Current Challenges in the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: From Bench to Bedside
This review discusses the complex physiopathology, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women, highlighting current management challenges and literature gaps.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This narrative review examines chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women, focusing on the complexity of its pathophysiology, contemporary understanding of chronic pain mechanisms (including central sensitization, neuropathic and nociplastic pain), and the evolving classification, diagnosis, and treatment evidence. It emphasizes that even with detailed history-taking, careful physical examination, and appropriate imaging, an organic cause of pain is not identified in a substantial proportion of women, leaving management challenging. A key limitation the paper notes is that CPP physiology “remains to be fully clarified,” despite recent advances, and the review aims to synthesize current evidence rather than provide new experimental results. Relevance to endometriosis: CPP is discussed as a major female pelvic pain condition and the review’s framework and treatment challenges apply to endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, though the paper does not explicitly single out endometriosis or adenomyosis as a primary focus.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00