⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24
· read from full text
ⓘ
This study examined whether pediatric de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) shares germline genetic risk variants with young patients with myelodysplastic syndromes or bone marrow failure, using whole-genome sequencing in 365 pediatric AML patients with matched sample types to identify “likely germline” variants. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants across 555 leukemia-associated genes were found in 5.5% of patients for familial myeloid malignancy risk genes and in an additional 3.3% for genes associated with risk to lymphoid malignancy or solid tumors, with the study using ACMG/AMP criteria for variant annotation. Burden testing, including comparison to 2,504 1000 Genomes controls, showed elevated loss-of-function variant burdens in myeloid-risk genes (6.9-fold), supporting a higher germline variant prevalence across ages and diagnoses in assembled cohorts from 10 studies. A key caveat is that germline classification relied on available matched samples and VAF-based inference rather than direct familial segregation in all cases. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Full text
4,036 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
ABSTRACT
Causal germline genetic variants are frequently detected in young (under age 40) patients presenting with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or bone marrow failure (BMF), where progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) contributes substantially to mortality in these patients. We reasoned that de novo pediatric AML, which shares clinical and biological characteristics, might also share germline genetic risk variants. We investigated germline variants in a large cohort (n=365) of pediatric AML patients with whole-genome sequencing (WGS), 29 with matched marrow-derived stromal cells, and 336 with matched remission marrow samples. Variants were deemed “likely germline” based on variant allele frequency (VAF) across available samples. Following American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) guidelines, we annotated pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 555 genes linked to leukemia risk. P/LP variants were identified in 5.5% (95% CI: (3.3%,7.9%)) of patients in genes linked to familial myeloid malignancy and an additional 3.3% (95% CI: (1.6%,5.2%)) of patients in genes conferring risk to lymphoid malignancy or solid tumors. The large cohort enabled burden testing, which we employed by comparing loss-of-function variants between patients and 2504 control subjects from the 1000 Genomes Project. There was a 6.9-fold (95% CI: (3.1,14.9)) increase in loss-of-function variants in genes implicated in myeloid malignancy risk, a 2.4-fold (95% CI: (1.7,3.2)) increase in candidate risk genes, and a 1.6-fold (95% CI: (1.1,2.3)) increase in randomly-selected genes. We then assembled cohorts totaling 4,622 pediatric and adult patients with acute leukemia or MDS from 10 published studies, and compared P/LP variant burdens across age and diagnosis. The prevalence of germline variants in myeloid malignancies across age groups exceeds 5% consistently and with high confidence. Because the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that all patients receive screening if their pre-test germline variant probability exceeds 5%, our results support germline genetic variant testing as an integral component of diagnostic work-up for myeloid malignancies, including donor selection for stem cell transplantation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the American Society of Hematology Graduate Hematology Award, the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute (Gabriella Miller Kids First 1R03CA290259 award; 1F99CA294248 award), the Michelle Lunn Hope Foundation, and the Van Andel Institute.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Van Andel Institute waived ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.