Abstract
Understanding how species coexist and why diversity varies across regions remains a central challenge in ecology. Although widely used theories such as niche theory, neutral theory, and modern coexistence theory have yielded key insights into coexistence and diversity, their reliance on abstract parameters lacking direct physiological grounding limits empirical validation and constrains cross-scale integration. To address this limitation, we propose the minimum carbon theory (cₘᵢₙ), grounded in the first principle that autotrophic organisms must maintain a net positive carbon balance to survive. The cₘᵢₙ defines the lowest rate of net carbon gain required for persistence, integrating the costs of maintenance respiration, structural investment, and stress responses, offset by facilitative interactions that reduce metabolic demand. By linking species persistence to physiological carbon sufficiency, cₘᵢₙ provides a unified, mechanistic explanation for patterns of distribution, coexistence, and diversity across environmental gradients. Reframing existing theories, including niche differentiation, neutral dynamics, modern coexistence models, and macroecological hypotheses such as the energy–diversity and water–energy dynamics theories through the lens of carbon physiology, cₘᵢₙ offers a coherent mechanism to integrate previously fragmented ecological paradigms. Because carbon is the universal currency of life, the cₘᵢₙ can be applied across taxa and scales, unifying questions of invasion, ecosystem function, and ecological stability. In a biosphere increasingly shaped by climate stress, the cₘᵢₙ theory provides a physiologically grounded foundation for a unified theory of diversity, offering mechanistic insight into how individual carbon thresholds scale up to shape the structure and functioning of ecological systems.
Full text
2,258 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
Understanding how species coexist and why diversity varies across regions remains a central challenge in ecology. Although existing theories such as niche theory, neutral theory, and modern coexistence theory have yielded important insights into species coexistence and diversity, their reliance on abstract parameters lacking direct physiological grounding limits empirical validation and constrains cross-scale integration. To address this limitation, the minimum carbon theory is proposed, defining Cₘᵢₙ as the minimum net carbon gain required for survival, grounded in the first principle that autotrophic organisms must maintain a positive carbon balance to persist. Coexistence occurs when multiple species each sustain net carbon gains above their Cₘᵢₙ under shared environmental regimes. The Cₘᵢₙ theory provides a physiological foundation for understanding species coexistence and diversity, integrating existing ecological theories under the common constraint of carbon balance. Because carbon is the universal currency of life, the Cₘᵢₙ can be applied across taxa and ecological scales, providing a broadly applicable framework for diverse domains, including biological invasions, ecosystem functioning, ecological stability, and evolutionary biogeography. In a biosphere increasingly shaped by global climate change, the Cₘᵢₙ theory provides a unifying physiological lens on how individual carbon thresholds scale up to shape species diversity and ecosystem function.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X2DH0H
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences
Minimum carbon requirement, physiological thresholds, species coexistence, diversity patterns, coexistence theory, Ecosystem functioning
Published: 2025-07-21 20:01
Last Updated: 2025-08-12 16:01
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.