2020). Plants make galls to accommodate foreigners: some are friends, most are foes. New Phytologist 225:1852-1872\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarris P, Shorthouse JD (1996) Effectiveness of gall inducers in weed biological control1. Canadian Entomologist 128:1021-1055\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHartley SE (1998) The chemical composition of plant galls: are levels of nutrients and secondary compounds controlled by the gall-former? Oecologia 113:492\u0026ndash;501\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHartnett DC, Abrahamson WG (1979) The effects of stem gall insects on life history patterns in Solidago canadensis. Ecology 60:910\u0026ndash;917\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHatsugai N, Katagiri F (2018) Quantification of plant cell death by electrolyte leakage assay. Bio-protocol 8:e2758\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHelms AM, De Moraes CM, Tooker JF, Mescher MC (2013) Exposure of \u003cem\u003eSolidago altissima\u003c/em\u003e plants to volatile emissions of an insect antagonist (\u003cem\u003eEurosta solidaginis\u003c/em\u003e) deters subsequent herbivory. PNAS 110:199-204\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHolm G (1954) Chlorophyll mutations in barley. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 4:457-471\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang H, Guo S, Chen G (2007) Reproductive biology in an invasive plant Solidago canadensis. Front Biol China 2:196\u0026ndash;204\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang MY, Huang WD, Chou HM, Chen CC, Chang YT, Yang CM (2014) Herbivorous insects alter the chlorophyll metabolism of galls on host plants. J Asia Pac Entomol 17:431\u0026ndash;434\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang, MY, Huang WD, Chou HM et al (2015) Structural, biochemical, and physiological characterization of photosynthesis in leaf-derived cup-shaped galls on \u003cem\u003eLitsea acuminata\u003c/em\u003e. BMC Plant Biol 15:61\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIndigo A, Sun X, Manning P (2025) Eurosta solidaginis‐induced stem galls affect strength and colour of botanical dyes extracted from giant goldenrod (Solidago gigantea). Plants, People, Planet (Early View)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIrwin JT, Lee, Jr RE (2003) Cold winter microenvironments conserve energy and improve overwintering survival and potential fecundity of the goldenrod gall fly, \u003cem\u003eEurosta solidaginis\u003c/em\u003e. Oikos 100:71-78\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIrwin JT, Bennett VA, Lee Jr RE (2001) Diapause development in frozen larvae of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis Fitch (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Comp Physiol 171B:181-188\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIvanov B, Khorobrykh S (2003) Participation of photosynthetic electron transport in production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 5:43-53\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIwase T, Tajima A, Sugimoto S, Okuda KI, Hironaka I, Kamata Y, Takada K, Mizunoe Y (2013) A simple assay for measuring catalase activity: a visual approach. Sci Rep 3:3081\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLarson KC, Whitham TG (1991) Manipulation of food resources by a gall-forming aphid: the physiology of sink-source interactions. Oecologia 88:15\u0026ndash;21 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLarson KC, Whitham TG (1997) Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia 109:575-582\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLee RE Jr, Dommel RA, Joplin KH, Denlinger DL (1995) Cryobiology of the freeze-tolerant gall fly Eurosta solidaginis: overwintering energetics and heat shock proteins. Clim Res 5:61\u0026ndash;67\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLemoine R, Camera SL, Atanassova R, D\u0026eacute;dald\u0026eacute;champ F, Allario T, Pourtau N, Bonnemain JL, Laloi M, Coutos-Th\u0026eacute;venot P, Maurousset L, Faucher M (2013) Source-to-sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci 4:272\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMapes CC, Davies PJ (2001) Indole-3-acetic acid and ball gall development on \u003cem\u003eSolidago altissima\u003c/em\u003e. New Phytol 151:195\u0026ndash;202\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez C, Pons E, Prats G, Le\u0026oacute;n J (2004) Salicylic acid regulates flowering time and links defence responses and reproductive development. Plant J 37:209-217\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcCrea KD, Abrahamson WG (1985) Evolutionary impacts of the goldenrod ball gallmaker on Solidago altissima clones. Oecologia 68:20\u0026ndash;22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379467\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcCrea KD, Abrahamson WG, Weis AE (1985) Goldenrod ball gall effects on Solidago altissima: 14C translocation and growth. Ecology 66:1902\u0026ndash;1907\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMeyer A, Salter N, Shooner S (2013) The effect of Eurosta solidaginis parasitism on pollinator preference in Solidago canadensis. McGill Sci Undergrad Res J 8:24\u0026ndash;29\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMotta LB, Kraus JE, Salatino A, Salatino ML (2005) Distribution of metabolites in galled and non-galled foliar tissues of Tibouchina pulchra. Biochem Syst Ecol 33:971-981\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMurakami R, Ushima R, Sugimoto R, Tamaoki D, Karahara I, Hanba Y, Wakasugi T, Tsuchida T (2021) A new galling insect model enhances photosynthetic activity in an obligate holoparasitic plant. Sci Rep 11:13013\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNisbett KJ, Alokozai A, Ko SH, Mott GA, Brown JCL (2024) Degradation and resynthesis of chlorophyll during increased oxidative stress and prolonged darkness differ between annual and perennial flax (\u003cem\u003eLinum\u003c/em\u003e L.). Oil Crop Sci 9:121-130\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOllerstam O, Larsson S (2003) Salicylic acid mediates resistance in the willow Salix viminalis against the gall midge Dasineura marginemtorquens. J Chem Ecol 29:163\u0026ndash;174\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePage MM, Richardson J, Wiens BE, Tiedtke E, Peters CW, Faure PA, Burness G, Stuart JA (2010) Antioxidant enzyme activities are not broadly correlated with longevity in 14 vertebrate endotherm species. Age 32:255\u0026ndash;270\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePamplona R, Costantini D (2011) Molecular and structural antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress in animals. Am J Physiol 301:R843\u0026ndash;R863\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePandey K, Kate AS (2024) Comparative analysis of foliar galls and ungalled leaves of Alstonia scholaris with a focus on tissue ultrastructure and phytochemistry. Biochem Syst Ecol 115:104851\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePonce GE, Fuse M, Chan A, Connor EF (2021) The localization of phytohormones within the gall-inducing insect \u003cem\u003eEurosta solidaginis\u003c/em\u003e (Diptera: Tephritidae). Arthropod-Plant Interactions 15:375-385\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePrice PW, Fernandes GW, Waring GL (1987) Adaptive nature of insect galls. Environ Entomol 16:15\u0026ndash;24\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRen G, Yang B, Cui M, Dai Z, Xiang Y, Zhang H, Li G, Li J, Javed Q, Du D (2022) Warming and elevated nitrogen deposition accelerate the invasion process of Solidago canadensis L. Ecol Process 11:62\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRivas-San Vicente M, Plasencia J (2011) Salicylic acid beyond defence: its role in plant growth and development. J Exp Botany 62:3321-3338\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSantacroce A, Kothari S, Wang M, Thiyagarajah B, Ko SH, Gunasekar S, Ridi SA, Chin MJ, Brown JCL (2024) Oxidative stress tolerance and salicylic acid levels in early-flowering populations derived from two cultivars of annual flax (\u003cem\u003eLinum usitatissimum\u003c/em\u003e L.). Plant Growth Regulation 104:925-937\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSarratt JV, Perryman MJ, Pratt PD (2023) Galls formed by \u003cem\u003eAceria genistae\u003c/em\u003e (Acari: Eriophyidae) alter reproduction of the invasive weed Scotch broom (\u003cem\u003eCytisus scoparius\u003c/em\u003e) in the USA. Biocontrol Sci Tech 33:805-19\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchriner SE, Linford NJ, Martin GM, Treuting P, Ogburn CE, Emond M, Coskun PE, Ladiges W, Wolf N, Van Remmen H, Wallace DC (2005) Extension of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to mitochondria. Science 308:1909\u0026ndash;1911\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShimada T, Sugano SS, Hara-Nishimura I (2011) Positive and negative peptide signals control stomatal density. Cell Mol Life Sci 68:2081\u0026ndash;2088\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSon DS, Eom TJ, Choi CO, Zhang RM (1999) Effects of controlling the pine needle gall midges by salicylic acid content in needles of some Pinus spp. J Korean Soc For Sci 88:31\u0026ndash;37\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStinner BR, Abrahamson WG (1979) Energetics of the Solidago canadensis\u0026ndash;stem gall insect\u0026ndash;parasitoid guild interaction. Ecology 60:918\u0026ndash;926\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStorey JM, Storey KB (1986) Winter survival of the gall fly larva, Eurosta solidaginis: profiles of fuel reserves and cryoprotectants in a natural population. J Insect Physiol 32:549\u0026ndash;556\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStone GN, Schonrogge K (2003) The adaptive significance of insect gall morphology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:512\u0026ndash;522\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSvriz M, Damascos MA, Lediuk KD, Varela SA, Barth\u0026eacute;l\u0026eacute;my D (2014) Effect of light on the growth and photosynthesis of an invasive shrub in its native range. AoB Plants 6:plu033\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTakeda S, Hirano T, Ohshima I, Sato MH (2021) Recent progress regarding the molecular aspects of insect gall formation. Int J Mol Sci 22:9424\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTakeda S, Yoza M, Amano T, Ohshima I, Hirano T, Sato MH, Sakamoto T, Kimura S (2019) Comparative transcriptome analysis of galls from four different host plants suggests the molecular mechanism of gall development. PLoS One 14:e0223686\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTanaka Y, Sugano SS, Shimada T, Hara-Nishimura I (2013) Enhancement of leaf photosynthetic capacity through increased stomatal density in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 198:757\u0026ndash;764\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTian Z, Cheng J, Xu J, Feng D, Zhong J, Yuan X, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Mao Z, Qiang S (2023) Cytogeography of naturalized Solidago canadensis populations in Europe. Plants 12:1113\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUhler LD (1951) Biology and ecology of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis (Fitch). Cornell Univ Agric Exp Stn Memoir 300:1\u0026ndash;47\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWarrier RR, Paul M, Vineetha MV (2013) Estimation of salicylic acid in Eucalyptus leaves using spectrophotometric methods. Genet Plant Physiol 3:90-97\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWerner PA, Gross RS, Bradbury IK (1980) The Biology of Canadian Weeds.: 45. \u003cem\u003eSolidago canadensis\u003c/em\u003e L. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 60:1393-1409\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2017) Constraints on the evolution of resistance to gall flies in \u003cem\u003eSolidago altissima\u003c/em\u003e: resistance sometimes costs more than it is worth. New Phytologist 215:423-433\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilliams JB, Ruehl NC, Lee RE Jr (2004) Partial link between the seasonal acquisition of cold-tolerance and desiccation resistance in the goldenrod gall fly Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Exp Biol 207:4407\u0026ndash;4414\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWilson D (1995) Fungal endophytes which invade insect galls: insect pathogens, benign saprophytes, or fungal inquilines?. Oecologia 103:255-260\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWojciechowska N, Marzec-Schmidt K, Kalemba EM, Ludwik\u0026oacute;w A, Bagniewska-Zadworna A (2020) Seasonal senescence of leaves and roots of \u003cem\u003ePopulus trichocarpa\u003c/em\u003e\u0026mdash;is the scenario the same or different?. Tree Physiol 40:987-1000\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWyka T (1999) Carbohydrate storage and use in an alpine population of the perennial herb, \u003cem\u003eOxytropis sericea\u003c/em\u003e. Oecologia 120:198-208\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Mittler R (2020) Vascular bundles mediate systemic reactive oxygen signaling during light stress. Plant Cell 32:3425-3435\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang L, Wu X, Tian C, Schneiter R (2024) Seasonal changes in salicylic and jasmonic acid levels in poplar with differing stress responses. Forests 15:1896\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang Z, Wen G, Bu D, Sun G, Qiang S (2022) Long-distance wind dispersal drives population range expansion of Solidago canadensis. Plants 11:2734\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":true,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"catalase, galls, stomatal density, parasitism, host manipulation, salicylic acid","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6966162/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6966162/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eEurosta solidaginis\u003c/em\u003e oviposits in the apical bud of \u003cem\u003eSolidago canadensis\u003c/em\u003e, leading to the development of a stem gall. Whether the presence of a stem gall affects leaf physiology and whether such effects are beneficial or detrimental to \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e are unknown. We examined the physiological effects of \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection on \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaves at two locations on the stem: close to the gall and far from the gall (i.e., near the ground). Chlorophyll levels were not impacted by \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e infection, but stomatal density was higher in leaves from infected plants close to the gall, suggesting elevated CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e uptake capacity in infected plants. Starch concentration was lower in infected plants, but only in leaves far from the gall. Starch accumulates within the galls, which may act as such powerful carbon sinks that leaves near the ground cannot maintain their own starch reserves. Catalase activity was higher in infected plants but only close to the gall. Notwithstanding, cells within leaves close to the gall were not more resistant to membrane damage from exogenous H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. We propose that \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e induced higher catalase activity, but only within the chloroplasts, to protect itself from photosynthetic reactive oxygen species (ROS) from nearby leaves. Levels of salicylic caid (SA), which is involved in plant defense, were elevated in infected plants but only close to the gall, suggesting a localized defense response only. Overall, \u003cem\u003eEurosta\u003c/em\u003e maximizes its energy supply and minimizes its oxidative damage by modulating \u003cem\u003eSolidago\u003c/em\u003e leaf physiology, thereby increasing its own fitness at the expense of its host.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The stem galler Eurosta solidaginis induces both localized and systemic physiological changes in the leaves of Solidago canadensis","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-08-01 06:54:18","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6966162/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"eeaf2cf8-36aa-41a9-8712-92d2419c858f","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 1st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-23T16:07:57+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-6966162","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-026-10239-4","journal":{"identity":"arthropod-plant-interactions","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions"},"publishedOn":"2026-03-18 15:59:10","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 18th, 2026"},"versionCreatedAt":"2025-08-01 06:54:18","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s11829-026-10239-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-026-10239-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6966162","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6966162","identity":"rs-6966162","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00