Biodiversity science is improved when silent herbaria speak

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper examines how “silent herbaria” in Nigeria—under-recognized and largely undigitized plant collections—are currently underused and vulnerable, using a detailed case study to assess their visibility in international registries and online accessibility. The authors report that nearly 80% of Nigerian herbaria are not recognized in key global registries and that more than 90% of these collections remain undigitized, concluding that their absence from global databases reduces the accuracy of large-scale biodiversity models by omitting important temporal and spatial gaps. A major caveat is that the analysis is centered on Nigeria’s herbaria rather than providing a cross-region quantitative assessment. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 3,101 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Herbaria represent a global biodiversity heritage essential for botanical research and conservation assessments. Despite their importance, herbaria in many parts of the world—especially in under-resourced regions such as much of Africa—are “silent”. These silent collections are poorly integrated into global research networks and hence underused and especially vulnerable to neglect. Here, we illustrate these problems through a detailed case-study of Nigerian herbaria and demonstrate that biodiversity assessments can be dramatically improved when silent herbaria are empowered to speak. Nearly 80% of Nigerian herbaria are unrecognized in key international registries, making them nearly invisible and inaccessible to the global research community. More than 90% of these collections remain undigitized and thus are inaccessible online. Because these collections capture critical temporal and spatial gaps not represented in herbaria outside of Nigeria, their absence from global databases reduces the accuracy of large-scale biodiversity models. Despite these many challenges, the number of silent herbaria in Nigeria has increased at a rate faster than the global average owing to commitments by Nigerian biodiversity scholars to prioritize herbaria for research and education. However, severely limited funding and inadequate infrastructure to effectively house these collections threaten their continued use, growth, sustainability, and online mobilization. Integration into global networks, increased investment, and digitization efforts are crucial for giving voice to silent herbaria in Africa. Large benefits to biodiversity science will accrue rapidly from such investment and integration. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X23W75 Subjects Life Sciences

Keywords

biodiversity conservation, Plant systematics, conservation, species distribution modeling, taxonomy, nigeria Dates Published: 2025-05-08 07:10 Last Updated: 2025-05-08 07:10 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: CCD declares that he is supported by LVMH Research and Dior Science, a company involved in the research and development of cosmetic products based on floral extracts. He also serves as a member of Dior’s Age Reverse Board. Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and analytical code associated with this preprint are publicly available Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

MUSA

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00