Pulmonary nodules: do we need a separate algorithm for non-solid lesions?

OA: gold
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25

This article describes the etiology and clinical significance of incidental non-solid pulmonary nodules, arguing that their higher malignancy risk and slow growth necessitate diagnostic algorithms distinct from those used for solid nodules.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-23 · read from full text

This review article evaluates the radiological characteristics and management algorithms for non-solid pulmonary nodules, specifically ground-glass opacities, distinguishing them from solid lesions. It highlights that while most small nodules are benign, persistent non-solid lesions often represent slow-growing malignancies like bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, which may not be detected by standard PET-CT scans. The authors note that current follow-up protocols designed for solid nodules are insufficient for these slower-growing tumors, necessitating longer surveillance intervals to accurately assess growth. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This article describes the aetiology, epidemiology and clinical significance of incidental non-solid pulmonary nodules. Non-solid nodules are more likely malignant. If malignant, they are mostly due to atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. As these may be negative on positron emission tomography and slow growing, the diagnostic algorithms that are used for solid nodules have to be modified for non-solid nodules.
Full text 8,255 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Non Solid

Most pulmonary nodules present as solid lesions (i.e. soft tissue density). These lesions exhibit the same density as pulmonary vessels. If the density of a nodule is lower than soft tissue attenuation, it does not obscure adjacent or transgressing vessels. These lesions are also known as ground glass opacities (GGOs). Part-solid nodules are characterised by a mixture of ground glass attenuation and solid components. Benign non-solid nodules are due to inflammation (eosinophilic pneumonia, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia), focal haemorrhage (pulmonary endometriosis, pulmonary trauma, post biopsy), and focal interstitial fibrosis [ 11 ] . Most benign non-solid lesions resolve during follow-up. Persistent non-solid lesions, in contrast, mostly represent neoplasms, predominantly malignant ones. In a study by Nakata et al . [ 12 ] 54% of persistent GGOs represented bronchioloalveolar carcinoma, 26% adenocarcinoma with mixed bronchioloalveolar carcinoma components and 21% atypical adenomatous hyperplasia. The proportion of malignant lesions differs between solid, part-solid and non-solid lesions. In a study by Henschke et al . [ 13 ] 7% of solid, 63% of part-solid and 18% of non-solid lesions were malignant. The majority of part-solid and non-solid malignant lesions were bronchioloalveolar carcinomas and adenocarcinomas with bronchioloalveolar features. Noguchi et al . [ 14 ] have described a classification of adenocarcinomas based on their histology which is reflected by their prognosis and this is also reflected by their thin-section CT morphology. Types A and B represent bronchioloalveolar carcinomas, are characterised by a 100% 5-year survival rate and appear as non-solid lesions at thin-section CT, whereas types C, D, E and F represent more aggressive BACs or adenocarcinomas, exhibit part-solid or solid appearances with a less favourable prognosis [ 14 ] . Figure 2 Part-solid nodule in the apical segment of the right lower lobe. Peripheral ill-defined lesion with mixed density; the more peripheral component exhibits ground glass attenuation, whereas the more central part exhibits soft tissue (solid) attenuation. Part-solid nodule in the apical segment of the right lower lobe. Peripheral ill-defined lesion with mixed density; the more peripheral component exhibits ground glass attenuation, whereas the more central part exhibits soft tissue (solid) attenuation. Another non-solid lesion which was just recently defined is atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH). This lesion is recognized as a separate entity which in itself is not malignant but may be a precursor of adenocarcinoma [ 11 ] . It is characterised by proliferation of atypical cuboidal or columnar epithelial cells along the alveoli and respiratory bronchioles without invasion of the stroma or adjacent structures. At CT, AAH usually appears as small pure ground glass opacity.

Algorithms

Most of the recommendations for the management of solid nodules [ 8 , 10 ] also apply to non-solid and part-solid lesions. For example, the risk of malignancy should be estimated, previous imaging should be reviewed, and if growth is detected biopsy should be performed. There are, however, some recommendations unique to non-solid or part-solid nodules: – If such a nodule is malignant the underlying lesion is likely to be bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features. – These may grow more slowly than other malignant tumors. Therefore, the recommendation of follow-up after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months and no further follow-up when no growth is demonstrated in 2 years should not be applied to non-solid and part-solid lesions. These require longer follow-up to exclude growth for several years. Because of the cumulative radiation exposure, dose levels during follow-up should be as low as possible [ 8 ] . – As bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features may be negative at PET, examination with PET-CT should not be performed routinely as a negative result does not exclude malignancy. – If such a nodule is malignant the underlying lesion is likely to be bronchioloalveolar carcinoma or adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features. – These may grow more slowly than other malignant tumors. Therefore, the recommendation of follow-up after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months and no further follow-up when no growth is demonstrated in 2 years should not be applied to non-solid and part-solid lesions. These require longer follow-up to exclude growth for several years. Because of the cumulative radiation exposure, dose levels during follow-up should be as low as possible [ 8 ] . – As bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features may be negative at PET, examination with PET-CT should not be performed routinely as a negative result does not exclude malignancy.

Conclusions

Non-solid pulmonary nodules are more likely malignant than solid nodules. If malignant they are usually due to atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. These lesions tend to grow more slowly than other malignant pulmonary lesions and are often not hypermetabolic at FDG-PET. Therefore, follow-up to exclude growth in non-solid nodules needs to be longer than in solid lesions and PET-CT is not appropriate to rule out malignancy in non-solid nodules.

Introduction

A pulmonary nodule is defined as a spherical well-circumscribed radiographic opacity that is surrounded completely by aerated lung. There is no associated atelectasis, hilar enlargement or pleural effusion. Lesions that are larger than 3 cm are described as lung masses. As size has been shown to be important for classification of nodules (see below) the term ‘subcentimetre nodule’ has been used to describe lesions smaller than 10 mm. The term ‘micronodules’ is usually applied to very small nodules (<7 mm, <5 mm) which are almost always multiple and diffuse. If only one pulmonary nodule is detected, it is described as a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN). If a nodule is detected in an examination performed for other reasons than a search for pulmonary nodules, it is called an ‘incidental nodule’ [ 1 , 2 ] .

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-20T09:27:46.357103+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-23T06:15:37.550144+00:00