A 25-year review of adenocarcinoma of the appendix. A frequently perforating carcinoma
This 25-year review of 316 appendix adenocarcinoma cases reports a male predominance, frequent preoperative misdiagnosis as inflammation, and high perforation rates, noting that pseudomyxoma peritonei and carcinomatosis peritonei indicate poor prognosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study analyzed 316 case reports and collective reviews to compare the clinical characteristics of appendiceal adenocarcinoma with those of colon adenocarcinoma. The findings indicated that the disease predominantly affects males, with a mean patient age of 57.1 years, and is frequently misdiagnosed as inflammatory appendicitis prior to surgery. Perforation occurred in more than half of the cases, often resulting in localized abscesses rather than immediate poor prognosis, although pseudomyxoma peritonei and carcinomatosis peritonei were associated with significantly worse survival outcomes. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,378 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:28:11.599399+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-11T06:28:45.473802+00:00