Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Social Risk Mitigation using the Social Hotspots Database: A National-scale Application in Japan

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 14,349 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Social Risk Mitigation using the Social Hotspots Database: A National-scale Application in Japan | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Social Risk Mitigation using the Social Hotspots Database: A National-scale Application in Japan Kayo Murakami, Shutaro Takeda, Norihiro Itsubo, Koichi Kuriyama This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7503112/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Purpose: The social life-cycle assessment (S-LCA) provides a framework for evaluating social risks in global supply chains. However, existing risk-based assessments lack an economic valuation of social risks from a stakeholder’s perspective. This study quantifies the willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate social risks using the social hotspots database (SHDB) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The objective is to provide a monetary benchmark for integrating social risk considerations into corporate and policy decision-making. Methods: This study employs a DCE to elicit WTP values for five social-risk categories defined in the SHDB: Decent Work (DW), Human Rights (HR), Health and Safety (HS), Governance (GV), and Community Infrastructure (CM). The survey targets Japanese respondents and collects stated-preference data to estimate the perceived economic value of reducing social risk. The WTP values are derived using mixed logit models, and the annual external cost of social risks is estimated based on these values. Additionally, heterogeneity across demographics (age, gender, income, and education) and occupational groups (employees, business owners, professionals, and non-workers) is analyzed. Results and discussion: The estimated annual external cost of social risks in Japan amounts to 5.2 trillion JPY (52 billion USD), which is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s GDP. Among the five categories, HS is the most highly valued, whereas DW is associated with the lowest WTP despite its significant share of total risk-hours. WTP exhibits heterogeneity; generational differences are observed, with working-age respondents over 40 years prioritizing DW more than younger groups. High-income and highly educated individuals prioritize CM but emphasize GV less, whereas others prioritize the opposite. Compared with employees, non-workers prioritize GV over HS. Business owners prioritize DW and HS, which are related to workplace conditions, while showing less concern for GV and CM, which pertain to workers’ living conditions. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating non-market valuation methods into S-LCA, offering a monetary benchmark for social risk mitigation. Future research should conduct cross-national comparative studies to analyze regional variations in social risk perception. Expanding the assessment to a global scale could refine the impact-category compositions, highlighting risks such as child labor and climate-driven social impacts. Comparing SHDB with stakeholder-based frameworks, such as PSILCA, could further enhance the social risk-weighting methodologies in S-LCA. Environmental Economics SLCA SHDB Weighting Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7503112","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":508165510,"identity":"a229e70d-a7cd-4bc3-b45d-c50052f0ae9f","order_by":0,"name":"Kayo Murakami","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6479-9240","institution":"School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, Hyogo, Japan","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kayo","middleName":"","lastName":"Murakami","suffix":""},{"id":508165511,"identity":"51949525-1f0a-484d-9ad6-ad4cf5c45395","order_by":1,"name":"Shutaro Takeda","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0559-1105","institution":"Graduate School of Media Design, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shutaro","middleName":"","lastName":"Takeda","suffix":""},{"id":508165512,"identity":"1d54c1c1-d0cc-41ca-a192-80dde60dca35","order_by":2,"name":"Norihiro Itsubo","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-7166","institution":"School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Norihiro","middleName":"","lastName":"Itsubo","suffix":""},{"id":508165513,"identity":"bf05a910-c132-446f-9099-b1d59fa28b3b","order_by":3,"name":"Koichi Kuriyama","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-1621","institution":"Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Koichi","middleName":"","lastName":"Kuriyama","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-01 00:17:42","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7503112/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7503112/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":91149074,"identity":"b928a5fa-8362-4bb1-923a-c96b34ae7c77","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-12 06:46:55","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1086104,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Murakamietal2025SLCAweighting.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7503112/v1_covered_bd05e28f-b103-4562-bfc6-6d912bccdf06.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eEstimating the Willingness to Pay for Social Risk Mitigation using the Social Hotspots Database: A National-scale Application in Japan\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"SLCA, SHDB, Weighting","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7503112/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7503112/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePurpose:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e The social life-cycle assessment (S-LCA) provides a framework for evaluating social risks in global supply chains. However, existing risk-based assessments lack an economic valuation of social risks from a stakeholder’s perspective. This study quantifies the willingness to pay (WTP) to mitigate social risks using the social hotspots database (SHDB) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The objective is to provide a monetary benchmark for integrating social risk considerations into corporate and policy decision-making.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003e This study employs a DCE to elicit WTP values for five social-risk categories defined in the SHDB: Decent Work (DW), Human Rights (HR), Health and Safety (HS), Governance (GV), and Community Infrastructure (CM). The survey targets Japanese respondents and collects stated-preference data to estimate the perceived economic value of reducing social risk. The WTP values are derived using mixed logit models, and the annual external cost of social risks is estimated based on these values. Additionally, heterogeneity across demographics (age, gender, income, and education) and occupational groups (employees, business owners, professionals, and non-workers) is analyzed.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults and discussion: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003eThe estimated annual external cost of social risks in Japan amounts to 5.2 trillion JPY (52 billion USD), which is equivalent to 1% of Japan’s GDP. Among the five categories, HS is the most highly valued, whereas DW is associated with the lowest WTP despite its significant share of total risk-hours. WTP exhibits heterogeneity; generational differences are observed, with working-age respondents over 40 years prioritizing DW more than younger groups. High-income and highly educated individuals prioritize CM but emphasize GV less, whereas others prioritize the opposite. Compared with employees, non-workers prioritize GV over HS. Business owners prioritize DW and HS, which are related to workplace conditions, while showing less concern for GV and CM, which pertain to workers’ living conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/em\u003eThis study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating non-market valuation methods into S-LCA, offering a monetary benchmark for social risk mitigation. Future research should conduct cross-national comparative studies to analyze regional variations in social risk perception. Expanding the assessment to a global scale could refine the impact-category compositions, highlighting risks such as child labor and climate-driven social impacts. Comparing SHDB with stakeholder-based frameworks, such as PSILCA, could further enhance the social risk-weighting methodologies in S-LCA.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Estimating the Willingness to Pay for Social Risk Mitigation using the Social Hotspots Database: A National-scale Application in Japan","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-03 08:46:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7503112/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"847dd784-b402-436d-8f10-c799f67108a6","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 3rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":53965585,"name":"Environmental Economics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-09-03T08:46:47+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-03 08:46:47","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7503112","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7503112","identity":"rs-7503112","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00