Prescribing the oral contraceptive pill: key considerations for primary care physicians.

Despite the apparent simplicity in the two options available, the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) vs. the progestogen-only pill (POP), choosing the right oral contraceptive pill can be challenging. With an increasing number of preparations and their inherently varying pharmacological properties, several factors require consideration when prescribing in the primary care setting.1 Assuming this is the most appropriate method of contraceptive cover, the aim of this article is to provide primary care physicians (PCPs) with a series of key considerations when counselling women on the oral contraceptive pill. KEY CONSIDERATION 1: COCP OR POP? One of the initial considerations for all PCPs is deciding between the COCP or POP. With detailed guidance on the safety profile of the oral contraceptive pill available from the UK Medicine Eligibility Criteria (UK MEC),2 a summary of the key patient characteristics and medical conditions favouring the use of the POP, over the COCP, has been listed in Table 1. However, compared with the COCP, PCPs must be clear when counselling women of the higher risk of unscheduled bleeding along with the implication of a ‘missed pill’ with the POP.3 While desogestrelcontaining POPs have a longer window for retaining contraceptive efficacy compared with more traditional POPs (12 hours vs. 3 hours), alternative forms of contraception should be sought if adherence is considered problematic. It is important to note that the two POPs now available over the counter in the UK, Hana and Lovima, contain desogestrel. KEY CONSIDERATION 2: TYPE AND DOSE OF OESTROGEN IN COCP The majority of COCPs contain varying doses, between 20–35 µg, of the synthetic oestrogen, ethinylestradiol. Analysing comparative studies of the different COCP preparations available is difficult because of the wide variations in the oestrogen dose, as well as the type and dose of progesterone present.4 However, PCPs are generally encouraged to start with the lowest possible oestrogen dose when prescribing the COCP.5 The aim is to avoid the side effects associated with higher doses, of which headaches, bloating, and weight gain are the most common, and which subsequently may lead to discontinuation. However, lower doses have been associated with unscheduled bleeding, with one meta-analysis suggesting that the risk was nearly doubled for women on a 20 µg COCP versus a 30 µg preparation.4 Therefore, PCPs are advised to steadily increase the oestrogen dose until adequate cycle control is achieved. For women keen to explore natural oestrogen preparations and potentially avoid the side effects associated with synthetic preparations, estradiol valerate (Qlaira) and estradiol hemihydrate (Zoely) are now available in the UK. However, women should be counselled that data regarding their tolerability are limited. One large multicentre study in Asia has suggested a high tolerability for estradiol valerate preparations (92% of women reported being either satisfied or somewhat satisfied).6 However, this has not been replicated for estradiol hemihydrate preparations, with a higher incidence of acne, weight gain, and discontinuation rates compared with more established COCPs.7 It is important to stress though that research focusing on targeted and natural oestrogen preparations remains ongoing. KEY CONSIDERATION 3: COCP PREPARATION AND REGIMEN COCPs can be further subdivided into monophasic or multiphasic preparations depending on whether the hormone dose varies throughout the pill pack.5 While multiphasic preparations aim to mimic the body’s natural hormone response and therefore reduce the likelihood of side effects, this would not be recommended for women who are susceptible to hormonal fluctuations such as in pre-menstrual syndrome (PMS).8 It is important to note here that the majority of preparations widely available in the UK are monophasic (Table 2).1,5 With the COCP forming a key management option for several gynaecological problems, deciding whether the COCP is to be given as a cyclical, extended, or continuous regimen is also important. While recent guidance has recommended moving away from a traditional cyclical regimen, towards an extended or continuous regimen for women who suffer from pain or mood swings during their periods, this has been associated with unscheduled bleeding.8 PCPs should also consider each woman’s own preference regarding the regularity of menstruation when choosing the regimen. A summary of the different regimens and indications for use is provided in Table 3. KEY CONSIDERATION 4: TYPE OF PROGESTERONE The options for progesterone cover have increased dramatically over the last few years. Traditionally, synthetic progesterones or progestogens are classified by the decade of their introduction or ‘generation’. While newer generations are generally associated with fewer progestogenic side effects, even within each generation there can be significant variations in their mechanism of action.9–10 With progestogens known to exert a wide range of androgenic, glucocorticoid, and mineralocorticoid effects, these must be carefully considered by PCPs when prescribing progesterone either as the POP (if available) or in combination with oestrogen. A summary of the key progestogens available in the UK, physiological activity, and indications for prescribing are presented in Table 2. Preparations containing cyproterone have not been included in this list because of their main mechanism of action being as an anti-androgen. In addition, the common side effects of progestogens in relation to their physiological activity have been provided in Table 4. At present, natural or micronised progesterones are unlicensed for the contraceptive pill. CONCLUSION With up to 50% of women discontinuing the oral contraceptive within the first year of its use,5 being aware of the different preparations, as well as their availability, is important for PCPs. While the purpose of this article was not to ‘name’ every single type of contraceptive pill that is currently available — which would be difficult considering the amount of research and change that is ongoing in this area — the aim instead was to provide PCPs with a set of key considerations. By doing so, it will not only enable a more individualised approach to be delivered but also, more importantly, provide reassurance for women. Notes Funding There was no additional internal or external funding for this project. Provenance Freely submitted; externally peer reviewed. Competing interests The authors have declared no competing interests. Discuss this article Contribute and read comments about this article: bjgp.org/letters - Received July 18, 2021. - Revision requested September 14, 2021. - Accepted September 27, 2021. - © British Journal of General Practice 2021